Mana2 wanita sama ada niqabi, tudung labuh, tudung pendek, free hair, yg bersilat begini tetap tiada menghalalkan perbuatan berlatih/pertunjukan bersama lelaki walau bersarung tangan. Niat sudah tidak halalkan cara. Wanita patutnya sesama wanita sahaja, dilakukan di tempat tertutup. Lelaki sesama lelaki. Antara mereka bila bersama ada nafsu, ada syaitan mencucuk. Jika halal saja dengan lapik, maka halal la wanita diraba setelah berpakaian, halal la zina apabila kondom diguna, halal la sentuh menyentuh asal ada lapik saja.
Jika mereka adik beradik, maka tidak pula layak aksi ditunjukkan di khalayak ramai kerana wanita perlu ditutup dari sebarang pintu fitnah yang banyak kini. Dengan lenggok badan, dengan menjadi tontonan, ia bukan ciri niqabi apatah lagi muslimah sejati. Dan tertanya juga, adik beradik buat show, pakai sarung tangan? Untuk apa ya? Tak apa la, hal mereka.
Wanita berniqab di sisi islam adalah contoh terbaik bagi menunjukkan cara berpakaian mengikut sunnah dan harus belajar adab dan akhlak isteri2 Nabi. Dan jika berniqab tapi tidak mengenakan sarung kaki dan menampakkan kaki, ia fitnah kepada islam.
Penghinaan terhadap agama Islam dan kitab suci Al-Quran kalam Allah SWT sudah sampai ke kemuncaknya. Semalam, di Masjid Limbongan, Terengganu kira-kira pukul 1 pagi tadi, perbuatan manusia yang tidak bertanggungjawab ini tidak boleh dipandang ringan dan mereka yang bertanggungjawab mesti dicari dan dihukum.
Kejadian berlaku jam 1 pagi tadi. Pintu masjid dipecahkan, Al-Quran diselerakkan dan ada yang dibuang di dalam tandas masjid. Tok Imam yang melihat kejadian itu menangis kerana tidak sampai hati melihat Al-Quran diperlakukan sedemikian rupa. Laporan polis juga telah dibuat oleh Adun Kota Putera, YB Mohd Mahdi Musa sebentar tadi.
Satu tindakan dan siasatan segera perlu dilakukan demi menjaga maruah dan kesucian Rumah Allah dan Al-quran.
Insiden tersebut sudah pun dilaporkan kepada polis.
Ringkasan kes:
Pada 4/3/2014 jam lebih 1.30 pagi semasa pengadu sedang buat rondaan KRT/SRS di kawasan Kg Limbongan Kg Raja Besut Trg telah singgah di Masjid Kg Limbongan dapati dalam keadaan baik. Seterusnya pengadu buat rondaan dan singgah di rumah kediaman YB Mahadi Bin Musa yang terletak berhampiran. Pada 4/3/2014 jam l/kurang 2.30 pagi pengadu pergi semula ke kawasan Masjid Kg Limbongan Kg Raja telah dimaklumkan oleh anggota SRS yang membuat rondaan bermotorsikal mengatakan bahawa telah menjumpai Al-Quran dalam keadaan berselerak di depan tangga pintu masuk masjid, di dalam mangkuk tandas,dan di tempat solat. Terdapat juga barang-barang lain seperti kipas dinding dan pintu sliding tempat solat telah dirosakkan dan di pecahkan. Pengadu syaki perbuatan tersebut dikhianati oleh orang yang tidak dikenalpasti.
Mohamed SaiddhinAbdullahNUS Professor Syed Khairudin Aljunied
I was recently made aware of the uproar over my dear friend Prof Dr Syed Khairudin Aljunied and his post on the wall of his personal Facebook account.I do not see why is there a need to make a big fuss over his post in the first place. There were some who took offence as they see it as him replying in his official capacity just because the word “prof” appeared. I find it daft really. It was the questioner who addressed him as “prof”. Prof K was replying in his personal capacity and nowhere did he say he is replying in his official capacity. (note that I too personally address him as Prof K)
Next, there are those who took offense at the words “diseases”, “cancerous” and “cleanse”. The ones starting the petition are being mischievous when they took those words out of context. It is literally putting words into his mouth when they angle it the way they are doing it now. The hypocrisy……
And if he edited the post, isn’t it good in some sense as perhaps he did see value in some of the complaints brought forth and corrected it accordingly. Or perhaps he realised it himself. I am just speculating here.
Most seem to fail to note who the post was addressing it to. Prof K was addressing it to the Muslim faithful. A Muslim not adhering to the teachings of Islam can’t be called the faithful can he? Nor can a Non-Muslim be part of the Muslim faithful. He is addressing to the in-house crowd. (though what Prof K is suggesting can be used by the other religions in their own religious context).
He is replying to a Muslim. How do you expect him to reply then? There is no way we can compromise on the issue. Islam abhors homosexual acts and we can’t condone nor compromise on it. As a scholar, he is obligated to stand up to deviant ideologies and practices. Read below:
“Scholars and religious teachers (asatizahs) must speak up and write against these ideologies and practices. They are obligated to explain to the public the true meaning of what Islam is and sexuality as defined by the Quran and Sunnah. When the scholars and asatizahs are silent about these issues, corruption will spread like wild fire.”
Same goes to Liberal Islam as they bring about a dangerous ideology that runs contrary to the teachings of Islam. They discard 1400++ years of scholarly research, debate and rulings and bring in instead deviant interpretation of the religion claiming that theirs is most up to date. And most of them who are advocating it are not even learned enough in the knowledge of Islam in order to make any new rulings. The ideas and ideals brought forth by the proponents of these ideologies and practices brings about many social ills and it is detrimental to the well being of any society. Any part of the body that is not normally there and brings diseases to it is cancerous. Then there is a need to cleanse it. Cleanse not in the sense of killing them but to do it spiritually in the context put forth by Prof K.
If we do not make a stand, society will degenerate faster that it is now. What next? If the pedophiles decided to form a lobby and lobby for the age of consent to be lowered further, what do we do? Do we let them be coz it is their rights? Freedom to love mah…Some European countries approve of Bestiality and some in fact have animal brothels. If ever we have a bestiality lobby here, do we allow them through also?
Where do we draw the line on the morality of society?
Many too failed to notice the words that come before and after those words mentioned above. They also fail to see the overall meaning he is conveying. Put it in context people! Nowhere is he spouting hatred for a certain group of minorities. It is conveniently angled in such a way by the authors of the petition. He is in fact advocating early detection and seeking early treatment. Read below:
“Parents and school teachers must be made aware of these challenges. They must detect early signs of waywardness from their children and students. Give advice, send them to proper religious classes and seek help from counsellors, if necessary. Win over the hearts of the misled youths and explain to them what’s right with knowledge and wisdom.”
We condemn homosexual acts but we do not condemn those who have homosexual tendencies or those who are transsexuals. We welcome them with open arms,always ready to listen to them and offer them advice if need be. We will accept them as who they are but we will never fail to remind them to return back to the true path. Coz we love ’em.
Peace.
PS. To all those who support Prof K can like his fan page created by some supporter out there. Haters need not come.
A letter jointly authored by Dr Muhammad Iqbal and Mr Faizal Razak; graduates and alumni of NUS to Provost and Deputy President (Academic Affairs), Vice Provost (Academic Personnel), NUS Alumni and Office of Student Affairs – National University of Singapore stating:
Concern over a recently published a petition against a professor and they display a trenchant hostility towards families and heterosexuals, and which we believe is unbecoming of an NUS graduate or undergraduate.
In their open letter, they attempted to discredit the Professor and threatened to get him sacked. These actions are tantamount to intimidation. They do not merely express a principled opposition to deny the extension of legal rights to heteronorms. What they represent is a clarion call to eradicate any and all instances of gender expressions and relations that fall outside their preferred homosexual order.
In their letter, they had forced the Professor to delete his post. They wanted to oppress any free speech that questions their lifestyle.
We however believe that they have crucially misunderstood their place as a graduate or undergraduate.
Firstly, the undergraduates and graduates have a respectful duty to provide a safe academic environment for its teachers, regardless of sexual orientation. Their petition however exhibit a fundamental disregard for the safety of heteronorm teachers, and that is unacceptable of any student, whatever their religious or political convictions.
Secondly, contrary to what they claim, they are not engaging in a debate about homosexuality. It is more accurate to see their letter as an intimidation towards teachers and denies recognition to heterosexuals and pro-families. Instead of being respectful to educators, they chose to launch this untenable and unjustifiable assault on an educator.
This goes beyond any issue of academic freedom or religious liberty. Not only have they failed to accord respect to educators, they have conducted themselves in a way that is not reflective of an NUS graduate or undergraduate.
We thus urge that they withdraw their petition and apologize to Professor Syed Khairuddin, as well as undergo counselling to further understand the issues and challenges confronting the student-teacher community. We also hope that the university leadership can see that these remedial actions are adhered to.
6. The University encourages students to display consideration, kindness and responsibility in their dealings with other persons. Students should not engage in disorderly or offensive behaviour such as making threats against others, intimidating others, harassing others, drunkenness, lewdness, or participating in any unlawful assembly.
7. Students should also refrain from participating in any activity which physically or mentally harms, intimidates or humiliates other students, or which violates one’s dignity as an individual. In particular, negative and improper orientation practices that make new students feel uncomfortable (also known as “ragging”) are not tolerated by the University. Such practices display a lack of basic respect for other persons, imperil students’ physical and mental welfare, and may unintentionally result in an unhealthy atmosphere of fear and intimidation on campus.
Read the ENTIRE chronology of saga in category ‘AGAMA’:
