Tag: Singaporeans

  • 5 Steps To Opt-Out From Getting Junk Mail From SingPost

    5 Steps To Opt-Out From Getting Junk Mail From SingPost

    Recently, SingPost said in a CNA report that most residents welcomed the junk mail in their mailbox, judging from low response to their Opt-Out scheme.

    To which many residents replied, “Har? Got such thing meh? Can opt out? Where got? Where?”

    It seems there is an online form buried deep inside their Contact Page.

    Here is how you can opt out:

    1. Visit the Singpost site and tear your hair out looking for an Opt-Out of Junk Mail link.

    2. Finally find it at: http://www.singpost.com/contact-us/service-enquiry

    3. For “Service Type”, choose “Postal”

    4. For “Category”, choose “Advertising Mail”

    5. For Sub-category, choose “OPT-OUT Service”

    Then you can fill out the special form to get an orange No Admail sticker to paste on your mailbox!

    You’re welcome.

     

    Source: mrbrown

  • Chee Soon Juan: Singapore Is Ailing, PAP Serving Her Poison

    Chee Soon Juan: Singapore Is Ailing, PAP Serving Her Poison

    Dr Chee Soon Juan, the Secretary-General of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), wrote an article on the condition of the country stating that Singapore economy is living on borrowed time and innovation is the only antidote.

    “It is what we desperately need for economic regeneration. Welcoming the unknown, taking risks, making mistakes, embracing failure, encouraging derring-do – isn’t this what being innovative is all about?” he said.

    Pointing that countries around the world are changing so drastically politically while Singapore continues to follow its old ways, being “disastrously out-of-sync with rapidly changing times.”. Cocooned in its comfort zone, unaware that Singapore is sinking deeper into dysfunction and mediocrity and passed by societies ready and willing to change.

    This is what he wrote in full :

    THE WORLD is in upheaval. South Koreans throng the streets demanding the removal of their president; Malaysians clash as they profess their love or loathing (depending on whether you don red or yellow apparel) for their prime minister; pro- and anti-Beijing Hong Kongers do battle over whether two young lawmakers should be disqualified from parliament; Pinoys and Pinays elected a Pope-cussing-Obama-hating-gun-happy politician as their national leader; the Brits up-ended order of every conceivable kind when they voted to leave the European Union; and now, half of Americans elected as their president someone whom the other half cannot find enough expletives to hurl at.

    All this is enough to make Singaporeans want to quicken the search for another habitable planet to fly to.

    Cue PM Lee: “In Singapore, we watch all this with concern and we have to ask ourselves how we can prevent ourselves from going in that direction. For 50 years we’ve been very lucky. We are still united, still proud of the country, still moving forward…So be aware that the risks are there, and you have seen what can go wrong in other countries.”

    Translation: Singaporeans are lucky to have the PAP. So shun disruption, stick with the familiar. We may not be able to change the government but that is a good thing because citizens cannot be trusted to make the right decisions – just look at the other countries. The PAP will decide for us and protect us from the world’s madness.

    This is what Singaporeans hear and have been hearing for half-a-century. The thinking has been baked into our national DNA.

    It is also one that will ensure our country’s demise. It is this fear of the unfamiliar, fear of getting things wrong, fear of taking chances that will be Singapore’s undoing. For nothing in such an outlook fosters an innovative culture.

    Welcoming the unknown, taking risks, making mistakes, embracing failure, encouraging derring-do – isn’t this what being innovative is all about?

    The truth is that our economy is living on borrowed time. The dependence on multinationals to transfer skills and know-how, a hard-working and cheap labour force ready to work even harder and cheaper, and a bewildering bevy of government companies controlled by the Prime Minister’s wife is a model that may have worked in the past but is disastrously out-of-sync with rapidly changing times.

    As it is, our economy, teetering on the brink of a recession, has been ailing for the last couple of years – this taking place despite the absence of a major world crisis. The danger is that it may signal the beginning of something protracted.

    Innovation is the anti-dote. It is what we desperately need for economic regeneration. For this, change – including political change, especially political change – is necessary.

    I can do no better than quote Steve Wozniak, Apple’s co-founder, who pointed out that a company like Apple could not have emerged from a place like Singapore: “Look at structured societies like Singapore, where are the creative people?…All the creative elements seem to disappear.”

    It is a tragedy that Singaporeans are unable to see that Americans, Hong Kongers, or Britons are unafraid to take political chances, stand up to injustice – perceived or otherwise, and be their nation’s boss. So what if Brexit fails or China cracks down on Hong Kong or Donald Trump’s tenure turns out to be a disaster? They’ll learn, course-correct and improve their political systems in the long run.

    What about us? We continue to be afraid of change because the PAP breeds and feeds the fear of change. We are cocooned in our comfort zone, unaware that we are sinking deeper into dysfunction and mediocrity and passed by societies ready and willing to change.

    It has become a cliche, but still no less true, that this island on which we inhabit has precious little natural resources; nothing to mine for, drill at or grow on. This is why it is so troubling that those in power are strangulating the very thing that will ensure our survival and progress – the minds of our people.

    What fertiliser does for crops, political freedom does for innovation. The messiness and seeming chaos that accompanies democracy must not be seen as societal threats to be bleached from our system. In our desire for peace and security, let us not inadvertently celebrate the peace of the cemetery and the security of the serf.

    Political disruption (unfortunately, to many Singaporeans, this includes the simple act of electing a few more opposition MPs) is needed to energise the human spirit and provide that impetus for positive change.

    May wisdom and courage prevail.

     

    Source: www.theonlinecitizen.com

  • F1 Supremo: Singapore Ungrateful, Not Interested To Extend F1 Contract

    F1 Supremo: Singapore Ungrateful, Not Interested To Extend F1 Contract

    The future of Singapore Grand Prix has been cast into fresh doubts after Formula One head honcho Bernie Ecclestone claimed the Republic no longer wants to host a race here.

    Speculation was rife during September’s Singapore Grand Prix on whether negotiations to extend the Singapore race when its five-year deal expires next year would be concluded successfully.

    In an interview with German magazine Auto Motor Und Sport that was published on Sunday (Nov 20), Mr Ecclestone — who once christened the Singapore night race the “crown jewel” of Formula One — claimed Singapore is not going to extend its deal.

    “Look at what we have done for Singapore,” the F1 chief executive was quoted as saying. “Yes, the Grand Prix has cost Singapore a lot of money, but we’ve also given them a lot of money.

    “Singapore was suddenly more than just an airport to fly to or from somewhere. Now they believe they have reached their goal and they do not want a Grand Prix anymore.”

    When contacted by TODAY, a Singapore GP spokesperson said they “don’t comment on ongoing commercial negotiations”.

    Mr Ecclestone’s comments came on the back of a poor 2016 edition of the Singapore race. Organisers Singapore GP reported that overall ticket sales at the Marina Bay Street Circuit were 15 per cent lower than the average attendance since 2008.

     

    In the interview with Auto Motor Und Sport, Mr Ecclestone also said that some of the current manufacturers – including world champions Mercedes – may quit in the near future.

    “It could happen to us that Mercedes and Ferrari run away,” he said. “But honestly, if the races get better, this may not be such a terrible vision.

    “We have to expect the manufacturers to leave us anyway. Mercedes will retire on the day when it suits them and it’s something we had before – look at Honda, BMW and Toyota. They go when Formula 1 has done the job for them. There is no gratitude.”

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Beware Of Scam Impersonating Muhammadiyah’s Discontinued Fund-Raising Project

    Beware Of Scam Impersonating Muhammadiyah’s Discontinued Fund-Raising Project

    BE AWARE

    I just received this under my door. The hp no is no longer in service and no one answers the tel line.

    When I called Muhammadiyah, I was shocked to find out they had already DISCONTINUED  this door to door collection and they have actually made a police report.

    Someone was using their logo and slip to make false collection.

     

    Source: Azian Ismail

  • PAP Has Gotten Worse Since Last GE

    PAP Has Gotten Worse Since Last GE

    <Written by Joseph Tan Kheng Liang>

    The PAP has gotten worse since the last GE!

    One of the most recent landmarks in the Singaporean political calendar was the ‘watershed elections’ of 2011. The term watershed was used because it seemed highly probable at that point in time that the PAP would lose several GRCs. Lee Hsien Loong even apologised and cried in public.

    The key question is this: How has the PAP changed for the better since then? The clear and simple answer is that the PAP is back to their own arrogant ways and Singaporeans are not going to benefit from this! Let me give you some examples to illustrate.

    In 2011, they promised to work harder and apologised for their mistakes, mainly due to a liberal immigration policy and an infrastructure which did not keep up. 5 years later, they have come up with arrogant tactics and a completely befuddling “ownself-check-ownself” governing philosophy.

    We have seen numerous cases of lack of transparency in recent times, including the Hep C outbreak at SGH which was not made public until a later stage, we had the case where residents in Sengkang felt cheated after plans to build a columbarium was labelled as a ‘temple’ instead.

    When the trains have new problems such as mysterious ‘signalling fault’, there was no sound or trace of apology from their favourite fixer Khaw Boon Wan. Instead, he chose to pretend that everything was fine, celebrating openings and gatherings on his Facebook page.

    Looking at the by-election of 2016 (which was caused in part because of the actions of their own MP), ministers and even junior MPs took the liberty to ‘whack’ their opponent’s character. When another by-election took place 3 years before, they resorted to no such thing with Lee Li Lian.

    Their jokes even continued abroad! Mainstream media was so proud that Pinky got invited to a US State dinner but did not boast as much when he later ended up offending China by commenting on their territorial dispute and later prove their foreign policy lapses by offending Trump!

    If the average man thinks that these issues do not affect him, look at the price increases: parking charges and waste collection charges (which Leong Sze Hian dug and found an increased surplus)! Even though there is a drop in transport charges, it is not as much as the drop in oil prices!

    Ask yourselves: has the PAP given you a better life since the last General Elections? If the answer is no, the PAP must be very thick-skinned to tell us that they wish to check themselves! Is this even right given their recent track record?

    I can only conclude that they have gotten worse and need someone like the SDP to keep them in check!

     

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

deneme bonusu