Tag: Singapore

  • Youths Will Be Careful With Votes

    Youths Will Be Careful With Votes

    First-time voter Tan Yu Jun, 22 is excited about casting his first ballot. The economics undergraduate and West Coast GRC resident says: “I feel privileged to have a say in the direction Singapore will be taking.”

    Law undergraduate Ian Low, also 22, and who lives in Tanjong Pagar GRC – which saw a walkover in GE2011 – agrees: “I finally have the right to suffrage, and I have a say in who governs my country.”

    This year, there will be an estimated 245,500 young voters aged from 21-25, most of whom will be voting for the first time, and 220,700 voters aged 26-30, according to the population census figures of citizens as of June 2014.

    Of the 25 first-time voters Insight spoke to, issues like the accessibility of education and social welfare are what they would like to see politicians address on the hustings.

    Part-time relief teacher Francoise Lee, 23, who lives in Hougang SMC, appreciates the education policies that have allowed her to earn a degree in sports science and management. But business student Joshua Wong, 24, who is in East Coast GRC, thinks more can be done, saying there is still a stigma surrounding polytechnics and the Institute of Technical Education (ITE).

    Referring to upgrades such as a $380-million ITE mega campus that opened two years ago, he says: “Just revamping these schools and providing financial support is not sufficient. More has to be done with employers to ensure it is not a paper chase.”

    Mr Tan, meanwhile, wants to hear more about social welfare policies. More can be done to help less fortunate Singaporeans, especially “those struggling to keep a roof over their head and make ends meet”, he says.

    Physics undergraduate Jackson Leow, 24, who lives in Ang Mo Kio GRC, admits some policies for the lowest tier of society are comprehensive, but ” the middle-class earners are left by themselves”.

    National University of Singapore (NUS) political scientist Reuben Wong thinks education, jobs and housing will be the key issues among youth. “I am not sure Singaporeans aged 21-30 are so much more confident about their jobs and future as they were in 2011,” he says.

    East Coast GRC resident and law student Godwin Tan, 22, says it is untrue that only the older generation appreciates the People’s Action Party’s (PAP’s) work. He says: “The peace and prosperity in Singapore do not go unnoticed, especially among the younger generation.”

    Young voters have been a concern for the PAP, as they prefer more diverse views in politics, which is seen as a disadvantage for the ruling party.

    NUS sociologist Tan Ern Ser believes that young voters want greater diversity in Parliament, but they will vote only for credible opposition parties.

    “It matters to them that whichever government they vote in must deliver stability, good jobs and a decent standard of living,” he says.

    Similarly, political science undergraduate Henry Lim, 24, of Sembawang GRC, believes his peers will be discerning: “We are not anti-establishment. While conservatives may worry that youth will opt for the opposition for the sake of (it), many young voters also recognise that many opposition parties are just not there yet.”

    But some first-time voters are concerned about having enough opposition voices in Parliament.

    Singapore Management University law undergraduate Benedict Chan, 22, of Aljunied GRC, says: “While I do believe that healthy debate can occur within a single party, having two parties of different values does contribute greatly to having differing, but not necessarily opposing, views.”

    Jurong GRC resident Amanda Yeo, 21, an accounting undergraduate, says: “Although the opposition is not as strong as the PAP, they are capable and persuasive. Also, it helps to keep PAP on its toes if they do not want to be overtaken by the opposition in the future.”

    However, biological sciences student Benjamin Goh, 22, a Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC resident, feels opposition voices should not come at the expense of residents’ well-being. He says: “The most important thing for an MP has to be the capability to work for your voters.”

    Ultimately, the youth Insight spoke to emphasised candidate quality rather than political party branding. Mr Chan of Aljunied GRC says: “Candidates should be able to communicate their ideas well but, more importantly, communicate well with residents and translate their opinions in Parliament.”

    Computer science undergraduate Wong Jing Yao, 22, of Sengkang West SMC, says: “It is not about PAP or the opposition parties, but the components and talents that make up these parties. I will vote for those who can lead us, regardless of their party.”

    Miss Dew Yang, 23, a pharmacist from Sembawang GRC, says: “My vote, though small, can affect the future of Singapore. With that in mind, I will vote wisely for the most deserving candidates who will be able to lead Singapore for another 50 years.”

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • GE2015: Charting The Future of Politics Of The Malay-Muslim Community in Singapore

    GE2015: Charting The Future of Politics Of The Malay-Muslim Community in Singapore

    GE2011 was described as a watershed election for Singapore as the Opposition tsunami threatened to overcome PAP’s hegemony. We witnessed a greater diversity of opinions being amplified and disseminated at unprecedented speeds, facilitated by the Internet. However, there seem to be little change to the political landscape of the Malay-Muslim community (MMC) in Singapore, with only one other MM MP, Muhamad Faisal Bin Abdul Manap from the Workers’ Party (WP), making it to Parliament. Muhamad Faisal had little impact in Parliament. For one, he did not take a stand on the hijab issue. Sounding like a PAP MM MP, he urged that the issue not be politicised and opined that a workable consensus was best achieved through public dialogue.

    Some would argue that this lack of good leadership in the MMC has been to the detriment of the MMC. Others contend that PAP MM MPs and organisations such as MUIS and Mendaki are doing a good job of not only protecting, but furthering the interest of the MMC. Perhaps, the truth is somewhere in between.

    With Singaporeans going to the polls in a forthnight, it is therefore timely to take stock of the political landscape of the MMC and where the MMC is headed – how it has changed, how the roles of the incumbent and the Opposition have been transformed and the impact this wil have on the MMC in this GE and the near future. Can the MMC still play a role in helping to build a better future for Singapore, one that is based on the principles of race-blind, meritocracy? Of course. How and at what cost? That remains to be seen.

    Diversity of Voices

    The political landscape of the MMC today is starkly different from that pre-GE2011. It could be argued that despite the greater awareness of the MM identity, the MMC has become more fragmented, with more people and organisations representing a greater array of partisan and non-partisan interests.

    Among the most prolific of MM commentators are Zulfikar Shariff, the editor of the now defunct Fateha.com and PAP member, Umar A H Marican.

    Zulfikar Shariff

    Zulfikar is presently a PhD candidate at La Trobe University based in Melbourne. Zulfikar went off the grid after leaving Singapore but the Internet has truly been a game changer in terms of affording him the ability to keep abreast of developments here in a timely manner. This has enabled Zulfikar to make timely comments and initiate thought provoking discourse on issues affecting the local MMC. Perhaps, the distance may have given Zulfikar a sense of security in expressing his views openly. It is thus not uncommon to see Zulfikar criticising the PAP for its policies that he deems discriminatory and oppressive to the MMC.

    To be clear, Zulfikar does not only have an axe to grind with the PAP government. He truly believes that the MMC cannot subordinate their faith to the Westphalian notion of the nation-state. To Zulfikar, the state is a mere political construct, hence the rules, norms and mores do not apply. He believes in the idea of establishing a separate, independent leadership for the MMC. He is also of the conviction that the MMC should have an insular, separate existence – no state, no country, no democracy, no political parties. Why bother with those when it has only led to the regression of the MMC?

    Zulfikar - 26 Aug

    Zulfikar - 27 Aug

    In one of his latest posts, Zulfikar highlighted Goh Chok Tong’s refusal to accede to the proposal to set up a Collective Leadership system which he claimed would have improved the lives of the MMC. Zulfikar asserted that the PAP’s disagreement was self-serving, meant to protct its MM MPs.

    His agitations have not won him admirers from among the supporters of the incumbent. That is not to say that he has not attracted a following at all. Zulfikar’s discourse have often initiated discussions from his small but vocal group of followers, who are disenchanted and disillusioned with their current predicament. It helps that Zulfikar is blessed with a huge dose of wit.

    But the more important question is, to what extent can Zulfikar achieve his objective of establishing a separate existence for the MMC? What would it take for that to happen? Realistically, it would take a total breakdown of the current nation-state system for that to happen. How does Zulfikar intend to overcome the nation-state? The UN will be made redundant. No ASEAN community to speak of. No SEA Games even. It is radical and there does not appear to be any way of doing so without burning bridges with people of other faiths and cultural backgrounds. Even providing more compelling, up-to-date, statistics which are grounded in context, may not faciltate Zulfikar’s course because it is that radical.

    For Singapore to prosper, Zulfikar’s assertions have to be addressed and rebutted . There have not been a dearth of people who have done so, including Umar A H Marican.

    Umar A H Marican

    Umar is a PAP apologist and has come to the fore to defend PAP’s policies, especially those from MM critics like Zulfikar. In a riposte to Zulfikar, Umar questioned Zulfikar’s motivations and cautioned that Zulfikar’s arguments were “politically inclined but disguised with religious intonation”.

    Umar A H Marican

    For Umar, Zulfikar’s posting is toxic and has the ability to encourage disunity and suspicions among Singaporeans. The caution is not without merit. Any race-based discourse permeating through the community has the ability to shape mindsets and further alienate the MMC from the Singapore community at large.

    That said, it will also be in PAP’s best interest to rebut Zulfikar with statistics instead of mere rhetoric. This will serve to convince the MMC of the fallacies in Zulfikar’s arguments and preserve racial and religious harmony in Singapore.

    That is not to say that dissenting voices like Zulfikar’s should be silenced. Umar’s response betrays the PAP’s marked disdain for freedom of speech. There is nothing stopping a Singaporean based overseas to comment on developments in Singapore. There are those who support and praise the government. Why not accept those who criticise and engage? Surely that is the best way to convince Singaporeans, especially the MMC of the PAP’s plans.

    PAP MM Candidates

    This brings us to the question of the capability of the new PAP candidates. As we have come to expect of PAP candidates (although admittedly, PAP does not have a monopoly over good candidates in Singapore), they have come with the requisite credentials. All are professionals with years of experience in the grassroots. But therein lies the danger of them having been brought up in the system for a long time. You cannot definitively exclude the possibility of groupthink.

    Rahayu Mahzam PAP

    Amrin Amin PAP

    Saktiandi Supaat

    What will they bring to the table? What kind of insights can they provide? Will they be afraid to speak up on MM issues? Will the fear of having to toe the party line overcome them? Will they be silenced by the Party whip?

    Having the heart and appreciation for the MMC is not everything. You must have the gumption and conviction, almost like Zulfikar, to really protect the interests of the community. They cannot be “yes” men and be quick to subordinate the interest of the community to the (arguably at times) selfish interest of others.

    The Opposition Slate

    Over the past week, Opposition parties have also been busy introducing their MM candidates for this GE. It is heartening to see more capable MM leaders standing up, wanting to contribute to the betterment of the MMC and the Singapore community at large.

    The aberration seems to be SDP candidate, Sidek Mallek. An auditor by profession, he was stumped by a simple question asked in Malay, by a reporter, at a press conference meant to showcase his credentials. Most excused his lack of fluency in the Malay language but many were appalled at the lack of direction by the party, in terms of the interests of the MMC that it wants to champion.

    Sidek Mallek Press Conference

    Sidek Mallek Mahjong

    Maybe Sidek was too preoccupied with his hobby of playing online mahjong that he could not think clearly? He is a good example of the kind of “leadership” that the MMC can do without. Surely there are better candidates out there?

    Conclusion

    The MMC has become more diverse and we have also witnessed a greater diversity in the views that have been espoused by people with partisan or non-partisan interests. This though does not neccessarily translate into good leadership for the MMC. In determining its future and negotiating the changing global terrain, the community has a responsibility to choose the best to lead them. What the community needs are leaders who understand Singapore’s place in the world and the realities that it contends with, to ensure its relevance and prosperity. It needs leaders who have a vision for the MMC within the multi-racial Singapore community because the future of the community is inextricably intertwined with the future of Singapore. History will judge if the Singapore MMC made the right decisions in GE2015.

    Anak Melayu Singapura

    [Reader Contribution]

  • PAP Manifesto With Slogan – With You, For You, For Singapore

    PAP Manifesto With Slogan – With You, For You, For Singapore

    The People’s Action Party (PAP) unveiled its 2015 General Election manifesto on Saturday (Aug 29) with the slogan  “With You, For You, For Singapore”. Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and several PAP candidates are speaking at the gathering of 1,000 party and non-party members, held at Infinite Studios near Portsdown Avenue.

    “Apart from holding on to all our current seats on Polling Day, we also want to be able to eat Orh Luat, Orh Neng or whatever you may call it with residents of Aljunied, Hougang and Punggol East”: Charles Chong at launch of the People’s Action Party’s #GE2015 manifesto.

    UPDATES: http://bit.ly/1NEUsp3Posted by Channel NewsAsia Singapore on Friday, 28 August 2015

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Move To Ease Traffic Congestion In Punggol, Sengkang, To Kick In End-September

    Move To Ease Traffic Congestion In Punggol, Sengkang, To Kick In End-September

    From end September, drivers entering Sengkang and Punggol towns from Tampines Expressway (TPE) can enjoy smooth travel, even during peak hours, according to the Pasir Ris-Punggol and Punggol East Grassroots Organisations and the Land Transport Authority (LTA) on Friday (Aug 28).

    Over the past year, residents have complained about the bottleneck in traffic at the Sengkang-Punggol exit, which was the result of two bus lanes that opened in 2014. The bus lanes serve two bus stops and 11 bus services, while motorists currently travel on the other two lanes.

    The bottleneck issue was brought up to the Chairperson of the Public Transport and Traffic Committee for Punggol North Loke Choon Wai, and Chairman of the Punggol East Citizens’ Consultative Committee Raymond Lye.

    “When the bus stop opened in August last year, I think what became apparent very soon was that the traffic flow changed, because there were two dedicated bus lanes and there were two car lanes,” said Mr Lye. “So when the bus stop opened, I think the bus users were very happy because the bus stop was generally clear all the time for the buses, so the buses had a very smooth journey.

    “But for the car owners, they realised that the traffic flow became worse. Jams started to build up, and during peak periods the jam could go all the way back to the KPE exit into the TPE.”

    Mr Lye went on to explain that they had received feedback that the bus lanes were sometimes relatively empty while motorists faced congestion in the other two lanes during peak hour.

    “I think some of the car owners got a little bit frustrated when they were caught in the jam, and they started driving into the bus lane,” he said, adding that when there appeared to be more unhappiness when traffic enforcers took photos of motorists who drove through the bus lanes.

    “It’s like, ‘look, the car lanes are congested, the bus lanes are empty, so when I use the bus lanes, I’m not causing any congestion for the buses, so why are you doing this?’” said Mr Lye.

    After months of discussions with the LTA, motorists will be able to travel on the outer bus lane, although they must still give way to buses when on this lane. The lane will feature a second Mandatory Give-Way To Bus road marking.

    This will benefit buses exiting the first bus stop at the exit, before they continue straight on to TPE or turn right towards Punggol Town. It is expected to ease traffic congestion, and ensure commuters can continue enjoying smooth rides while travelling on public transport.

    Mr Teo Ser Luck, Minister of State for Trade and Industry, and Vice Chairman of Pasir Ris-Punggol Town Council Janil Puthucheary, who lobbied for the enhancements to improve traffic at the exit, welcomed the approval of the proposed solution.

    “This new bus lane enhancement is actually quite useful, because it gives the bus the right and also a path that is clear to bring our residents home,” said Mr Teo.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Two-Hour Shouting Match Between Seller And Buyer In HDB Dispute

    Two-Hour Shouting Match Between Seller And Buyer In HDB Dispute

    After the former owners were sent to jail, Madam Herni Fadhillah Saad thought she could finally move into the flat that she bought five years ago.

    Mr Lim Teck Choon, 59, and his wife, Madam Tan Poh Lee, were jailed for contempt of court after defying court orders to vacate the flat.

    But after they were released on Thursday evening, Madam Herni ended up in a two-hour shouting match with Mr Lim after he showed up at the flat.

    Madam Herni told The New Paper on Friday that she had gone to the flat at Bedok South Road at 10pm on Thursday and was shocked to see Mr Lim standing outside the door.

    ”When I asked him why he was there, he started shouting, insisting that it is his home,” she said. Mr Lim said he had returned to his old flat because his current rental flat was unliveable.

    A neighbour, who declined to be named, said she saw four policemen at the lift landing when she returned home at about 8.30pm.

    Mr Lim was sitting outside the flat.

    Another neighbour living a floor below, Madam Png Ah Hock, 75, said she heard shouting coming from upstairs at about 10pm.

    “The shouting was very loud and they sounded very fierce,” she said in Mandarin.

    “I didn’t go and take a look because I was so frightened. I stayed at home. I was too scared to open the door.”

    When TNP went there close to midnight, Mr Lim was sitting forlornly outside the flat.

     

    Source: www.tnp.sg

deneme bonusu