Tag: Singaporeans

  • GE2015: 10 Key Election Speeches From Independence To GE2011

    GE2015: 10 Key Election Speeches From Independence To GE2011

    We look back at some of the significant speeches and rallies held by candidates and the historical turning points from past elections.

    By Hong Xinying

    image

    Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong at a lunchtime rally in 2011. Image: Yahoo file photo/ Kzan

    1. The uncontested 1966 by-elections

    This was the year when four of five People’s Action Party (PAP) candidates were elected, uncontested at the three by-elections held in January, March and November 1966.

    By-elections were held after Barisan Sosialis members of parliament quit en masse in 1966. The now-defunct opposition party was formed in 1961 by former PAP members with leftist sympathies.

    Lawyer M. P. D. Nair and clerk Chan Yoke Kwong were the only independent candidates who contested for and lost the Thomson seat at the by-elections that year.

    “It is good to see other people coming out to contest the elections again,” said then Minister of Labour Jek Yeun Thong, as reported by local newspaper The Straits Times.

    He added: “This helps to nail the lie of the Barisan Sosialis that democracy is dead in Singapore and that people are no more interested in elections.”

    2. When PAP first became ruling party by default

    In 1968, the People’s Action Party (PAP) was automatically returned to power on Nomination Day itself, as 51 of 58 seats were left uncontested. Independent candidates fielded for and lost the remaining seven seats to PAP. Its biggest opponent, Barisan Sosialis chose to boycott the elections that year as well.

    In a public statement made on Nomination Day, then Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew said simply that he “would have preferred many more contests” from opposition leaders, to serve as “good training to our younger men (of PAP).”

    3. Lee Kuan Yew’s ‘that iron in him’ 1980 rally speech

    Singapore’s first Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew gave one of his most memorable quotes at a December 20 rally at Fullerton Square in 1980, ahead of polling day that year.

    As reported by The Straits Times, Lee said: “Whoever governs Singapore must have that iron in him, or give it up! This is not a game of cards! This is your life and mine! I spent a whole lifetime building this, and as long as I am in charge, nobody is going to knock it down.”

    He also discussed how the 1980 election was “the most tranquil election” he had had in post-independence Singapore, and harangued the opposition parties “to make some effort” in fielding more candidates.

    That year, 38 out of 75 seats were contested by opposition politicians from the United People’s Front, Workers’ Party, United Front, Barisan Sosialis, Singapore Malay National Organisation (also known as PKMS), Singapore Democratic Party and the Singapore Justice Party.

    4. The first opposition politician in parliament

    At the 1981 by-elections, Opposition leader J B. Jeyaretnam of Workers’ Party (WP) became the first opposition politician in parliament at a post-independence election. No other opposition leader was successfully elected since the Barisan Sosialis boycott in 1966.

    Jeyaretnam contested and won the Anson ward with 51.93 per cent of the vote, beating PAP candidate Pang Kim Hin and independent candidate Harbans Singh.

    At a WP election rally in October 1981, Jeyaretnam said he had the people’s interest at heart when he decided to stand for election. “I want to do it for you. This is your fight, not mine,” said Jeyaretnam at the rally, as reported by local newspaper The Straits Times.

    5. Chiam See Tong’s winning 1984 campaign

    A notable Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) rally held on December 17 at Toa Payoh Lorong 8 drew a large crowd that a Straits Times editor called ‘stupendous’.

    During the rally, then SDP secretary-general Chiam See Tong said he stood for election because Singaporeans “cannot take things for granted”.

    He spoke in reference to bread and butter issues such as the prices of HDB (Housing Development Board) flats, Central Provident Fund (CPF) withdrawals, as well as the controversial graduate mother scheme (which gave said mums financial benefits).

    Chiam stood for and won the seat for Potong Pasir that year and was re-elected at subsequent elections up to 2011.

    6. The GRC and presidential power debates in 1988

    This was the year where the Group Representation Constituency (GRC) system was first introduced. Before 1988, candidates competed for single-member seats, which are now known as Single Member Constituencies (SMCs).

    The new system also required multi-racial representation in contesting groups; at least one of the candidates must belong to an ethnic minority for each group constituency.

    United People’s Front leader Harbans Singh said the GRC system was ‘rubbish’. To such criticism, the then-Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew gave a sharp retort.

    “Vote for the best candidate … If you vote for the wrong man, then I wish you well, you will soon find out,” said Lee at the 22 August rally covered by The Straits Times.

    At the rally, Lee again defended his hard-line approach to politics. He suggested that “affable, soft-approach, soft-touch leaders” might not have the “certain steel in them to stand up to pressures”.

    Candidates from four political parties contesting the 1988 general election also went on screen to woo voters to their cause, in the first unedited and televised political debate in Singapore.

    In his televised segment, PAP politician Goh Chok Tong echoed the single-minded, pragmatic approach of Singapore’s first Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew.

    Goh spoke of how the ruling party government dealt with the 1985 financial crisis and triumphed, with policies that were “difficult and unpleasant to implement” but ultimately “succeeded”.

    Opposition leaders, on the other hand, criticised the proposed new powers to be granted to future presidents.

    Chiam See Tong felt that the elected presidents would not be “a true representative” of the voters’ choice, as a select few would qualify to be elected.

    National Solidarity Party (NSP) candidate Ken Sunn felt that any changes to presidential powers should be passed only after a national referendum.

    The impact of that televised debate however, is debatable. PAP returned to power that year with 80 out of 81 seats; Chiam was the only opposition leader who fielded and got elected in 1988 with 63.3 per cent of votes for Potong Pasir.

    7. Breakthrough for opposition leaders in 1991

    This election was held just nine months after the role of Prime Minister was passed from Lee Kuan Yew to Goh Chok Tong. The ruling party PAP lost four seats to opposition leaders in 1991 but held on to the majority vote with 77 out of 81 seats in parliament.

    WP candidate Low Thia Khiang (the party’s current secretary-general in 2015) was elected for the Hougang SMC for the first time at this election.

    At a Hougang rally that year, Low said that voters need to think long-term when voting. He argued that support for opposition leaders could send “strong signals” that will encourage more qualified candidates to join the opposition ranks.

    8. The recession election in 2001

    The PAP political slogan for the year was “A People United” — this election was held in the year of the September 11 attacks, while Singapore was also in the midst of economic downturn.

    “What we offer is a trusted team, reliable, whom you can depend on to deliver,” said Lee Hsien Loong (then PAP’s first assistant secretary-general), when the PAP election manifesto was released on 20 October, according to a Today report.

    He also spoke of the $11.3 billion fund for tax cuts and handouts meant to help Singaporeans in need, during the recession period.

    This was also the year that an opposition coalition was formed with the creation of the Singapore Democratic Alliance (SDA) banner, led by Chiam See Tong.

    PAP eventually won 82 of 84 seats, with the largest number of overall votes (75.3 per cent of total votes) in history since 1980.

    9. Opposition parties united with a purpose in 2006

    The year saw opposition parties making a concerted effort to avoid three-cornered contests against the ruling party.

    The argument goes that it would diminish the overall votes for all opposition candidates involved. That year, all contested wards (47 seats out of 84 in total) were straight fights between an opposition party (SDP, WP or SDA) and the ruling party.

    “We’re trying to avoid a three-cornered fight,” said Chiam See Tong, according to a March 10 report by Today newspaper. “If we enter into one, we’re only going to kill ourselves. We’re not that stupid.”

    This was also the first year that WP opposition leader Sylvia Lim stood for election. She was the only female opposition politician contesting that year.

    “It’s important to have a credible opposition in Singapore … I felt it was important for the system to have some balance and facilitate the voting contest,” Lim told Today newspaper, in a March 8 report.

    10. PM Lee’s apology in 2011

    “If we didn’t get it right, I’m sorry. But we will try better the next time,” said Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong at a rally held on May 3 at Boat Quay next to UOB Plaza, ahead of election day in 2011.

    The apology was notable for its conciliatory note (rare for the party known for its unwavering conviction) and how the ruling party owned up to problems caused by what Lee had described as “side effects” of government initiatives. These include the traffic congestion on trains and problem gambling at the integrated resorts.

    PM Lee also indirectly addressed the controversial comments made by Singapore’s first Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew on 30 April. The then-minister mentor (MM) had said that Aljunied voters had five years to “live and repent”, should they vote for the opposition team from Workers’ Party.

    PM Lee described the MM’s style as one which “tells it like it is”, while describing the current generation of PAP leaders as politicians who “don’t try to do it (Minister Mentor’s) MM’s style”.

    “We do it our way, we spend some time to talk, to explain … to overcome some of these working problems so that we can go in the right strategic directions,” said PM Lee.  Some analysts suggest the difference in political style may have led to MM Lee’s decision to leave the cabinet after the 2011 elections.

     

    Source: https://sg.news.yahoo.com

  • Samir Salim Neji – The Last Minute Independent Candidate For Bukit Batok SMC

    Samir Salim Neji – The Last Minute Independent Candidate For Bukit Batok SMC

    About new citizen Samir Neji- Last minute independent candidate for Bukit Batok

    Samir Salim

    1. His wife, Sabeena Ahamed submitted forms on behalf of Samir as he was overseas – ( is that even allowed ?)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRwKjZVkPfQ

    Wife Submitting Forms On His Behalf

    2. At the Nomination Centre at Kemming Primary School on Sept 1 , Samir was almost disqualified from contesting as a candidate in Bukit Batok as he had only one Proposer, one Seconder and one Assentor – all three are his relatives , Indians from Kerala of non Singapore origin .

    3. PAP members provided another 3 Assentors who are residents of Bukit Batok SMC.

    Nomination Forms

    4. Samir Salim Neji application was eventually accepted and approved for contest by the Election Returning Officers (ELD)

    When asked why he was contesting , Mr Samir Replied that ‘ he was bored ‘

    5. Blogger Joseph Lefort witnessed the 3 PAP members acting as Assentors on his behalf . Read his account of the incident :https://www.facebook.com/shapeoutorshipout?ref=hl

    6. Another witness, Mr Alex Au wrote an account of this episode at Yawning Bread
    https://yawningbread.wordpress.com/…/how-bukit-batok-came…/…

    7. Reactions from Singaporeans
    http://www.sammyboy.com/showthread.php…

    WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT Salim Senji

    He is of Indian origin, from Kerala, South India

    Living in Singapore for the past 15 years ( he claims )

    Holds a singapore citizenship

    Has not served National Service as required by all Singapore citizens

    Linkedin Profile
    https://sg.linkedin.com/in/samirneji

    Twitter
    https://twitter.com/samirneji

    Here’s a youtube video of him apparently answering a question, but there is no interviewer ??
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6C0VpQ4YGbc

    Currently Anaplan’s Managing Director, Southeast Asia.

    What an insult for Singapore to have an alien running as an Independent Candidate but with Assentors from the PAP.

     

    Source: Joseph Lefort

     

     

  • Vivian Balakrishnan: SDP Policies Will Set Singapore On “Path To Greece”

    Vivian Balakrishnan: SDP Policies Will Set Singapore On “Path To Greece”

    Dr Vivian Balakrishnan (photo) did not mince his words when he warned voters that the policies of his opponents from the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) “will set us on our paths to Greece”.

    He and his People’s Action Party team are up against SDP’s team headed by Dr Chee Soon Juan at the polls for Holland-Bukit Timah GRC.

    Dr Balakrishnan went on the offensive, calling for a press conference at the Holland-Bukit Panjang Town Council at Bangkit Road hours after nominations closed yesterday.

    He said of SDP’s policies: “Tax, spend, cut essential services and investments, including defence, that will put our country at risk and ultimately lead to bankruptcy, and a very big bill being passed to our children, not to mention very high levels of taxation.

    “These are not new ideas, these are ideas cut and copied and pasted from other parts of the world, which have failed.

    “In other words, the SDP will set us on the road to Greece and it’s the duty of my team to awaken Singaporeans to the dangers of such policies.”

     

    Source: www.tnp.sg

  • MacPherson, Radin Mas And Bukit Batok SMCs To See 3-Cornered Fights

    MacPherson, Radin Mas And Bukit Batok SMCs To See 3-Cornered Fights

    The single-seat wards of MacPherson, Radin Mas and Bukit Batok will face three-cornered fights at the Sept 11 polls, two more than in the 2011 General Election.

    The Workers’ Party’s (WP) rookie candidate Bernard Chen, 29, a funeral services company executive, will go up against the PAP’s Ms Tin Pei Ling and the National Solidarity Party’s Mr Cheo Chai Chen in MacPherson, which was carved out of the Marine Parade GRC.

    In Radin Mas, PAP incumbent Sam Tan will face off against Mr Kumar Appavoo of the Reform Party and an independent candidate, blogger Han Hui Hui.

    Another independent, businessman Samir Salim Neji, 45, is contesting Bukit Batok against the Singapore Democratic Party’s Sadasivam Veriyah and the PAP’s David Ong.

    The other 10 single-seat wards and 16 group representation constituencies (GRCs) are seeing straight fights.

    At the 2011 polls, there was only one three-cornered fight – in Punggol East between the PAP’s Michael Palmer, the WP’s Ms Lee Li Lian and Mr Desmond Lim Bak Chuan of the Singapore Democratic Alliance.

    Mr Palmer won with 54.54 per cent of the vote, with Ms Lee garnering 41.01 per cent and Mr Lim losing his electoral deposit after scoring just 4.45 per cent.

    Mr Palmer later resigned after publicly admitting to an extramarital affair. Ms Lee won the subsequent by-election in 2013.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Ismail Kassim: New PAP Candidates Should Be Principled, Follow Lead Of S Dhanabalan

    Ismail Kassim: New PAP Candidates Should Be Principled, Follow Lead Of S Dhanabalan

    To the PAP new candidates, I extend my best Qi greetings. I am sure all of you are sincere, dedicated and think of nothing except to do your best to serve the people.

    I like to say that I have no quarrel with any of you. My grouse is against your top party leadership and some of their policies on the key issues that will determine how we will develop as a nation.

    For example, I am against abuses of the law to strike down against opponents, to destroy their lives and their families in the name of strengthening the government. The Amos Yee case comes to mind.

    I am also against putting the glory of the nation above that of the welfare of the ordinary citizens.

    What for become the world’s No 1 in this field and that field, when the majority of the people cannot join in the joy.

    Many of you are from the best homes and come from the world’s greatest universities and left richly rewarding jobs in order to serve the people.

    It is no secret that a select few among you will be groomed for the very top leadership, while others will be rewarded with lucrative appointments commensurate with their ability and talent.

    You may all know it already, but there is no harm in being reminded that holding office has a corrupting, corroding influence.

    Just look at the world around you. See how many idealistic and selfless leaders have succumbed to temptation once in office, more so if they overstayed.

    There is no such thing as self-check. Without proper checks and balance institutions, power corrupts. Even the purest of steel will eventually become rusty.

    It is only natural when you have a desirable post to want to hang on to it, and to hope to get a better, higher post. It’s only human nature.

    But one can also try to resist; every office-holder has to decide for himself the price he is prepared to pay if a conflict arises with his principles or religious precepts.

    It is better to draw your line now and make it firm than later, because it is tempting to change the goal posts, to extend the boundary and make it more accommodating. This is also human nature, reflecting the survival instinct in all of us.

    In the PAP, there is the fine example set by Dhanabalan. He decided to leave the Cabinet after he would not in good conscience support the detention of the so-called Marxist conspiracy.

    Even then it took him years to extricate himself from office, and even more years before the public hears of his deed.

    Years later, two devout Christians opposed the Casino Bill in Parliament as it conflicted with their religious beliefs. But many other very religious MPs from all faiths opted to stifle their conscience.

    People like Dhanabalan are a rare breed these days. Many office-holders here and elsewhere will put their posts right up the altar, above everything else.

    If the crunch ever comes, you will have to decide whether you want to be a Dhanabalan or his opposite, and unless you have drawn a firm line earlier it will be all too easy to rationalise.

     

    Source: Ismail Kassim

deneme bonusu