Tag: Hindus

  • Mohd Khair: Disrespectful Of Pink Dot To Feature Muslims As Ambassadors

    Mohd Khair: Disrespectful Of Pink Dot To Feature Muslims As Ambassadors

    As a Singaporean, I have friends, neighbours, colleagues, associates, clients and vendors who come from all walks of life, regardless of race, language or religion. And that’s typical of any Singaporean.

    We respect each other’s religious beliefs, social customs and ethnic practices.

    Non-Hindus know that the cow is a sacred being among our fellow Hindu Singaporeans. We respect that belief. We don’t poke fun on it. We don’t provoke by asking our Hindu friends to promote any activities that demean the sacred cow or that promote the consumption of cow. That’s NOT what we do as Singaporeans. We respect each other. We don’t make fun nor offend nor provoke each other’s cultural, ethnic or religious sentiments. Even if there are Hindus who consume beef, hypothetically speaking, we Singaporeans take that as an exception rather than the rule. If such Hindus were to do it, again hypothetically speaking, they could do it within their private spheres and we Singaporeans don’t generalise that Hindus now consume beef. That’s blasphemous.

    Likewise, non-Muslims know that our fellow Muslim Singaporeans do not consume pork. We respect that belief. We don’t poke fun on it. We don’t provoke by asking our Muslim friends to promote any activities that glorify pig or that promote the consumption of pork or that suggest that pork is halal. That’s NOT what we do as Singaporeans. We respect each other. We don’t make fun nor offend nor provoke each other’s cultural, ethnic or religious sentiments. Even if there are Muslims who consume pork, hypothetically speaking, we Singaporeans take that as an exception rather than the rule. If such Muslims were to do it, again hypothetically speaking, they could do it within their private spheres and we Singaporeans don’t generalise that Muslims now consume pork or that pork is now halal in Islam. That’s blasphemous.

    Likewise, the organisers of this year’s pinkdot event are well aware that the lgbt lifestyle option is not Islamic and is not accepted by Muslims in Singapore. And yet, as in previous years, they keep on featuring Muslims as if the lgbt lifestyle option is part of being Muslims. Featuring Muslims as ambassadors of pinkdot and advocating that such act is laudable are instead provocative and confrontational. They know and yet again disrespect the cultural, ethnic and religious sentiments of Muslims in Singapore. They know and yet again provoke.

    Isn’t that blatantly disrespectful?
    Isn’t that outrightly confrontational?
    Isn’t that very unSingaporean?

     

    Source: Mohd Khair In We are against Pinkdot in Singapore

  • Voice Of One Meets Hindu Endowment Board For Showdown

    Voice Of One Meets Hindu Endowment Board For Showdown

    The ‘Voice of One’ with a team of 6 spokespersons from the public attended the meeting with HEB on 6 Mar 2015 from 11:30 am to 13:30 pm .The main agenda of ‘Voice of One’ (VOO) for this meeting is to feedback the voices of many with regards to the restrictions imposed on the musical instruments to be played during Thaipusam procession in Singapore. Along with this, few other issues pertaining to Thaipusam was raised by VOO. The following are the main questions and feedbacks by VOO to HEB:

    1. The condition by HEB for Kavadi bearers to leave the temple by 5pm.

    2. The shortening of this time frame; from 7pm to 6pm and now to 5pm.

    3. The quota being placed for devotees to participate while it deprives others to participate and fulfil their vows.

    4. The condition on Kavadi participants to stop playing music at the temple by 3pm.

    5. The ambiguity in HEB’s guidelines for Thaipusam 2015, clause number 3 with regards to the restrictions imposed on singing and music.

    6. The underlying reasons for the banning of musical instruments.

    7. The lack of music support by HEB on the roads during the procession.

    8. The significance of music throughout the entire procession.

    9. To conduct research and survey before making certain important decisions that can affect the devotees.

    10. To uplift restrictions on musical instruments such as portable radios so that everyone has the opportunity to have music on equal footing.

    11. To better train and counsel HEB volunteers and members to improve their standards in managing the crowds.

    12. To stop stereotyping of Indians with rowdyism by using that as a reason for many of their rules and regulations.

    13. To support and encourage religious tolerance by relaxing their rules.

    14. To advocate better for the Hindu community by considering feedback from participants

    We will soon update the responses from HEB after finalizing our minutes. Stay tuned for more updates

    Regards
    Voice of ONE

     

    Source: www.therealsingapore.com

  • AGC Warns Public Comments On Case Of Three Singaporeans Arrested During Thaipusam Is Sub Judice

    AGC Warns Public Comments On Case Of Three Singaporeans Arrested During Thaipusam Is Sub Judice

    In the wake of the arrest of three Singaporeans for various offencesallegedly committed during a Thaipusam procession on Feb 3, the Attorney-General’s Chambers on Wednesday (Feb 11) issued a reminder warning against public comments, including on the Internet, as such statements may be sub judice contempt of court.

    The accused face various charges, ranging from disorderly conduct to voluntarily causing hurt to a police officer. The three – Ramachandra Chandramohan, 32, Jaya Kumar Krishnasamy, 28, and Gunasegaran Rajendran, 33 – are out on bail and will appear in court again on Mar 6.

    Said the AGC in a press release on Wednesday: “As criminal proceedings are currently before the Courts, we would like to remind the public that statements made may be sub judice contempt of court, if the statements are calculated to affect the judicial process and there is a real risk of prejudice being caused to the ongoing proceedings.”

    Under sub judice laws, commenting on a case being considered by the court may be considered interference with due process.

    “All parties are advised to refrain from making any public comments, or posting any statements on the Internet on these matters which may have that effect, pending final determination of the legal proceedings by the Courts,” the AGC added.

    “The Attorney-General’s Chambers takes a serious view of statements made which are calculated to interfere with the integrity of the administration of justice. Anyone who has information on the case should send it to the Police.”

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Make Thaipusam A Public Holiday In Singapore Again!

    Make Thaipusam A Public Holiday In Singapore Again!

    I got this message yesterday. Anyone knows what the dish is?

    Ng Yi-Sheng

    Angelina who is a local Singaporean born Hindu who converted to Christianity will be filing an application this afternoon to challenge the banning of the drums during Thaipusam by the Law Minister Shanmugam. She will also be challenging the removal of Thaipusam as a public holiday by Lee Kuan Yew with its purported replacement Vesak Day.

    Further, Angelina will tomorrow be carrying a kavadi at Sri Perumal Temple, Desker Road and she invites all members of the public to turn up to show solidarity with her. Her legal team from M Ravi’s practice will also be there to witness her religious observances.

     

    Source: Ng Yi-Sheng