Tag: Singapore

  • Switzerland Considering Paying Citizens $2,600 A Month For Doing Nothing

    Switzerland Considering Paying Citizens $2,600 A Month For Doing Nothing

    Update: According to ​the folks behind the Basic Income campaign, Switzerland’s government will start discussing the proposal in spring 2015, with the public vote likely to take place by fall 2016.

    Switzerland could soon be the world’s first national case study in basic income. Instead of providing a traditional social net—unemployment payments, food stamps, or housing credits—the government would pay every citizen a fixed stipend.

    The idea of a living wage has been brewing in the country for over a year and last month, supporters of the movement dumped a truckload of eight million coins outside the Parliament building in Bern. The publicity stunt, which included a five-cent coin for every citizen, came attached with 125,000 signatures. Only 100,000 are necessary for any constitutional amendment to be put to a national vote, since Switzerland is a direct democracy.

    The proposed plan would guarantee a monthly income of CHF 2,500, or about $2,600 as of November 2014. That means that every family (consisting of two adults) can expect an unconditional yearly income of $62,400 without having to work, with no strings attached. While Switzerland’s cost of living is significantly higher than the US—a Big Mac there costs $6.72—it’s certainly not chump change. It’s reasonable income that could provide, at the minimum, a comfortable bare bones existence.

    The benefits are obvious. Such policy would, in one fell swoop, wipe out poverty. By replacing existing government programs, it would reduce government bureaucracy. Lower skilled workers would also have more bargaining power against employers, eliminating the need for a minimum wage. Creative types would then have a platform to focus on the arts, without worrying about the bare necessities. And those fallen on hard times have a constant safety net to find their feet again.

    Detractors of the divisive plan also have a point. The effects on potential productivity are nebulous at best. Will people still choose to work if they don’t have to? What if they spend their government checks on sneakers and drugs instead of food and education? Scrappy abusers of the system could take their spoils to spend in foreign countries where their money has more purchasing power, thus providing little to no benefit to Switzerland’s own economy. There’s also worries about the program’s cost and long term sustainability. It helps that Switzerland happens to be one of the richest countries in the world by per capita income.

    The problem, as with many issues economic, is that there is no historical precedent for such a plan, especially at this scale, although there have been isolated incidents. In the 1970s, the Canadian town of Dauphin provided 1,000 families in need with a guaranteed income for a short period of time. Not only did the social experiment end poverty, high school completion went up and hospitalizations went down.

    “If you have a social program like this, community values themselves start to change,” Evelyn Forget, a health economist at the University of Manitoba, told The New York Times.

    Similar plans have been proposed in the past. In 1968, American economist Milton Friedman discussed the idea of a negative income tax, where those earning below a certain predetermined threshold would receive supplementary income instead of paying taxes. Friedman suggested his plan could eliminate the 72 percent of the welfare budget spent on administration. But nothing ever came to fruition.

     

     

    It’s what makes the potential experiment in Switzerland so compelling. Developed countries around the world are struggling to address the issues of depressed wages for low-skilled workers under the dual weight of automation and globalization.

    For German-born artist Enno Schmidt, one of the founders of the proposal, a living wage represents continued cultural progress along the lines of women’s suffrage or the civil rights movement by providing dignity and security to the poor, while unleashing creativity and entrepreneurial spirit.

    “I tell people not to think about it for others, but think about it for themselves,” Schmidt told the Times. “What would you do if you had that income?

    @sfnuop

    Source: http://motherboard.vice.com/blog/what-would-you-do-with-2800-a-month-no-…

     

    Source: www.therealsingapore.com

     

  • 1,395 Ultra High Net Worth Individuals With Combined Net Worth of S$234 Billion in Singapore in 2014

    1,395 Ultra High Net Worth Individuals With Combined Net Worth of S$234 Billion in Singapore in 2014

    The ultra high net worth (UHNW) population in Singapore saw the addition of 40 individuals in 2014, according to a wealth report released on Wednesday (Nov 19).

    There are now a total of 1,395 UHNW individuals in Singapore – a record high. Their combined net worth is US$180 billion (S$234 billion), an increase of 12.5 per cent over the past year, according to the Wealth-X and UBS World Ultra Wealth Report.

    UHNW individuals are defined as those with US$30 million and above in net assets. The size of Singapore’s UHNW population ranks sixth among Asian countries and 19th globally, according to the report.

    This year, while Singapore’s UHNW population grew slower than both the global and Asian average, the combined wealth of its UHNW individuals has grown significantly faster.

    “Such strong growth is reflective of the city-state’s growing international appeal with regards to the strength of its financial sector, and the ease of both establishing and conducting business in the country, allowing for rapid wealth accumulation” the report stated.

    The report also found that:

    • Singapore’s UHNW population controls almost 17 per cent of the country’s total wealth of US$1.08 trillion.
    • More than 20 per cent of Singapore’s UHNW population is engaged in the finance, banking and investment industry
    • 60 per cent of Singapore’s UHNW population is fully self-made.
    • 25 per cent of Singapore’s UHNW population inherited their wealth and went on to grow their fortunes through businesses or other ventures
    • 15 per cent fully inherited their wealth
    • Singapore’s female UHNW population accounts for a much larger share of its total population than the global average. But the average net worth of female UHNW individuals in Singapore is 45 per cent lower than that of male UHNW individuals in the country.
  • Is The PAP Government Being Selectively Pro-Family?

    Is The PAP Government Being Selectively Pro-Family?

    Kirsten Han is a Singaporean blogger, journalist and filmmaker. She is also involved in the We Believe in Second Chances campaign for the abolishment of the death penalty. A social media junkie, she tweets at @kixes. The views expressed are her own.

    Singapore, we are told, is a pro-family country. The government actively introduces policies that will encourage young Singaporeans to get married and have children, and nuclear families are often given benefits in the form of tax rebates and subsidies. 

    Yet there are sometimes stories that make you doubt that stance.

    The New Paper ran an article on 17 November about a family now torn apart: upon returning to Singapore and applying for a Long-Term Visit Pass, married couple Mr Y. C. Chen and Ms Li Qiaoyan realised that Ms Li had been served an entry ban. Her offence was not seeking permission from the Ministry of Manpower before getting pregnant and married. Ms Li is now back in China, while Mr Chen had to quit his job to care for their 10-month-old son.

    Under Singapore’s current rules, existing and former work permit holders are required to obtain permission from the state before marrying Singaporeans. According to The New Paper, the Ministry of Manpower says:

    “MOM reviews all marriage applications on a case-by-case basis. Factors taken into consideration include the economic contributions of the applicants, the ability of the applicants to look after themselves and their family without becoming a burden to the society or state.” 

    The New Paper also reported MOM’s position that “work-permit holders, as transient workers, ought to come to Singapore only for work”.

    There are 980,8000 work permit holders in Singapore. It’s impossible that these men and women are here “only for work”; they don’t just come here to serve us food, work in our construction sites and clean our homes. They come here with all their likes and dislikes, their hopes, dreams and desires. They’re people. It’s hardly surprising that they might meet someone and fall in love. 

    Yet the state doesn’t seem to see them as the multi-dimensional human beings they are. It expects them to serve, and only to serve. When they fall in love and want to get married or have children, they are expected to apply to Singapore for permission, even though it should be none of the state’s business who anyone chooses to marry. The state will then decide if the work permit holder is a worthy (read: economically viable) spouse for the Singaporean.

    This rule even applies to former work permit holders. Come to Singapore on a work permit and your desire to marry your partner – if he/she is a Singaporean – will always be dependent on special dispensation from the Controller of Work Passes.

    Such rules and requirements show us that the state is, perhaps, only pro-a-certain-type-of-family. If you’re a non-Singaporean, if your “economic contribution” is deemed wanting, then maybe your family is not so important after all.

    Source: https://sg.news.yahoo.com

  • Wong Kan Seng: Singapore Not Immune To Threat Of Radicalisation

    Wong Kan Seng: Singapore Not Immune To Threat Of Radicalisation

    SINGAPORE: Former Deputy Prime Minister Wong Kan Seng said there is no immunity to the threat of radicalisation for any society, including Singapore.

    Speaking at a seminar by the S Rajaratnam School of International Studies on Tuesday (Nov 18), Mr Wong said that the “vigilance of the security services must ultimately be augmented by the vigilance of the society itself.”

    He said groups like Islamic State (IS) are savvy in their use of social media to propagate radical rhetoric and recruit fighters to their cause. He also urged governments in the region to step up efforts in the sharing of information and intelligence.

    Mr Wong said: “13 years on from 9/11 and Singapore’s discovery of the regional JI (Jemaah Islamiyah) network, we are none the safer from the terrorism threat. The terrorism threat has not diminished, but has evolved and adapted to a more hostile security environment. It has also become more diffused with the rise of the phenomenon of self-radicalised or ‘lone wolf’ terrorists.”

    He felt that the conflict in Syria and and the IS have given new impetus to existing regional jihadist groups like JI and the Jemaah Anshorut Tauhid (JAT), which have sent their members to Syria to fight.

    Mr Wong said the manner in which foreign fighters flock to Syria reminds him of how Muslims around the world had similarly been drawn to fight in the Soviet-Afghan war in the 1980s.

    He added: “The Soviet-Afghan war not only led to the creation of the Al-Qaeda terrorist organisation, but also a global fraternity of terrorist brotherhood. Many governments anticipate that the Syrian conflict will likewise lead to the emergence of a new generation of mujahidin and the perpetuation of the terrorism menace for many years to come.”

    Mr Wong, who was also Minister for Home Affairs, recounted how Singapore had taken a multi-pronged approach to counter the threat of jihadist terrorism.

    “Apart from investigations and exchange of intelligence with foreign security services, the Government held closed-door national dialogues with religious and community leaders to share our concerns on the terrorism threat and how we must not let it destroy our Singapore’s social cohesion,” he stated.

    Mr Wong said there was also the awareness to go beyond the detention of JI members to counter the deviant religious teachings. A core group of religious teachers formed the Religious Rehabilitation Group (RRG) to provide religious counselling for the JI detainees and their families.

    To this end, Mr Wong said that for some “hardcore” detainees, results so far have not been positive, and that they will only be released once they are rehabilitated.

    Overall, he said that while Singapore has been successful in keeping the terrorism threat at bay, the general public must continue to remain vigilant and stay united in the event of an incident.

    “The irony is, the more successful we are in our counter-terrorism efforts, the more the urgency and cogency of the terrorism threat will diminish in the public’s consciousness,” said Mr Wong. “We need every resident to be vigilant against this threat. Should we one day be unable to stop a bomb from exploding or a murderous act by an ISIL supporter in Singapore, I hope Singaporeans will have the resilience to overcome the attack, cope with the crisis and maintain our social cohesion.”

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • IOC Opens Door For Joint Hosting Bids From Countries

    IOC Opens Door For Joint Hosting Bids From Countries

    LAUSANNE: International Olympic Committee president Thomas Bach revealed on Tuesday (Nov 18) that the IOC were willing to consider joint bids between countries and cities in order to make hosting an Olympic Games more accessible.

    “Under certain conditions, mainly for reasons of geography and sustainable development, it might be possible to organise some events in other cities other than the host city, or even in other countries,” Bach told the press.

    “If a city says ‘we don’t have enough facilities for this sport, in this place, but there are some in a close city’ why not? In the Winter Games it already exists. If two countries share a mountain, then why not share a bid?” he continued.

    “In the Summer Games, it is more about small neighbouring countries where distances are close. It is about giving smaller countries the opportunity to organise Games.”

    The plan which it is also hoped will help reduce bidding costs are among 40 recommendations which will be voted on at a meeting of IOC members in Monaco on Dec 8 and 9.

    Another recommendation revealed at The Olympic Museum in Lausanne on Tuesday was to cap the number of sports and athletes, while giving a new sport or discipline an invitation to participate in the Games every four years.

    “These 40 recommendations are like pieces of a jigsaw puzzle,” explained Bach, a former Olympic gold medallist in fencing from Germany. “When you put them together, a picture emerges that shows the IOC safeguarding the uniqueness of the Olympic Games and strengthening sport in society.

    “We still want to limit the number of Olympic events but within this framework, we want to give more flexibility to sports which want to become Olympic,” Bach continued. “The Olympic Games mustn’t become bigger, but more diverse.”

    The recommendation on reducing costs for bidding also includes cutting the number of presentations that are allowed by bidding cities and “providing a significant financial contribution from the IOC”.

    The IOC also want to have an “invitation phase” for bidding during which cities will be “advised about the opportunities this new procedure offers”. The recommendations were announced to a round table of athletes, many of whom contributed to the ‘Olympic Agenda 2020’ process.

    “In the case of the Summer Olympics, it could be small countries with short distances. Sometimes the distances within a country are less important than in a metropolis of 15 million people,” said Bach. “The host contract is always signed with a city but in reality it would be the whole country that would be the partner.”

    Occasionally, the IOC has allowed co-organisation, particularly in the case of the Winter Games, among a host city and ski resorts, or for sailing events, often relocated during the Summer Olympics

deneme bonusu