Tag: lifestyle

  • Cigarette Vending Machine Contradicts FairPrice Philosophy

    Cigarette Vending Machine Contradicts FairPrice Philosophy

    NTUC FairPrice was the first off the starting blocks with vending machines to sell and dispense cigarettes, even before the tobacco display ban takes effect (“NTUC FairPrice trials cigarette vending machine for tobacco display ban”; March 17).

    Its fast reaction to meet the new requirement, with its emphatic move to increase market share in this smoky business and break away from the pack, suggests that tobacco is a big revenue earner for FairPrice.

    Surely this is not “guided by the philosophy to do well in order to do good for the community” as promulgated on its corporate website, since tobacco kills thousands of smokers and passive smokers here annually.

    It is unconscionable for FairPrice, with its social mission, to not scale down its tobacco sales operations, which it is beefing up instead with a heavy investment.

    This runs counter to our national agenda to reduce the smoking rate.

    If this is not the case, we should hear from FairPrice whether its management has other noble intentions.

     

    This article written by Lim Teck Koon, was published in Voices, Today, on 22 Mar 2016.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Suicide and Heart Attack Main Causes Of Deaths Of Adults In Singapore

    Suicide and Heart Attack Main Causes Of Deaths Of Adults In Singapore

    Suicide and heart attack were the top causes of deaths among 15- to 49-year-olds here last year, accounting for 337 lives, while the top killer for those aged 70 and older was pneumonia.

    These figures, which did not go into greater detail, come from a global study published in The Lancet medical journal yesterday comparing causes of death and burden of disease in 188 countries between 1990 and last year.

    In that period, global life expectancy went up from 65.3 years to 71.5 years – though people in Singapore fared far better with women living an average of 84 years and men 79.7 years.

    The study was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, with hundreds of collaborators from around the world led by Professor Christopher Murray of the University of Washington.

    Prof Murray said collective action against potentially deadly infectious diseases such as diarrhoea, measles, tuberculosis, HIV and malaria has had a huge impact in reducing deaths.

    But he added that some major chronic diseases have been neglected and are becoming increasing threats to life, particularly drug disorders, liver cirrhosis, diabetes and kidney disease.

    In Singapore, deaths from chronic kidney disease and pancreatic cancer tripled between 1990 and last year. Pneumonia deaths also increased by 56 per cent.

    Associate Professor Reshma Merchant, who heads general medicine at National University Hospital, said pneumonia in the elderly is often due to dementia or frailty that causes difficulty in swallowing. She said: “Swallowing problems can have devastating health implications, including dehydration, malnutrition and pneumonia which affects quality of life and increases caregiver burden.”

    Deaths from congenital problems and asthma fell by 70 per cent and 39 per cent respectively.

    The study noted gender differences with far more men in Singapore dying from lung cancer and women from stroke. Last year, 953 men and 550 women died of lung cancer; and 1,449 women and 1,044 men from stroke.

    Dr Ross Soo, a senior cancer consultant at the National University Cancer Institute, said many studies show women with lung cancer do better than men – regardless of whether they have radiation or chemotherapy. He added: “The reasons for the gender differences are very complex and are not well understood.”

    At a global level, standardised for age, deaths from some cancers have fallen since 1990: lung by 9 per cent, breast by 18 per cent and leukaemia by 20 per cent. Deaths from heart disease and strokes have fallen by over 20 per cent.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Singaporean Man Living With HIV

    Singaporean Man Living With HIV

    It had started with a fever, rashes, then fatigue. When the symptoms persisted for weeks, alarm bells went off for Daniel.

    The 28-year-old homosexual man got himself tested for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. The results were positive.

    “Although I had previously gone for regular HIV testing at anonymous test sites, the diagnosis came as a shock because I was in a monogamous relationship at that time and I thought the risk was low,” said Daniel.

    Fortunately for him, timely diagnosis and treatment have helped him keep his condition under control. Currently working as a senior executive in the public sector, Daniel is able to live a normal life. Besides his day job, he also juggles part-time degree studies and volunteer work.

    THE NUMBERS IN SINGAPORE

    Not everyone learns about his or her HIV status early enough. There were 155 new cases of HIV infection among Singapore residents in the first six months of this year, showed the latest figures from the Ministry of Health. Nearly half (49 per cent) had late-stage HIV infection when they were diagnosed — an increase from 41 per cent last year. Currently, about 0.1 per cent of the population in Singapore is living with HIV.

    Dr David Lye, senior consultant at the Institute of Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology at Tan Tock Seng Hospital (TTSH), said people with a late-stage HIV diagnosis face a higher risk of death, even if they receive treatment as soon as possible.

    The virus, which is spread mainly via sexual transmission in Singapore, wreaks havoc on the immune system. It may eventually cause infections, cancer, memory loss as well as heart, liver and kidney diseases.

    The two biggest groups at risk here are heterosexual men who engage in casual or commercial sex, and men who have sex with men.

    SEEK TREATMENT EARLY

    A person with HIV is said to have Aids (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome) when his CD4 (a type of white blood cell) count is less than 200, said Dr Lye. This increases his risk of infections and death.

    On the other hand, people who detect their condition soon after the infection and start on HIV medication immediately can expect to have a normal life span. “Detecting HIV as early as possible and starting treatment early can preserve the person’s immune system. Adherence to treatment and medical follow-up ensures a healthy long life,” said Dr Lye.

    TTSH sees 70 per cent of HIV patients in Singapore. More than 95 per cent of patients on HIV medication are doing well, said Dr Lye. Stigma and misconceptions about the disease prevent at-risk groups from testing and seeking treatment early.

    Dr Lye shared that even with a HIV diagnosis, some patients do not seek treatment because they think they will not be able to afford HIV medication.

    “Medisave can help cover the costs of medication. For patients with limited resources, Medifund can provide coverage too,” said Dr Lye.

    People with HIV can use up to S$550 per month from their Medisave to pay for their HIV medication. The cost of medication can range from S$300 to more than S$800, depending on the individual’s condition, said Ms Lin Jingyi, a medical social worker at the Department of Care and Counselling at TTSH.

    Since September, anti-retroviral (ARV) drugs for HIV treatment have been subsidised for lower- to middle-income patients receiving treatment at public hospitals and institutions, as long as the drugs have been assessed to be clinically necessary and appropriate for treatment.

    MISCONCEPTIONS AND SOCIAL STIGMA

    A common misconception is that HIV is a death sentence or that treatment will fail after several years. That is not true if the patient takes his medication on time daily without skipping doses, said Dr Lye. These misconceptions, coupled with the immense social stigma of the disease, often cause newly diagnosed patients to bear the burden of the disease without adequate support.

    Ms Lin said HIV patients tend to live in secrecy because of the fear of stigma and discrimination. “Often, family members may have misconceptions, concerns and fears about HIV and its spread,” she said.

    Faced with family rejection, Daniel left home and, for over a year, struggled to come to terms with his illness, the side effects from the medication and dwindling finances without the support of his loved ones. He broke up with his partner shortly after the diagnosis.

    Thankfully, he had the support of his close friends, employer and colleagues. He also joined the HIV Orientation Programme and AGAPE Support group at TTSH, where he befriended people with HIV and learned to cope with the condition.

    At TTSH, every newly diagnosed HIV patient is referred to a medical social worker, who also counsels and educates family members about the condition.

    “Engagement of the patient’s family is important because family support can be a key determinant of how a patient would cope,” said Ms Lin.

    Today, Daniel is a peer mentor at the TTSH HIV Orientation Programme, where he motivates newly diagnosed HIV patients. His family has accepted his condition and asked him to move back to live with them.

    “The journey might be hard at first, but it will get better. There will always be a light for you in dark times, even when all the other lights go out,” he said.

     

    Source: http://www.todayonline.com

  • The Idolisation of Tolérance & Its abuse

    noorderossyedkhairudinsaga

    By Muhd Noor Muhd Deros.

    Recently our esteemed brother, Prof Syed Muhd Khairudin Aljunied, courageously wrote a couple of short postings that state the truth about homosexuality. It caught the attention of some LGBT students from the NUS whom later wrote a petition against him.

    This short writing of mine seeks to address one of the central argument that they and their likes have never failed to summon while trying to defend homosexuality, it is none other than the idea of Tolérance, or its new form; Recognition, as used in the petition.

    1. We have seen the idolisation of the word Tolérance and the destructions it brought during the French Revolution where it was given the status of a dogma and endowed with the sanctity of a religion together with its share of fanaticism and blind herds. During that time, those who were intolerant of their brand of tolerance were sent to the guillotine. It was and never is a neutral word nor does it bear any positive connotation in itself. Of course it can be and was already used as a tool for oppression.

    “It is preferable that we use the term (Tolérance) in its French orthography, since it was consciously conceived as one of the power instruments of the emerging atheist state following the French Revolution. It is a significantly irrational doctrine, while it poses as being the opposite. If examined, it is clear that it is a power instrument aimed at one group to subvert them to the value structure of the opposing group. In other words, it has a uni-directional dynamic. We mean by that, a doctrine of tolerance orders the accused group, “Tolerate us!” It contains in it no possibility of a reverse process by which the group demanding tolerance offer tolerance to the accused group.” – Shaykh Abdal Qadir As-Sufi.

    Hence, the act of tolerating or ‘recognising’ something in itself is not necessarily good. The main issue lies in the object of your tolerance. What are you tolerating?

    2. The dangerous appeal and the control power of the word Tolerance lies in its deep and subconscious attachment to the basic need of the human self, and that is the need to be accepted, which – like tolerance – is not necessarily good in itself. But whenever the word is summoned today, you can almost see its spell breaking through any defense mechanism of the mind and leaving it defunct.

    syed Khairudin

    We need to break its spell by being aware of its neutrality.

    3. We must know that it is perfectly fine to be intolerant of certain things and ideas. The health of the society is in danger when it becomes tolerant of everything as the body breaks down when it loses its ability to be intolerant to sickness. Even those who idolised tolerance or ‘recognition’ never failed to be intolerant towards those whom they perceive as a threat to their idol.

    But when I say that I can’t tolerate the idea of homosexuality it does not mean I can’t have a coffee with a homosexual while calling him to heterosexuality. We just need to grow up and leave either-ors to kids.

    4. As a person who believes in a Higher power who is conscious of Himself and all of His creations, free from any physicality and humanness, and that He sent prophets to guide human beings to spiritual happiness till the end of time, I would like to reiterate that The Islam of the Prophet Muhammad s.a.w – not the Islamic “Islam” – views homosexual inclination as a sickness that must be treated.  It is no different from incestual inclination, and that act of homosexuality itself is one of the most abhorrent sins.

    Some general suggestions from a Muslim’s perspective:

    • Re-inculcate the belief in The higher power that is Most Merciful and Compassionate yet Majestic in the same time. And that we are the created not The Creator, we are here not by ourselves nor are we a product of a random activity of an unconscious cosmic soup.
    • Punish child molesters severely.
    • Make marriage easy to those who are ready.
    • Women must be allowed to be women and men to be men. Homosexuality will emerge in a society whenever the economy forces the majority of the women to take up the responsibilities of men.
    • Protect the institution of marriage with the Divine law.

    5. Homosexuality is a cancer to the society, yes it surely is. This is an objective and unemotional statement. Unlike the term ‘hate speech’ used in the petition, it seeks to convey the scale of threat and destruction brought about by the homosexual lifestyle. Whereas the term ‘hate speech’ is a direct accusation to a person. If we are serious for a healthy debate we should avoid such jerky misconstructions.

    6. What we want is a healthy and a harmonious society, a society that is free from the stench of moral relativism and is built upon the firm belief that truth is not subjected to time & context, instead it is the other way round. Therefore we should stop demanding people to be tolerant of immoralities such as homosexuality.

    God knows best.

    Benjamin Seet
    khairulanwar
    Khairulanwar Zaini
    melissa tsang
    Melissa Tsang

    Source: Muhd Noor Muhd Deros

    Read the ENTIRE chronology of saga here: