Tag: Islam

  • Watching America Under Trump Is Like Watching A Real-Life Cartoon

    Watching America Under Trump Is Like Watching A Real-Life Cartoon

    America is now run by Donald, with the help of Mickey (Pence). He’s now becoming Grumpy coz the Justice Department is Goofy-ing around with his executive orders.

    Can’t these guys just behave like the Seven Dwarfs and follow the script? When he gets mad, he Tweets. I’m not sure what Tweety Bird thinks of this coz all this while she’s been terrorized by Sylvester, the All-American cat, not the Persian or Arabia breed.

    He wants to build a wall to keep Speedy Gonzales out. I’m sure those muchachos will make Looney Tunes out of him. After that bad phone call, the Aussies may not want to be his Road Runner anymore.

    And I’m told that his inauguration speech was taken from Dory. Or was it Nemo? That’s a tough one.

    But I’m sure America will be great again!

     

    Source: Effendi Basri

  • More Than 2 Years But Still No Muslim Stall At Nan Hua Pri School Canteen

    More Than 2 Years But Still No Muslim Stall At Nan Hua Pri School Canteen

    *Renting of Muslim Stall at Nan Hua Primary School*

    (this post/advertisement/invitation will expire after 15 Feb)

    Dear all. It’s been more than 2 years since the Muslim staff and pupils have any Muslim stall. My school has been trying to publicise and advertise for interested stallholders, but to no avail. I hope to have some luck posting in this FB group.

    • Stall Rental: $15/mth
    • Payment to cleaner: $8/school day
    • Own registration for water and gas with PUB
    • Electricity usage will be billed by school based on meter reading
    • Operating hours: 9.00am to about 2.00pm on school days
    • Peak hours:
    Recess time: 9.30am to 11.00am
    Lunch time: 1.30pm to 2.00pm
    Address: 30 Jalan Lempeng S128806 (opposite Clementi Fire Station)

    Please call Mr Phua (Admin Manager) at 67788050 if you are interested and/or want to view the stall.

    Thank you.

    P/S: There is a generous individual who is willing to help the eventual successful applicant for the malay stall with a $500 interest-free loan. This is to help with the licensing fee, rental and initial costs. The individual will contact the successful applicant directly. His niat is to enable the muslim students and teachers to have easier access to halal food.

    God bless the above-mentioned generous loan 😇

    Regards,
    Md Faizal
    PE Teacher
    Nan Hua Primary School

     

    Source: Mohamad Faizal in Halal Cafe & Restaurants in Singapore

  • Why Is Ong Teng Cheong Not Recognised As Singapore’s First Elected President?

    Why Is Ong Teng Cheong Not Recognised As Singapore’s First Elected President?

    The changes to the Elected Presidency (EP) scheme were passed by Parliament on Monday, 7 February.

    The Government have also announced that the next EP will take place in September 2017.

    This next presidential election will be a special one which is reserved only for Malay candidates.

    It is part of the slew of changes made to the EP scheme by the Government which claimed that it was concerned about there not being a minority-race president for an extended period.

    The changes ensure that this would not be so. If there has not been a minority-race president for five terms, the following EP election will be reserved only for minority candidates.

    The proposed changes had only been announced last year and were quickly debated in Parliament in November last year.

    Barely two months later, the changes are now in force and the next election will be reserved only for Malay candidates.

    Since the proposed changes were raised, some have expressed suspicion that they were engineered by the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) to bar Dr Tan Cheng Bock from running in September.

    Dr Tan had come within a whisker of defeating the PAP-approved candidate, former PAP minister Dr Tony Tan, in the 2011 election.

    Dr Tan Cheng Bock had last year announced that he would contest the next presidential elections.

    The Government, in the meantime, has said the changes are not to bar anyone, and that it was making the changes because of its concern that Singapore, being a multi-racial society, should be represented at the highest level by the different racial groups.

    While there have been many questions raised about the new rules, one in particular is worth delving further into.

    This has to do with the decision to designate the next election as a reserved one.

    Workers’ Party chairman and Member of Parliament for Aljunied GRC, Sylvia Lim, highlighted the issue in Parliament on Monday.

    “The Schedule sets out a table showing President Wee Kim Wee as the first President to be counted,” Ms Lim said. “Together with the subsequent Presidential terms of President Ong Teng Cheong, two terms of President SR Nathan and one term of President Tony Tan, these form 5 terms where a non-Malay President was in office.  Thus, the government reaches the conclusion that this year’s Presidential Election will be reserved for Malays.  This is a conclusion that has left Singaporeans bewildered and suspicious.”

    Indeed it has.

    The Government, which said it was advised by the Attorney General’s Chambers (AGC), had explained that counting should begin from President Wee because he was the first President to exercise the powers of an Elected President.

    “This advice was surprising and illogical to many Singaporeans, given that President Wee Kim Wee was never elected to office,” Ms Lim said.

    “Why not count from the first Elected President, Mr Ong Teng Cheong?” she asked. “Is it because if President Ong was the first one to be counted, we would have to go through this year’s election as an open election and risk the contest by Chinese or Indian candidates who may not be to the Government’s liking?”

    In his response, the Minister in the Prime Minister’s Office, Chan Chun Sing, said Mr Wee was the first president to exercise the powers under the elected presidency.

    According to news reports, Mr Chan doesn’t seem to have elaborated further on his argument, except to insist how the Government had no political intentions, and that in fact “the changes carried high political risk and cost.”

    “If this Government led by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong is for short-term political advantage, would we do it?” he asked. “Would we expend our political capital to do this?”

    Rhetoric aside, the Government’s position on why Mr Wee should be the starting point makes him, in effect, the first elected president because he had exercised the powers under the elected presidency.

    But such a view runs counter to earlier statements by Government ministers themselves, including former Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong, and the government-controlled media, who had all described Mr Ong as Singapore’s first Elected President.

    Let us take a short walk down memory lane.

    Way before the EP scheme became reality, former Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew, who had initiated the idea, “hinted” in 1985 “that Singapore might have its first elected President at the end of Mr Wee’s four-year term or, perhaps, earlier.”

    st85

    The Business Times, in September 1993, just a day before Mr Ong was sworn in as President, described Mr Ong as “the first elected president.”

    businesstimes

    In the Malay Berita Harian newspaper the next day, it said “History made: Mr Ong Teng Cheong has been sworn in as S’pore’s first [elected president].”

    tnp-93

    6 years later, in 1999, the Straits Times published a chronology of Mr Ong’s achievements, including: “1993: Mr Ong Teng Cheong wins Singapore’s first presidential Election..”

    st-99

    In 2002, upon Mr Ong’s demise, the radio station 93.8FM had this headline: “Former president Ong Teng Cheong, S’pore’s first elected president, has died..”

    tnp-02

    And even as recent as 2007, the Straits Times was still referring to him as Singapore’s first Elected President:

    st-07

    “Hwa Chong Institution now has student centre in honour of  Singapore’s first elected president, Mr Ong Teng Cheong.”

    And if you are still not convinced that Mr Ong was indeed Singapore’s first Elected President, here are two authoritative sources which might change your mind.

    First, there is the government’s own National Library website.

    Right the top of its “History SG” page is this headline, in caps:

    nlbotc

    “ONG TENG CHEONG IS THE FIRST ELECTED PRESIDENT OF SINGAPORE”.

    That is pretty unequivocal from the curators of our history.

    And second, here was what then Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong in 2002 said in his condolence letter to Mr Ong’s family:

    nlb02

    “As the first elected President, Teng Cheong had to work the two-key system…”

    So, there you have it.

    Singaporeans, the media and even the Government itself, had referred to Mr Ong as Singapore’s first Elected President many times the last 24 years since he was first elected.

    Mr Chan’s explanation on why it was instead Mr Wee who is being counted as the nation’s first Elected President is unconvincing at best, and totally disrespectful of Mr Ong, at worst.

    It also denies our own political and national history which, in fact, is plain for all to see. And not to mention it is also an utter repudiation of Singaporeans’ choice when they elected Mr Ong to be the first Elected President.

    All in all, a simple stroke of the pen to change our history is an act of betrayal.

    Mr Ong Teng Cheong presented himself to the people as a candidate, convinced them he could do the job and they elected him through the ballot.

    This, with all due respect to Mr Wee who himself was a very excellent president indeed, is what the ELECTED president is supposed to do, at a minimum.

    What Mr Ong has done as Singapore’s first Elected President resonates even today with many Singaporeans, especially when he stood independent from the rulers of the party he once belonged to, in carrying out his duty on behalf of Singaporeans.

    And because of his presidency, the EP went through many substantial changes and improvements as well.

    Mr Ong was Singapore’s first Elected President and the changes to the EP should take reference from his tenure.

    To conveniently sidestep his presidency, without any valid or convincing explanation, only fuels suspicion and speculation that the current Government has ulterior motives in pushing through the changes at such speed.

    In the end, it damages the credibility of the EP, especially the reserved EP, and this is not good for the country.

    Mr Chan needs to do better to convince Singaporeans that the Government has no ulterior agenda in not recognising Mr Ong’s presidency.

     

    Source: https://andrewlohhp.wordpress.com

  • Jufrie Mahmood: Malays Oppose Reserved Malay Elected Presidency Not For Racist Reasons

    Jufrie Mahmood: Malays Oppose Reserved Malay Elected Presidency Not For Racist Reasons

    If you are a non Malay and you oppose the amendments to the constitution to reserve the post of the Elected President for a Malay this time round solely because you don’t want a Malay to hold the post then you are opposing for the wrong reason.

    You may then be accused of being a racist.

    For your information many enlightened Malays also oppose the amendments but for different reasons. They hate the insinuation that they are unable to stand on their own merit and would end up having a PAP puppet for a president. We prefer a capable and fair minded person who is independent and can stand up for all Singaporeans, irrespective of his racial background.

    MOST IMPORTANTLY WE WANT A PRESIDENT WHO IS NOT BEHOLDEN TO THE RULING PARTY AND CAN SAY “NO” TO THE PAP SHOULD THE NEED ARISES. THAT IS THE DIFFERENCE. GET IT?

    MAJULAH SINGAPURA!

     

    Source: Mohamed Jufrie Bin Mahmood

  • Human Rights Watch: Myanmar Commanders Must Be Punished For Rape Of Rohingya

    Human Rights Watch: Myanmar Commanders Must Be Punished For Rape Of Rohingya

    YANGON: Human Rights Watch on Monday called for Myanmar to punish army and police commanders if they allowed troops to rape and sexually assault women and girls of the Rohingya Muslim minority.

    The New York-based campaign group said it had documented rape, gang rape and other sexual violence against girls as young as 13 in interviews with some of the 69,000 Rohingya Muslims who have fled to Bangladesh since Myanmar security forces responded to attacks on border posts four months ago.

    “The sexual violence did not appear to be random or opportunistic, but part of a coordinated and systematic attack against Rohingya, in part because of their ethnicity and religion,” a Human Rights Watch (HRW) news release said.

    Reuters was unable to contact a Myanmar government spokesman to respond to the allegations.

    An estimated 1.1 million Rohingya live in the western state of Rakhine, but have their movements and access to services restricted. Rohingyas are barred from citizenship in Myanmar, where many call them “Bengalis” to suggest they are illegal immigrants from Bangladesh.

    Independent journalists and observers have been barred from visiting the army’s operation zone in northern Rakhine since the Oct. 9 attacks that killed nine border police.

    The government has so far dismissed most claims that soldiers raped, beat, killed and arbitrarily detained civilians while burning down villages, insisting instead that a lawful operation is underway against a group of armed Rohingya insurgents.

    The HRW report comes just days after United Nations investigators said Myanmar’s security forces had “very likely” committed crimes against humanity, posing a dilemma for de facto leader Aung San Suu Kyi.

    The Nobel Peace Prize winner took charge of most civilian affairs in April after a historic transition from full military rule, but soldiers retain a quarter of seats in parliament and control ministries related to security.

    U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra’ad al-Hussein said on Friday that Suu Kyi had promised to investigate the U.N.’s allegations.

    HRW said it had gathered evidence on 28 separate sexual assaults, including interviews with nine women who said they were raped or gang raped at gunpoint by security forces during the army’s so-called “clearance operations” in northern Rakhine.

    The women and other witnesses said the perpetrators were Myanmar army troops or border police, who they identified by their uniforms, kerchiefs, arm bands and patches, HRW said.

    “These horrific attacks on Rohingya women and girls by security forces add a new and brutal chapter to the Burmese military’s long and sickening history of sexual violence against women,” said HRW senior emergencies researcher Priyanka Motaparthy.

    “Military and police commanders should be held responsible for these crimes if they did not do everything in their power to stop them or punish those involved.”

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

deneme bonusu