Tag: Religious rehabilitation

  • Female Volunteers Play Key Role In Religious Rehabilitation Of Radicals

    Female Volunteers Play Key Role In Religious Rehabilitation Of Radicals

    When the Religious Rehabilitation Group (RRG) was officially formed in April 2003, it had only 11 members. All of its volunteers were male asatizah (religious teachers, advisers and counsellors), as the rehabilitation work at that nascent stage was concentrated on understanding and countering the radical ideology of Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) detainees.

    As religious counselling for the detainees and those under Restriction Order (RO) progressed, there was a realisation that their wives should be offered religious counselling as well. Acknowledging the religious and cultural sensitivities — as counselling is usually conducted one-to-one in a private setting — female religious advisers were invited to join the RRG in 2005.

    Despite the lack of religious counselling for the wives in the early years, the welfare of the detainees’ families was not neglected. Understanding that these families might experience emotional trauma and financial difficulties, the Aftercare Group (ACG) was swiftly formed in February 2002, shortly after the first wave of the arrests of JI members. The ACG comprised voluntary non-governmental organisations (NGOs) that provided a range of services including counselling, financial assistance, job assistance for detainees’ spouses and educational assistance for schoolgoing children.

    The assistance began from the period of detention and, if necessary, would continue even after the detainees are released. While the ACG provides material welfare support, the RRG focuses on the religious aspect of the rehabilitation programme.

    In February 2005, five ustazaat (ustazaat is the Arabic plural term for female religious advisers, teachers and counsellors; the singular noun is ustazah) joined the RRG. Their role is to provide emotional support and religious counselling to the wives of both JI detainees and former JI detainees under RO. Four more ustazaat have since joined the RRG, which currently has a total of 36 religious clerics among its members.

    Although the JI members’ wives were not detained, they should be equipped with a rightful understanding of the religion, as they might have been influenced ideologically by their husbands. With religious guidance, they will then impart the right teachings to their children and help to minimise the latter’s resentment.

    Engaging the families by effectively challenging the radical ideology and replacing it with the true understanding of Islam that teaches peace and moderation will also undermine their sympathy towards and support for extremism. The counselling process has yielded positive results over the years. Some of the wives have themselves requested religious counselling from the RRG.

    The religious rehabilitation and aftercare programmes offered are evidence that the community embraces the families as part of their own, neither discriminating against them nor stigmatising them. Most importantly, it is an effort to prevent a regeneration of extremists.

    The role of the ustazaat of the RRG is not confined to giving counselling. As part and parcel of the RRG’s effort in countering radicalisation, they are also involved in giving talks at seminars, forums and various other platforms on the work of the RRG and the threat of radical ideology. The RRG ustazaat play a crucial role in fostering social cohesion in Singapore’s multiracial and multi-religious society.

    CHALLENGES FACING RRG

    There are three key challenges confronting the RRG. First, the group needs to keep abreast of the changing terrorism landscape. After the two waves of arrests in 2001 and 2002, the JI network in Singapore was dismantled. Out of the 66 that have been detained since 2001, more than four-fifths have been released.

    As years go by, the threat of terrorism has changed from being Al Qaeda/JI-centric to one focused on the self-styled Islamic State in Iraq and Greater Syria (ISIS).

    In Singapore, two families had travelled to Syria to join the conflict. Several Singaporeans had also intended to travel to Syria or expressed interest in joining the fight. The RRG has been observing the ISIS phenomenon and studying its ideology so as to be able to counter it effectively.

    The RRG has, in fact, produced two public education pamphlets — The Syrian Conflict and The Fallacies of ISIS Islamic Caliphate — to raise awareness of the Islamic State threat and to debunk its self-proclaimed caliphate. The second pamphlet comes in English, Malay, Chinese and Tamil versions and these have been distributed to mosques. Several educational institutions have also requested them. In addition, the RRG has produced short video clips and posted them online to counter the ISIS narratives.

    Second, it is important to recruit young ustazaat as the RRG prepares for the next generation of clerics to continue counselling people radicalised by narratives such as that of Islamic State. Third, a small segment of the community remains sceptical of the RRG. To address this, it tirelessly conducts community outreach programmes to raise awareness of its work.

    In spite of the challenges, the RRG has not allowed the spirit of altruism of the group to wane. On the contrary, members have been even more motivated to carry on the voluntary work. The ustazaat find the counselling sessions rewarding, especially when they witness a positive change in the behaviour and thinking of the ladies they have counselled.

    They perceive their work with the RRG fulfilling on both the spiritual and patriotic levels. Spiritually, it is a form of da’wah (missionary work) and ibadah (act of worship). They are also aware that the RRG’s voluntary service contributes to preserving Singapore’s national harmony, stability and security. The inclusion of the ustazaat has strengthened the role and contribution of the RRG.

    Today, as the world faces the threat from ISIS, the RRG feels that it must continue its efforts to help counter its extremist narrative and inoculate Singaporean society, just as the RRG has done in the wake of JI.

    ABOUT THE AUTHOR:

    Nur Irfani Saripi is an associate research fellow of the S Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, and also a volunteer of the Religious Rehabilitation Group (RRG). This commentary first appeared in RSIS Commentaries.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Mufti: Credibillity Of Religious Authority Need To Be Earned, Open And Engaging Discussions Necessary

    Mufti: Credibillity Of Religious Authority Need To Be Earned, Open And Engaging Discussions Necessary

    Counter-messaging must be a key weapon in the fight against terrorism, yet it can be a difficult one to wield due to the myriad of factors fuelling the rise of extremism today, said speakers at a symposium yesterday.

    Speaking on the second day of the East Asia Summit Symposium on Religious Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Singapore’s mufti, Dr Fatris Bakaram, questioned if acts of terror could simply be attributed to a misinterpretation of religious texts.

    He also asked if radicalisation could be caused by a sense of disenchantment with the state, a rejection of the secular culture or a political agenda.

    “One could certainly add on to the list of questions, and I suspect the reasons are as multi-various as they are interlinked,” he added.

    Retired General John Allen from the United States noted that the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) is an “offshoot” of a series of socio-economic and political circumstances.

    “And unless we solve those underlying causes, Daesh (an acronym of ISIS’ Arabic name) will simply be … a symptom … ultimately, the coalition’s activity will not be cured,” said Gen Allen. He was appointed last September as the Special Presidential Envoy for the Global Coalition to Counter ISIL, a term by which the ISIS is also known.

    Gen Allen noted that the Internet has aided extremist operations in their global expansion, resulting in an “unprecedented generational challenge”, with young men and women able to fight for the cause from even their home countries.

    To fight terrorism, he said, we must “dominate the information environment” across different platforms and languages, with messages that contest ISIS’ “propaganda machine”.

    “(We must) take back the information sphere from Daesh and eliminate its pre-eminence.”

    Gen Allen added that a multi-pronged approach against terrorism must also involve efforts to clamp down on the movement of foreign fighters as well as the financial resources of extremist outfits.

    However, Dr Fatris stressed that messages must be crafted and conveyed by credible leaders, and noted that credibility had to be earned over time. “Our credibility as a religious authority is not a right … we (cannot) implicitly assume that people will listen to us … we are essentially partaking in a battle for the heart and soul of Islam.”

    He added that religious leaders cannot shy away from addressing “dark and difficult episodes of warfare and persecution”. Educating the young today is not simply about telling them what is right or wrong, he said. “It is engaging their learning process, hearing them … engaging them on ideas and letting them speak their minds.”

    Dr Rohan Gunaratna, head of the International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research at the S Rajaratnam School of International Studies, said there were more than 10,000 terrorist-related Facebook accounts, 47,000 Twitter accounts and more than 9,800 websites. “We need a point-by-point rebuttal of (ISIS’) justifications for using violence … you specifically question, show me in the Koran that this is permitted,” he said.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Open And Objective Analysis Of Multiple Factors Contributing To Religious Extremism Is Needed

    Open And Objective Analysis Of Multiple Factors Contributing To Religious Extremism Is Needed

    Alhamdulillah!

    Kudos to our Mufti for speaking up! TODAY reported:

    Speaking on the second day of the East Asia Summit Symposium on Religious Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Singapore’s mufti, Dr Fatris Bakaram, questioned if acts of terror could simply be attributed to a misinterpretation of religious texts. He also asked if radicalisation could be caused by a sense of disenchantment with the state, a rejection of the secular culture or a political agenda.  “One could certainly add on to the list of questions, and I suspect the reasons are as multi-various as they are interlinked,” he added.

    Yes! Yes! A VAST majority of ‘analysis’ by so-called ‘scholars’ of terrorism only want to focus on this ‘misinterpretation’. As if the fault lies in Islam and Muslims. Perhaps it would be opportune for these people to come out of the woodwork and do intellectually-honest pieces on the underlying causes of terrorism? Rather than flog the issue of ‘interpretation’ of religious texts alone? RSIS asatizahs and other myriad bunch of scholars?

    Mufti is absolutely right. One could certainly add to the ‘multi-various’ reasons for the phenomenon. Probably the most important being American foreign policy in the Muslim world.

    Which brings me to my next point.

    As usual, the so-called ‘terrorism expert’ must open his mouth. Rohan G said: We need a point-by-point rebuttal of (ISIS’) justifications for using violence … you specifically question, show me in the Koran that this is permitted,” he said.

    Typical. Flogging the same ol ‘misinterpretation’ issue. The hallmark of the intellectually bankrupt.

    Let me reply to Rohan’s question with a question of my own.

    What would Rohan do if he sees his own mother being blown up by a drone 10km up in the sky, with Uncle Sam acting as judge, jury and executioner? And then claiming its an unfortunate incident of mixed up intelligence and chalking it up as collateral damage?

    Once again, Well done Mufti! A man of multi-faceted talent and formidable communication skills.

    We expect more. A lot more.

    After all, one does not applaud Ronaldo or Messi for merely making a throw-in; or a world class tenor for merely clearing his throat.

     

    Source: Syed Danial