Tag: Khaw Boon Wan

  • Analysts: Higher Income Ceiling Will Have Minimal Impact On Property Market

    Analysts: Higher Income Ceiling Will Have Minimal Impact On Property Market

    A higher income ceiling for Build-to-Order (BTO) flats and executive condominiums (ECs) is likely to have minimal impact on the HDB resale and private property market, according to market watchers.

    National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan had said in a radio interview on Tuesday (Jun 23) that changes to the income ceiling are likely to be made known in August. The income ceiling was last raised in 2011 by S$2,000 for both types of housing.

    Market watchers Channel NewsAsia spoke to said they expect the income ceiling for BTO flats and ECs to be raised by a similar amount later this year.

    The Government’s plans to increase the income ceiling for the purchase of BTO flats and ECs will divert some demand from the HDB resale and private property markets. Currently, households earning a gross income of more than S$10,000 cannot apply for new HDB flats, while those earning more than S$12,000 cannot buy ECs.

    However, market watchers said the impact is likely to be minimal, as HDB resale flats and private homes have their merits. Compared to BTO flats, there is a shorter waiting time for HDB resale homes which are mostly located in mature estates.

    One of the largest property firms in Singapore has described the move as timely, as more Singaporeans are settling down much later, and may be earning above the current limit when they apply for a BTO flat.

    The demand for new HDB flats has also cooled off compared to three years ago, said PropNex Realty’s CEO Ismail Gafoor. “Three years ago, the subscription rate was about four to five times and there was a long pent-up demand.”

    He added: “Today, the subscription rate is about 1.5 to two, which means most of the demand has been absorbed, and with this greater supply, opening up to a higher increment of the income ceiling is the right thing to do.”

    However, another analyst is surprised at the plans to raise the income ceiling, especially at a time where prices of HDB resale flats and private homes are falling.

    Colliers International’s director of research and advisory, Chia Siew Chuin, said: “We would expect the Government to raise the income ceiling over time to keep up with wages. However, perhaps certain conditions must exist first to justify the raising of the income ceiling.”

    “But as of now, I would say that the market is relatively more stable compared to before, and in fact prices are slowly, gradually moderating,” Ms Chia added.

    Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Mr Khaw had said that he has received “some” requests from Singaporeans who exceeded the income limit, to apply for new HDB flats. Analysts added that public housing, as they are subsidised by the Government, should be reserved for those who really need it.

    As for the two-room Flexi scheme – a result of combining the studio apartment and two-room flat schemes – Mr Ismail said the plan signals a move towards more customisation for home buyers in Singapore, in which it is flexible and caters to needs of individuals based on their age and how much they want to pay for each unit.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • DBSS Woes: Because HDB Went Flat?

    DBSS Woes: Because HDB Went Flat?

    fter it has happened so many times, you have to ask: What the hell is going on?

    The latest DBSS fiasco to hit the Internet is Pasir Ris One, located beside the neighbourhood’s White Sands shopping mall. Residents are complaining that the common corridor – exactly 1.2m-wide – is too narrow, even if it is built to fire safety standards. Owners who picked up their keys over the last two months have formed a private Facebook group to discuss the issue. So far, more than 200 home-owners – about half of the 447 units available – have signed up. Members are required to present a letter or any official document that proves ownership in order join the group.

    Residents who spoke to TMG complained about several building defects, including uneven ceilings and exposed pipes. The size of the flat and its rooms appear to have caught several by surprise, although the developer had stuck to the specified dimensions. The chief complaint was the dark and narrow corridors, which is “shocking, too small and with a ceiling that is worse than a factory and a car park”, as Ms Jynny Chew, 50, a soon-be-resident in Block 530C said.

    Commissioned by the G, DBSS flats are designed and built by private developers. They typically come with better fittings and finishings than standard Build-to-Order flats, though unlike Executive Condominiums, these projects do not have facilities such as pools and gyms.

    Pasir Ris One, launched in April 2012, was built by private developers SingHaiyi Group Ltd and Kay Lim Holdings. The last of the 13 projects offered under the Design, Build and Sell Scheme, an average four-room flat costs around $550,000 to S$670,000, compared to a reported S$350,000 for a four-room BTO flat around the area.

    This latest spate of complaints follows a handful of other DBSS projects which have been under fire for shoddy workmanship despite the premium price such flats command.

    Just last month, DBSS estate Trivelis in Clementi made headlines when residents told of shower room glasses that shattered easily, water seepage into units from floods in corridors and rusty lift doors.

    Earlier in the year, Centrale 8 in Tampines was lambasted by residents over what they perceived to be the low quality of its finishes and fittings. Residents faced faulty balcony locks, toilets, and even bursting water pipes.

    In 2013, The Peak in Toa Payoh was attacked for the dreadful state of its 1203 units, with inferior materials used, such as flimsy lamination, topping the list.

    The woes of the DBSS residents have surfaced an issue: what are the responsibilities of the Housing Board and the private developer for the state of the finished product?

    So far, HDB has remained in the background, preferring to let private contractors handle the matter while it monitors changes. The private developers, on the other hand, are falling mainly on the “one-year defects warranty” to placate residents who want the place spruced up.

    In the case of Centrale 8, developer Sim Lian was adamant about not extending the defect liability period or provide financial compensation despite the impending expiry of the residents’ one-year “warranty”. This is even as residents maintained that defects were still surfacing.

    Trivelis residents were told by developer ELD that contractors would continue to engage the Trivelis Residents Working Committee and see to their problems.

    As for structural work that doesn’t quite constitute surface defects and which would require extensive work, it’s probably too hard a case to make.

    Like common corridors.

    Most of the 447 units in the four Pasir Ris blocks were unoccupied when TMG visited the area on Monday. What stood out immediately was the width of the corridor that ran along the units. At 1.2 metres across, the passageway is at the minimum width permitted by the Singapore Civil Defence Force. This means that residents aren’t allowed to place items along the passageway, as they would impede movement during an emergency.

    Mr Ali, 42, who was at his four-room flat with his family of six, never expected the corridor to be so narrow. The police officer, who had moved in with his family a month ago, said that with the door grilles open, a person would have to edge past the grilles sideways to get through the corridor.

    Photo By Shawn Danker
    The corridors of Pasir Ris One are so narrow that the Fire reel doors on opposing sides will block each other if opened at the same time.
    Photo By Shawn Danker
    An open gate shows how much walking space is left in the corridors of Pasir Ris One after a resident opens their doors.
    Photo By Shawn Danker
    Mrs Chew pointed out that the ceiling pipes on her floor were all exposed and lacking a false ceiling to cover them up.

    While another resident, Ms Vera Foo, 26, an administrative executive, didn’t mind the narrow space, her mother, on the other hand, was outraged. It was “ridiculous” that people had to pass through the corridor in a single file, she said. She recalled how a construction worker had to wait for her to pass into a wider part of the corridor before proceeding past her. “If others come to visit during the festive season like Chinese New Year, there might be a problem of congestion in there”, she said pointing to the passage.

    One resident who was not too fussed about the corridor is Mrs Lynn Pang, 44, a housewife. Her four-room flat is situated at the end of a passage which widens into a lift lobby and staircase. “I am satisfied with my place but I don’t know how our neighbours are going to move in through that corridor”, Mrs Pang said.

    There will be no more DBSS woes simply because this is the last DBSS project but it appears that even residents in new BTO flats have a problem with the quality of work. It makes one wonder if the push to provide more housing in quicker time over the past few years is leading to some compromise of quality. A quick, but not very good, job done?

     

    Featured photo by Shawn Danker. 

     

    Source: http://themiddleground.sg

  • Pasir Ris One DBSS – Yet Another Development Under Fire

    Pasir Ris One DBSS – Yet Another Development Under Fire

    In what is becoming a recurring series of incidents, another group of homeowners of new flats are crying foul at the shoddy workmanship and design of their homes.

    The Online Citizen (TOC) understands that some of the owners of the new Pasir Ris ONE have just received their keys to their new homes which are located at the junction of Pasir Ris Central and Pasir Ris Drive 1, a stone’s throw away from the Pasir Ris MRT station.

    The 447-unit development is one under the Design, Build and Sell Scheme (DBSS), and consists of three-, four- and five-room flats.

    The purchase prices of these homes are reported to be between S$390,000 to S$470,000 for 3-room flats, and S$550,000 to S$670,000 for 4-rooms.  (See here.)

    The Pasir Ris ONE website lists the prices for 5-rooms as follow:

    comparisons-chart

    DBSS flats are supposed to come with better finishings and design, as buyers pay a premium for them.

    However, since owners had entry to their homes the last few months, it has emerged that the workmanship has left a lot to be desired.

    For a start, the corridors of the flats are so narrow that two persons can hardly walk side by side.

    When TOC measured the corridor of one block, it was precisely 1.2m wide.

    DSC_0456

    This is believed to be the minimum required by HDB and the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) safety rules.

    According to the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) website:

    scdf1

    Guidelines_HDB_1

    It is also worth noting that in a parliamentary reply in 2013 to a question of ensuring “clear passages along common corridors of HDB flats”, the Ministry of National Development said it was revising the clearance required from 1.2m to 1.5m, to provide for safety and rescue purposes.

    “To prepare for an ageing population and to provide wider access routes for people using mobility aids, BCA announced revisions to the Code on Accessibility last month.

    “The revisions include a wider minimum clearance width of 1.5m along corridors for buildings with plans submitted for regulatory approval on or after 1 Apr 2014.”

    Some of the gates at the main doors of opposite flats along the corridors are so close together that the gates almost touch each other when they are swung open.

    It is thus unclear how the homeowners of the Pasir Ris ONE flats would have the requisite allowable and safety space in their corridors if they were to, for example, place a shoe rack or a bicycle outside their main doors.

    Another curious placement issue is the way the gas vents have been installed on the ceilings along the corridors.

    DSC_0488
    Besides its questionable aesthetic design, is there also a safety issue here if an incident of leakage or fire should happen, especially with the narrow corridors?

    Besides safety, there are also concerns of security with how the flats are designed.

    Burglars or others with ill intention could gain easy entry into their homes through the air-conditioner ledges, for example, and enter the flats though the windows.

    Here is how it looks like, outside a ground floor flat:

    DSC_0460

    Here is another view:

    DSC_0491

    It would not be too hard for someone to climb to the upper floors through these balconies.

    And for some unknown reasons, TOC understands that the owners cannot make use of the entire ledge, although the floor area of the ledge is included as part of the size of the flat.

    And even over at the community barbeque pits, the design also came under fire, as one resident posted on the Pasir Ris ONE Facebook page on 4 June:

    bbqcomplaint

    TOC measured the height of the pit and it was about 1.3m high – from the ground to where the wire mesh would be. This would make it hard for anyone who is below, say, 1.7m to manage the barbeque.

    This writer – who is 1.7m tall – is pictured here at the pit:

    bbqpit

    When it comes to drying the laundry, the clothes rack isn’t something to crow about either.

    The rack is so small it can hardly dry any clothes; and also, the sun is blocked by the ledge above the rack which is presumably to prevent litter from the upper floors from reaching the lower ones.

    These would make drying your laundry quite a challenge.

    DSC_0462

    These are some issues which residents have with the external surroundings of the flats.

    What about the insides?

    Not much better.

    TOC understands that owners face many defects which need to be rectified.

    These include tiles in the living room which were either scratched, or have different shades of colour, or the groutings were poorly finished, while others have uneven flooring which need to be corrected.

    Some of the grilles at the balcony were also badly painted, and others had leaky pipes in the kitchen.

    The placement of the water heater in their kitchens is also another issue.

    When it is turned on, the heater can become a safety hazard, and it also contributes to warming up the kitchen when cooking is also in process because of the inefficient ventilation design.

    In the bedrooms, there were more defects – there were windows which took some effort to open, and toilet and shower doors were designed such that one has to close one in order to have enough space to open the other.

    And then there were the cracked tiles and poor grouting work.

    Some bedroom doors were also faulty, leaving big gaps between the door and the floor. There were also faulty window screws, window frames, door handles, chipped doors, bad wiring, dirty toilet bowls, and poorly installed floor tiles, among many other complaints.

    Some have complained that the master room, which is 15sqm, is so small it can barely fit a king-sized bed, leaving scarce room to walk.

    According to HDB rules, homeowners have one year to inform the developer of any defects.

    Pasir Ris ONE is a joint project between Sing Haiyi Group and Kay Lim Holdings.

    Homeowners have since created a private Facebook group  to highlight the flaws in their homes.

    Such problems in new developments have been reported  by new owners of other DBSS flats at the Trivelis in Clementi and Centrale 8 in Tampines in the last two months, along with several other groups of owners of build-to-order flats, such as in Punggol and Bukit Panjang, in the last few years.

    In its response to all these, the HDB said earlier in June that the defects were merely “surface imperfections.”

    “This is due mainly to the inherent features of natural materials or the nature of construction works that are dependent on manual labour,” a HDB spokesman said.

     

    Source: www.theonlinecitizen.com

  • MND: Most Wiling To Pay More Than Average Price Of Flats

    MND: Most Wiling To Pay More Than Average Price Of Flats

    In a recent survey of nearly 1,500 residents, MND said it showed that majority of prospective flat buyers are willing to pay more than the current average prices.

    However, the survey also showed that people continue to view the new BTO flats as expensive. The survey was conducted in November last year.

    Last year, the average price of a 4-room HDB flat in a non-mature estate was $295,000. Eighty per cent went for under $350,000.

    MND said a third of the respondents did not know how much such flats cost, while 40% overestimated the price. The most common estimate MND said, was between $300,001 and $400,000 for a 4-room unit.

    That estimated price range was higher than the average $295,000, MND said.

    The survey also found that those who intend to buy a flat in the next 1 to 2 years are willing to pay as much as or more than actual BTO prices in non-mature estates:

    • 3-room flats (avg price $186,000 in 2014) – 58% willing to pay more than $200,000
    • 4-room flats (avg price $295,000 in 2014) – 61% willing to pay more than $300,000
    • 5-room flats (avg price $391,000 in 2014) – 51% willing to pay more than $400,000

    However, it’s not known if MND is aware that a person willing to pay more does not necessarily mean he is happy to do so. The 2 matters are not the same.

    In any case, the better approach to measure affordability of a flat is to take the ratio of the price of the flat over the annual household income of the owners.

    Many BTO HDB flats still remain unaffordable

    After Mr Khaw Boon Wan took over the job as National Development Minister from Mah Bow Tan in 2011, Mr Khaw told Parliament that more would be done to reduce BTO flat prices relative to income, so as to reduce the financial burden of housing on the young. He said [Link]:

    “Many are now clamoring for the HDB to return to basics and its original mission of helping Singaporeans own a basic home. But what does ‘returning to basics’ mean?

    The primary mission of HDB to offer an affordable flat for the majority of Singaporeans will remain unchanged. Fortunately this is within our control as we set BTO prices and HDB is the largest housing developer.

    We have stopped BTO prices from rising by delinking them from resale prices. We can now pause and see what else we can do to bring BTO prices in non-mature estates to, say, around 4 years of (annual) salaryas it was before the current property cycle started.

    One thing is clear. We are committed to restoring and maintaining the affordability of new HDB flats to the vast majority of first-timer Singaporean households. Their Singapore Dream of owning their own flats, like their parents’, is safe. We will make sure of that.”

    Note that Mr Khaw used the term “restoring” the affordability of new HDB BTO flats, which implies that in his predecessor’s time (i.e. Mah Bow Tan), the HDB BTO flats were already unaffordable.

    In the 70′s, a graduate’s starting pay was around $1,000 per month. Then, in Marine Parade HDB estate, the price of a new 3-room, 4-room and 5-room flat was $17,000, $20,000 and $35,000 respectively. A young graduate could easily afford a 5-room flat at a Price-to-Annual Income Ratio, also known as the Affordability Ratio (AR), of slightly under 3 (i.e. 3 years of annual income to match the price of the house). Even households earning $500 a month could easily afford a 3-room flat priced at $17,000 (AR under 3).

    The World Bank considers a ratio of 5 or under as affordable for local residents, while the United Nations has set the bar lower, at 3 (see Link). In any case, anything above 5 is considered unaffordable by both the World Bank and the United Nations.

    By 1990, the average price of a new 5-room flat was $70,000 and a young graduate earned about $2,000 a month. The AR then was still under 3 – very affordable.

    Examining the affordability of current new HDB BTO launches

    TRE took the opportunity to examine the affordability of new HDB BTO flats launched in November last year. A total of 7,568 flats were launched by HDB for sale in a mix of mature and non-mature towns on 25 Nov 2014 [Link]. This was HDB’s final sales exercise for 2014.

    Sembawang Sun Breeze

    Typical 2-room (I):

    • Nett selling price less grants = $30,000
    • Applicants’ median monthly household income = $1,600
    • Price to annual household income = 1.6

    Typical 2-room (II):

    • Nett selling price less grants = $50,000
    • Applicants’ median monthly household income = $1,600
    • Price to annual household income = 2.6

    Typical 3-room:

    • Nett selling price less grants = $115,000
    • Applicants’ median monthly household income = $2,500
    • Price to annual household income = 3.8

    Typical 4-room:

    • Nett selling price less grants = $240,000
    • Applicants’ median monthly household income = $4,200
    • Price to annual household income = 4.8

    Sengkang Anchovale Fields

    Typical 2-room (I):

    • Nett selling price less grants = $45,000
    • Applicants’ median monthly household income = $1,600
    • Price to annual household income = 2.3

    Typical 2-room (II):

    • Nett selling price less grants = $70,000
    • Applicants’ median monthly household income = $1,600
    • Price to annual household income = 3.6

    Typical 3-room:

    • Nett selling price less grants = $135,000
    • Applicants’ median monthly household income = $2,500
    • Price to annual household income = 4.5

    Typical 4-room:

    • Nett selling price less grants = $270,000
    • Applicants’ median monthly household income = $4,200
    • Price to annual household income = 5.4

    Yishun

    Typical 2-room (I):

    • Nett selling price less grants = $30,000
    • Applicants’ median monthly household income = $1,600
    • Price to annual household income = 1.6

    Typical 2-room (II):

    • Nett selling price less grants = $45,000
    • Applicants’ median monthly household income = $1,600
    • Price to annual household income = 2.3

    Typical 3-room:

    • Nett selling price less grants = $115,000
    • Applicants’ median monthly household income = $2,500
    • Price to annual household income = 3.8

    Typical 4-room:

    • Nett selling price less grants = $240,000
    • Applicants’ median monthly household income = $4,200
    • Price to annual household income = 4.8

    Typical 2-room (I):

    • Nett selling price less grants = $30,000
    • Applicants’ median monthly household income = $1,600
    • Price to annual household income = 1.6

    Typical 2-room (II):

    • Nett selling price less grants = $50,000
    • Applicants’ median monthly household income = $1,600
    • Price to annual household income = 2.6

    Typical 3-room:

    • Nett selling price less grants = $115,000
    • Applicants’ median monthly household income = $2,500
    • Price to annual household income = 3.8

    Typical 4-room:

    • Nett selling price less grants = $235,000
    • Applicants’ median monthly household income = $4,200
    • Price to annual household income = 4.7

    Conclusion

    For 2-room and 3-room BTO flats in Sembawang and Yishun, they are considered affordable at 4 years of applicants’ median annual salary or less. However, for 4-room flats, the AR is 4.7 to 4.8, way above Mr Khaw’s own target of 4.

    In this case, 4-room BTO flats should be priced around $201,600 (4 x $4,200 x 12) instead of the current $235,000 to $240,000 in Sembawang and Yishun (i.e, prices after grants).

    For Sengkang, the situation is worse. 2-room flats are priced below AR of 4 but 3-room and 4-room flats have ratios of 4.5 and 5.4 respectively, again, above Mr Khaw’s own target of 4.

    In fact, Sengkang 4-room BTO flats (AR of 5.4) are considered unaffordable by the standards laid down by the World Bank and the United Nations. Sengkang 4-room flats, instead of selling for $270,000 (after grants), ought to be selling at $201,600 (4 x $4,200 x 12). They are overpriced by 34%.

    One can only conclude that Mr Khaw has yet to fulfill his promise of bringing down ALL the BTO prices in non-mature estates to 4 years of annual salary, especially for first-time Singaporean buyers. The middle-income group appears to be squeezed by the higher new HDB flat prices for 4-room and above. For mature estates, the AR of new BTO flats would naturally be even worse.

    So, regardless of what MND is trying to say in its recent survey, the fact of the the matter is, new BTO flats remain expensive and not affordable even by Mr Khaw’s own measure, generally speaking.

     

    Source: www.tremeritus.com

  • Wajah Kampung Moden Bagi Kehidupan Masa Depan

    Wajah Kampung Moden Bagi Kehidupan Masa Depan

    SUDAH berdekad lamanya kampungkampung di kawasan utara Singapura memberi laluan kepada pemodenan, dan penduduknya ditempatkan semula di flat-flat Lembaga Perumahan dan Pembangunan (HDB) di serata pulau ini.

    Namun, menjelang 2017, sebuah kampung akan dibangunkan di Woodlands – dalam bentuk berbeza.

    Pembangunan baru itu akan diberi nama Kampung Admiralty – tafsiran moden bagi kehidupan kampung yang akan membolehkan penduduk makan bersama, bersosial, membeli-belah dan menerima penjagaan kesihatan di bawah satu bumbung.

    Mengapa HDB, yang terkenal dengan pembinaan estet perumahan moden, mencari ilham daripada kampung-kampung?

    Lebih daripada struktur fizikalnya, kehidupan kampung bercirikan sifat tolak ansur, pemikiran sivik dan semangat kemasyarakatan yang utuh – ciri yang HDB harap dapat diterapkan dalam pembangunan baru itu menerusi rekaannya yang mempunyai matlamat tersendiri.

    Menteri Pembangunan Negara, Encik Khaw Boon Wan, menjelaskan:

    “Projek ini adalah percubaan kami dalam membina sebuah kampung moden. Lantaran itu, kami menamakannya Kampung Admiralty bagi menyatakan dengan jelas wawasan dan semangat yang kami harap dapat kami pupuk.”

    Satu kajian yang dijalankan HDB baru-baru ini dengan Pusat Bandar Lestari Asia di bawah Universiti Nasional Singapura (NUS) dan Jabatan Sosiologi di bawah Fakulti Sastera dan Sains Kemasyarakatan NUS, menunjukkan bahawa dengan melaksanakan rekaan yang baik, ia boleh memudahkan interaksi antara masyarakat.

    Walau telah menggantikan kampung dan memindahkan penduduknya untuk memberi laluan kepada perumahan awam, HDB sudah lama menyedari peri pentingnya mereka ruang yang dapat terus menghidupkan semangat kemasyarakatan.

    Ini jelas daripada hasil kajian itu yang menunjukkan bahawa estet perumahan HDB sekarang sudah pun menawarkan pelbagai peluang jiran bertemu, sama ada secara tidak sengaja di lobi lif, di penghubung jalan, di pasar raya ataupun di kedai kopi.

    Serupa dengan itu, pelan induk Kampung Admiralty direka dengan matlamat kehidupan yang bersatu padu.

    Pembangunan itu akan terletak bersebelahan stesen MRT Admiralty, di tapak tanah yang pada asalnya diperuntukkan bagi perumahan awam.

    Memandangkan sebuah tapak berdekatan akan dibangunkan bagi kemudahan awam, termasuk sebuah pusat penjaja dan pusat perubatan, HDB mendapati akan terdapat sinergi yang lebih baik sekiranya kemudahan itu, bersama apartmen studio dan kedai-kedai disepadukan dalam satu pembangunan, lantas memulakan usaha menyelaraskan projek itu.

    PENYEPADUAN INOVATIF

    Maka lahirlah Kampung Admiralty yang menyediakan pelbagai kemudahan demi memenuhi keperluan penduduk yang pelbagai. Ruang yang mencukupi juga diperuntukkan bagi memudahkan jiran tetangga berinteraksi, seperti pusat penjaja dan Plaza Masyarakat.

    Bahagian atas pembangunan itu akan menampilkan sebuah ladang masyarakat dan taman herba – untuk penggemar tanaman menyemai benih tanaman dan persahabatan.

    Sebuah taman masyarakat juga disediakan – bagi menjadi tempat berteduh, berehat dan bersenam.

    Apa yang menjadi nadi di setiap kampung dengan rumah dan tafsiran kampung moden HDB akan menampilkan dua blok apartmen studio, yang mempunyai ciri mesra warga emas seperti sistem mengeringkan pakaian di dalam dan di luar rumah yang boleh ditarik masuk, sebuah dapur masak aruhan dan lantai yang berdaya tahan.

    Dengan kemudahan seperti pusat penjaja, pasar raya, kemudahan perubatan dan jagaan warga tua terletak di sekitar Kampung Admiralty itu, penduduk lanjut usia akan lebih mudah menjalani gaya hidup yang cergas dan berdikari.

    Keperluan penduduk lebih muda di Woodlands juga akan dipenuhi di Kampung Admiralty.

    Sebuah pusat jagaan kanak-kanak akan dibina bersebelahan dengan kemudahan jagaan warga tua.

    Bagi memupuk hubungan lebih erat antara golongan muda dengan mereka yang berjiwa muda, sebuah taman permainan tiga generasi akan dibina di depan kedua-dua pusat itu, menyediakan ruang tambahan untuk masyarakat berinteraksi.

    KUASA MASYARAKAT

    Kampung Admiralty direka untuk masyarakat.

    “Kami harap penduduk akan benar-benar mempunyai rasa memiliki ke atas pelbagai ruang masyarakat untuk berhubungan dengan jiran mereka, mewujudkan semula semangat kampung yang bersatu padu serta rasa jati diri dan semangat kekitaan yang kukuh,” kata Timbalan Ketua Pegawai Eksekutif (Estet & Korporat), Encik Yap Chin Beng.

    Ia memerlukan lebih daripada strategi penggunaan tanah yang inovatif bagi membentuk masyarakat yang bertenaga di perbandaran yang direka dengan baik.

    Konsep rekaan yang dapat memudahkan usaha mempereratkan jalinan dan interaksi juga memainkan peranan penting.

    Sedang HDB berminat mengkaji, meneroka dan menguji strategi-strategi, hanya sebuah masyarakat yang bersedia dan terbuka dapat menghasilkan perubahan terbesar.

    “Semangat kemasyarakatan inilah yang akan menyuntik tenaga dan semangat, dan membentuk jiwa raga estet perumahan awam kita,” ujar Encik Yap.

    • Rencana ini kali pertama diterbitkan dalam ‘Dwellings, Harmonious Living at its Best’, sebuah penerbitan HDB.

     

    Source: http://beritaharian.sg