Tag: Malays

  • Commentary: Weakening Position and Diminishing Role of the Malay Language in Islamic Education and Development in Singapore. Is that the case?

    Commentary: Weakening Position and Diminishing Role of the Malay Language in Islamic Education and Development in Singapore. Is that the case?

    Weakening Position and Diminishing Role of the Malay Language in Islamic Education and Development in Singapore. Is that the case?
    – A Personal Reflection

    “Dosa besar” or ‘A Major Sin’ – that’s how I’ve been made to feel whenever the Malay Language has allegedly been said to be the cause for non-Malay speaking Muslim to be alienated from learning Islam within the local context. And that’s how distasteful the Malay Language has been viewed by some Muslims. It’s been accused of creating social distance among Muslims, and of alienating non-Malay speaking Muslims. Perhaps, some Muslims here may not know how Islam came to Nusantara and how the Malay Language was the primary medium of instruction in the spread of Islam in this region. The Malay Language was THE UNIFYING LANGUAGE for Muslims in the Nusantara. But now, it has been flamed, blamed and shamed as the language that’s preventing non-Malay-speaking Muslims from learning Islam.

    It is indeed a reflection of changes within the Muslim Community in Singapore. Slowly but surely it seems, the significant role that the Malay Language used to play in Islamic learning is now becoming more diminished. It is said that the younger generation of Malays are more comfortable using the English Language than their Mother Tongue Language. It is said that more and more parents are reporting that English has replaced Malay as the preferred medium of communication at home. We are not sure though if such changes, if indeed true, have resulted in better scores in English Language by Malay students during exams. Are Malay students performing better in English language and less so in their Mother Tongue language?

    Personally, I see that the Islamic Education scene in Singapore is undergoing a transition from a predominantly Malay language based shifting more and more towards the English language as the medium of instruction in class, especially for the younger audience.

    Most, if not all, of the asatizahs teaching at such programmes come from our local Madrasahs where English has not been the main and primary medium of instruction. Arabic still feature highly in the local Madrasah scene. Despite that, we have witnessed more and more younger asatizah demonstrate better command of the English language. To many of them, English is a second or even third language, after Arabic and Malay. Granted that some of them started education at mainstream schools before joining the full-time madrasahs. Asatizah from such background may demonstrate better grasp and command of the English language.

    Generally, for centuries, Muslims in Singapore, as those living in Nusantara, have been attuned to using the Malay language in religious instruction and discourse. It is not about placing the Malay language on a pedestal and to sanctify its position as sacred.

    No. None of such things.

    Simply, the Malay language used to be the lingua franca of the region and perhaps for still many Malays in Singapore. And the Malay language has indeed been the medium for religious instruction since Islam came to the region. And for many of asatizah, it’s not surprising that they too received their own religious instructions early in their lives through the use of Malay language. The Arabic language become a must when they dwell deeper into the religion. To transfer that past Malay-Arabic dominated learning experience right away into the current English-dominated learning environment is no mean feat

    It is not easy. Not many can do the switch easily. It will take time.
    We are in a transition. Probably the current batch of students in the madrasahs would perform better in creating a 100% English language driven learning environment when they teach later in their lives.

    Demand for Malay language to be replaced by English as the main medium of instruction for Islamic Education for the younger generation seems to be getting louder. More and more Mosques and Private Centres are creating classes in Islamic learning in English to cater to the growing demand.

    Perhaps that demand for change from Malay to English language seems louder within the Malay community because it forms the bulk of Muslims here in Singapore.

    I still come across the Indian Muslim community here conducting their religious classes in their Mother Tongue language, despite some classes being conducted in the English language. In fact, religious instructions in many parts of the region are still being delivered mainly in the mother tongue. Regionally, there is yet a proliferation of religious instructions being conducted in the English language. Where there are, the speed is not as fast and furious as that found locally.

    With changing demography, with the growing presence of non-Malay speaking Muslims and a decline on the use of the Mother Tongue language among younger Malays, there is no denying the fact that there is certainly a need to have Islamic Learning delivered in English.

    Nevertheless, it would be a monumental task to expect and place delivery of such Islamic Learning classes in the same light and standard as lessons taught in English at mainstream schools. There are already loud voices demanding the same standard of delivery by Asatizah at Mosque as that at mainstream school. In fact, such voices have been around for quite some time now.

    And it’s not the case that nothing has been done about such demands. Asatizahs have indeed been sent for training at NIE to attain national level teaching competencies and accreditations.
    But it will certainly take time to see standards of delivery of religious classes using English as the main medium of instructions on par with those classes conducted in mainstream schools. It will take a bit more time. As of now, seeing the use of English language being toggled with Malay is only to be expected.

    Some have already expressed their angst that such toggling shouldn’t happen in the first place, and should not be tolerated.
    But to expect a generational learning experience to change suddenly from one language to another is something that don’t usually happen overnight in a social environment.

    Not many can do the switch in record time. Not many are as eloquent as Ust Noor Deros or Ust Mizi Wahid or Al Marhum Ustaz Zhulkeflee Bin Haji Ismail who have delivered religious instructions in the English Language almost effortlessly. To expect every Asatizah to be able to deliver lessons in English with such poise will definitely take time. The change will eventually happen insyaaALlah, but over time and not over night.

    Delivering religious instructions well in any language at all involves not only the transference of information or facts. It is also about resorting to the teacher’s own socio-religious experience in growing up, learning about and experiencing the religion itself. Not many can simply switch to an alternative mode, ie from the current predominantly Malay-Arabic socio-religious experience to the expected English-Arabic socio-religious milieu.

    This is not about buying insurance for the asatizah.

    Work is in progress (WIP). Many efforts have been done and will continue to be done to raise the standards of delivery of religious instructions across the board. And as in any WIP, there are hiccups along the way that need to be addressed.

    This brief write-up is also by means as attempt to sanctify the position of Malay language in Islam and its development locally. Instead, it is a witness to the possibly dying use of the Malay language in the socio-religious life, environment, experiences and learning of Muslims in Singapore, especially among the younger generations of Malays. (Could this be a research topic for anyone doing Masters or Phd?)

    And the ensuing online altercation of a recent outburst on the non-use of English language in a religious class (it was supposed to be a religious class conducted in English), it is also interesting to note that Malays are expected, subtly or otherwise, to abandon the use of their Mother Tongue language in their interaction with other Muslims in favour of the English language. That appears to be the line of argument taken by both Malay and non-Malay speaking Muslims online.

    This seems not to be the case for Muslims in the region, at least not among Muslims in Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Cambodia, Vietnam, and even China and Japan. (In fact, Islam came to China even earlier than it did to Nusantara, and the Chinese became Muslims earlier than the Malays.) The Mother Tongue languages in those countries still play an important role in the socio-religious life and learning among Muslims there.

    In summary, is it really true that we are witnessing a weakening of the position and diminishing role of the Malay language in socio-religious life of and leaning of Islam among Muslims in Singapore, unlike decades ago? Is it also true that the Malay language has become a cause for concern as far as local Islamic development is concerned, as it is being alleged to have created barriers for non-Malay-speaking Muslims to learn Islam and hence has alienated them from Muslims in Singapore?

    Perhaps these are plausible research questions worthy of consideration for a post-graduate work.

     

    Source: Mohd Khair

  • Malays Most Racially Discriminated Group In Malaysia, Says Former Minister

    Malays Most Racially Discriminated Group In Malaysia, Says Former Minister

    Contrary to what some may believe, Malays are the most discriminated race in Malaysia, Mr Zaid Ibrahim said on Tuesday (March 21).

    The former law minister said that while all ethnic groups in the country are prejudiced racially, none compare to the discrimination faced by Malays, especially on issues like khalwat or close proximity among men and women who are not married to each other or have no family relations.

    “Non-Malays are not only the victims. I think the Malays are discriminated too. You think khalwat laws are not discriminating against the Malays.

    “Most of the victims of discrimination in this country are Malays. Malays however unfortunately have low grade leaders leading them. They are taught false teachings or understandings,” Mr Zaid said during a forum on racial discrimination here.

    The DAP member however added that many Malays fail to see this as they are disillusioned by the current crop of leaders.

    “Discrimination happens to all of us. When a policy discriminates one, we have to take ownership

    “My greatest fear for this county is Malays being given a false sense of power, ownership of the country. They will not be able to see for themselves. The Malays will be left out,” Mr Zaid said.

    Ms Noor Farida Ariffin of the G25 civil group started by prominent Malay government pensioners who was also present, said that there were government institutions that undermined Putrajaya’s other efforts to promote racial harmony.

    She named the National Civics Bureau, popularly known by its Malay abbreviation, as an example.

    “Not only there is minor racism but there are institutions in government that covertly promoting racism.

    “BTN’s course is supposed to promote national unity but instead is promoting Malay supremacy,” she said during the forum.

    The former diplomat also said the National Economic Policy (NEP) was supposed to help the poor of all races, but instead was “hijacked” to promote a Malay agenda.

    “The NEP has been hijacked. It is supposed to eradicate poverty but it has only concentrated on the Malay agenda,” Noor Farida said.

    She added that though the Barisan Nasional coalition had formed a multiracial government, its component parties still played the racial card to garner voter support.

    “Racial politics are entrenched in the country. Political parties are raced based. The government is making efforts to stamp out racism and promote unity, but the main partner in the ruling coalition is promoting racism, day in day out,” Ms Noor Farida said.

    On Tuesday, a report was also released which found that discrimination based on the colour of one’s skin seems to be on the rise in Malaysia despite the government’s efforts to promote moderation and racial harmony.

    The Racial Discrimination Report 2016 by non-profit social outfit Pusat Komas found that strained ethnic relations are growing although the National Unity Consultative Council has been working to bolster ties.

    “Recent incidents of racial discrimination, racism and stained ethnic relations within the Malaysian society have increasingly surfaced over the years despite the Prime Minister’s numerous assurances and claims at home and abroad that the government promotes moderation in the country,” the report presented by programme coordinator Ryan Chua read.

    The report added that the growth of social media has also made the racial divide further with more room for such negative sentiments to be propagated.

    “The emergence of the Internet and social media platforms has provided more open spaces and platforms for widespread expression of racial sentiments and hate speech,” it read.

    The report was based on news reports on racial discrimination in 2015 and 2016. It also found that many Malaysians were critical of the authorities for their “lack of enforcement and actions towards overt and public declarations of racial sentiments” by groups perceived as racial supremacist.

    Among several recommendations, Pusat Komas urged the government to immediately sign and ratify the International Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination under the United Nations to promote equality among Malaysians.

    It also recommended harsher punishments for individuals, especially politicians, who make racially inciting statements.

    “The government must be willing to impose heavy legal and formal sanctions on any government Minister’s, senior officers, elected representatives, organisations and groups, individuals… who exhibit racist and discriminatory tendencies and in speech and action,” the report read.

    The report highlighted various cases of racial discrimination which happened over the past year which includes statements made by political figures like Umno grassroots leader Jamal Yunos and Perkasa president Ibrahim Ali.

     

    Source: Today

  • Preference Or Just Racist: Prefer A Non-Malay Baby Sitter

    Preference Or Just Racist: Prefer A Non-Malay Baby Sitter

    Too many Malay men sex abusing infants in Singapore? Like pedophiles?! I haven’t heard of one such incident in Singapore. As much as we’d like to think we are very multi-racial, everyday I still come across racism in Singapore. Be it finding a job or doing anything else, most Chinese people/employers always seem to play the race card. Pretty sick of this.

     

     

    Source: Nana Bruns

  • Commentary: Riding Is A Cheaper Method Of Transport But That Only Shows How Cheap Your Life Is

    Commentary: Riding Is A Cheaper Method Of Transport But That Only Shows How Cheap Your Life Is

    Hi

    Someone posted a bold comment about riding motorcycle in Singapore and relate to the BKE accident recently. In the post he criticise riders saying that ride motorcycle as a form of cheap transport. He say maybe there is a trend in singapore because like almost all riders are malay and told the malays to take care. He was a rider to a driver (car to lorries who cares) and realise that singapore roads are not for bikers.

    In the post:

    “i am a rider and driver from cars to lorries even class 4, i must say bikers are a pain in the ass (: thankfully i drive now. Lets face the fact that Singapore roads are never suitable for motorcycles.  Yes it may be a cheaper method of transport as compared to a car. However, that only shows how cheap your life is. so if you cant afford to drive, dont ride and just take public transport @ Yusuf norseni i dont know whats the trend going on in SG but it seems like many mlay are riders, please take care buddy. Lets pray for all the casualties and van driver, peace out”

     

    So, who is this guy think he is. All bikers are pain in the ass? All riders are malay? How bout your stupidity is the trending now. People can ride because of hobby and they want to spend the money on bikes. Why you have to mention one race when saying about all the bikers in sg? And from rider to driver means you right to criticise and look down at people who are riding bikes is it? No point you remove your fb.

    I have been riding in singapore close to 10 years now. From small bikes to bigger so i know how it feel as a biker here. I work despatch and delivery too. As a singaporean and malay and a rider, i really feel offended and angry.

     

    Salim

    Reader’s Contribution

  • Singapore Bishop Issues Advisory On ‘Gay Moment’ In Beauty And The Beast

    Singapore Bishop Issues Advisory On ‘Gay Moment’ In Beauty And The Beast

    Romantic scenes involving two male characters in the live-action remake of the Disney classic Beauty and the Beast have prompted an advisory from the head of the Anglican church in Singapore, calling on parents to “provide guidance to their children” on the movie.

    In a statement posted on the St Andrew’s Cathedral website on Sunday (12 March), Bishop Rennis Ponniah urged the faithful to be mindful of the “homosexual content” in the movie, which comes out during the March school holidays. Singapore’s censorship board has given the movie a PG (parental guidance) rating.

    “In this new live-action remake of the classic film , the character LeFou is portrayed as gay and a ‘gay moment’ is included in the movie by way of a sub-plot,” noted the bishop.

    “Parents are therefore strongly advised to provide guidance to their children about this re-make of Beauty & the Beast, and indeed to their children’s entertainment choices in a rapidly changing age.”

    Ponniah added that the Anglican Diocese and the National Council of Churches are working on a fuller advisory in the coming week.

    Beauty and the Beast has stirred controversy in the US, with conservative Christians calling for a boycott of the movie for its alleged pro-LGBT agenda.

    Source: Yahoo