Tag: Singaporeans

  • Imam Apologises For Remarks On Christians And Jews

    Imam Apologises For Remarks On Christians And Jews

    An imam under police investigation for allegedly making remarks against Christians and Jews during his Friday sermons at a mosque has apologised.

    His lawyer Noor Marican said the imam made the apology at the Ministry of National Development building on Friday morning (Mar 31), in front of members of the Indian Muslim association and other religious council members.

    Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugamhad said in Parliament religious preaching that encourages violence or pits one religion against another will not be tolerated in Singapore.

    Video of the imam’s remarks uploaded to social media sparked widespread debate, with some criticising the uploader for whipping up tensions between religious groups, and others saying he was right in bringing the matter to light. Minister-in-charge of Muslim Affairs Yaacob Ibrahim called for calm in the Muslim community and said “on such sensitive matters, it would be better to go to the authorities in the first instance, rather than online”.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • AST Ah Beng Want To Whack People In Yishun Cinema

    AST Ah Beng Want To Whack People In Yishun Cinema

    Spotted this AH Beng gangster on social media calling out someone and want to whack him in Yishun cinema. They got into a quarrel after the gangster block the screen and the other person call him an a**hole then he said he is AST (ang soon tong) and want to call people whack him.

    As an old timer who was once active, I think young gangsters these days need to learn to be more standard. Firstly, no need to declare your gang. Just ask him where he’s from. If same gang can talk. If different gang just whack. Need to call people and bring metal pole? That’s why I say no standard.

    And I see other examples of no standard gangsters. If u want to shout gang cheer don’t so stupid put on youtube. wah lau. really stupid. Fight also put on FB. Knn. Pui. These days gangsters really no standard.

    Ah Xiong
    ASS Reader

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

  • Dr Tan Cheng Bock: 2017 Should Be Open Presidential Election

    Dr Tan Cheng Bock: 2017 Should Be Open Presidential Election

    (Dr Tan Cheng Bock’s Press Conference on 31st March 2017)

    1. Thank you everyone for making the time to attend this Press conference.

    2. I call this press conference to ask the government whether it is correct to make the 2017 Presidential Election a reserved election. I think it should be an open election.

    3. For those new to Singapore politics, our Constitution was recently changed. We now have a new Article 19B(1). This reserves an election for a racial group if no one from that community has been President for the 5 most recent Presidential terms.

    4. The purpose for reserved election was explained in the Constitutional Commission’s report dated 17 August 2016. They said that a reserved election for a minority group should only be invoked if VOTERS do not CHOOSE someone from that minority group as President after 5 consecutive presidential terms produced by free and unregulated elections.

    5. Let’s look at what the Constitutional Commission Report originally said (Constitutional Commission Report dated 17 August 2016):

    “5.36 … if free and unregulated elections produce Presidents from a varied distribution of ethnicities, the requirement of a reserved election will never be triggered.

    5.40 … This may be illustrated in the following scenario: An election is reserved for racial group A because no candidate from racial group A has been ELECTED for 5 consecutive terms”.

    6. The “free and unregulated” elections mentioned by the Commission, is what many people call “open elections”. It is not closed to a specific group of candidates. It is a presidential election where candidates of all races can stand, and voters can elect a President who is Chinese, Malay, Indian or any other race.

    7. The Government said the Attorney General’s Chambers (AGC) advised the Prime Minister that 2017 will be our 1st reserved election. This is based on AGC counting 5 consecutive presidential terms beginning with President Wee Kim Wee.

    8. I question whether AGC’s method of counting is actually in line with the spirit and purpose put forward by the Constitutional Commission for having a reserved election.

    9. The AGC included a nominated President in their count. But the Commission’s emphasis was on open elections, where voters fail to vote in a minority president.

    a. Let me read for you what the Commission said again:

    “5.36 … if free and unregulated elections produce Presidents from a varied distribution of ethnicities, the requirement of a reserved election will never be triggered.

    5.40 … This may be illustrated in the following scenario: An election is reserved for racial group A because no candidate from racial group A has been ELECTED for 5 consecutive terms”.

    b. The Government White Paper published on 15 Sept 2016 accepted this position. At paragraph 81 and 82, they explain,

    “81(b) … A reserved election will never arise if free and unregulated elections produce Presidents of varied ethnicities. It will only be invoked if there has not been a President of a given ethnicity for an “exceedingly long period.

    82 The Govt agrees with the approach proposed by the Commission.”

    c. On 7 Nov 2016 in Parliament, DPM Teo Chee Hean at the 2nd reading of the Constitutional Amendment Bill repeated that a reserve election will only come into play if OPEN ELECTIONS fail to return a President from the different races. I quote at paragraph 107(b) of his speech “..it will only come into play if open elections fail to periodically return Presidents from the different races”.

    d. So, open elections is the trigger for reserved elections.

    e. DPM Teo then introduced the new Article 19B of our Constitution at paragraph 109 of his speech by saying that “Elections will generally be open to candidates from all races.” “However, if a particular racial group has not held the Presidency for the most recent 5 consecutive terms, Article 19B(1) reserves the next election for that group.”

    f. Reading DPM Teo’s statements, which adopted the Commission’s report and the White Paper, it is obvious that 5 open elections must first take place before there is a reserved election.

    g. So his reference to “the most recent 5 consecutive terms” to be counted must therefore mean “the most recent 5 consecutive terms PRODUCED BY OPEN ELECTIONS”.

    h. However one day later, on 8 Nov 2016, PM Lee told Parliament that AGC had advised the Government to count 5 consecutive terms of presidents who exercised elected powers. So AGC counted from Dr Wee Kim Wee 5 Presidents with elected powers. PM Lee said:

    “We have taken the Attorney General’s advice. We will start counting from the first President who exercised the powers of the Elected President. That means we are now in the fifth term of the elected Presidency.“

    i. The counting is clearly different from what the Commission said previously. If you recall, the Commission said that “An election is reserved for racial group A because no candidate from racial group A has been elected for 5 consecutive terms”. The Commission’s emphasis was on open elections and not Presidents who exercised elected powers.

    j. So AGC’s trigger and the Commission’s trigger for reserved elections are different.

    10. Unfortunately, there was no debate on whether AGC advised the Government correctly. The Government also declined the opportunity to explain this in Parliament. As a result of AGC’s advice, 2017 became a reserved election year.

    11. So we need to know why the AGC did not advise the PM to count 5 “open elections” in line with the spirit and purpose of the Commission? And why did the AGC also advise the PM that Singapore is now in the fifth term of the Elected Presidency when only 4 presidents have been returned by open elections?

    12. History shows that Singapore has only invoked 4 open presidential elections. The Prime Minister only issued 4 writs of Presidential Elections: in 1993, 1999, 2005 and 2011.

    13. Our 1st open election produced President Ong Teng Cheong. President Nathan returned unopposed in the 2nd and 3rd open elections. The 4th open election produced President Tony Tan. Following the Commission’s recommendations as accepted by the Government, 2017 should be an open election.

    14. President Wee never stood for election. He was a President nominated by Government. He only exercised the powers of an elected president for less than ½ a term. Those powers were given to him by Parliament as a transitional provision. But his term was never an Elected Presidency. That is the view of a respected constitutional law professor in Singapore. He said: “Although he exercised all the discretionary powers of an elected president, the first truly elected President was Ong Teng Cheong.” (https://singaporepubliclaw.com/2016/08/25/elected-president/)

    15. In all my 26 years in Parliament we had always referred to Mr Ong Teng Cheong as the first elected President. Our Presidents past and present, and Ministers and MPs in Parliament have ALL referred to President Ong Teng Cheong directly or indirectly as Singapore’s first elected president and the 1st elected presidency. Even the Constitutional Commission’s Report contains a statement calling President Ong Teng Cheong the first elected president. That is also the view of most, if not all, Singaporeans I’ve spoken to.

    16. To summarise, I have put forward the reasons why I think 2017 should be an open election year. I think my understanding is consistent with the Commission’s spirit and purpose for introducing reserved elections. The AGC should have counted the 5 most recent presidential terms produced by open elections. This starts with President Ong Teng Cheong.

    17. I now invite the Government or the AGC to explain why they counted the presidential terms of presidents who exercised elected powers. If need be, the Government can refer AGC’s opinion to Court for independent judicial verification. After all, the Courts have the final say on legal issues in Singapore. And a recent high profile Court of Appeal case has shown that the AGC is not always correct in their legal opinion.

    18. If the Government double-checks the AGC’s advice with the Court, then Parliament and the people of Singapore can be satisfied beyond doubt that the constitutional changes they are making stand on strong legal foundations.

    19. But if the Government simply accepts AGC’s advice without explaining why they accepted the accuracy of the opinion, I am concerned that our Elected Presidency will always be tainted with the suspicion that the reserved elections of 2017, was introduced to prevent my candidacy.

    20. How we do things is as important as what we do.

    21. On this note, I would urge the Government to explain, or refer AGC’s opinion to Court to confirm whether AGC’s advice is in sync with the Commission’s spirit and purpose for having reserved elections.

     

    Source: Dr Tan Cheng Bock

  • Operasi Penyemburan Asap Dimulakan Di Simon Place, Sehari Selepas Kelompok Zika Dikesan

    Operasi Penyemburan Asap Dimulakan Di Simon Place, Sehari Selepas Kelompok Zika Dikesan

    Sehari selepas kelompok Zika yang pertama tahun ini disahkan di Simon Place di Hougang, operasi penyemburan asap mula dijalankan di estet perumahan tersebut.

    Semalam (29 Mac), Agensi Sekitaran Kebangsaan (NEA) mengesahkan bahawa dua anggota keluarga di estet itu dijangkiti virus Zika.

    Notis NEA yang dipasang di kawasan itu menyatakan NEA akan menjalankan operasi penyemburan asap haba di kawasan-kawasan luar di kejiranan itu untuk menghapuskan nyamuk-nyamuk dewasa yang boleh merebakkan virus tersebut.

    Para pegawai NEA juga dilihat mengunjungi para penduduk dari rumah ke rumah sekitar 9.00 pagi untuk memaklumkan bahawa operasi penyemburan asap akan bermula tidak lama lagi.

    Anggota Parlimen GRC Aljunied Sylvia Lim bercakap kepada para wartawan pagi tadi semasa mengunjungi kawasan itu semasa operasi NEA dijalankan.

    “Para penduduk di kawasan itu sudah biasa dengan kelompok penyakit-penyakit bawaan nyamuk – dalam beberapa tahun kebelakangan ini, penularan denggi juga berlaku di sini. Jadi mereka agak berdaya tahan, mereka secara umum tahu apa yang harus dilakukan dan cara melindungi diri mereka,” katanya.

    Selain operasi penyemburan asap di kawasan-kawasan luar, para pegawai NEA juga akan menyembur selaput wap dengan isi padu rendah di semua rumah, katanya, dan menggesa semua penduduk memberi kerjasama.

    “Saya faham pada masa lalu sesetengah penduduk diperiksa beberapa kali dan mereka agak letih. Tapi anda tidak akan tahu jika keadaan sudah berubah, jadi tolonglah bekerjasama dengan pihak berkuasa,” ujarnya.

    “Pada masa yang sama, kami mesti terus bertenang dan terus memikirkan perspektifnya… jangan terlalu panik dengan situasi ini.”

    KLINIK-KLINIK: TIADA LAGI KES DIKESAN

    Para doktor biasa (GP) di kawasan itu yang bercakap kepada Mediacorp pagi tadi berkata tiada di kalangan pesakit mereka menunjukkan tanda-tanda Zika.

    Namun Dr Chua Boon Ling dari Simon Road Family Clinic berkata dalam dua minggu lepas, seorang pesakit datang dengan simptom flu dan kembali beberapa hari kemudian dengan demam panas.

    Dr Chua berkata oleh kerana kawasan itu diisytiharkan sebagai kelompok Zika, Dr Chua berkata beliau akan memantau pesakit itu.

    Klinik itu juga akan menjalankan ujian-ujian terhadap pesakit yang disyaki dijangkiti Zika.

    Source: BeritaMediacorp

  • Commentary: Weakening Position and Diminishing Role of the Malay Language in Islamic Education and Development in Singapore. Is that the case?

    Commentary: Weakening Position and Diminishing Role of the Malay Language in Islamic Education and Development in Singapore. Is that the case?

    Weakening Position and Diminishing Role of the Malay Language in Islamic Education and Development in Singapore. Is that the case?
    – A Personal Reflection

    “Dosa besar” or ‘A Major Sin’ – that’s how I’ve been made to feel whenever the Malay Language has allegedly been said to be the cause for non-Malay speaking Muslim to be alienated from learning Islam within the local context. And that’s how distasteful the Malay Language has been viewed by some Muslims. It’s been accused of creating social distance among Muslims, and of alienating non-Malay speaking Muslims. Perhaps, some Muslims here may not know how Islam came to Nusantara and how the Malay Language was the primary medium of instruction in the spread of Islam in this region. The Malay Language was THE UNIFYING LANGUAGE for Muslims in the Nusantara. But now, it has been flamed, blamed and shamed as the language that’s preventing non-Malay-speaking Muslims from learning Islam.

    It is indeed a reflection of changes within the Muslim Community in Singapore. Slowly but surely it seems, the significant role that the Malay Language used to play in Islamic learning is now becoming more diminished. It is said that the younger generation of Malays are more comfortable using the English Language than their Mother Tongue Language. It is said that more and more parents are reporting that English has replaced Malay as the preferred medium of communication at home. We are not sure though if such changes, if indeed true, have resulted in better scores in English Language by Malay students during exams. Are Malay students performing better in English language and less so in their Mother Tongue language?

    Personally, I see that the Islamic Education scene in Singapore is undergoing a transition from a predominantly Malay language based shifting more and more towards the English language as the medium of instruction in class, especially for the younger audience.

    Most, if not all, of the asatizahs teaching at such programmes come from our local Madrasahs where English has not been the main and primary medium of instruction. Arabic still feature highly in the local Madrasah scene. Despite that, we have witnessed more and more younger asatizah demonstrate better command of the English language. To many of them, English is a second or even third language, after Arabic and Malay. Granted that some of them started education at mainstream schools before joining the full-time madrasahs. Asatizah from such background may demonstrate better grasp and command of the English language.

    Generally, for centuries, Muslims in Singapore, as those living in Nusantara, have been attuned to using the Malay language in religious instruction and discourse. It is not about placing the Malay language on a pedestal and to sanctify its position as sacred.

    No. None of such things.

    Simply, the Malay language used to be the lingua franca of the region and perhaps for still many Malays in Singapore. And the Malay language has indeed been the medium for religious instruction since Islam came to the region. And for many of asatizah, it’s not surprising that they too received their own religious instructions early in their lives through the use of Malay language. The Arabic language become a must when they dwell deeper into the religion. To transfer that past Malay-Arabic dominated learning experience right away into the current English-dominated learning environment is no mean feat

    It is not easy. Not many can do the switch easily. It will take time.
    We are in a transition. Probably the current batch of students in the madrasahs would perform better in creating a 100% English language driven learning environment when they teach later in their lives.

    Demand for Malay language to be replaced by English as the main medium of instruction for Islamic Education for the younger generation seems to be getting louder. More and more Mosques and Private Centres are creating classes in Islamic learning in English to cater to the growing demand.

    Perhaps that demand for change from Malay to English language seems louder within the Malay community because it forms the bulk of Muslims here in Singapore.

    I still come across the Indian Muslim community here conducting their religious classes in their Mother Tongue language, despite some classes being conducted in the English language. In fact, religious instructions in many parts of the region are still being delivered mainly in the mother tongue. Regionally, there is yet a proliferation of religious instructions being conducted in the English language. Where there are, the speed is not as fast and furious as that found locally.

    With changing demography, with the growing presence of non-Malay speaking Muslims and a decline on the use of the Mother Tongue language among younger Malays, there is no denying the fact that there is certainly a need to have Islamic Learning delivered in English.

    Nevertheless, it would be a monumental task to expect and place delivery of such Islamic Learning classes in the same light and standard as lessons taught in English at mainstream schools. There are already loud voices demanding the same standard of delivery by Asatizah at Mosque as that at mainstream school. In fact, such voices have been around for quite some time now.

    And it’s not the case that nothing has been done about such demands. Asatizahs have indeed been sent for training at NIE to attain national level teaching competencies and accreditations.
    But it will certainly take time to see standards of delivery of religious classes using English as the main medium of instructions on par with those classes conducted in mainstream schools. It will take a bit more time. As of now, seeing the use of English language being toggled with Malay is only to be expected.

    Some have already expressed their angst that such toggling shouldn’t happen in the first place, and should not be tolerated.
    But to expect a generational learning experience to change suddenly from one language to another is something that don’t usually happen overnight in a social environment.

    Not many can do the switch in record time. Not many are as eloquent as Ust Noor Deros or Ust Mizi Wahid or Al Marhum Ustaz Zhulkeflee Bin Haji Ismail who have delivered religious instructions in the English Language almost effortlessly. To expect every Asatizah to be able to deliver lessons in English with such poise will definitely take time. The change will eventually happen insyaaALlah, but over time and not over night.

    Delivering religious instructions well in any language at all involves not only the transference of information or facts. It is also about resorting to the teacher’s own socio-religious experience in growing up, learning about and experiencing the religion itself. Not many can simply switch to an alternative mode, ie from the current predominantly Malay-Arabic socio-religious experience to the expected English-Arabic socio-religious milieu.

    This is not about buying insurance for the asatizah.

    Work is in progress (WIP). Many efforts have been done and will continue to be done to raise the standards of delivery of religious instructions across the board. And as in any WIP, there are hiccups along the way that need to be addressed.

    This brief write-up is also by means as attempt to sanctify the position of Malay language in Islam and its development locally. Instead, it is a witness to the possibly dying use of the Malay language in the socio-religious life, environment, experiences and learning of Muslims in Singapore, especially among the younger generations of Malays. (Could this be a research topic for anyone doing Masters or Phd?)

    And the ensuing online altercation of a recent outburst on the non-use of English language in a religious class (it was supposed to be a religious class conducted in English), it is also interesting to note that Malays are expected, subtly or otherwise, to abandon the use of their Mother Tongue language in their interaction with other Muslims in favour of the English language. That appears to be the line of argument taken by both Malay and non-Malay speaking Muslims online.

    This seems not to be the case for Muslims in the region, at least not among Muslims in Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Cambodia, Vietnam, and even China and Japan. (In fact, Islam came to China even earlier than it did to Nusantara, and the Chinese became Muslims earlier than the Malays.) The Mother Tongue languages in those countries still play an important role in the socio-religious life and learning among Muslims there.

    In summary, is it really true that we are witnessing a weakening of the position and diminishing role of the Malay language in socio-religious life of and leaning of Islam among Muslims in Singapore, unlike decades ago? Is it also true that the Malay language has become a cause for concern as far as local Islamic development is concerned, as it is being alleged to have created barriers for non-Malay-speaking Muslims to learn Islam and hence has alienated them from Muslims in Singapore?

    Perhaps these are plausible research questions worthy of consideration for a post-graduate work.

     

    Source: Mohd Khair

deneme bonusu