Tag: PAP

  • No Pay Increments For Politicians Over Past Three Years

    No Pay Increments For Politicians Over Past Three Years

    The sizes of politicians’ pay cheques have not changed in the past three years, although the salary benchmark for an entry-level minister last year was about 9 per cent higher than 2011 levels.

    Deputy Prime Minister and Minister-in-charge of the Civil Service Teo Chee Hean told the House yesterday the 2011 annual salary norm of S$1.1 million was kept because changes in the benchmark have been “moderate” — it moved up in two years and down in one, resulting in an overall annual increase of 3 per cent.

    While a ministerial salaries committee recommended the salary framework be reviewed every five years, Mr Teo said “we can continue to adjust salaries within this framework should there be a change in overall salary levels in the coming years”, given that things have been stable and the framework remains valid.

    He was responding to a question from Mr Edwin Tong (Moulmein-Kallang) at the Committee of Supply debate for the Prime Minister’s Office yesterday about how the framework proposed by the committee had been applied and how the benchmark had moved.

    The benchmark for politicians’ pay is based on the median income of the top 1,000 earners who are Singapore citizens, with a 40 per cent discount to reflect the ethos of political service, as recommended by a ministerial salaries committee appointed in May 2011 by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.

    This benchmark for an entry-level minister, also called the MR4 benchmark, includes all salary components including individual performance bonuses.

    The MR4 benchmark for last year was S$1.2 million, but the MR4 annual salary norm was kept at S$1.1 million, said Mr Teo.

    In January 2012, the ministerial salaries committee led by charity-sector veteran Gerard Ee had proposed linking the salary framework and National Bonus to the socio-economic progress of average and lower-income Singaporeans.

    Its recommendations, which were backdated to May 2011, included the removal of the pension scheme for politicians.

    Yesterday, Mr Teo said Singapore must continue to keep wages in the Public Service realistic and strike a balance between recognising the ethos of political service and providing a fair salary.

    This would ensure a flow of able and committed leaders into the Government, he added.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Khaw Boon Wan: HDB Flats Have Become More Affordable

    Khaw Boon Wan: HDB Flats Have Become More Affordable

    Public flats have become more affordable in recent years, with many Singaporeans able to buy a home within their budget, said Minister for National Development Khaw Boon Wan.

    To ensure that this remains the case for future generations, Mr Khaw said that the Government remains committed to quality housing that is within the reach of most Singaporeans.

    “Every generation will be able to afford their own HDB homes. This is our promise,” he said in the parliamentary debate on his ministry’s budget yesterday.

    Stressing the importance of home ownership, Mr Khaw said his ministry has achieved results in taming the red hot housing market. This was a hot topic in the 2011 General Election.

    Resale housing prices have risen by about 37 per cent since their low in 2009, while new flat prices rose by just 15 per cent without grants. With grants, new flat prices rose by just 6 per cent.

    — SOURCE: MND

    “Measured against the (median) household income increase of 38 per cent, we can see that public housing affordability has substantially improved since 2011,” he said.

    As for whether cooling measures will be lifted, Mr Khaw said that the property market is in transition and that the Government “should not overkill”.

    Mr Khaw also cited a recent Housing Board survey which showed that people were willing to pay up to $300,000 for a new three-room flat, and between $300,000 and $500,000 for a four- or five-roomer.

    In comparison, 90 per cent of new three-roomers last year were sold at below $250,000.

    For new four-roomers, 81 per cent were sold below $350,000, and 89 per cent of new five-roomers were sold below $450,000.

    “These are actual transactions. They paint a comforting picture of young Singaporeans being able to get their first BTO (Build- To-Order) flat, well within their expected budget,” said Mr Khaw.

    Home ownership has also been possible for the lower-income group, added Mr Khaw.

    From March 2012 to July last year, 1,491 families with household incomes below $1,000 had booked two-room or larger BTO flats.

    Yesterday, 24 MPs rose to ask about issues such as the affordability of housing. Ms Lee Bee Wah (Nee Soon GRC) was one of three MPs calling for the $10,000 income cap to be raised, while Mr Seah Kian Peng (Marine Parade GRC) and Mr Gan Thiam Poh (Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC) wanted flats with shorter leases for the needy.

    Mr Khaw outlined plans to help different segments, from singles to public rental tenants.

    Starting from May, half of all new two-room flats in non-mature estates will be set aside for singles, up from 30 per cent now.

    The Government will look for ways to help non-first-timers who want resale flats near their parents, as well as public rental tenants who aim to own a home.

    It is also prepared to raise the $10,000 income ceiling for public flats, as incomes rise, he said.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Today’s Young Singaporeans Will Be In Relatively Good Shape To Retire

    Today’s Young Singaporeans Will Be In Relatively Good Shape To Retire

    Singaporeans who work regularly and make prudent housing choices should have no worries in meeting their retirement needs through the mandatory Central Provident Fund (CPF) system, Manpower minister Tan Chuan-Jin has said, as he told the House that the retirement picture for younger Singaporeans was “relatively healthy”.

    He was addressing concerns that Singaporeans might not save up enough in their CPF accounts to meet the Basic Retirement Sum, now that they will be given more flexibility and options to use their CPF savings.

    Citing the example of a 25-year-old polytechnic graduate earning S$2,200 and assuming this CPF member works 32 out of 40 years, the minister estimated that this worker would have a nest egg of about S$55,000 by the age 65. With compounded interest earned in the Special Account, he would have about S$165,000 at age 65 – three times what was put in.

    “This is not magic – it is just basic mathematics and is a very conservative estimate because I did not account for any wage growth at all and whatever savings he has accumulated in his Ordinary Account after paying off his flat. And if you add those, clearly, he would have even more.”

    As he walked the House through a typical CPF member’s stages in life, Mr Tan said that at age 65, the member would have to decide whether to withdraw up to 20 per cent of his Retirement Account savings in a lump sum.

    The minister also announced that from January 2016, members will need to choose from among the three payout streams to subscribe to under CPF Life from age 65 – up from the current 55. They will also have to decide whether they want to start receiving CPF Life payouts at age 65, or between age 65 and 70.

    The Manpower Ministry (MOM) will also restore the contribution rates for workers aged 50 to 55 to the same level as younger workers, as employment rates for this age band have improved and are almost on par with that of younger workers, he said.

    During Monday’s Committee of Supply debate, MP David Ong suggested raising CPF contribution rates for workers above 55 to the same level as younger workers.

    But Mr Tan said the employment rate for those above 55 was still much lower than those who were younger, so it would not be prudent to raise contribution rates of this group too quickly. The higher rates would also put employers off hiring older workers, he said.

    To encourage the employment of older workers, Senior Minister of State Amy Khor said the government has launched an additional Special Employment Credit (SEC); employers who hire Singaporean workers aged 65 and up and who draw up to S$4,000 a month will receive up to 3 per cent of the monthly wage bill under this SEC.

    This is on top of the current 8.5 per cent SEC for hiring Singaporean workers above 50.

    The government is supporting employers in improving workplace practices so as to attract and retain mature workers, said Dr Khor, who added that the government is putting in place legislation to extend re-employment to 67 in two to three years.

    Employers should also tap existing measures available to put in place age-management practices, so that they can be better prepared to hire older workers, she added.

    Mr Tan urged CPF members to be prudent with their housing purchases, especially when buying or upgrading a property later in life.

    “I think it’s important to pay attention to this because older members may have to take on loans with shorter tenures, higher monthly instalments; they should also factor in any decline in CPF contributions as they age, which may mean that they may need to service their monthly housing instalments with cash on top of CPF.”

    In response to calls for more targeted help for non-working women with low CPF balances, MOM’s support for this group is two-fold, noted Mr Tan.

    Firstly, it has encouraged non-working women to rejoin the workforce, which has led to higher Labour Force Participation Rates (LFPR) among women; as a result, the difference in average CPF balances between men and women have started to narrow, he said.

    Secondly, with families remaining a pillar of support for women, the rules have been tweaked to make it easier for CPF members to transfer their CPF savings to their spouse’s CPF.

    He added that the government is providing attractive interest rates to encourage such transfers: from next year, those aged 55 and above can earn an extra 1 percentage point of interest for the first S$30,000 in their combined CPF balances.

    As for Ms Foo’s suggestion that such transfers be made automatic or require spouses’ joint consent before withdrawals from the Retirement Account, Mr Tan replied that those were ‘very personal decisions” and “best left to couples to decide”, as it would be intrusive for the government to intervene.

    MPs Zaqy Mohamed and Seng Han Thong asked how MOM was communicating the various changes to its members.

    The House was told that, under efforts in this direction, a guided one-to-one retirement-planning service to CPF members would be launched so they can get a better understanding of the various CPF options before making their choices.

    The ministry has completed a three-month trial project and will pilot a retirement-planning service in the second half of the year. The plan is to ramp up the service gradually from next year, with priority given to those turning 55, said Mr Tan.

    In his speech, he stressed that the fundamental principles of CPF will not change and that retirement adequacy remained the scheme’s primary objective.

    And while Singapore’s social safety nets for the vulnerable need to be strengthened, the government and the CPF system alone will not be able to solve all problems.

    “There is a role of collective responsibility – individuals, families, employers, social groups. We all need to step in to provide the assistance and support.”

     

    Source: www.businesstimes.com.sg

  • PAP Engineering A Subservient Middle Class

    PAP Engineering A Subservient Middle Class

    Every stable well developed first world country will have one common characteristic, a large and strong middle class. A strong middle class is the basic building block of a mature and developed economy and society. A strong middle class provides the consumption as well as the inputs needed to drive and sustain a country’s economy.

    I offer an alternative perspective to the author’s rendition of needs and wants.

    Needs are defined as a necessity for survival for every living creature. It is however not unique to the middle class or any class. Healthcare, safety, law and order, housing, education.. are universal requirements.

    Wants are the source of inspiration and motivation for a better quality of life for ones family. This is the basic DNA of humanity that drives its ability to create, innovate and progress a nation forward. Without wants, a state of mediocrity will exist.

    What the reporter Rachel advocates is that for the Singaporean middle class to accept mediocrity, and become the subservient workforce to support the PAP elitist policy of providing for themselves, super rich and rich. Such policies like the freeze on medical student intake remaining the same since the beginning of times, the removal of the recognition of law degree programs from overseas universities, the PAP propaganda to discourage our youth from pursuing higher education, the prejudice of university scholarships against our Singaporean youth. By denying the opportunities for advancement for our youth, the PAP government is once again engineering themselves to dominate over Singaporeans and to rule forever.

    Therefore as the subservient workforce forever doomed to a life of submission, the middle class should have no ambition for improving their quality of life, and therefore not harbour any desires for wants. Needs is enough for the middle class and for all Singaporeans, except the PAP and the rich.

    The PAP is saying to all Singaporeans to accept the life of mediocrity and serve the rich and elites.

    PAP has no credibility

    Comment appeared in TRE article: ST reporter says middle-class can’t tell ‘needs’ from ‘wants’

     

    Source: www.tremeritus.com

  • Tharman Shanmugaratnam: Budget Is For Future, Not For Getting Votes

    Tharman Shanmugaratnam: Budget Is For Future, Not For Getting Votes

    While some may be dissatisfied with certain aspects of government spending, budgets cannot be “all sweetness and light”, said Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam.

    The Government shapes the Budget in the interest of Singapore’s future and not to win elections, and this may involve some measures that are unpopular, Mr Tharman said, speaking at a dialogue with about 400 youths organised by the People’s Association Youth Movement yesterday.

    “You should be very worried if you have a government that disburses only nice measures … because that never lasts,” said Mr Tharman, who is also Finance Minister. When countries reverse policies, it is the poor who will be most affected and the Budget this year ensures the Government will not have to do that in years to come, he added.

    Mr Tharman’s comments echo earlier remarks he made when wrapping up the Budget debate last Thursday, when he said the Republic has to sustain a fair and inclusive society for generations, “not one election at a time”, as has been the case in the United Kingdom and other advanced economies.

    Yesterday, more than 30 questions were posed in the 90-minute dialogue on policies introduced in the Budget, including concerns about the SkillsFuture scheme, the Silver Support Scheme and the petrol duty hike.

    Mr Tharman said SkillsFuture, which will provide credits to Singaporeans for use in training and enhancing vocational education through better internships and paid apprenticeships, will not only help make Singapore a more competitive economy, but also enhance social mobility. This is because it will provide learning opportunities for all Singaporeans throughout their lives, regardless of their education qualifications.

    Mastery of skills is essential to keep Singapore competitive in the global economy and is possible regardless of one’s academic achievements, he said. Currently, learning is too “front-loaded” and involves too much “information cramming” and competition in the first 10 years of life. However, he said life beyond school is not a race, but a continuous discovery of one’s potential.

    “SkillsFuture is for everyone: Those who dropped out early, those who went to university, those who are in mid-career, those who already have a Masters degree … If you’ve got a university degree, after a while, frankly, it doesn’t mean very much. So it’s for everyone regardless of qualifications,” said Mr Tharman.

    Asked why the S$500 SkillsFuture Credit is not offered to Singaporeans before the age of 25, Mr Tharman said it is important for those fresh in the workforce to spend time learning on their jobs.

    While he acknowledged the value of developing multiple specialisations, particularly how synergies among different skill sets can lead to innovation, Mr Tharman said that mastery takes time.

    “To develop deep skills, you really need time … so don’t move too quickly,” he said.

    In terms of education and career counselling, the minister said it is important for those as young as secondary-school age to gain exposure to the real world. For older students, career guidance can be geared more towards specialisations and internships.

    Junior colleges should also explore offering some courses centred on applied learning, he said. “I think that provides a bit more fluidity because people don’t know for sure at that age if they are more interested in an applied pathway or a more conceptual route. So having a bit of both is useful.”

    Mr Tharman added that getting employers on board SkillsFuture is vital but also challenging, because many small and medium enterprises may not have sufficient resources to invest in training and development. He added that employers must also adopt an “enlightened attitude” towards training.

    “If we all keep thinking short term, we will be caught in a vicious circle, where the employer does not invest in the employee, and the employee as a result feels he does not have an important future in the firm and moves,” he said.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

deneme bonusu