Tag: politics

  • SDP: Elected Presidency Reforms A Distraction From Real Democratic Reforms

    SDP: Elected Presidency Reforms A Distraction From Real Democratic Reforms

    In 1993 when the government introduced the Elected Presidency (EP) bill, it gave a grand vision of how system was evolving into a more democratic one where there would be greater checks and balance.

    Then prime minister Goh Chok Tong even said that “In introducing this Bill, the present Government, is in fact, clipping its own wings. Once the constitutional amendment is effected, this Government will have some of its powers checked.”

    The truth was not quite as noble. Instead, many saw the move as Mr Lee Kuan Yew ensuring that Mr Goh, as the new prime minister, would not run off with the horse, so to speak. Following the introduction of the scheme, the late Ong Teng Cheong then became Singapore’s president from 1993-1999.

    Mr Ong actually believed Mr Goh that the EP was formulated to clip the Government’s wings. During his tenure, President Ong famously asked for the state’s accounts to be made known to him, to which he was told that the information would take 52 man-years to compile. Towards the end of his term, Mr Ong publicly complained of his “long list of problems” with the Government. He also announced that he would not seek a second term.

    Which was just as well because PM Goh revealed that although Mr Ong had sought a second term, the Government could not support his bid. Mr S R Nathan was chosen instead.

    Before he left office, however, Mr Ong told the public that some cabinet ministers and civil servants had treated his office as a “nuisance” and that the government had indicated that it did not need his approval in using the reserves to fight the Asian financial crisis that occurred in 1997.

    The very public spat prompted Mr Lee Kuan Yew to step in, upbraiding everyone for harbouring illusions about the powers of the presidency. He slapped down Mr Goh’s statement about the government clipping its own wings: “No, if you’ve to clip the wings, then you are in for trouble, you cannot govern…I cannot remember it but I would not have used that phrase because the executive powers of the Government should not be clipped.”

    Then in 2004, Mr Lee Hsien Loong introduced legislation to bypass the president when it came to the transfer of reserves to GLCs and statutory boards (see here), making the EP even more meaningless.

    The government is in the midst of reviewing the Constitution to pave the way for a president from the minority race. Only the very naive will fail to see the move for what it is – to ensure that the PAP’s candidate ascends to the office. The EP scheme degenerates into a deeper and bigger political farce.

    It is clear that the PAP has absolutely no intention of allowing its powers to be scrutinised and checked by anyone. Together with schemes like the Nominated Member of Parliament (NMP) and the Non-constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP), the Elected Presidency serves only to create the illusion of democracy in Singapore.

    What we need is a genuine democratic system where all political parties can openly and fairly contest for seats in elections overseen by an independent elections commission, where the mass media is not monopolised by the PAP, and where the civil liberties of the people are not curtailed.

    Only then can we hope to check the government and truly protect our reserves.

     

    Source: http://yoursdp.org

  • Osman Sulaiman: Zulfikar Shariff Is Not A Radical

    Osman Sulaiman: Zulfikar Shariff Is Not A Radical

    May Allah ease their worries in times of difficulties.

    Detained under ISA. No court appearance. No judge to determine whether he is guilty of whatever charges the gov thrown on them.

    As with all other ISD detainees, we will never know if they are indeed guilty.

    I know Zulfikar, Shamim and Saiddin personally. I dont think they are radicalised. Saddened by this event.

     

    Source: Osman Sulaiman

  • MHA: Political, Controversial Social Issues Should Be Decided by Singaporeans Alone

    MHA: Political, Controversial Social Issues Should Be Decided by Singaporeans Alone

    The Government has always taken the position that foreigners and foreign entities should not interfere in our domestic matters (“Clarity needed on ‘interference by foreign entities’” by Ms Corinna Lim; yesterday).

    Political and controversial social questions should be decided by Singaporeans alone.

    The Speakers’ Corner was established to provide a space for Singaporeans to express themselves, without requiring a permit, on the condition that there is no participation of foreigners.

    In line with this condition, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) is reviewing Speakers’ Corner rules to make clear that foreign entities should not fund, support or influence such events held at the Speakers’ Corner.

    We will adopt a practical approach.

    When this review is complete, the ministry will set out the parameters.

    The Government is committed to diversity and inclusiveness, and expects the same of businesses operating here with respect to their employees.

    However, advocating positions on Singapore laws and policies on socially divisive issues is an entirely different matter.

    That is a right that must be reserved for Singaporeans.

    The MHA statement of June 7 made it clear that this applies equally to those who advocate lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) causes, as well as those who oppose LGBT causes.

    Lee May Lin (Ms)

    Director

    Information Planning and Strategy

    Community Partnership and Communications Group

    Ministry of Home Affairs

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • WAAPD: Reject PinkDot & LGBT Agenda Through Intellectual, Policy Engagement, Not Violence

    WAAPD: Reject PinkDot & LGBT Agenda Through Intellectual, Policy Engagement, Not Violence

    Message from waapd admins In response to the recent post on violence.

    WAAPD is made up of a cross section of Singaporeans from all walks of life, belief systems, ethnicity, gender and creed.

    We were set up to discuss the attempt to promote a homosexual movement in Singapore. This movement is not part of our traditional family values.

    We are clear that our position is to reject the promotion of the homosexual lifestyle.

    We do not condone the advocacy of violence.

    As is expected in a group of thousands of Singaporeans, we will not know the inclination of every member.

    We would like to inform every WAAPD member that we will delete any post that promote violence as they come to our attention.

    We would also not hesitate to report such matters to the authorities and ban the member from the group if we believe a threat is real.

    WAAPD is a public advocacy group.

    PinkDot and the homosexual movement should be rejected through intellectual and policy engagement.

    We are confident that our members can come together and engage on that level.

     

    Source: Syed Danial in We Are Against PinkDot in Singapore

  • Activist: Malaysian Malays Still Cannot Accept Non-Muslim PM

    Activist: Malaysian Malays Still Cannot Accept Non-Muslim PM

    PETALING JAYA: The majority of those who responded to a survey conducted by social activist Fahmi Reza rejected the possibility of Malaysia having a non-Muslim prime minister some day.

    According to a Malay Mail Online report, out of 1,344 respondents, 39% said they could accept such a situation, while 31% said that as long as the prime minister was a Muslim, they would be agreeable to it.

    The other 30%, however, completely rejected the possibility of having a non-Malay premier.

    The one-day survey conducted on Fahmi’s Twitter account revealed the prevalence of mistrust among the Malays towards those of other ethnicities which he said portrayed Malaysians’ failure as a society.

    Speaking to the English news portal, he said the country’s education and political systems, which had increasingly become polarised based on race, were not helping the situation.

    “But at the same time, this problem exists because there is a lack of interaction and sharing among races and an in-depth understanding among ourselves in society.”

    Targeted only at Malays, Fahmi said he conducted the survey because he was interested in finding out their views over such a possibility.

    The graphic designer acknowledged that the results of his survey may be flawed as anyone could have responded to it, but said that was a trivial matter as the survey’s primary aim was to get the public speaking on the issue.

    It was also a follow-up to a previous question he posed on Facebook, asking his followers if they were prepared to openly discuss matters related to racial discrimination and racism, with those of a different ethnicity.

    “I posted this question because I wished there were more spaces and opportunities where these exchanges could really happen in real life, and not just on social media,” he said, adding that the poll was merely a starting point for open talks on the rarely discussed topic of racism.

    “I am actually planning to hold a few series of workshops about the issue of racial discrimination and racism that is intended to create a space and opportunity for this issue to be discussed openly by workshop participants from different ethnic backgrounds.”

    Public policy advocacy group Centre for a Better Tomorrow had on March 17, released the results of a survey it conducted last year where 60% of the 1,056 Peninsular Malaysians polled claimed they were not racist.

    Out of the 60%, half however said they would not vote for a candidate coming from a different race, while another 34% felt race-based politics was still relevant.

     

    Source: www.freemalaysiatoday.com