Tag: private

  • Ngee Ann Poly Makes Police Report Over Blog Targeting Students

    Ngee Ann Poly Makes Police Report Over Blog Targeting Students

    Some girls from Ngee Ann Polytechnic (NP) who had posted on social media photos of themselves dressed in shorts, yoga pants, bikinis and dresses were horrified when they discovered that those images were reposted with lewd captions on micro-blogging platform Tumblr.

    Thirteen girls were affected. When NP found out about the blog, it lodged a police report.

    The blog, which targeted female students from NP, surfaced on May 10. The New Paper spoke to six victims, who confirmed they were from NP.

    A final-year student, 19, who found out about her reposted photos through a friend, told TNP: “The text that accompanied the posts disgusted me.

    “I am aware of how dangerous the Internet can be, but it is not a valid reason for sexual harassment under any circumstances.”

    She has since made all of her social media platforms private and deleted photos that could be considered mildly sexual.

    Another 19-year-old victim, who graduated earlier this year, said it is unnerving to know that NP was targeted.

    A 20-year-old final-year student who was also a victim said she e-mailed the user and asked him to take the photos down but to no avail.

    “We posted those pictures for fun, for our friends to see, not for some perverts to use our pictures and make offensive remarks about us.”

    Criminal lawyer Ravinderpal Singh of Kalco Law told TNP that such an act could be a crime. He said: “It is a breach of the Harassment Act and Section 509 of the Penal Code for the offence of insulting a woman’s modesty.” An NP spokesman told TNP that the school has lodged a police report.

    TNP contacted the person behind the blog on Tuesday but did not receive a reply. Yesterday, the blog was taken down.

    Chairman of the Media Literacy Council, Mr Lock Wai Han, said: “When posting on a website or account that is public, we should be aware that what we do and share is accessible to anyone, and avoid posting photos or other information that may be misused.”

    Clinical psychologist Carol Balhetchet said: “The culprit has a fetish and is victimising (the girls), and (the blog) encourages other people to follow in his footsteps.”

    The victims TNP spoke to said how they dress does not translate into them inviting such comments.

    One of them said: “Some of the girls on the page did not even dress in a revealing way. This clearly shows that it does not matter what we post, but what the viewer chooses to do with it.”

     

    Source: http://www.tnp.sg/

  • Pasir Ris One DBSS – Yet Another Development Under Fire

    Pasir Ris One DBSS – Yet Another Development Under Fire

    In what is becoming a recurring series of incidents, another group of homeowners of new flats are crying foul at the shoddy workmanship and design of their homes.

    The Online Citizen (TOC) understands that some of the owners of the new Pasir Ris ONE have just received their keys to their new homes which are located at the junction of Pasir Ris Central and Pasir Ris Drive 1, a stone’s throw away from the Pasir Ris MRT station.

    The 447-unit development is one under the Design, Build and Sell Scheme (DBSS), and consists of three-, four- and five-room flats.

    The purchase prices of these homes are reported to be between S$390,000 to S$470,000 for 3-room flats, and S$550,000 to S$670,000 for 4-rooms.  (See here.)

    The Pasir Ris ONE website lists the prices for 5-rooms as follow:

    comparisons-chart

    DBSS flats are supposed to come with better finishings and design, as buyers pay a premium for them.

    However, since owners had entry to their homes the last few months, it has emerged that the workmanship has left a lot to be desired.

    For a start, the corridors of the flats are so narrow that two persons can hardly walk side by side.

    When TOC measured the corridor of one block, it was precisely 1.2m wide.

    DSC_0456

    This is believed to be the minimum required by HDB and the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) safety rules.

    According to the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) website:

    scdf1

    Guidelines_HDB_1

    It is also worth noting that in a parliamentary reply in 2013 to a question of ensuring “clear passages along common corridors of HDB flats”, the Ministry of National Development said it was revising the clearance required from 1.2m to 1.5m, to provide for safety and rescue purposes.

    “To prepare for an ageing population and to provide wider access routes for people using mobility aids, BCA announced revisions to the Code on Accessibility last month.

    “The revisions include a wider minimum clearance width of 1.5m along corridors for buildings with plans submitted for regulatory approval on or after 1 Apr 2014.”

    Some of the gates at the main doors of opposite flats along the corridors are so close together that the gates almost touch each other when they are swung open.

    It is thus unclear how the homeowners of the Pasir Ris ONE flats would have the requisite allowable and safety space in their corridors if they were to, for example, place a shoe rack or a bicycle outside their main doors.

    Another curious placement issue is the way the gas vents have been installed on the ceilings along the corridors.

    DSC_0488
    Besides its questionable aesthetic design, is there also a safety issue here if an incident of leakage or fire should happen, especially with the narrow corridors?

    Besides safety, there are also concerns of security with how the flats are designed.

    Burglars or others with ill intention could gain easy entry into their homes through the air-conditioner ledges, for example, and enter the flats though the windows.

    Here is how it looks like, outside a ground floor flat:

    DSC_0460

    Here is another view:

    DSC_0491

    It would not be too hard for someone to climb to the upper floors through these balconies.

    And for some unknown reasons, TOC understands that the owners cannot make use of the entire ledge, although the floor area of the ledge is included as part of the size of the flat.

    And even over at the community barbeque pits, the design also came under fire, as one resident posted on the Pasir Ris ONE Facebook page on 4 June:

    bbqcomplaint

    TOC measured the height of the pit and it was about 1.3m high – from the ground to where the wire mesh would be. This would make it hard for anyone who is below, say, 1.7m to manage the barbeque.

    This writer – who is 1.7m tall – is pictured here at the pit:

    bbqpit

    When it comes to drying the laundry, the clothes rack isn’t something to crow about either.

    The rack is so small it can hardly dry any clothes; and also, the sun is blocked by the ledge above the rack which is presumably to prevent litter from the upper floors from reaching the lower ones.

    These would make drying your laundry quite a challenge.

    DSC_0462

    These are some issues which residents have with the external surroundings of the flats.

    What about the insides?

    Not much better.

    TOC understands that owners face many defects which need to be rectified.

    These include tiles in the living room which were either scratched, or have different shades of colour, or the groutings were poorly finished, while others have uneven flooring which need to be corrected.

    Some of the grilles at the balcony were also badly painted, and others had leaky pipes in the kitchen.

    The placement of the water heater in their kitchens is also another issue.

    When it is turned on, the heater can become a safety hazard, and it also contributes to warming up the kitchen when cooking is also in process because of the inefficient ventilation design.

    In the bedrooms, there were more defects – there were windows which took some effort to open, and toilet and shower doors were designed such that one has to close one in order to have enough space to open the other.

    And then there were the cracked tiles and poor grouting work.

    Some bedroom doors were also faulty, leaving big gaps between the door and the floor. There were also faulty window screws, window frames, door handles, chipped doors, bad wiring, dirty toilet bowls, and poorly installed floor tiles, among many other complaints.

    Some have complained that the master room, which is 15sqm, is so small it can barely fit a king-sized bed, leaving scarce room to walk.

    According to HDB rules, homeowners have one year to inform the developer of any defects.

    Pasir Ris ONE is a joint project between Sing Haiyi Group and Kay Lim Holdings.

    Homeowners have since created a private Facebook group  to highlight the flaws in their homes.

    Such problems in new developments have been reported  by new owners of other DBSS flats at the Trivelis in Clementi and Centrale 8 in Tampines in the last two months, along with several other groups of owners of build-to-order flats, such as in Punggol and Bukit Panjang, in the last few years.

    In its response to all these, the HDB said earlier in June that the defects were merely “surface imperfections.”

    “This is due mainly to the inherent features of natural materials or the nature of construction works that are dependent on manual labour,” a HDB spokesman said.

     

    Source: www.theonlinecitizen.com

  • Property Experts: DBSS Losing Its Relevance

    Property Experts: DBSS Losing Its Relevance

    Property experts say the Design, Build and Sell Scheme (DBSS) is losing its relevance and should be scrapped.

    The scheme was suspended in 2011, but came under the spotlight after recent complaints by residents over defects in their new DBSS flats. The Housing and Development Board (HDB) says the scheme is not currently its priority.

    One four-room DBSS unit at Ang Mo Kio gave its owner nightmares. Forty-five-year-old Ng Tong Seng had moved into the flat – which cost more than S$500,000 – in December 2012. Within weeks, he found numerous flaws, from bug infestation to cracks on the walls.

    It was a painful process for Mr Ng, who had to spend months getting the developer to rectify the defects.

    “The number of defects filed by the residents was a lot,” he said. “And they were having a difficult time catching up with all the work. We have about one year to get all these rectified by the developer and the developer took their own sweet time.”

    He said the HDB did not offer much help.

    “We are being left alone by authorities,” he said. “We bought the house under the ruling of HDB. They threw the rule books at us, but when we faced problems and approached them for help, they said, ‘Sorry, I can’t do anything’. So, that is frustrating. On one side, you try to govern me, on the other side, you can’t help me. So, I’m very confused about their rule.”

    Residents of the Trivelis DBSS estate in Clementi have also questioned HDB’s role in the scheme. About 500 of them have complained about problems such as rusty dish holders and flooding in the corridors.

    The housing board says it oversees the scheme, but under the sale and purchase agreement, developers must rectify defects reported by buyers within a year.

    HDB brought on board private developers to bring diversity and creativity to public housing designs, when it introduced the scheme in 2005. The condominium-like furnishings of DBSS units initially grabbed attention.

    But experts say the quality of Build-to-Order (BTO) flats has gone up.

    Associate Professor Sing Tien Foo from the Department of Real Estate at the National University of Singapore said: “I think the differentiation has become smaller. So, if the price differentiation is relatively big, it makes DBSS less attractive in that sense compared to BTO flats, because there’s still a price gap between BTO and DBSS flats.

    “So, we might see that the DBSS scheme may no longer be necessary in the near future. So, this is probably a good time to phase it out.”

    The scheme was intended to cater for the “sandwiched class”, which referred to those who could not afford private condominiums, but did not qualify for BTO flats because their income exceeded the qualifying ceiling, which was then set at S$8,000.

    However, analysts say prices between private and HDB units are narrowing, which means the scheme is losing its target group. Furthermore, the income ceiling for BTO flats was raised to S$10,000 in 2011, the same as that for DBSS properties.

    With not much difference in quality, they added that home buyers will be more inclined to purchase BTO flats, which are cheaper. This would lower demand for DBSS flats.

    Still, one expert says it’s better to suspend the scheme than scrap it totally.

    “Because we never know that, perhaps one day when prices start to escalate quickly again, there may be a need to bring back a scheme that is similar to DBSS,” said Mr Nicholas Mak, an executive director for research and consultancy at SLP International Property Consultants. “But I think in the next two or three years, the chances of it coming back are not high.”

    There have been 13 DBSS projects since the scheme was introduced.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Signs Higher Income Singaporeans Cannot Afford Private Housing

    Signs Higher Income Singaporeans Cannot Afford Private Housing

    Signs of mid-upper income Singaporeans not being able to afford private housing are emerging.

    Many Singaporeans are clamouring for the government to raise the income ceiling so they can buy public housing.

    Currently, households with a gross income of more than $10,000 are not eligible to buy new HDB BTO flats. Those earning more than $12,000 cannot buy executive condominiums (ECs).

    Lab researcher Tan Si Hui, 30, and her boyfriend have a combined income of $10,500, but they have failed in their past 5 BTO applications. “We don’t want to risk putting money into private property, especially with the rising cost of living in Singapore,” said Ms Tan. She and her boyfriend have no choice but to look for a resale HDB flat instead.

    However, resale HDB flats are not cheap either nowadays. The price gap between resale and BTO flats has been growing. According to government data, the price differential in the outside central region was 31% last year, up from 18% in 2004.

    Last week, during the Budget debate, some PAP MPs asked National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan to raise the income ceiling or remove it altogether.

    “The income ceiling is too blunt a tool, (it) does not take into consideration the circumstances faced by each family such as the number of dependants,” said MP Hri Kumar Nair.

    Mr Khaw disagreed.

    “I don’t think we want to lift the income ceiling completely,” he said, noting that HDB flats are “heavily subsidised” and are aimed at those who need help.

    Mr Khaw, of course, was talking about “market subsidy”, not “cost subsidy”. Till today, Mr Khaw has refused to reveal the construction cost of an HDB flat.

    However, Mr Khaw did hint that the income ceiling could be raised for more Singaporeans to buy HDB BTO flats. But he attributes this to the increase in income level.

    “As income level rises, we must be prepared to adjust the income ceiling,” he said, adding that he would mull over the income ceiling issue.

    The income ceiling was last raised in 2011, from $8,000 for HDB flats and $10,000 for ECs. Before that, the $8,000 limit had remained unchanged for 17 years.

    If Mr Khaw decides to raise the ceiling this year, it would reflect a change in 4 years, compared to the last change in 17 years.

    What does this show?

    What are the implications of such a change in a relatively short period of time, compared to the previous change over 17 years?

     

    Source: www.tremeritus.com

  • Private Toilet For PM Lee At Clean And Green Singapore Week

    Private Toilet For PM Lee At Clean And Green Singapore Week

    Dear The Real Singapore,

    I am a member of public who attended the Clean & Green Singapore 2015 event at CCK Lot1 on 8/11/14, organised by NEA. The event was graced by none other than our own PM Lee, as well as various other ministers and MPs. PM Lee then left the area after launching the event and taking a short tour around.

    After browsing the exhibits and games, I met up with my friend who was headed to the bus waiting area to wait for her transport. Now, after having had a long day walking and with a hip injury, she wanted to go to the nearest toilet. My friend headed to a small tentage area with a purple portable toilet inside, but was told by workers that they were locking up that toilet. It was meant for PM’s use only, and not for the public.

    She was then directed to the bunch of public toilets on the opposite end, which were further away. She managed to snap a picture of the toilet in question, and it was far better than the one she ended up using.

    From the photo, you can see that there is a beautiful potted plant, a mini-fan, full length mirror, air freshener, elevated seat as well as brand new toilet paper in the portable toilet cubicle.

    So I would like to pose a few questions here:

    1) Why does PM Lee require a special personal toilet all for himself when the other ministers, MPs and the public do not have personal toilets? You could say it is for his security, but then why is his toilet specially decorated and more spacious in contrast with the public’s?

    2) Why is this toilet not opened up for public use as it is in a more convenient location when waiting for the bus? PM has already left and there is no reason to lock it up to prevent others from using.

    3) Where is the funding for this personal toilet coming from? Is it worth the money to order a specially outfitted toilet for a single use? PM might not even use it at all!

    Of course, the worker in question might have had some miscommunication and misunderstanding, and not being there to see it first hand I cannot confirm that this is really the case as well. However, the fact remains that there was a special toilet which was not opened up to the public at the event site.

     

    Daniel L

    TRS reader

     

    Source: www.therealsingapore.com