Tag: ITE

  • ITE And Students On The Up And Up

    ITE And Students On The Up And Up

    It is heartening to read that more Institute of Technical Education (ITE) students are completing their courses (“ITE rate of success on the uptrend“; Monday).

    I applaud the good news as more students further their studies at the ITE after completing their secondary school education.

    Several decades ago, many parents and students viewed the ITE in a negative light.

    Some even quipped that the ITE was an abbreviation for “It’s the end”, given that the vocational institute mainly took in students who were school dropouts and post-secondary school students who were not able to gain entrance to polytechnics and junior colleges.

    However, the ITE has, in recent years, not only transformed physically, but its overall image has also improved tremendously.

    In the past few years, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has held his annual National Day Rally at the ITE College Central in Ang Mo Kio.

    This has signalled the Government’s strong support and endorsement of the institute.

    The Government has also been investing heavily in the ITE and its various colleges across the island.

    There are various courses available at the ITE now, including health sciences, digital animation, hospitality operations and early childhood education.

    ITE graduates also have good opportunities to further their studies and their careers.

    I have many friends and relatives who are ITE graduates, and most of them are doing well in their respective careers.

    I hope that the Government will continue to support the ITE and its students, especially working adults who are looking to enrol in short courses at the institute.

    Muhammad Dzul Azhan Haji Sahban

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • ITE Graduate Looked Down By Interviewer Because Of Poor Qualifications

    ITE Graduate Looked Down By Interviewer Because Of Poor Qualifications

    Dear All Singapore Stuff,

    I’m going to share my thoughts regarding an interview with a certain company for the position of Test Technician and after the interview, I left feeling horrible, depressed and really upset. The interviewer was rude and unprofessional. I found this job opening through jobstreet.

    First of all, I waited for almost an hour before the interview commenced because the HR recruitment specialist had an appointment and forgot about the interview. How convenient. That is unprofessional and they should have told me beforehand. The interviewer didn’t introduce his name, what his position was or which department here was from. So we’ll call him Mr Nice guy.

    So Mr Nice guy asked me regarding my last drawn salary, from two previous companies. He asked “why is your salary low?”. I explained that I worked only for a few days during the course of the employment and probably that’s the reason why it’s not that high. Mr Nice guy wasn’t satisfied with my answer and raised his voice and said “NO NO YOU’RE NOT ANSWERING MY QUESTION”. At this point of time, I felt that this interview had gone sideways. Mr Nice guy critiqued how could I possibly work with the company if I couldn’t answer a simple question.

    In the first place, is this question even relevant? You employ someone based on merit and skills, not on previous pay and I did give an answer. I’m sorry if you are not satisfied with my answer.

    Mr Nice guy proceeded with the interview and I answered as best as I could, in a polite manner even though I felt like walking out the door. He was rude throughout the interview and asked me questions that are not related to the job scope. All the while he behaved in a condescending manner and constantly undermined my credibility. Mr Nice Guy kept hinting that the company is looking for “highly educated people” He seem to have a prejudice against ITE graduates like me.

    The ad that they posted is misleading to future applicants on what are the required qualifications. I have met the necessary requirements. I have a Nitec in the relevant course and I have the relevant experience. The interviewer looked down on me just because I was an ITE graduate. He also continously undermined my capabilities throughout the interview and he was hinting that ITE graduates have no place in the company.

    Education is very important in Singapore. But it is wrong to stereotype someone just based on his/her qualifications. Even if you are from ITE, it doesn’t make you less of a person. What does it matter if you have a PhD but you’re an asshole. Is someone deemed highly educated just based on his qualifications? Everyone should be treated equally regardless of their education. There should be no prejudice against people who has less education than you. What’s important is the attitude of someone and I believe that is what you should look for in an employee.

    Mr Nice guy concluded the interview by bluntly saying that according to him, I had failed the interview because of my attitude and I wouldn’t ever get a good job in Singapore and that the way I answered his first question was unreasonable and unprofessional.

    I believe he was the one who was rude and treated me with no respect. If i wanted to be interrogated I would’ve just gone to a police station. Where did he learn his interviewing skills from? He was rude and inconsiderate from the start and he didn’t even know that he was rude. He spoiled my day with his attitude. I dont have any background in human resource but i doubt that that is a how an interview should be held.

    I have lodged a report with TAFEP and am currently awaiting a personal apology from the interviewer itself for being rude to me. I hope other people don’t go through what I have been through.

    PS: Interviewer is a foreigner. At first I didn’t want to mention it for fear of readers having clouded judgements but due to recent cases, i thought this factor should be taken into consideration.

    Disgruntled Applicant
    A.S.S. Contributor

     

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

  • Local Undergraduates Expect $4,000 As Starting Salary

    Local Undergraduates Expect $4,000 As Starting Salary

    According to a poll by STJobs, one in five local under/graduates expects no less than $4,000 as their starting pay.

    This contrasts sharply with the average starting pay for a bachelor’s degree (without honours) at $2,741, according to an earlier report last month.

    In view of realistic market payouts, some soon-to-be graduates seem to be asking for the sky.

    In February, STJobs.sg conducted a survey among close to 200 fresh graduates and undergraduates across a wide variety of academic disciplines in local tertiary institutes to find out what their salary expectations are.

    12 per cent of all respondents expected to receive less than $2,500 per month while 70 per cent of them expected to be paid up to $4,000 per month. The remaining 18 per cent felt they should receive more than $4,000 in remuneration.

    When asked why they felt they deserved their expected salary, half of the respondents said it was because they would be graduating from a recognised university.

    This reasoning seems to align with an earlier mypaper report whose survey findings – conducted and compiled by a HR consultant firm – found that one in five employers placed an average premium of $214 per month for local university graduates over those with degrees from overseas.

    Jerry Wee, Director of JRT Recruitment, agrees that employers tend to prefer fresh graduates from a recognised local university compared to private tertiary institutions, and would even be willing to pay them 10 to 15 per cent more.

    “The tightening of EPs for employment, coupled with rising costs and difficulty of hiring experienced qualified locals will put fresh grads in good stead to compete in the job market,” he said. However, he also cautioned that fresh grads need to be realistic in their expectation on remuneration.

    Yu Lan, 26, a student from Nanyang Technological University, is one of them who thinks that her starting salary should be at least $4,000 as she has “strong analysis skills and trouble-shooting ability”.

    On the other hand, 25-year-old Samuel Tan expects to be paid up to $4,000 in starting salary as other jobs he has applied to offer similar payouts. Other reasons cited include “I have the required abilities and good work ethics and experience from my part-time jobs”.

    Interestingly, 1 in 5 fresh graduates admitted that they had no clue about the usual starting pay of the job they are looking for and thought up a random figure for their expected remuneration.

    Most of them said they decided on their expected salary after consulting with friends who worked in a similar industry (46 per cent) or assumed that the industry or organisation they wanted to work in would be willing to pay them their expected salary (23 per cent).

    Among those surveyed, 79 per cent are from local universities, 11 per cent from local polytechnics and the Institute of Technical Education (ITE), and the remaining from private institutions.

    The fresh grads also comprised of Singaporean and Singapore Permanent Residents (61 per cent) and foreigners (39 per cent), and 9 in 10 fresh grads are aged between 20 to 27 years old.

     

    Source: http://business.asiaone.com

  • Faisal Manap Saran Agar Kemansuhan Yuran Peperiksaan Peringkat Nasional Diperluas Kepada Pelajar Sekolah Swasta, Privet Dan Pelajar Sambilan Politeknik, ITE

    Faisal Manap Saran Agar Kemansuhan Yuran Peperiksaan Peringkat Nasional Diperluas Kepada Pelajar Sekolah Swasta, Privet Dan Pelajar Sambilan Politeknik, ITE

    By MP for Aljunied GRC, Muhamad Faisal bin Abdul Manap
    [Delivered in Parliament on 4 Mar 2015]

    Puan,

    Belanjawan 2015, pada pandangan saya, membawa mesej perubahan pada pendekatan pemerintah dalam usaha untuk memperbaiki dan mendatangkan manfaat kepada rakyat Singapura. Dapat dihayati bahawa pendekatan pemerintah pada belanjawan kali ini lebih cenderung kepada pendekatan hala kiri atau pendekatan yang lebih memberatkan aspek-aspek keseimbangan sosial dengan memberi lebih fokus kepada pengagihan sumber-sumber negara kepada segenap lapisan masyarakat Singapura. Peralihan ini adalah sesuatu yang memberangsangkan. Seperti yang diucapkan oleh rakan saya Puan Sylvia Lim, Belanjawan kali ini lebih memberi penekanan kepada pelaburan sumber manusia serta jaringan keselamatan sosial. Penekanan yang sebegini amat diperlukan memandangkan keadaan jurang pendapatan dan pemilikan harta di Singapura yang membimbangkan.

    Puan,

    Dalam ucapan ini, saya ingin menyentuh 3 aspek atau perkara yang telah disampaikan oleh Menteri Kewangan Encik Tharman semasa ucapan belanjawan beliau, iaitu (i) Tabung Simpanan Pekerja atau CPF, (ii) Skim Ihsan Senja dan (iii) Kemansuhan Yuran Peperiksaan Nasional dan yuran peperiksaan Politeknik dan ITE.

    (i) Tabung Simpanan Pekerja atau CPF

    Parti pekerja ingin mengutarakan dua usulan bagi skim CPF.  Usulan yang pertama adalah menurunkan usia kelayakkan bagi pengeluaran wang dari akaun persaraan atau Payout Eligibilty Age, dulu yang dikenali sebagai Draw-Down Age. Buat masa sekarang, para pesara akan menerima pembayaran bulanan dari akaun persaraan CPF apabila mencapai usia 65 tahun, bermula dari 2018. Kami ingin mencadangkan agar had usia pengeluaran ini dikurangkan daripada usia 65 kepada 60 tahun. Kami percaya ini akan memberi keringanan kepada para pencarum jika mereka memilih untuk membuat pengeluaran bulanan lebih awal dari akaun persaraan mereka atas sebab-sebab yang tertentu.

    Usulan kedua Parti Pekerja bagi skim CPF adalah sesuatu yang pernah disuarakan sebelum ini iaitu untuk memisahkan Usia Kelayakan bagi pengeluaran wang dari akaun persaraan atau Payout Eligibility Age daripada usia persaraan. Ini adalah supaya usia yang membolehkan pengeluaran wang dari akaun persaraan akan terus kekal dan tidak terjejas walaupun usia persaraan meningkat. Kami mencadangkan sedemikian kerana sebahagian besar masyarakat Singapura merasa kurang senang pada perubahan had usia kelayakan bagi pengeluaran wang dari akaun persaraan yang sentiasa berubah dan meningkat. Dengan mengekalkan had usia kelayakan ini, ia akan memberi para pencarum lebih jaminan bila mereka boleh mengeluarkan wang dari CPF justeru dapat membuat perancangan yang sepatutnya.

    (ii) Skim Ihsan Senja

    Puan, perkara kedua yang saya ingin sentuh adalah tentang Skim Ihsan Senja. Skim ini adalah satu initiatif yang baik dan memang amat diperlukan. Skim ini membolehkan golongan warga Singapura yang berusia 65 tahun ke atas yang berpendapatan 20 hingga 30 peratus paling bawah menikmati sokongan kewangan seumur hidup.

    Puan, keprihatian saya tentang skim ini adalah tentang proses implementasinya. Proses implementasi adalah satu aspek penting yang akan menentukan betapa efektifnya sesebuah skim dalam mencapai tujuan utamanya. Menerusi pengamatan dan juga pengalaman saya dalam bidang kerja sosial, kriteria dan proses penilian yang terlalu ketat ada masanya boleh menyebabkan kes-kes yang tulen dan memerlukan terlepas peluang untuk mendapatkan bantuan.

    Seperti yang diketahui, tujuan utama skim ini adalah untuk meringankan bebanan kewangan yang dihadapi oleh warga emas yang telah banyak menyumbang kepada pembangunan Singapura serta untuk mencerminkan nilai kita sebagai sebuah masyarakat yang inklusif. Oleh itu saya harap pemerintah dapat melaksanakan skim Ihsan Senja ini dengan hati dan minda yang terbuka, fleksible dan penuh keihsanan agar skim ini dapat memberi kemanfaatan yang terbaik kepada warga emas kita.

    Puan, sepekara lagi tentang Skim ini adalah mengenai cara pembayarannya. Seperti yang dikatakan oleh Menteri Kewangan, pembayaran kepada warga emas yang layak akan dilakukan tiga bulan sekali. Saya berpendapat agar pembayaran dapat dilakukan sebulan sekali agar lebih mudah bagi penerima untuk mengurus bil-bil dan perbelanjaan bulanan mereka.

    (iii) Kemansuhan yuran Peperiksaan Nasional  dan yuran Peperiksaan Politeknik/ITE

    Perkara ketiga yang ingin saya ketengahkan adalah tentang kemansuhan yuran peperiksaan nasional dan yuran peperiksaan politeknik dan ITE. Saya mengalu-alukan kemansuhan yuran-yuran Peperiksaan Nasional seperti PSLE, GCE Peringkat ’N’, ‘O’ dan ‘A’ dan juga yuran bagi peperiksaan Politeknik serta ITE seperti yang diumumkan. Kemansuhan yuran peperiksaan nasional ini merangkumi setiap pelajar Singapura yang menuntut di sekolah pemerintah sementara kemansuhan yuran peperiksaan Politeknik dan ITE diberikan kepada pelajar-pelajar sepenuh masa.

    Disini, saya ingin meminta agar Kementerian Pedidikan membuat pertimbangan untuk melanjutkan kemansuhan yuran-yuran peperiksaan ini kepada pelajar-pelajar sekolah swasta dan juga kepada pelajar-pelajar politeknik dan ITE yang membuat pengajian secara sambilan.

    Puan, pada tahun 2013 Kementerian Pendidikan telah mengambil keputusan untuk melanjutkan Skim Edusave kepada setiap pelajar-pelajar Singapura yang berusia 7 hingga 16 tahun. Keputusan ini diambil selepas 20 tahun Skim Edusave diperkenalkan iaitu pada 1993. Dalam masa 20 tahun ini, ramai pelajar-pelajar yang tidak menuntut di sekolah-sekolah pemerintah atau awam telah terlepas peluang untuk meraih manfaat dari skim ini.

    Menteri Negara bagi Pendidikan, Puan Sim Ann, dalam ucapan beliau semasa perbincangan Pindaan rang undang-undang Skim Endowmen dan Simpanan  Pendidikan telah menyatakan bahawa Kementerian Pendidikan telah menjalankan kajian selepas debat COS 2013 untuk melanjutkan Skim Edusave dan setelah pertimbangan yang teliti, Perdana Menteri telah mengumumkan lanjutan sumbangan Edusave kepada semua rakyat Singapura yang berumur tujuh hingga 16 di Rapat Hari Kebangsaan pada tahun 2013.

    Puan, saya ingin meminta agar Kementerian Pendidikan dapat mengadakan kajian dan penelitian yang sama dalam perkara ini iaitu kemungkinan melanjutkan kemansuhan yuran peperiksaan nasional bagi setiap pelajar-pelajar Singapura, tidak terhad kepada pelajar-pelajar yang menuntut di sekolah pemerintah sahaja, serta mengambil langkah yang sama juga terhadap pelajar-pelajar politeknik dan ITE yang membuat pengajian secara sambilan.

    Puan, sepekara lagi yang saya ingin cadangkan adalah agar Kementerian Pendidikan turut membuat pertimbangan untuk melanjutkan skim FAS kepada pelajar-pelajar Singapura yang menuntut di sekolah-sekolah swasta atau privet. Saya rasa adalah penting bagi setiap skim bantuan pendidikan pemerintah dihulurkan kepada kesemua pelajar-pelajar Singapura kerana setiap daripada pelajar-pelajar ini apabila dewasa kelak akan menjadi warga yang menyumbang kepada pembangunan masyarakat dan negara.

    Puan, akhirkata, saya harap pemerintah dapat membuat penilaian yang serius tentang cadangan-cadangan yang telah diutarakan agar skim-skim yang disebutkan diatas akan mendatangkan lebih maanfaat kepada masyarakat Singapura secara keseluruhannya, ini sesuai dengan objektif pemerintah untuk membina sebuah masyarakat yang saksama dan inklusif.

    Terima Kasih Puan.

  • Budding MMA Fighter Sharil Salim Passed Away

    Budding MMA Fighter Sharil Salim Passed Away

    SINGAPORE – He fought hardship growing up as an orphan. He was hoping to make it big as a fighter in the boxing ring. But all that came to nought when, on the cusp of his big day, he ended up facing a protracted fight to live.

    Sadly, Shahril Salim lost that battle – and Singapore lost a potential star. The budding local boxer died on Nov 27, two years after a collapse during training left him with a serious brain injury.

    The 23-year-old former ITE College East student had been preparing to make his debut in a show at Marina Bay Sands in November 2012 when tragedy struck during a group sparring session at the Juggernaut Fight Club in Boat Quay.

    He had been bedridden and unable to speak since the incident and had to be fed through a tube in his nose.

    On Nov 27, he developed a high fever at his sister’s home in Jurong West and stopped breathing in the ambulance. He was pronounced dead on arrival at the Singapore General Hospital.

    We look back at his fighting spirit through reports from The Straits Times Archives.


    Shahril’s rocky road to the ring spurs him to succeed

    THE REPORT WAS FIRST PUBLISHED IN THE STRAITS TIMES ON OCT 12, 2012

    Boxer Shahril Salim, smiling and affable before, lowers his voice when asked why he got into the fight game. Those around him also fall silent as he tells the story.

    “I am an orphan and this is my chance to do something after all the struggles I have been through in my life,” says the 21-year-old.

    “My dad passed away when I was nine through illness and my mum died when I was 10.

    “After that I shifted from one house to another to stay with relatives. I was very close to being sent to an orphanage but my sister Lisa took me in. She had 10 children and adults staying in her four-room flat but did her best and gave me what she could.”

    The sense of hurt and hardship is clear in his voice, even as he sits and talks as a strong and powerful man about to make his professional boxing debut at Marina Bay Sands on Nov 9.

    Click here to read the full story.


    Boxer fights for life after collapsing before debut

    THE REPORT WAS FIRST PUBLISHED IN THE STRAITS TIMES ON NOV 9, 2012

    Shahril Salim was supposed to be making his debut as a professional boxer at Marina Bay Sands tonight. Instead, the 21-year-old is now fighting for his life at the Singapore General Hospital.

    He was rushed to hospital for emergency brain surgery on Oct 28 after collapsing following a group sparring session at the Juggernaut Fight Club in Boat Quay.

    Click here to read the full story.


    Shahril fighting for his future, one day at a time

    THE REPORT WAS FIRST PUBLISHED IN THE STRAITS TIMES ON JAN 20, 2013

    Shahril Salim can only blink slowly to communicate. One day, he may be able to learn to walk again. For now, the smallest movement in the tips of his fingers seems an exquisite gift.

    At the Bright Vision Hospital on Lorong Napiri in Hougang, the 22-year-old boxer is recovering from a brain injury suffered in a sparring session on Oct 28.

    Spencer Oliver, one of Britain’s most promising boxers who went into a coma after being knocked out in a fight in 1998, understood Shahril’s plight.

    The Briton, who works as a television pundit and runs his own gym, said: “It sounds like Shahril has real fighting spirit and I hope that he continues to get better.

    Click here to read the full story.


    Shahril’s not throwing in the towel

    THE REPORT WAS FIRST PUBLISHED IN THE STRAITS TIMES ON NOV 2, 2013

    Twelve months after the accident that stole his boxing dreams, the former ITE College East student’s struggle continues.

    “Some doctors told us that he was on the verge of dying and that they had done everything that they could,” explained his brother, Jufri, who takes care of Shahril along with his wife Surayah Akbar, their three children and a maid in a three-room Housing Board flat in New Upper Changi Road.

    “But he kept fighting and can still respond to us. He can’t talk but he can raise his hands to answer a question or blink his eyes.

    “We ask him if he wants to carry on and he always says ‘yes’.

    “He is inside his body but can’t get out and we will help him for as long as it takes.”

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com