Tag: malay

  • Singaporean Malays Must Reflect On PAP’s True Intentions For The Reserved Elected Presidency

    Singaporean Malays Must Reflect On PAP’s True Intentions For The Reserved Elected Presidency

    1.PAP says Singapore is a sworn Meritocracy. We are not like Malaysia with its affirmative action policy of helping the indigenous people of the land. Malays in Singapore are not like that! Malays in Singapore do not need handouts or any help. They can self-help!

    2. Lee Kuan Yew determines that the national reserves of Singapore must be secured with two keys: The Parliament and an Elected President (not a lame duck President like Sheares) even when GIC for which he heads which handles the biggest Sovereign fund of Singapore is absolutely controlled by him and is not required to publish any accounts. What is the dollar worth of our wealth? Only he and God knows. So such a move is really to shore up his absolute control over the Nation’s reserves. He thinks that an elected President from his own ranks will co-operate with that.

    3. Enter the Elected President who does not play ball, Mr. Ong Teng Cheong. First thing he did was to ask for a full audit of the National Wealth – He wants to know what is in the safe for which he is holding one key. The stone-walling and delay was legendary. Lee Kuan Yew does not want Ong Teng Cheong to know what is in that vault.

    4. The next elected President played ball to a tee and reap a million dollar salary without any incidents in a period when GIC made all sorts of investment blunders including investing in CitiBank which later got into trouble. But Nathan cannot live forever…

    5. And then there are others who dare to challenge and try out for the Presidential elections. One or two of these are mavericks that PAP cannot control. For as a Chinese elitist political party, no one can threaten the Chinese PAP but other Chinese. The Malay “leadership” have been unashamedly castrated and are little more than house-niggers to the Chinese PAP masters.

    6. So something needs to be done. Enter Lee Hsien Loong the proverbial son to hatch a “brilliant” plan. Confine the Presidential elections only to Malays. If you are Chinese or Indian or anything else you are automatically disqualified. Never mind Meritocracy. Never mind Non-Communal politics. Never mind the fact that this is what Malaysia’s affirmative action looks like. But not any Mat, Dollah or Minah can qualify! Set a criteria that only well to do Malays within or those close to the establishment can ever qualify and PAP will be secured. No such Malay will pull an Ong Teng Cheong move!

    7. Enter the foolish Malay who finds pride in all of these scheming political shenanigans. We are going to have a Malay president! How GREAT this is! What an achievement of the Malays of Xing Chia Poh!

    ***

    Thinking Malay-Muslims should reflect properly and consider whether they should be proud of this or really be shameful of a Malay who is for all intents and purpose appointed by the PAP to be made a tool of. Maybe for the one who has sold his or her soul that million dollar salary is all worth it.

    La hawla wa la quwatta illa biLlahil Aliy ul-Adzim!

     

    Source: Abd’ Al-Halim

  • Leon Perera: Abandon Reserved Elected Presidency, Return To Appointed Presidency

    Leon Perera: Abandon Reserved Elected Presidency, Return To Appointed Presidency

    We all want a President who can be a unifying symbol for all Singaporeans. But we disagree about the best means to achieve that end.

    In Parliament on 6 Feb 2017, DPM Teo suggested that in November 2016, I had supported measures to depoliticise Presidential Elections (PEs). In fact all the Workers’ Party MPs and NCMPs, including myself, had argued in Parliament for not having an elected President at all and reverting to appointed Presidents.

    DPM Teo alluded to my comments about a PAP MP who suggested political safeguards in PE campaigns. In fact, I said that it was to her credit that she attempted to address the politicisation risk issue, not that I agree with her proposed solution. I had argued earlier that day that Presidential elections inevitably become politicised.

    DPM Teo went on to say that because I am “not shy” to speak in debate and since I had not challenged his characterisation of what I said, that means I agree with it. It does not. Nowhere did I say that I supported an elected President with politicisation safeguards. I did not raise my hand a second time to challenge his characterisation of what I said because my colleagues and I had already made our views emphatically clear during the three days of debate – we support an appointed Presidency, not an elected one, safeguards or no.

    I reiterated my views in Parliament on 6 Feb 2017. For those who are interested, please scroll down below to read the excerpts, watch the clips and judge for yourself.
    —————————————————————————————-

    What I had said in Parliament on 9 November 2016 referring to a PAP MP’s speech was:-
    “My second question pertains to a question we have repeated a few times – what are the strategies that the Government has to mitigate the risks of politicising the unifying office of the Presidency? No doubt, that politicisation may not have fully materialised for the past EPs that we have, but there is good reason to believe in future Presidential elections, if let us say there are 10 candidates, and let us say the winner gets 5% of the votes or let us say the campaign ends up becoming bitterly partisan, the Office of the President could be politicised. I have not heard any strategy from any Member of the PAP on how this can be managed. I think Ms Rahayu Mahzam came closest to that. To her credit, she talked about tightening up the rules for partisanship during the Presidential election campaign. So, what would be the Government’s strategy to mitigate that? That is my second question.”

    This was DPM Teo’s reply to me at the time:
    “Turning to the risk of politicisation and the possible tightening of rules for the Presidential Elections. The risk of politicisation is there. I have addressed it explicitly just now in my answer. But I think what Mr Leon Perera suggests, and what the Commission suggests also, is to look at rules and the way that the Presidential Elections are conducted. I think there is merit and I agree with Mr Leon Perera there.”

    https://sprs.parl.gov.sg/search/topic.jsp…

    In my earlier speech on the Bill delivered that very same day, I argued for reverting to appointed Presidents. Here is an extract from that speech:-

    “Mdm Speaker, the Presidency, and I concur with Members who have talked about the importance of the Presidency, is the one precious unifying symbol of our national unity, above party politics. As a National Serviceman, I pledged my allegiance, as did many Members here, to the President and the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore, proudly. When we elect this office, inevitably, it becomes a proxy General Election…The Constitutional Commission, the Menon Commission recognised this. They had the courage to do so, and suggested that we cast our eyes back to the time when Presidents were not elected.”

    https://sprs.parl.gov.sg/search/topic.jsp…

    Here is the video clip of that speech. It makes clear that I am not calling for rule changes to Presidential Elections but for a reversion to appointed Presidents.

    http://www.channelnewsasia.com/…/leon-perera-s…/3275492.html

    On 8 November 2016, in responding to PAP MP and MOS Dr Janil Puthucheary, I said:

    “Firstly, and most importantly, we have argued that subjecting the office of the Presidency to an election runs the risk that that election will inevitably become a proxy General Election, will become politicised. As a result of that process, the Elected President that emerges from there with a mandate that is less than 50% will be seen in a political light and will, therefore, have his or her ability to unify the entire country severely curtailed…Can the President be a unifying figure, after being subject to an election that is vulnerable to the tinge of partisanship? …Our proposal actually saves the Presidency from the risk of this kind of politicisation.”

    https://sprs.parl.gov.sg/search/topic.jsp…

    Here is the video clip of my exchange with DPM Teo in Parliament on 6 Feb 2017:

    https://youtu.be/1Isvb5773MU

     

    Source: Leon Perera

  • Kalau Support Local Kenapa Take Support Anugerah?

    Kalau Support Local Kenapa Take Support Anugerah?

    Ada orang cakap jangan support artis Anugerah, artis realiti TV. Tapi suruh support local artis.

    Apa cakap ni? Budak Anugerah tu tak local ke? Apa orang daripada realiti TV bukan real artis ke?

    Ni tak marah, ni tanya… sebab aku pun daripada Anugerah.

    Berbual masih cara lepak KGC ok.

     

    Source: Aqmal Namasaya

  • Why Is Ong Teng Cheong Not Recognised As Singapore’s First Elected President?

    Why Is Ong Teng Cheong Not Recognised As Singapore’s First Elected President?

    The changes to the Elected Presidency (EP) scheme were passed by Parliament on Monday, 7 February.

    The Government have also announced that the next EP will take place in September 2017.

    This next presidential election will be a special one which is reserved only for Malay candidates.

    It is part of the slew of changes made to the EP scheme by the Government which claimed that it was concerned about there not being a minority-race president for an extended period.

    The changes ensure that this would not be so. If there has not been a minority-race president for five terms, the following EP election will be reserved only for minority candidates.

    The proposed changes had only been announced last year and were quickly debated in Parliament in November last year.

    Barely two months later, the changes are now in force and the next election will be reserved only for Malay candidates.

    Since the proposed changes were raised, some have expressed suspicion that they were engineered by the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) to bar Dr Tan Cheng Bock from running in September.

    Dr Tan had come within a whisker of defeating the PAP-approved candidate, former PAP minister Dr Tony Tan, in the 2011 election.

    Dr Tan Cheng Bock had last year announced that he would contest the next presidential elections.

    The Government, in the meantime, has said the changes are not to bar anyone, and that it was making the changes because of its concern that Singapore, being a multi-racial society, should be represented at the highest level by the different racial groups.

    While there have been many questions raised about the new rules, one in particular is worth delving further into.

    This has to do with the decision to designate the next election as a reserved one.

    Workers’ Party chairman and Member of Parliament for Aljunied GRC, Sylvia Lim, highlighted the issue in Parliament on Monday.

    “The Schedule sets out a table showing President Wee Kim Wee as the first President to be counted,” Ms Lim said. “Together with the subsequent Presidential terms of President Ong Teng Cheong, two terms of President SR Nathan and one term of President Tony Tan, these form 5 terms where a non-Malay President was in office.  Thus, the government reaches the conclusion that this year’s Presidential Election will be reserved for Malays.  This is a conclusion that has left Singaporeans bewildered and suspicious.”

    Indeed it has.

    The Government, which said it was advised by the Attorney General’s Chambers (AGC), had explained that counting should begin from President Wee because he was the first President to exercise the powers of an Elected President.

    “This advice was surprising and illogical to many Singaporeans, given that President Wee Kim Wee was never elected to office,” Ms Lim said.

    “Why not count from the first Elected President, Mr Ong Teng Cheong?” she asked. “Is it because if President Ong was the first one to be counted, we would have to go through this year’s election as an open election and risk the contest by Chinese or Indian candidates who may not be to the Government’s liking?”

    In his response, the Minister in the Prime Minister’s Office, Chan Chun Sing, said Mr Wee was the first president to exercise the powers under the elected presidency.

    According to news reports, Mr Chan doesn’t seem to have elaborated further on his argument, except to insist how the Government had no political intentions, and that in fact “the changes carried high political risk and cost.”

    “If this Government led by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong is for short-term political advantage, would we do it?” he asked. “Would we expend our political capital to do this?”

    Rhetoric aside, the Government’s position on why Mr Wee should be the starting point makes him, in effect, the first elected president because he had exercised the powers under the elected presidency.

    But such a view runs counter to earlier statements by Government ministers themselves, including former Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong, and the government-controlled media, who had all described Mr Ong as Singapore’s first Elected President.

    Let us take a short walk down memory lane.

    Way before the EP scheme became reality, former Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew, who had initiated the idea, “hinted” in 1985 “that Singapore might have its first elected President at the end of Mr Wee’s four-year term or, perhaps, earlier.”

    st85

    The Business Times, in September 1993, just a day before Mr Ong was sworn in as President, described Mr Ong as “the first elected president.”

    businesstimes

    In the Malay Berita Harian newspaper the next day, it said “History made: Mr Ong Teng Cheong has been sworn in as S’pore’s first [elected president].”

    tnp-93

    6 years later, in 1999, the Straits Times published a chronology of Mr Ong’s achievements, including: “1993: Mr Ong Teng Cheong wins Singapore’s first presidential Election..”

    st-99

    In 2002, upon Mr Ong’s demise, the radio station 93.8FM had this headline: “Former president Ong Teng Cheong, S’pore’s first elected president, has died..”

    tnp-02

    And even as recent as 2007, the Straits Times was still referring to him as Singapore’s first Elected President:

    st-07

    “Hwa Chong Institution now has student centre in honour of  Singapore’s first elected president, Mr Ong Teng Cheong.”

    And if you are still not convinced that Mr Ong was indeed Singapore’s first Elected President, here are two authoritative sources which might change your mind.

    First, there is the government’s own National Library website.

    Right the top of its “History SG” page is this headline, in caps:

    nlbotc

    “ONG TENG CHEONG IS THE FIRST ELECTED PRESIDENT OF SINGAPORE”.

    That is pretty unequivocal from the curators of our history.

    And second, here was what then Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong in 2002 said in his condolence letter to Mr Ong’s family:

    nlb02

    “As the first elected President, Teng Cheong had to work the two-key system…”

    So, there you have it.

    Singaporeans, the media and even the Government itself, had referred to Mr Ong as Singapore’s first Elected President many times the last 24 years since he was first elected.

    Mr Chan’s explanation on why it was instead Mr Wee who is being counted as the nation’s first Elected President is unconvincing at best, and totally disrespectful of Mr Ong, at worst.

    It also denies our own political and national history which, in fact, is plain for all to see. And not to mention it is also an utter repudiation of Singaporeans’ choice when they elected Mr Ong to be the first Elected President.

    All in all, a simple stroke of the pen to change our history is an act of betrayal.

    Mr Ong Teng Cheong presented himself to the people as a candidate, convinced them he could do the job and they elected him through the ballot.

    This, with all due respect to Mr Wee who himself was a very excellent president indeed, is what the ELECTED president is supposed to do, at a minimum.

    What Mr Ong has done as Singapore’s first Elected President resonates even today with many Singaporeans, especially when he stood independent from the rulers of the party he once belonged to, in carrying out his duty on behalf of Singaporeans.

    And because of his presidency, the EP went through many substantial changes and improvements as well.

    Mr Ong was Singapore’s first Elected President and the changes to the EP should take reference from his tenure.

    To conveniently sidestep his presidency, without any valid or convincing explanation, only fuels suspicion and speculation that the current Government has ulterior motives in pushing through the changes at such speed.

    In the end, it damages the credibility of the EP, especially the reserved EP, and this is not good for the country.

    Mr Chan needs to do better to convince Singaporeans that the Government has no ulterior agenda in not recognising Mr Ong’s presidency.

     

    Source: https://andrewlohhp.wordpress.com

  • Jufrie Mahmood: Malays Oppose Reserved Malay Elected Presidency Not For Racist Reasons

    Jufrie Mahmood: Malays Oppose Reserved Malay Elected Presidency Not For Racist Reasons

    If you are a non Malay and you oppose the amendments to the constitution to reserve the post of the Elected President for a Malay this time round solely because you don’t want a Malay to hold the post then you are opposing for the wrong reason.

    You may then be accused of being a racist.

    For your information many enlightened Malays also oppose the amendments but for different reasons. They hate the insinuation that they are unable to stand on their own merit and would end up having a PAP puppet for a president. We prefer a capable and fair minded person who is independent and can stand up for all Singaporeans, irrespective of his racial background.

    MOST IMPORTANTLY WE WANT A PRESIDENT WHO IS NOT BEHOLDEN TO THE RULING PARTY AND CAN SAY “NO” TO THE PAP SHOULD THE NEED ARISES. THAT IS THE DIFFERENCE. GET IT?

    MAJULAH SINGAPURA!

     

    Source: Mohamed Jufrie Bin Mahmood