Tag: Singapore

  • Car Buyers Adopt Wait And See Attitude

    Car Buyers Adopt Wait And See Attitude

    It is the first weekend of the Chinese Lunar New Year and some showrooms saw a steady flow of prospective buyers on Saturday (Feb 21).

    Despite Certificate of Entitlement (COE) premiums, especially for small cars, going down recently due to a higher number of de-registrations, car dealers said many buyers were still taking a “wait-and-see” approach.

    And although market demand is growing, many hope the COE will slide further before they commit to a purchase.

    Neo Nam Heng, president of the Automobile Importer & Exporter Association, said: “We’re projecting more COEs coming into the market because from January figures, you can see there are already 5,000 or more deregistered vehicles.”

    Mr Neo added: “Besides the supply-demand issues, there are other factors like currency exchange rates and the CEV (carbon emissions-based vehicle scheme) rebates. Euro and yen are so weak that there are substantial savings for importers to support the COE price. So COE prices will be softened, but not collapse.”

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Police Appeal For NOK Of Mdm Ho Chun Neo To Contact Them

    Police Appeal For NOK Of Mdm Ho Chun Neo To Contact Them

    Police are appealing for the next-of-kin of Mdm Ho Chun Neo to come forward.

    In a news release, police said Mdm Ho was found along New Bridge Road at about 5am on Sunday morning (Feb 22) and was unable to provide her next-of-kin’s contact details.

    Mdm Ho is 1.55m tall, and was last seen dressed in a short-sleeved floral blouse with black pants, according to the release.

    The next-of-kin or anyone with information can call the Police hotline at 1800-255-0000 or submit information online at www.spf.gov.sg/CrimeStopper. All information will be kept strictly confidential, police added.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Lee Bee Wah: Raise Qualifying Income Ceiling For Homebuyers

    Lee Bee Wah: Raise Qualifying Income Ceiling For Homebuyers

    Chairman of the Government Parliamentary Committee for National Development, Lee Bee Wah, has called for the qualifying income ceiling to be raised to allow more people to buy executive condominiums (ECs) and new Housing and Development Board (HDB) flats.

    Speaking ahead of the Budget statement on Monday (Feb 23), she said more middle-income couples are feeling the squeeze.

    The last time HDB raised the qualifying income ceiling for homebuyers was in 2011. Then, the monthly income ceiling for those buying a Build-To-Order (BTO) flat was raised from S$8,000 to S$10,000, while the limit for those buying ECs went up from S$10,000 to S$12,000.

    But amid rising incomes, there have been calls for this ceiling to be lifted further, by S$2,000-$3,000.

    Ms Lee said: “Nowadays, people get married later and there are also more graduates. They get married later; by the time they apply for flats, their salary would have exceeded the ceiling. I think it is good to let Singaporeans have a chance to own HDB flats and stay in HDB flats to have that unique living experience.

    “If they hit the ceiling, they are forced to buy private housing and some of them really feel the squeeze, especially if they need to support their parents and grandparents.”

    Ms Lee has also called for more to be done to help divorcees with children and low-income families own a flat. She also said the Government could look at allocating more BTO flats to singles. Currently, about a third of two-room flats in non-mature estates are set aside for them.

    Said Ms Lee: “Due to pent-up demand, there is still quite a big number of applicants for every batch of flats that is for sale for singles. I also get feedback because they need to wait and so perhaps we can increase the quota, because the demand from first-timers has eased.”

    PROPERTY COOLING MEASURES

    Property cooling measures are another issue on the minds of many. While National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan has said some of these measures are temporary, the market has to be cool enough for them to be relaxed.

    However, industry experts have said this is unlikely to happen soon. They notes while prices have come down, they have not fallen drastically. Last year, overall prices of HDB resale flats fell by six per cent, while those of private homes fell by four per cent.

    Analysts added that other factors should also be taken into account.

    Associate Professor Lim Lan Yuan, from the Department of Real Estate at the National University of Singapore, elaborated: “The Government should really monitor the market situation. First, (they should) look at the number of property transactions, whether there is an indication there is a fall in the volume. They should also look at the prices, whether there is a drastic fall in the prices.

    “On the other hand, they should also look at the number of mortgagee sales – it may have gone up, indicating that there is some problem with some of the owners who have bought high. They would of course look at the economy. Not only the local, also the external and global economy. So when the situation is not really that conducive, that may be a time they should consider relaxing some of the measures.”

    However, Assoc Prof said the cooling measures, if relaxed, should be done in phases. He added that the Seller’s Stamp Duty could be one of the first to be removed. He said: “The Seller’s Stamp Duty is different, the impact is to really curb speculative activities.

    “Speculative activities take place in a rising market, but right now, we are seeing a fall in the market and there is really very little speculative activities. So the Seller’s stamp Duty has less impact, so if you want to remove, then we could remove that first. ”

    One analyst said the impact on the real estate industry should also be considered. Mr Colin Tan, director of research and consultancy at Suntec Real Estate Consultants, said: “I suppose you have to assess the market … whether it has cooled. To all intents and purposes, some people will say the market has turned cold because if you look at some of the transactions, they are very low.

    “So agents are not having enough income, the bankers, the valuers are not having enough work. In that sense, maybe something needs to be done. The market to these people may have been frozen.”

    So Mr Tan said the Government could look into helping those who want to upgrade. He said: “What we could do is probably look at maybe helping the genuine upgraders because in any normal year, there will be a fair amount of upgrading. But the measures, while hampering speculators, are also having the same impact on genuine upgraders.

    “So maybe we could look at some of the measures and tweak them, and say ‘if you are a genuine upgrader, we would maybe not impose the stamp duty up front, we give you six months, or we grant you the full mortgage loan as if it were your first property, because you are going to sell your current property’. These are some measures that will allow upgrading to work its way back into the market.”

    Providing greater assurance for the elderly is also a theme in this year’s Budget, and Members of Parliament and experts add more could be done to educate seniors on the existing options to help them monetise their flats.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Have You Benefitted From PA Events?

    Have You Benefitted From PA Events?

    I will share about Peoples’ Association activities.

    Parties, celebrations, goodie bags, free buffet spread. Grassroots have it well.

    My question to Singaporeans, how many of you have participated or benefited from these? Little or none.

    Do anyone realize, its always the same old gang or participants? Why? Die hard participants who benefits from everything.

    One question we need to ask: Whose money are these?

    The PAP strongest point, to which the oppositions are generally very weak in, is public funds.

    Participants fear the loss of benefits. Volunteers shudder at the fact that their benefits run out (Free parking within this GRC or constituency, priority school application, HDB BTO after 3 years of service).

    Last year’s Grassroots retreat by Sengkang West brought about the question of cost. Grassroots Leaders are given a subsidy of S$100 from Peoples’ Association and perhaps, additional ‘out of pocket’ subsidy from the Member of Parliament.

    These are your money! Why are retreats overseas? Why not OBS? Or NTUC Chalet? Or cheaper locations like Batam or Bintan? Excuses like ‘Bonding’, ‘Appreciation’ etc. Do anyone realize these are the ground people for the PAP?

    Have they heard your voice? Have they represented your concerns to the Government? Aren’t Grassroots Leaders supposed to link the people and the Government together? Ask yourself this question, when was the last time you saw your Grassroots Leader, other then them walking around?

    Residents’ Committee are heavily subsidized by HDB and Peoples’ Association. Yet, we pay for the said courses. Ok, justified if they need to maintain the Center.

    However, do anyone realize these RCs and CCC have surpluses of tens and some hundreds of thousand dollars? How did these money benefit the residents? Or did it benefit just a core group of individuals?

    Singapore, there are many unanswered questions. No one to check on them, no one to question, no one to challenge. All these are kept away from the average Singaporean. Who justifies their balances? Will they be willing to display their accounts of each RC for residents knowledge?

    Obviously no.

    On the surface, Facebook post, media coverage on activities appears wonderful. My question would always be, how many residents actually benefited from it? In an average of 25,000 residents per constituency, an event that captures 100 participants is less than 0.5% of the population and the amount spent? A GRC event, say, 120,000 residents but participation figures? 1000? That is less than 1%!

    Well, Singapore, please spend some time to think about it. The media appears to display huge participation. Well, think again. Its your money.

    Singapore Son

    TRS Contributor

    Source: www.therealsingapore.com

  • SDP: Model For Implementing Minimum Wage In Singapore

    SDP: Model For Implementing Minimum Wage In Singapore

    Minimum wage (the lowest level of wages an employer may legally pay an employee) is an important policy tool that balances the needs of an economy with those of low-income workers so that economic growth occurs in a just and sustainable manner.

    A wage structure that is out of kilter with the cost of living and productivity is inimical to long-term growth.

    Under the SDP ‘s A New Economic Vision for Singapore, the government will establish a Wage Equity Commission (WEC) to recommend the minimum wage level.

    The WEC will comprise representatives from trade unions, chambers of commerce, professional associations, social work organisations, and academe.

    The determination of the minimum wage level will be based on a basket of factors including the cost of living index and inflation rate.

    Based on a wage level that would allow a worker working full-time (44 hours per week) to afford basic necessities, the SDP recommends the official minimum wage to be $7 per hour. This works out to be $1,232 per month for a full-time job of 44 per week. The amount would be subject to review by the WEC.

    Following the enactment of the Minimum Wage Act, the WEC will assess the impact of the policy on a basket of indicators (see box on right) and publish annual reports to monitor the situation.

    In addition, the WEC will be empowered to deal with complaints of wage manipulation and non-compliance by employers.

    The Progressive Wage Model recently introduced by the PAP targets only a small number of low-wage workers in the cleaning and security industries. What about workers in other sectors who are paid below a fair, living wage?

    There is also no mechanism to stop employees from manipulating the system by paying workers more but extending their work hours.

    Hong Kong implemented minimum wage in 2011 amidst much scare-mongering by the policy’s opponents that such a law would increase business costs to the extent that it would make the economy less competitive.

    However since its implementation, minimum wage has not adversely affected Hong Kong’s economy which continues to remain competitive and buoyant.

    Singapore is one of the few countries left in the world without a minimum wage law. The SDP will campaign for minimum wage, as we have in the past, in the upcoming elections.

     

    Source: http://yoursdp.ucoz.org

deneme bonusu