Tag: Singapore

  • Interview With Tharman Shanmugaratnam: I Wanted To Be A Sportsman

    Interview With Tharman Shanmugaratnam: I Wanted To Be A Sportsman

    Hockey, football, cricket, athletics, volleyball, sepak takraw, rugby… you name it, he has played it. Studies were not high on his priority list and he certainly harboured no ambitions of being a medical professional like his father.

    Studying medicine required arduous effort, so he decided to steer clear of it. “Studying medicine would have required time and academic effort, and I didn’t have that at the age of 17 or 18. I was completely disinterested in my studies at the time, and was put off by the fact that medicine would require six years of hard study,” he said.

    So it was in sports that Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam diverted his energy. Hockey held a special place in his heart and the Anglo-Chinese School (ACS) boy went on to represent Combined Schools.

    “At that time life was simpler and less competitive. There wasn’t a need for us to spend a lot of time on our studies. My aim was to put in minimum effort to get to the next level, and spend time on my sports. But I really enjoyed my youth,” Mr Tharman, 58, said.

    Anaemia affected his heart

    His sporting pursuits came unexpectedly to a standstill when he was diagnosed with a very severe case of anaemia when he was 17, which also affected his heart. Having to abandon his ambitions in sports was, as he put it, the “biggest setback in my life”.

    Doctors initially thought he had a hole in the heart, but after anaemia was diagnosed, he had to consume 25 pills a day for several nutrients that his body was not absorbing, for more than four years before he recovered. The big downside for him was having to scale back his sports life. But he was still able to play for the premier hockey league for Singapore Cricket Club and Singapore Recreation Club.

    Looking back, he said sports taught him tremendous discipline.

    “As someone who took sports seriously, you had to put a lot of effort into it, week after week, year after year. For some reason, I didn’t use that discipline in my studies at the time. But the discipline was somewhere there in the mind, and became useful later,” he said.

    Having been forced to pay less attention to sports because of his health, his interest turned to reading.

    “I started reading more. I had a very strong interest in social issues after my pre-university years, so my reading was mainly about society and politics. I became quite driven by an interest in society.”

    Mr Tharman considers himself fortunate that his parents allowed him to be himself and never told him which career path to choose.

    “In those days we didn’t have a lot of career advice or career counselling. I had done economics in A levels and although I did double mathematics, I decided I wasn’t going to go into engineering. But I never had a job in mind, no ambition in terms of career.”

    Early professional life at MAS

    He eventually did well enough in his A levels at ACS to secure a place in the London School of Economics and graduated with a BA in Economics. He later went to Cambridge University to do his master’s in Economics. It was much later, when he was with the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), that he took up an MAS scholarship to study Public Administration at Harvard University.

    He spent most of his early professional life at MAS where he was the managing director and is grateful to have worked under “some exceptionally good leaders in the civil service such as Mr J.Y. Pillay andMr Lim Siong Guan”.

    Politics came naturally to him and he was elected MP for Jurong GRC in 2001, going on to serve as a Minister in Education and Finance, among several other portfolios. He is currently DPM and Coordinating Minister for Economic and Social Policies.

    “I actually enjoy politics, both as a Member of Parliament and as a minister. Part of the reason is because I was always interested in politics from my student days. I spent a lot of time on student activism when I was in the UK.

    “I also enjoy chatting with people, listening to them and trying to figure things out with them. You must enjoy it. If you don’t enjoy politics, it can be a chore, or a cloud in your mind. But if you enjoy it, it keeps you going. Everything becomes an opportunity to help someone, an opportunity to understand an issue better so that we can find a solution, or do something novel in the community.

    “So it’s very important to enter politics for the right reasons. We must enjoy serving, enjoy being with people, working with them and immersing yourself in a community.”

    Mr Tharman noted that working in education was the most meaningful part of his career. “I really enjoyed working with teachers and principals, who were so well motivated. It is a tremendous asset to have a well-motivated teaching force. People who themselves are willing to learn new skills, and to shape changes in the school, so they can do the best for their students.

    “Whatever change you are thinking of, whether you are introducing computers in primary schools or changing the literature curriculum, we have to adapt the pace and nature of change around our teaching force. Their ability to absorb and to shape change in the school is critical.

    “You can’t impose things from the top. That’s the key ingredient in a successful education system – the quality and motivation of our teaching force. I found it very rewarding, but it is also very different from other vocations because you have very little certainty of success in what you set out to do. You will know only years later whether we truly get the outputs we desire, whether we get socially responsible people, innovative people in each new generation.”

    Hectic schedule

    Mr Tharman has a very hectic schedule and often works late into the night. Finding time for his family can be challenging. He is married to Ms Jane Yumiko Ittogi, a lawyer by training, who is currently actively engaged in community work and in the non-profit arts sector. They have a daughter and three sons.

    “My children have adopted their own sleeping habits, which also has meant sleeping later and later. We all keep in touch via WhatsApp now. A couple of my children are based overseas and so we share jokes, pictures and messages through WhatsApp. We try to find every opportunity we can to spend a bit of time together.

    “Despite the fact that they went to SAP schools, they have developed a set of friends of different races. They have Malay and Indian friends. They just felt that they wanted it that way.”

    Children too love sports

    As parents, Mr Tharman and his wife encouraged their children to take their CCAs seriously and develop their own interests. But they left it to their children to decide on their interests, and to let them evolve naturally. For example, the children have taken an interest in culture on their own. Daughter Maya took up Indian classical dance when she was younger.

    “I just trust them to find their own way, and make the most of life. We cannot force them in one direction or the other.”

    One thing all his children have in common is their love for sports. Much like himself, Mr Tharman pointed out with a laugh.

    “My father told me at the end of my Pre-U years that I have to find my own way in life. And that is my attitude as well towards my children.

    “Encourage them in whatever they are doing. Let them do what they enjoy. Encourage them to take it seriously, whatever it is they enjoy, and trust that they will find their own way in life. You have got to trust them.

    “The signals we send our children are extremely important. Respect the things they want to do, and are enjoying. That is how we can develop people who are imaginative, who do something different.”

    Mr Tharman also re-emphasised the importance of life-long learning, the need to develop new interests which may arise midway through life and how SkillsFuture was created to address this issue. “As we go through life, everyone is going to require some renewal in skills, and to refresh ourselves. That’s what SkillsFuture is about. Some people will take some time off from work to study again, some others will continue working but learn while at work, as well as outside work. Whichever way, it should be made as convenient as possible for everyone to keep learning. That is a very exciting possibility: to maximise the potential of every citizen through life. You can’t just achieve it through education in the early years,” he said.

    Asked how he would like to be remembered,Mr Tharman replied: “As someone who worked with others, his colleagues and grassroots leaders, to make a better society, with hope for every individual. We each can only do so much in our short span of life. You’ve got to do the best you can. If I can be remembered as someone who served Singaporeans well, that is enough reward.”

     

    Source: http://news.asiaone.com

  • Forcing Racial Rotation For Presidency Is Racist And Anti-Meritocracy

    Forcing Racial Rotation For Presidency Is Racist And Anti-Meritocracy

    I welcome the proposal by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong to tighten the criteria for the Elected Presidency (“Key changes to refresh political system”; Jan 28).

    But I believe it is superfluous to force a rotation among the races for the Elected Presidency. Such a policy also assumes inherent racism, as it presupposes that the Chinese majority in Singapore would not elect a minority candidate to the Elected Presidency even if he or she were the best candidate in an election. It assumes that minorities in Singapore are so incapable that they require such affirmative action in order to be elected. It is saddening that after more than 50 years of nation-building, such attitudes could persist in our society.

    Such a system will also shut out highly qualified persons simply because they are of the wrong race. Enforcing minority representation for the Elected Presidency flies in the face of Singapore’s policy of meritocracy, as it will no longer be about choosing from among the best and most qualified candidates because of the rigidity of such a system.

    Moreover, the pool of qualified persons from minority races is naturally smaller, due to their smaller numbers. This may increase the likelihood of walkovers and reduce the strength of the Elected President’s mandate, in an era when Singaporeans are used to exercising their right to vote in elections. The competitiveness of the election is reduced.

    On Thursday, Member of Parliament Rahayu Mahzam, who is Malay, said in Parliament that “we would like to see representation from our community, but we want Malays to be chosen because he or she is the best, and not because of his or her race”. As we move beyond our first five decades of nation-building, we should refrain from enacting policies based on the crutch mentality that minorities will always need a helping hand because of their race.

     

    This view by Dennis Chai Hoi Yim, was published in Voices, Today, on 30 Jan 2015.

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Leon Perera: WP Working Within Flawed System To Bring About Democratic Progress

    Leon Perera: WP Working Within Flawed System To Bring About Democratic Progress

    Just finished the debate in Parliament on filling the vacated NCMP seat. Most of the People’s Action Party members of the House were present for this particular debate. Over the past few days, when the House debated national issues and Parliamentary questions, the attendance often dipped to 30 or 40 (or less). Interesting priorities. Please read the text of the PAP’s amendment to our motion. It speaks volumes about their approach to politics and Parliamentary debate.

    I was asked me why I accepted the NCMP position if I opposed the NCMP scheme as bad for Singapore in the longer-term. I believe the NCMP scheme serves the PAP’s interests by enabling it to ask voters to vote only for the PAP to entrench the current one party hyper-majority in Parliament. It is fully elected Opposition MPs who assure political balance. But, as Mr Low Thia Khiang explained (amidst occasional laughter from the PAP MPs), we need to work within a flawed system, one that keeps getting changed and “refreshed” by the ruling party.

    Why do we do this? To do whatever we can to help build a democratic society. In the 1960s, the Barisan Sosialis left Parliament in protest at what they saw as unjust policies. We choose to stay and work within the system, in spite of its many unfair aspects and challenges. A democratic society has to be fought for, step by step and brick by brick.

     

    Source: Leon Perera

  • PAP-Proposed Amendment To NCMP Bill Tabled By WP Passed, WP Abstained From Voting

    PAP-Proposed Amendment To NCMP Bill Tabled By WP Passed, WP Abstained From Voting

    Parliament yesterday approved a motion tabled by the Workers’ Party (WP) to transfer its Non-Constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP) seat offered to losing Punggol East candidate Lee Li Lian to Associate Professor Daniel Goh — but not before a heated debate, lasting almost two hours, and with amendments made to the original motion by the Government Whip and Minister in the Prime Minister’s Office Chan Chun Sing.

    A clause was inserted to the motion to state that Parliament “regrets that Ms Lee Li Lian, having stood as a Workers’ Party candidate and received the highest vote share among all losing opposition candidates, has now decided to give up her NCMP seat to another candidate from her party with a lower vote share, contrary to the expressed will of the voters. And that the WP supports this political manoeuvre to take full advantage of the NCMP seat, even as its secretary-general criticises NCMPs as just duckweed on the water of the pond”.

    The amended motion was passed by Parliament, despite the objections to the additional clause by the eight WP MPs — including its two incumbent NCMPs Mr Leon Perera and Mr Dennis Tan. All the WP MPs abstained from the final vote on the amended motion.

    During the debate on the motion, the PAP and the WP locked horns on the spirit of the NCMP scheme and had strong words for each other.

    The PAP MPs — Mr Chan, Punggol East MP Charles Chong and Nee Soon GRC MP Lee Bee Wah — charged that the WP was trying to game the system despite openly criticising the NCMP scheme. They also took aim at WP chief Low Thia Khiang’s comments on Wednesday — in response to changes to the NCMP scheme — where he likened an NCMP to “duckweed” as he or she does not have roots in a constituency, unlike an elected MP.

    In response, Mr Low — who was joined in the debate by Mr Perera, Hougang MP Png Eng Huat and Aljunied GRC MP Sylvia Lim — called the ruling party a “hypocrite” for downplaying fundamental differences between elected MPs and NCMPs.

    In proposing the amendment, Mr Chan said the motion “must reflect the truth”. “My party (PAP) will support the filling of the last NCMP seat according to the rules … We have recognised that the WP has continued to criticise the system, but yet deliberately made use of it to the hilt for their political advantage,” Mr Chan said.

    Referring to comments made by Ms Lee in turning down the NCMP seat — Ms Lee had said she wanted to give this chance to her WP colleagues — Mr Chan said: “The honour and privilege to join this House is for service to our nation. It is not for us to showcase ourselves. It is not for us to showcase our party talents. If we do that, we come in with the wrong end in mind.”

    Mr Chong, who edged Ms Lee out in last September’s polls, called for a review of the NCMP scheme to ensure that it is not abused. It is not intended for opposition parties to “pick and choose” which best losers to enter Parliament, he said.

    Objecting to the amendment tabled by Mr Chan, Mr Low said there is “no basis” to say the motion was a political manoeuvre. “It is provided under the law that since Lee Li Lian has not taken up the seat, Parliament can decide to fill the seat, and I have moved the motion to allow Parliament to decide.”

    All four WP MPs who spoke pointed out that Parliament had moved to fill a vacancy left by WP candidate M P D Nair back in 1984. The seat, which was offered to Mr Tan Chee Kien of the Singapore United Front, was ultimately left vacant after Mr Tan also turned it down.

    While the party remains opposed to the NCMP scheme in principle, said Mr Low, it recognises that having one more seat in Parliament can contribute to the debate and “possibly better policy outcomes”. “There is no contradiction, make no mistake about it. That is the spirit of the WP in wanting to work the system by respecting the law,” he said.

    Singapore Management University law don Eugene Tan said he was surprised by the PAP’s “tactically shrewd” move to let the WP fill the NCMP seat. “What they have done … is they facilitated WP having its complement of three NCMP seats, but they also took the opportunity to show up the WP for their inconsistent stance on and instrumental use of the NCMP scheme,” he said, adding that the WP would be shooting themselves in the foot if they voted against the amended motion.

    National University of Singapore political scientist Bilveer Singh noted that historically, the WP has in principle objected to the scheme and yet, it has produced the most number of NCMPs. The amendment sought by the PAP was “to signal to the public that the WP is not upfront on the issue”. However, Associate Professor Singh doubted that the matter will be a major dent on the WP. “Eventually what matters is what the three NCMPs of the WP do in Parliament … as the WP’s pouring of cold water on the scheme is a more-than-30-years-old story,” he said.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

     

  • Maarof Salleh: Don’t Be Taken In By Rahayu Mahzam, Nothing Will Change

    Maarof Salleh: Don’t Be Taken In By Rahayu Mahzam, Nothing Will Change

    When MP Rahayu Mahzan again raised the tudung issue in her maiden parliamentary speech, I cannot but be a bit more cynical in asking whether this is again a new ‘sandiwara’, and not a serious effort, in trying to persuade the national leadership to review its position on the subject.

    The fact is the subject has been there long before Rahayu been recruited into politics, with so many dialogues and debates. But the position of the government has remained unchanged.

    Like some others, I too feel such an unchanged position cannot but raise other related questions. Whether we (the national leadership and the Malay Muslim community) really understood the issue and did not react wrongly out of the misunderstanding or misperceptions of the issue? Whether those responsible for the task to explain and clarify on the issue have really done their work without fear and favour? If every possible explanation have been made why there have been no change in the leadership position in this issue?

    While Rahayu’s re-raising the issue is refreshing, it is the sentiment of many that it will be yet another sandiwara in which the issue will pop up now and then, but no happy ending can be expected.

     

    Source: Maarof Salleh

deneme bonusu