Tag: HDB

  • Financial Support Key To Urge Singaporean Couples To Buy Resale Flats Near Parents

    Financial Support Key To Urge Singaporean Couples To Buy Resale Flats Near Parents

    Financial support is the main way to help people who want to get a resale Housing Board flat near their parents, said experts.

    This could mean giving a higher resale grant, or allowing more buyers to qualify for it.

    As part of efforts to encourage extended families to live close together, the Government is studying whether such resale buyers can get more help, National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan said last Friday.

    Currently, there is the Higher-Tier CPF Housing Grant for first-timers who are buying a resale flat with, or close to, parents or married children.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Pasir Ris One DBSS – Yet Another Development Under Fire

    Pasir Ris One DBSS – Yet Another Development Under Fire

    In what is becoming a recurring series of incidents, another group of homeowners of new flats are crying foul at the shoddy workmanship and design of their homes.

    The Online Citizen (TOC) understands that some of the owners of the new Pasir Ris ONE have just received their keys to their new homes which are located at the junction of Pasir Ris Central and Pasir Ris Drive 1, a stone’s throw away from the Pasir Ris MRT station.

    The 447-unit development is one under the Design, Build and Sell Scheme (DBSS), and consists of three-, four- and five-room flats.

    The purchase prices of these homes are reported to be between S$390,000 to S$470,000 for 3-room flats, and S$550,000 to S$670,000 for 4-rooms.  (See here.)

    The Pasir Ris ONE website lists the prices for 5-rooms as follow:

    comparisons-chart

    DBSS flats are supposed to come with better finishings and design, as buyers pay a premium for them.

    However, since owners had entry to their homes the last few months, it has emerged that the workmanship has left a lot to be desired.

    For a start, the corridors of the flats are so narrow that two persons can hardly walk side by side.

    When TOC measured the corridor of one block, it was precisely 1.2m wide.

    DSC_0456

    This is believed to be the minimum required by HDB and the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) safety rules.

    According to the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) website:

    scdf1

    Guidelines_HDB_1

    It is also worth noting that in a parliamentary reply in 2013 to a question of ensuring “clear passages along common corridors of HDB flats”, the Ministry of National Development said it was revising the clearance required from 1.2m to 1.5m, to provide for safety and rescue purposes.

    “To prepare for an ageing population and to provide wider access routes for people using mobility aids, BCA announced revisions to the Code on Accessibility last month.

    “The revisions include a wider minimum clearance width of 1.5m along corridors for buildings with plans submitted for regulatory approval on or after 1 Apr 2014.”

    Some of the gates at the main doors of opposite flats along the corridors are so close together that the gates almost touch each other when they are swung open.

    It is thus unclear how the homeowners of the Pasir Ris ONE flats would have the requisite allowable and safety space in their corridors if they were to, for example, place a shoe rack or a bicycle outside their main doors.

    Another curious placement issue is the way the gas vents have been installed on the ceilings along the corridors.

    DSC_0488
    Besides its questionable aesthetic design, is there also a safety issue here if an incident of leakage or fire should happen, especially with the narrow corridors?

    Besides safety, there are also concerns of security with how the flats are designed.

    Burglars or others with ill intention could gain easy entry into their homes through the air-conditioner ledges, for example, and enter the flats though the windows.

    Here is how it looks like, outside a ground floor flat:

    DSC_0460

    Here is another view:

    DSC_0491

    It would not be too hard for someone to climb to the upper floors through these balconies.

    And for some unknown reasons, TOC understands that the owners cannot make use of the entire ledge, although the floor area of the ledge is included as part of the size of the flat.

    And even over at the community barbeque pits, the design also came under fire, as one resident posted on the Pasir Ris ONE Facebook page on 4 June:

    bbqcomplaint

    TOC measured the height of the pit and it was about 1.3m high – from the ground to where the wire mesh would be. This would make it hard for anyone who is below, say, 1.7m to manage the barbeque.

    This writer – who is 1.7m tall – is pictured here at the pit:

    bbqpit

    When it comes to drying the laundry, the clothes rack isn’t something to crow about either.

    The rack is so small it can hardly dry any clothes; and also, the sun is blocked by the ledge above the rack which is presumably to prevent litter from the upper floors from reaching the lower ones.

    These would make drying your laundry quite a challenge.

    DSC_0462

    These are some issues which residents have with the external surroundings of the flats.

    What about the insides?

    Not much better.

    TOC understands that owners face many defects which need to be rectified.

    These include tiles in the living room which were either scratched, or have different shades of colour, or the groutings were poorly finished, while others have uneven flooring which need to be corrected.

    Some of the grilles at the balcony were also badly painted, and others had leaky pipes in the kitchen.

    The placement of the water heater in their kitchens is also another issue.

    When it is turned on, the heater can become a safety hazard, and it also contributes to warming up the kitchen when cooking is also in process because of the inefficient ventilation design.

    In the bedrooms, there were more defects – there were windows which took some effort to open, and toilet and shower doors were designed such that one has to close one in order to have enough space to open the other.

    And then there were the cracked tiles and poor grouting work.

    Some bedroom doors were also faulty, leaving big gaps between the door and the floor. There were also faulty window screws, window frames, door handles, chipped doors, bad wiring, dirty toilet bowls, and poorly installed floor tiles, among many other complaints.

    Some have complained that the master room, which is 15sqm, is so small it can barely fit a king-sized bed, leaving scarce room to walk.

    According to HDB rules, homeowners have one year to inform the developer of any defects.

    Pasir Ris ONE is a joint project between Sing Haiyi Group and Kay Lim Holdings.

    Homeowners have since created a private Facebook group  to highlight the flaws in their homes.

    Such problems in new developments have been reported  by new owners of other DBSS flats at the Trivelis in Clementi and Centrale 8 in Tampines in the last two months, along with several other groups of owners of build-to-order flats, such as in Punggol and Bukit Panjang, in the last few years.

    In its response to all these, the HDB said earlier in June that the defects were merely “surface imperfections.”

    “This is due mainly to the inherent features of natural materials or the nature of construction works that are dependent on manual labour,” a HDB spokesman said.

     

    Source: www.theonlinecitizen.com

  • Last Teen In HDB Vandalism Case Given Last Shot At Probation

    Last Teen In HDB Vandalism Case Given Last Shot At Probation

    In what a district judge termed as an “exceptional” case, a teen convicted in a high profile vandalism case at a Toa Payoh HDB block last year was given a second shot at probation because of his “clear and sustained turnaround”.

    While the prosecution had pressed for a more severe term of reformative training, citing Boaz Koh Wen Jie’s high culpability and the fact that he re-offended while under probation, District Judge Lim Keng Yeow took the unusual step of ordering a fresh probation of 30 months.

    “The offender should be acutely aware that a second chance at probation now given to him is one which in most other cases will not be considered,” said the judge, who recognised that the 18-year-old had made “significant changes in his lifestyle” after his release from custody in May last year.

    The prosecution will be appealing against the judge’s decision.

    The court heard that Koh had committed himself to regular counselling and residential rehabilitation at The Hiding Place, and has now reported to have made good and stable progress over the last three months, among other things.

    Koh and four others were first arrested in May last year for multiple charges related to theft, vandalism and criminal trespass. He was convicted in January.

    Deputy public prosecutor Tang Shangjun stressed that Koh was the most culpable among the five as he acted first as a lookout, to ensure that all lights in the surrounding units were switched off. He was also the one who sprayed over the graffiti a second time as he “wanted to make the text bolder”.

    But the judge said: “Although the viability of a fresh probation order was initially doubtful, it is my judgment, having regard to all of the facts before me, that a stringent and exacting probation order best balances all the considerations.”

    He added that his recommended term of probation is longer than most terms ordered by the courts, and his “freedom will be severely curbed”, as he will be placed on a long period of residential supervision and electronic monitoring scheme for four months. Koh will also have to return to court after four months for a progress review before the judge.

    Addressing the potentially cynical view that members of public will place on the court’s willingness to attach weight to an offender’s “pre-sentencing reform” in this case, the judge said that Koh will be closely monitored during his probation and tougher consequences can be imposed if he is found to have “staged (changes) purely for impression management”.

    The fact that pre-sentencing offender reform is noted by the courts may also motivate some young offenders to make a sincere effort towards reform from an early stage, he added.

    The maximum penalty for vandalism is a S$2,000 fine or three years’ jail. Offenders may also face up to eight strokes of the cane. Those caught trespassing may face up to three months in jail, a maximum fine of S$1,500 or both. Those convicted of theft may be jailed up to three years, fined or both.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • More Empty Homes On The Horizon

    More Empty Homes On The Horizon

    The housing vacancy rate in Singapore may hit a record high of 9.8 percent in 2016 as private home completions rise from 19,900 units in 2015 to 20,900 by the end of next year, according to media reports citing a Barclays report.

    Aside from the private home supply glut, the occupancy rate will also be pressured by growing public housing completions over the coming quarters.

    Barclays expects public housing completions to increase from 28,000 units in 2014 to 26,000 this year and 20,000 by end-2016.

    “As a result, the overall vacancy rate increased to 7.2 percent at the end of Q1 2015. Island-wide private home rents have fallen five percent from their Q3 2013 peak, while suburban rents have fallen six percent from their Q2 2013 peak,” the report said.

    History shows that prices tend to drop significantly when the vacancy rate exceeds eight percent.

    During the Asian financial crisis between Q2 1996 and Q4 1998, for instance, private home prices plunged 45 percent as the vacancy rate climbed from 6.2 percent to 9.7 percent.

    “With an annual private home demand of only 15,000 units – we estimate 55 percent of total annual household formation of 26-27,00 to live in or enable upgrades to private homes – we estimate the vacancy rate could reach 9.8 percent by 2016E,” noted Barclays.

     

    Romesh Navaratnarajah

    Source: www.propertyguru.com.sg

  • Why Are More And More Singaporeans Complaining About Their DBSS Flats

    Why Are More And More Singaporeans Complaining About Their DBSS Flats

    As you open the door to your brand new DBSS flat, the scent of fresh flowers hits you. You look through the window and see a dazzling meteor shower rain down from the sky. You take a deep breath and step into your new paradise.

    Ha. Yeah right. In real life, one Singaporean couple opened the door to their new DBSS flat only to find the floor covered in faeces. Nice.

    HDB’s DBSS (Design and Build Scheme) allows private developers to build flats to be sold under the banner of HDB. They generally cost more than regular HDB flats, but many people go for them because they’re supposed to be more luxurious.

    However, in the past few months there’ve been a ton of complaints from DBSS purchasers. Here are the most common.

    Flooding

    I’m not sure whether they’re making their pipes out of toilet paper rolls these days, but it seems like there’ve been tons of complaints of flooding lately, the worst reported case being that of thePunggol flat that was covered in crap. Some purchasers of units at the Trivelis in Clementi have also complained about flooding in the common corridors after rain and water seeping into the units, which sounds to us like lousy design. The crappy thing about flooding is that it can also ruin any renovation work that’s been undertaken on the flat.

    When viewing the completed flat, you really want to check for puddles of water / water stains in unusual places ie corners, behind shelvings,  in between floor laminates

    Lousy quality

    DBSS flats are supposed to look a little more glamorous than the average BTO flat. But it seems they’re a lot like goods on Taobao. They look nice in the pictures, but when you see the finished product you realise they used the cheapest quality and shoddiest workmanship they could find. Buyers have complained about rust on their dish racks, glass panels threatening to shatter and scratched floor tiles.

    Be prepared that the materials used may not be of the highest quality, they may look decent but not last very long. Buyers need to be prepared for this.

    Layout issues

    You would think that a private developer would be able to give slightly better design than BTO flats would, right? After all, that’s precisely what people are paying a premium for. However, it seems that some of these private developers have hired designers who are seriously lacking in common sense. From bedrooms with awkwardly placed doors, shower stalls that can’t keep the water inside, kitchen cabinets that, uh, can’t handle the heat and kitchen areas with dimensions too small to accommodate a standard-sized oven, the gaffes are getting more and more ridiculous.

    Buyers should not be complacent about layouts and dimensions, less you be surprised by how the new bed you bought basically cannot fit in the room unless you forgo certain other things…. Like DOORS or wardrobes. Its not just about whether you can squeeze it all in but whether its ergonomic and functional in the long run.

    Not as described

    So you’ve seen the showflat, and it looked pretty. But when you move into your new place, it looks like a lousy imitation. One purchaser at the Trivelis complained that his flat came complete with garishly visible sanitary pipes and water heater, none of which appeared in the pictures. While not quite on the level of the condo purchasers who were befuddled as to where their infinity pool was when they moved into their units, it still sucks when you realise you got suckered by a pretty brochure.

     But then this is something that every buyer needs to be aware of. The brochure is a photoshopped work of art that is not reflective of how things are in reality, most if the time. Water down your expectation from the brochure and you’ll start to be able to see things more objectively.

    Think about lighting and daylight and how it plays a part. When selecting a unit, visualize how installed lighting could help and where the daylight comes in from for most of the day.

    What to do?

    We bet you didn’t read the sale and purchase agreement you signed because it was so thick and boring. But if you had, you would have realised that there’s a one year defects liability period, which means that the developer is obliged to rectify any defects you might find within one year.

    One year starting from when, you might ask? This is where things get tricky. The one year begins from the day you receive the Notice of Vacation Possession (ie. The letter telling you you can come collect your keys). This applies even if you were overseas or otherwise busy and could only collect your keys months weeks or months later. So clearly, the earlier you move in the better, as some defects take time before you discover them.

    Instead of trying to contact the developer on your own, you might want to get the lawyer who’s handling the purchase for you to do so on your behalf. So long as it doesn’t escalate into a big dispute, your lawyer may do this at no extra charge. Be prepared to email your lawyer lots of pictures and a detailed description of the defects.

    The developer is ignoring me. What do I do?

    The defects are supposed to be rectified within one month from the day the developer is notified. If one month has passed, you can actually just notify the developer that you’re going to repair the defect yourself, tell them the estimated cost and then give them 14 days to decide if they want to get their asses moving or not. If they don’t respond, you can technically get your own workmen to rectify the defect and then ask to be reimbursed by the developer.

    Again, if you have a lawyer handling the purchase you might be able to get him or her to write a few fierce letters free of charge, so don’t be afraid to ask.

    Have you ever had to deal with a defective DBSS flat? Share your experiences in the comments!

    Image Credits:
    Soapstar D’lux

    Source: http://blog.moneysmart.sg