Tag: Muslim

  • Indonesia Introduces Strict Anti-Gay Law, Gay Sex Punishable With 100 Strokes Of Cane

    Indonesia Introduces Strict Anti-Gay Law, Gay Sex Punishable With 100 Strokes Of Cane

    Strict laws against homosexuality have come into effect in the conservative Indonesian province of Aceh.

    Gay sex between Muslim men or women, both locals and foreigners, can now be punished with 100 strokes of the cane.

    The law, passed in 2014 but only now being enforced, has faced opposition by rights groups.

    The strictly Muslim province has become increasingly conservative in recent years and is the only one in Indonesia allowed to implement Sharia law.

    Under the new laws, adultery also carries a possible penalty of 100 strokes. Those who accuse someone of adultery without proof could themselves face 80 lashes.

    A man is caned for violating Sharia law

    “The law is to safeguard human dignity. It is to protect Aceh’s Muslims from committing immoral acts,” provincial Sharia chief Syahrizal Abbas told the AFP news agency.

    But Ismail Hasani, from human rights group the Setara Institute for Democracy and Peace, criticised the law as “cruel, inhumane and against the constitution”.

    Gay sex is not illegal in the rest of Indonesia.

    Aceh has allowed brought in its own laws ever since reaching an agreement with the national government in 2001 to end a separatist movement.

    The province has recently seen a deterioration in relations between the Muslim majority and smaller religious groups such as Christians.

    Churches have been destroyed in violent protests in recent weeks or have been demolished by local authorities who said they lacked proper permits.

     

    Source: www.bbc.co.uk

  • Osman Sulaiman: City Harvest Episode Shows Even ‘Man Of God’ Errs, Community Must Not Be Complacent

    Osman Sulaiman: City Harvest Episode Shows Even ‘Man Of God’ Errs, Community Must Not Be Complacent

    Generally, the Malay Muslim community placed their trust on MUIS to have the honesty, integrity and soundness of moral character managing funds and donations from the public.

    With the recent convictions of CHC leaders, it showed that even a ‘Man of God’ can err. Therefore, we should not be complacent and relinquish our moral duty just because all is well now.

    No system is perfectly safe. Without proper transparency and accountability, things might just go astray. There should exist within an organization, proper system in place to highlight any irregularities or suspicious activities.

    Stakeholders should not just care when something goes wrong. It should be done continuously to ensure rot has not been given a chance to fester.

    Questioning our religious leaders when we sense something is amiss, is not blasphemy. Although there are proper etiquettes to observe when doing so. It is part of our responsibility as a Muslim to always seek clarification.

    Hopefully we can learn some useful lessons from the CHC’s case.

     

    Source: Osman Sulaiman

  • Sangeetha Thanapal: City Harvest Church Incident Shows Double Standards In Which Islam And Christianity Are Held Accuntable

    Sangeetha Thanapal: City Harvest Church Incident Shows Double Standards In Which Islam And Christianity Are Held Accuntable

    What’s interesting to me in all this City Harvest stuff, is that no one is talking about this as a peril of Christianity. No one is using this as an example of how there’s something wrong with Christianity and Christians who are so easily misled and brainwashed.

    Compare this to any rhetoric on anyone who is vaguely brown and Muslim. It immediately becomes about Islam, a failure or inherent flaw in Islam and these Muslims who are so easily radicalized and brainwashed.

    As always, western religion when practiced by Chinese people gets a pass. They get to be people in their own right, not strereotypes to be made fun of.

     

    Source: Sangeetha Thanapal

  • Legal Action Threatened Against Rilek1Corner For 2014, Public-Submitted Information Article On Halal Practices At 89.7 Supper Club

    Legal Action Threatened Against Rilek1Corner For 2014, Public-Submitted Information Article On Halal Practices At 89.7 Supper Club

    On 27 May 2014, #Rilek1Corner published an article on halal practices concerning 89.7 Supper Club.

     http://rilek1corner.com/2014/05/27/89-7-supper-club-food-court-is-not-100-halal-certified

    The information contained within the article was received from a member of the public (informant) who used the moniker “Hamba Allah”.  “Hamba Alllah” had provided two attachments which contained a feedback to MUIS Feedback (dated 24 Apr 2014), as well as the response, from MUIS (dated 5 May 2014). These attachments were reproduced in full, in the article concerned. MUIS Feedback, as the recipient of the feedback in question, and the sender of the reply, can testify to this fact.

    Subsequently on 29 May 2014, we published a clarification from HalalDesk, a company that provides halal consultancy to 89.7 Supper Club.  http://rilek1corner.com/2014/05/29/halal-issue-halaldesk-clarifies-on-behalf-of-89-7-restaurant

    Neither the information from “Hamba Allah”, or the clarification from HalalDesk, were embellished or edited. As far as Rilek1Corner is concerned, we, as an online media platform, have given fair representation for both sides to state their case and address the facts. This is in line with our objective of serving the public, to be an independent online voice for the Malay-Muslim community.

    We regret to inform you that we recently received an email from Gomez & Vasu LLC (dated 21 Oct 2015), acting on behalf of 89.7 Supper Club Pte Ltd, demanding, the following:

    Gomez and Vasu LLC 1

    Gomez and Vasu LLC 2

    We will be taking down the two articles concerned within the next two hours. Nonetheless, this should not, in any manner, be taken as an admission of wrongdoing or guilt on our part.

    We are especially concerned with the demand to reveal information that may lead to the identification of the informant. This will, no doubt, undermine journalistic principles and integrity.

    We would like to assure you, our readers, that we continue to welcome information from our readers, so long as the information you provide is not baseless and falsely created with malicious intent.

    Rilek1Corner

  • Benjamin Netanyahu Distorts History, Claims Mufti Of Jerusalem Instigated Adolf Hitler To Terminate Jews

    Benjamin Netanyahu Distorts History, Claims Mufti Of Jerusalem Instigated Adolf Hitler To Terminate Jews

    REUTERS — Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu provoked controversy on Wednesday, hours before a visit to Germany, by saying the former Muslim elder in Jerusalem convinced Adolf Hitler to exterminate the Jews.

    In a speech to the Zionist Congress late on Tuesday, Netanyahu referred to a series of attacks by Muslims against Jews in Palestine during the 1920s that he said were instigated by the then Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini.

    Husseini famously flew to visit Hitler in Berlin in 1941, and Netanyahu said that meeting was instrumental in the Nazi leader’s decision to launch a campaign to annihilate the Jews.

    “Hitler didn’t want to exterminate the Jews at the time, he wanted to expel the Jews,” Netanyahu said in the speech. “And Haj Amin al-Husseini went to Hitler and said, ‘If you expel them, they’ll all come here.’

    “‘So what should I do with them?’” Netanyahu said Hitler asked the mufti, who responded: “Burn them.”

    Netanyahu, whose father was an eminent historian, was quickly harangued by opposition politicians and experts on the Holocaust who said he was distorting the historical record.

    Palestinian officials said Netanyahu appeared to be absolving Hitler of the murder of six million Jews in order to lay the blame on Muslims. Twitter was awash with criticism.

    “It is a sad day in history when the leader of the Israeli government hates his neighbor so much that he is willing to absolve the most notorious war criminal in history, Adolf Hitler, of the murder of six million Jews,” Saeb Erekat, the Palestine Liberation Organisation’s secretary general, said.

    “Mr Netanyahu should stop using this human tragedy to score points for his political end,” said Erekat, the chief Palestinian negotiator with the Israelis.

    Even Netanyahu’s defense minister, close ally Moshe Yaalon, said the prime minister had got it wrong.

    “It certainly wasn’t (Husseini) who invented the Final Solution,” Yaalon told Israel’s Army Radio. “That was the evil brainchild of Hitler himself.”

    It is not clear what sources Netanyahu was relying on for his comments. A 1947 book “The Mufti of Jerusalem” and a newspaper report at the time said a former Hitler deputy had testified at the Nuremberg war crimes trials that Husseini had plotted with the Nazi leader to rid Europe of its Jews.

    Husseini was sought for war crimes but never appeared at the Nuremberg proceedings and later died in Cairo.

    HISTORICAL RECORD

    But the point several historians made was that Netanyahu was distorting timelines and drawing false conclusions.

    The meeting between Husseini and Hitler in Berlin took place on November 28, 1941. More than two years earlier, in January 1939, Hitler had addressed the Reichstag and talked clearly about his determination to exterminate the Jewish race.

    “To say that the mufti was the first to mention to Hitler the idea to kill or burn the Jews is not correct,” Dina Porat, a professor at Tel Aviv University and the chief historian of Yad Vashem, Israel’s Holocaust museum, told Israel Radio.

    “The idea to rid the world of the Jews was a central theme in Hitler’s ideology a long, long time before he met the mufti.”

    Porat and others pointed out that the murder of the Jews began in June 1941. Even if the mufti wanted the Final Solution to be expanded, he wasn’t the one who came up with the idea.

    “For somebody who knows something about history and grew up in the house of historian Professor Benzion Netanyahu, he should know well,” Porat said of the prime minister. “But in my humble opinion, to say that the mufti gave Hitler the idea is wrong.

     

    Source: www.huffingtonpost.com

deneme bonusu