Tag: SDP

  • Chan Chun Sing In No Position To Criticise Chee Soon Juan

    Chan Chun Sing In No Position To Criticise Chee Soon Juan

    Yesterday, Minister for Social and Family Development Chan Chun Sing wrote a scathing letter to the Huffington Post about Chee Soon Juan claiming that he was a nobody in Politics in Singapore.

    Chan had taken issue with the fact that the Huffington post, which is a media not censored and controlled by the Singapore government unlike our mainstream media, had published two of Dr Chee’s letters which were critical of Singapore and he tried to make them understand that they shouldn’t continue publishing Dr Chee’s letters.

    In doing so, he highlighted all of Dr Chee’s “failures” including all the instances where he had been ‘fixed’ by the government to discredit him personally and professionally.

    See his full letter here: Chan Chin Sing: Chee Soon Juan is a Nobody

    In another separate letter to Straits Times, Chan Chun Sing, has gone even further to attack Dr Chee.

    He said that Dr Chee was a failure and he rebut Dr Chee’s other articles where he criticised the fact that Singaporeans cannot live on $1000 a month.

    Mr Chan insisted that Singaporeans who earn $1000 a month can afford a flat and benefit from many aid schemes including getting subsidies on healthcare, transport, education and utilities.

    Chan Chun Sing also attacked Dr Chee saying he had failed to win any elections and kicked out the former leader of his party Mr Chiam See Tong.

    It is interesting that Chan Chun Sing attacks Dr Chee for failing to win any elections as he himself also never won any elections.

    Chan Chun Sing was parachuted into parliament iin the walkover GRC of Tanjong Pagar on the coattails of Lee Kuan Yew.

    Mr Chan never won a single vote but Dr Chee had won many, just not enough to get into parliament. This is despite the mainstream media in Singapore continuously painting him as a madman and a criminal.

    For Mr Chan to bring up the “kicking out” of Chiam See Tong from the SDP as a character flaw in Chee Soon Juan, perhaps he should be looking at his own party and fellow MP in Tanjong Pagar.

    Back in the 1960s, Lee Kuan Yew also “kicked out” the main charismatic character in the PAP, Lim Chin Siong, by taking over the party. When Lim Chin Siong left the PAP and formed his own party like Chiam See Tong from the SDP, Lee Kuan Yew then him in jail accusing him of being a communist despite declassified British documents indicating that this was not the case at all.

    What do you think?

     

    Source: www.therealsingapore.com

  • Chan Chun Sing Criticises Chee Soon Juan In Reply To The Huffington Post

    Chan Chun Sing Criticises Chee Soon Juan In Reply To The Huffington Post

    SINGAPORE — Two articles by opposition politician Chee Soon Juan published in The Huffington Post have drawn a sharply worded response from Minister for Social and Family Development Chan Chun Sing, calling out the American news website for giving the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) secretary-general “considerable but undeserved attention and space”.

    The two opinion pieces, Without Freedom There Is No Free Trade and Free The Singapore Media And Let The People Go, were published on Nov 13 and Dec 11 last year, respectively.

    The articles criticised the Singapore Government for violating human rights through its trade processes and for its control over the media, which Dr Chee said “have put reason and
    intellectualism to sleep”.

    In the letter addressed to the site, Mr Chan did not address the opinions expressed by Dr Chee, but took issue with the website’s decision to publish the articles. “You perhaps believe he is a weighty political figure in Singapore. He is nothing of the kind,” said Mr Chan.

    Describing Dr Chee as a “political failure” who had stood for and lost three elections, Mr Chan said: “The party he now leads, the Singapore Democratic Party, was once the leading opposition party in the country. But that was when it was led by Mr Chiam See Tong, a man everyone in Singapore — political friend and foe alike — regards as honourable.”

    While it was Mr Chiam who brought Dr Chee into the SDP fold in 1992, Dr Chee later forced him out of the party. “Since then, the SDP hasn’t won a single seat in Parliament, although Mr Chiam went on to win elections repeatedly,” Mr Chan said.

    He also pointed out that while Dr Chee “likes to trumpet in foreign media”, the SDP secretary-general had been sued by ruling-party politicians and did not mention that he had been sued by Mr Chiam “because it is embarrassing”.

    Dr Chee’s dismissal from the National University of Singapore — where he was a psychology lecturer — in 1993 for misappropriating research funds and other misconduct, including secretly recording conversations with university staff, as well as his 1996 conviction of perjury by Parliament for submitting false statements all point to his failure as a politician, the minister said.

    “It is because of these and other failings that Dr Chee is a political failure — not because he was persecuted, as he likes to pretend (to be),” said Mr Chan.

    “His party is now one of the weakest political parties in Singapore principally because voters do not regard its leader as an honourable man.”

    Mr Chan noted that Dr Chee, who was disqualified from contesting the past two General Elections because he was declared a bankrupt in 2006 for failing to pay damages for libel to
    former Prime Ministers Lee Kuan Yew and Goh Chok Tong, has been campaigning to redeem himself in the public eye.

    “As he has done in the past, he has looked to the foreign media for redemption, chiefly because foreign journalists don’t know him as well as Singaporeans and he believes he can beguile them into believing he is the Aung San Suu Kyi of Singapore politics,” Mr Chan said.

    While Dr Chee has claimed that he has been forced to publish in foreign media as he has been silenced in local channels, Mr Chan noted that several sociopolitical websites in Singapore had run several articles by Dr Chee, while some of his letters had been published in the local press.

    “Dr Chee’s problem is not that he has not been heard by Singaporeans; his problem is that they have,” said the minister.

    The SDP was unable to respond as of press time.

    MR CHAN’S LETTER TO THE HUFFINGTON POST IN FULL:

    Your website has given Dr Chee Soon Juan considerable but undeserved attention and space. You perhaps believe that he is a weighty political figure in Singapore. He is nothing of the kind.

    Dr Chee has stood for elections thrice – and lost badly all three times, once receiving just 20% of the vote.

    The party he now leads, the Singapore Democratic Party, was once the leading opposition party in the country. But that was when it was led by Mr Chiam See Tong, a man everyone in Singapore, political friend and foe alike, regards as an honourable man.

    Indeed, it was Mr Chiam who brought Dr Chee into the SDP in 1992. He mentored the younger man and promoted him. Dr Chee then proceeded to betray Mr Chiam, isolate him and force him out of the SDP, a party that he had founded in 1980 and had nurtured over 14 years. Since then the SDP hasn’t won a single seat in Parliament, though Mr Chiam himself went on to win elections repeatedly.

    In 1993, Dr Chee was dismissed from the National University of Singapore for misappropriating research funds and for other serious misconduct, including surreptitiously recording conversations with university staff.

    He has been sued for defamation not only by ruling party politicians, a fact that he likes to trumpet in the foreign media, but also by the doyen of the opposition in Singapore, Mr Chiam, a fact that he doesn’t mention because it is embarrassing.

    And in 1996, Dr Chee and three of his associates were convicted of perjury by Parliament tor submitting false statements to a Special Parliamentary Committee. This is the equivalent of Congress convicting someone of perjury, a most serious offence.

    It is because of these and other failings that Dr Chee is a political failure — not because he was persecuted, as he likes to pretend.  His party is now one of the weakest political parties in Singapore principally because voters do not regard its leader as an honourable man.

    Dr Chee was disqualified from contesting the last two General Elections because he was declared a bankrupt in 2006 for failing to pay damages for libel to former Prime Ministers Lee Kuan Yew and Goh Chok Tong. He was discharged from bankruptcy in 2012 after the former Prime Ministers agreed to accept a reduced sum in damages. Since then Dr Chee has been campaigning to redeem himself in the public eye in preparation for the next General Election.

    As he has done in the past, he has looked to the foreign media for redemption, chiefly because foreign journalists don’t know him as well as Singaporeans and he believes he can beguile them into believing he is the Aung San Suu Kyi of Singapore politics.  Dr Chee, however, claims he is forced to publish in the foreign media because he has been silenced in the Singapore media.

    But this is false. There are several socio-political websites in Singapore, some with as wide a reach among Singaporeans as the Huffington Post has among Americans. They have run several articles by Dr Chee. The local press also has carried several of Dr Chee’s letters.

    Dr Chee’s problem is not that he has not been heard by Singaporeans. His problem is that they have.

    Sincerely,

    Chan Chun Sing

    Minister for Social and Family Development, Singapore

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • SDP Considering Contesting A GRC In Upcoming General Elections

    SDP Considering Contesting A GRC In Upcoming General Elections

    At the next General Election, which is due by January 2017, the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) plans to contest the same four constituencies that it contested at the last GE in 2011.

    But the opposition party, which does not have any seats in the current Parliament, has not ruled out contesting one more Group Representation Constituency (GRC) – possibly Tanjong Pagar. In 2011, the SDP contested two single seats – Yuhua and Bukit Panjang – as well as two GRCs – Sembawang and Holland-Bukit Timah GRC. It did not win any of the seats.

    The party’s Secretary-General Chee Soon Juan revealed the SDP’s plans as the party launched its election campaign on Saturday (Jan 10). When asked if he would contest the next election, Dr Chee said it has been a long time since he stood for election and it would be an “interesting contest this time around”. However, he added that it was “premature” to say where he would contest.

    Launching its party slogan, “Your Voice in Parliament”, the SDP said it will introduce its potential candidates at a pre-election rally in Hong Lim Park in October. The party also plans to release an economic policy paper in February and its manifesto in May. It also plans to unveil a town council management manifesto in June, which will spell out how the party plans to manage estates if it was to win in any of the constituencies it is contesting.

    Besides saying it would focus on the same constituencies it had contested in the previous GE, the SDP also said it intended to campaign on several policy ideas it had raised earlier.

    These included advocating the abolishment of Medisave, Medifund and MediShield schemes in favour of a National Health Investment Fund, and the introduction of a non-open market scheme for public housing which would see new flats being sold at a price which does not factor in the cost of land.

    The party is also advocating the scrapping of the PSLE, a point system for foreigners to qualify to work in Singapore and abolishing the CPF’s Minimum Sum scheme.

    Mr Chee expressed enthusiasm about the upcoming elections: “I’m excited about the prospect of leading the SDP into the next elections, excited about the opportunity of presenting our alternative vision to the people of Singapore, and excited that right now, we have the opportunity to effect change and take Singapore up a different path. One that is democratic, dynamic, just, equal and compassionate.”

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Chee Soon Juan In Wall Street Journal: A New Vision For Singapore

    Chee Soon Juan In Wall Street Journal: A New Vision For Singapore

    Singapore has made great economic strides over the 50 years since independence. With a GDP per capita of $55,000, the island state is, by this measure at least, the most prosperous country in the world. Yet rather than being proud of their country’s achievement, measures of social harmony and happiness indicate that Singaporeans are far from pleased with the status quo.

    Looking behind the numbers, it seems that Singapore’s economic success has wrought havoc on less measurable, but no less important, aspects of life: Freedom, compassion and equality. It is the degradation of these values that has contributed significantly to Singaporeans’ disenchantment with the current system.

    Even before the Reagan-Thatcher era of neoliberal economics, Singapore adopted a market-driven approach in which even value systems and social life were commodified. When the government wanted fewer births in the 1970s, it paid women to undergo tubal ligation. When it changed its mind and wanted more births, it gave tax incentives to couples to have more babies. When it wanted the children to demonstrate strong character, it rewarded their desirable traits with cash.

    Monetizing things that we shouldn’t—especially under circumstances where societal values are involved—leads to harmful outcomes. It causes citizens to abrogate moral responsibility and devolve decision-making to market norms set by the elite few.

    We need to fundamentally rethink how we pursue wealth and, more importantly, to what end. We need to ask that all-important question that Harvard philosopher Michael Sandel so trenchantly posed: What price do we pay when we cede our values to market mechanisms?

    Unfortunately, without democracy Singaporeans cannot have a national debate on the future direction of our country. Talk about political freedom and the rights of the people is eclipsed by government threats that democracy undermines GDP growth.

    And yet Singapore is in danger of being left behind. A survey of countries around the world reveals a distinct shift towards more democratic forms of governance. Many such political transitions have yielded greater, not less, prosperity. Adaptation to change is necessary for societies to keep themselves relevant in the global community. Singapore is no exception.

    The island republic needs an alternative vision, one that will confidently usher Singapore into the next phase of development: Privately owned small and medium-sized enterprises, instead of state-owned conglomerates, need to be the prime drivers of growth; the wage structure should ensure that the working poor don’t see their real incomes shrink even as the number of billionaires rise; the elderly should not have to work menial jobs just to feed themselves; the media must be free from state control; and, most importantly, the political system needs to change to allow truly free and fair elections, where the political freedoms of Singaporeans are respected.

    Singapore is at a crossroads. How the country moves forward will depend on the choices that the people and their leaders make today. The incentives that those in power build into the system will determine whether the country progresses or stagnates. To that end, the ability of Singaporeans to question authority and to build a capacity for collective reasoning and debate is essential.

    It is shameful that we live in a state where market values guided by an authoritarian system trump moral ones guided by a democratic process. The danger is that we become blinded by the things we want and ignore the things we really need. Ultimately a nation’s success is not measured by the size of its GDP but by the number of minds it unfetters, the number of young lives it gives hope to and the number of poor it empowers. It is this kind of wealth, the kind that really matters, that Singapore must accumulate.

    Now more than ever, we need a genuine conversation about Singapore’s future. Indeed, we need a bold new vision for the country.
    * Written by Chee Soon Juan, Secretary-General of the Singapore Democratic Party.

     

    Source: http://online.wsj.com

  • SDP Working The Ground In Sembawang GRC

    SDP Working The Ground In Sembawang GRC

    “I thought Lee Kuan Yew said nothing is free?” an elderly resident pointed out when we visited the Sembawang GRC on Sunday. “Then why Lee Hsien Loong giving out this and that? Like he’s very scared like that.”

    He was referring to the recent announcements of goodies that the Government made.

    “Yes,” we agreed, “the Government is obviously feeling the pressure. But it’s important to remember that it is the opposition that is constantly speaking up that the PAP feels it has to react.”

    It is certain, however, that after the elections the PAP will find ways and means to collect back what it gave out before the elections.

    The only way to stop this is to ensure that the next Parliament has SDP MPs in it. We will ensure that the Government genuinely takes care of the people rather than employ such cynical and unworthy ploys.

    The SDP will be vigilant and push for policies that will make life for the people less stressful and enhance the quality of life in Singapore.

    The PAP must not continue to squeeze Singaporeans just so that it can boast that we have huge reserves and then pay its ministers million-dollar salaries.

    The greater the strength of the SDP, the less the PAP will bully the people.

    On the matter of the MPs in the GRC, a few residents told us that they hardly see their MP Mr Ong Teng Koon. “He’s not very involved with us,” one commented.

    On the other hand, residents’ reactions to our work and presence has been encouraging.

    This is because the SDP has been visiting these constituencies consistently in our walkabouts, house-visits and kopi sessions since the last elections in 2011.

    The exciting news is that we will increase our tempo in 2015 as the next GE draws nearer. We will be announcing our plans soon.

     

    Source: http://yoursdp.org