Tag: port

  • China Wants This Malaysian Port To Rival Singapore

    China Wants This Malaysian Port To Rival Singapore

    The Straits of Malacca have been a gateway for China for centuries in its quest for power.

    A story blended from Malaysian history and folklore says an emperor sent a princess called Hang Li Poto marry the Sultan of Malacca in the Ming Dynasty, offering a ship filled with gold needles. He also sent a blunt message. “For every gold needle, there is a subject. If you can count the number of needles, you will learn the true extent of my power”, the emperor reportedly said in a letter.

    Hundreds of years later, China is again seeking influence in Malaysia as it spreads its economic and military clout through South-east Asia. It is investing billions in a US$7.2 billion (S$9.8 billion) redevelopment that will see Malacca, long the haunt of Chinese traders, become a new deep sea port.

    It is also providing funds for infrastructure projects down the eastern seaboard of Malaysia, key heartland areas for Prime Minister Najib Razak ahead of an election that could be held this year. New roads and bridges may help him woo ethnic Malays, but the money could come at a long-term cost.

    “The closeness with China is an Achilles heel for Najib,” said Dr Mustafa Izzuddin, a fellow at the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute in Singapore. “While investment coming in will balloon government coffers and boost the economy, the opposition is using the China card to criticise the government for becoming too close to China and accusing it of selling Malaysia’s sovereignty.”

    China’s investment in Malaysia has risen since Mr Xi Jinping took power in 2012, with the president describing ties with Mr Najib as the “best ever”. Beijing is readying a state visit by Mr Xi to Malaysia in the coming months, according to three people with knowledge of the plans who asked not to be identified given the sensitivity of the discussions.

    China has committed to import goods worth US$2 trillion from Malaysia over the next five years (a nearly eight-fold jump from 2016 imports over that period), invest up to US$150 billion in the country and offer 10,000 places for training in China.

    Mr Najib brought home US$33.6 billion in deals when he visited China in November — the biggest haul yet between the countries — plus an agreement to buy four patrol boats from China.

    China has been Malaysia’s largest trading partner since 2009, displacing Singapore, with two-way trade last year valued at US$83.4 billion. China is Malaysia’s biggest export market.

    Malaysia, like Singapore, has strong historical links to China. About a quarter of its population is ethnically Chinese, and traders for centuries stopped at ports in Malacca and Penang to sell silk, tea and porcelain while buying cinnamon and nutmeg. There is even a fusion cuisine based on Chinese and Malay ingredients, called Peranakan or Nyonya.

    Chinese companies accounted for 8 billion yuan (S$1.6 billion) in construction projects in Malaysia in 2015, DBS analyst Chong Tjen-San said in an April report — nearly half the total value of projects clinched by foreign contractors.

    “We are going to be drawn into the economic gravity of China,” said Mr Steven CM Wong, deputy chief executive of the Institute of Strategic and International Studies Malaysia, at a conference on Mr Xi’s Belt-and-Road trade project in Kuala Lumpur last month. “Just as if you are in North America, you are drawn into the economic gravity of the United States,” he said. “This is not what we want or we don’t want. It’s just the way things are.”

    Still, the money risks being caught up in domestic politics. Mr Najib’s critics, including former premier-turned-opposition leader Mahathir Mohamad, say the country will need to cede influence to China in exchange for its money, and that local businesses will lose out.

    “Much of the most valuable land will now be owned and occupied by foreigners,” Dr Mahathir wrote on his blog in January. “In effect they will become foreign land.”

    Mr Najib, in an article published in May in the South China Morning Post before a visit to China, said that he made “no apologies for wanting to build world-class infrastructure for Malaysia that will, with local ownership being preserved, open up huge swathes of our country”. His office did not respond to requests for comment.

    Some analysts said Najib risks being painted as too close to China. While the countries both claim parts of the disputed South China Sea, for example, Malaysia has been mostly quiet on China’s military build up in the region.

    “There are perceptions that Najib is being bought by the Chinese,” said Professor Bridget Welsh, a political scientist at John Cabot University in Rome and author of The End of UMNO? Essays on Malaysia’s Dominant Party.

    “Within Malaysia, China’s interventions have the potential to bring about greater ethnic tensions and political instability, as well as affect Malaysia’s relationships with its neighbours,” she said.

    The Malacca Strait already has sufficient port facilities, according to opposition Selangor state legislator Teng Chang Khim. “Why can’t you make use of the present ports?” Mr Teng said at the Belt-and-Road conference.

    Deputy Secretary General for Trade Isham Ishak said the government would seek to balance its relationship with China.

    “We want to make sure that there’s fair value in terms of investments from China into Malaysia,” he said at the same conference. “It’s not only about Chinese products coming in, Chinese money coming in, and Chinese foreign workers coming in.”

    Investment in infrastructure is good for Malaysia whether it comes from China or the US, according to Mr Xu Bu, China’s ambassador to the Association of South-east Asian Nations.

    “Whoever comes to power that really doesn’t matter,” he said in a July interview. “Whoever comes to power in Malaysia, the leaders or the people in Malaysia they need investment.”

    Mr Harrison Cheng, a senior analyst with Control Risks in Singapore, said there were signs of unease in some quarters of Mr Najib’s United Malays National Organisation about Chinese investments.

    Still, UMNO’s core voters are more interested in bread-and-butter issues, he said. “There has yet to be any strong signs of a serious backlash within UMNO and the public.”

     

    Source: http://www.todayonline.com

  • Two Sites Here Named As Potential Terrorist Targets: SGX Centre And A Port

    Two Sites Here Named As Potential Terrorist Targets: SGX Centre And A Port

    Singapore was “specifically targeted” by terrorists in the past year, with jihadist publications and videos naming two sites as potential targets last October.

    This has resulted in the terrorism threat remaining the highest in recent years, said the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) in its first Singapore Terrorism Threat Assessment Report yesterday.

    It is understood that the targets mentioned were the SGX Centre and a port.

    A spokesman for the Stock Exchange did not confirm that its building was being targeted, but told The New Paper: “SGX takes physical security very seriously and constantly reminds our employees to remain alert and vigilant.

    “Over the years, we have stepped up our security measures and are in close contact with our regulator and relevant government agencies.”

    MHA also said security agencies had worked with the two sites to tighten security measures.

    While there has been no credible intelligence of an imminent attack, MHA said security agencies remain on “high vigilance” because of the “heightened” regional threat.

    “The public should continue to stay alert and be prepared,” it added.

    MHA said the most serious threat comes from Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) and its affiliates.

    With at least two known ISIS plots to attack Singapore,MHA said: “ISIS has demonstrated that Singapore is very much on its radar.”

    There is also the risk of attacks by those influenced by ISIS propaganda, with the authorities dealing with radicalised Singaporeans and foreigners in recent years.

    The report called radicalised individuals “a grave security concern” as attacks using vehicles and knives can happen anywhere.

    Nanyang Technological University Associate Professor Kumar Ramakrishna, coordinator of the National Security Studies Programme at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), said: “The lone-wolf vehicle attacks in London, Nice and Berlin showed that individuals can carry out operations wherever they are.

    “If you can drive a truck or a car, lives can be lost.

    “These are relatively low tech methods that authorities must pay attention to.”

    Another concern for MHA is the release of about 200 terrorist prisoners in the region over the next two years. “They may return to terrorism if they have not been de-radicalised,” it said.

    An MHA spokesman said: “Through this report, we hope Singaporeans will better appreciate the seriousness of the terrorism threat, and to be alert and prepared in the event of an attack.”

    The ministry will issue further reports when necessary.

    Dr Rohan Gunaratna, head of the International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research at RSIS, said: “Dynamic security measures, which involve constant changes, are the best form of security because terrorists are constantly surveying and can predict routine security measures.”

    Mr Gregory Tan, 57, a consultant at BSG Communications, said: “While the Government has prepared us well mentally with practices and rehearsals, nothing can prepare us for the loss of lives, the trauma and the damage caused when it does happen.”

     

    Source: http://www.tnp.sg/