Tag: Singaporeans

  • MINDEF: Allegations Of Discriminatory Behaviour Are Taken Seriously, Investigations Ongoing

    MINDEF: Allegations Of Discriminatory Behaviour Are Taken Seriously, Investigations Ongoing

    It has come to our attention that there are social media posts spreading allegations of discriminatory practices in the SAF.

    MINDEF/SAF takes such allegations seriously as it impacts public trust and undermines the strong public support for National Service (NS) and the SAF.

    MINDEF/SAF does not tolerate any discriminatory behaviour and is investigating to determine the facts of the case. We take a serious view of the conduct of our servicemen.

    If any service personnel is found to have breached our Code of Conduct, disciplinary proceedings will be convened and the necessary actions will be taken.

     

    Source: Cyberpioneer

  • The Fear Perpetuated By The Urban Myth About Voting In Singapore

    The Fear Perpetuated By The Urban Myth About Voting In Singapore

    By Jamal Ismail

    At a recent dinner with some friends, I was surprised to hear a friend remark that she had no choice but to vote for the PAP because she is a teacher. On another occasion, I heard a similar remark by an office colleague who is convinced that she must vote for PAP or else her son may not get into the right school, and her application for a new HDB flat will be rejected.

    Both assume that their votes are being recorded, and they will be somehow penalized if they don’t cast a vote in favour of the PAP. Surprisingly, these are highly educated people and I realized then that the fear of voting for parties other than PAP is more prevalent than I initially thought.

    During the 2011 General Elections, I volunteered as an Election Agent and saw the entire campaigning and voting process from start to finish. Please allow me to share my experience and guide you through the voting system, one step at a time.

     

    Acknowledging the issue

    There is a perception among many that the Singapore Government is an all-knowing, vengeful entity. Understandably, these fears are rooted in basic survival issues, concerning their career and daily livelihood ‘bread and butter’ issues like housing, healthcare and their children’s education.

    Many Government employees could even relate rumours of some people who had their career destroyed for voting in favour of the Opposition.

    Rumours like these have been passed around for so long, it achieved urban myth status; where everyone has heard of them but no one has been able to prove that it exists. A crucial way to overcome the fear is to learn the facts.

     

    Is my vote a secret?

    YES, your vote is secret. The plain and simple fact is: No one knows who you voted for, unless you tell them. The proof is in the voting process, and you can read about it on the Singapore Elections Department’s webpage.

    Here is the eight-step process that safeguards the secrecy of your vote.

    1. The maintenance of secrecy is mandated by law under Section 56 Parliamentary Elections Act, which states that everyone manning the polling or counting centre must maintain and aid in maintaining the secrecy of voting and anyone who contravenes Section 56 will be guilty of a criminal offence.
    1. Every voting slip has a serial number that is matched to the Electoral Roll. The purpose of a serial number to ensure that you get only one voting slip. Note that your name is NOT on the voting slip.
    1. Each voter has their name and voter number called out for another official to cross out your name from the Electoral Roll, to prevent anyone from voting twice, which would be unfair.
    1. Then you go into a private booth and mark the voting slip. After you mark the voting slip, you are required to fold it in half and drop it into the ballot box. As only one person can use the booth each time and your voting slip was folded, no one can see who you voted for.
    1. Your voting slip goes into the ballot box along with thousands of others. At 8pm, all the ballot boxes containing the voting slips are sealed. The officials use a serial-numbered tamper-proof sticker, signed off by Opposition and PAP representatives. The sealed ballot boxes are sent to a Counting Centre, guarded by a police officer.
    1. At the Counting Centre, the tamper-proof sticker serial numbers are checked by Opposition and PAP representatives. The ballot boxes are then opened and thousands of voting slips are dumped into a big pile on a table. The voting slips are counted, but their serial numbers are NOT RECORDED. This is witnessed and verified by Opposition and PAP representatives.
    1. After the voting slips are counted and verified, all the voting slips and count records go back into the ballot boxes and aresealed again with another set of serial-numbered tamper-proof seals. This is again witnessed by Opposition and PAP representatives.
    1. The sealed ballot boxes are then transported with police escort and locked in a high-security vault at the Supreme Court. No one can open the vault without a court order, and so far the court has never issued such an order.
    1. At the end of 6 months, the same ballot boxes containing the voting slips are burnt. They are transported to the incineration plant under police escort. The Opposition and PAP representatives check and ensure that the same serial numbered tamper-proof seals remain intact, before dumping all the voting slips and records into the incinerator.

    The fact remains, your vote is secret. No one can gain access to your voting slip once you have marked it.

     

    Can someone be punished for not voting for PAP?

    The plain and simple fact is that no one can be or has been punished for their votes. Who you vote for your RIGHT as a Singapore citizen, and voting is mandatory.

    1. No one can force you to vote for anyone, because they would be guilty of Section 59 “Undue Influence” of the Parliamentary Elections Act (Chapter 218).
    2. No one can anyone incentivize you to vote for anyone because they would be guilty of Section 60 “Bribery” of the Parliamentary Elections Act (Chapter 218).

    To give you a scale of how Singaporeans voted in the last General Elections in 2011, a total of 1.9 million votes were cast. About 40% of the votes were NOT in favour of the PAP.

    That means, over 761 THOUSAND people did NOT vote for the PAP.

    If the Urban Myth rumours were true, almost half of the population of Singapore would be unemployed, evicted from their HDBs and their children rejected from schools.

    When GE2011 ended, Opposition Party candidates and thousands of their supporters like me simply went back to our jobs and families; lead productive lives, working and conducting business as usual. I continued serving my reservist as an officer.

    Although many of my friends and I are openly in support of the Opposition for many years, none of us were investigated, arrested or penalized in any way. We did walkabouts, organized and attended Opposition party meetings and rallies, and participated in the democratic process lawfully. So please be assured that you too can do the same without fear of reprisals.

     

    Overcome the fear

    Please find out more about our electoral system, read from a wide variety of sources or even participate in election rallies. Some recommended reading and video on this subject are:

    Your Vote is Your Voice By Maruah (With Video)

    Singapore Elections DepartmentBallots Secrecy

    Take the opportunity to see for yourself how the voting process is conducted by volunteering to be a Voting or Counting Agent and see for yourself the whole voting and counting process from start to finish.

    Your vote is very important. It is your chance to decide on our future. You are not obliged to vote for anyone and no one can force you to choose, even if you are a PA or grassroots member or work in a Government statutory board.

    This coming General Elections, please vote without fear.

     

    Source: www.theonlinecitizen.com

  • Goh Meng Seng: If Private Sector Can Accept Employees Wearing Tudung, Why Not The Public Sector?

    Goh Meng Seng: If Private Sector Can Accept Employees Wearing Tudung, Why Not The Public Sector?

    I do not understand why Tudung is such a difficult issue.

    I believe most Chinese like me are used to seeing our fellow Malay ladies wearing Tudung in our lives, in our working places and on the streets or neighbourhood.

    It is nothing intimidating at all and it should be a proud Heritage of our multi ethnicity and culture. Local born Singaporeans do not feel uneasy with Tudung ladies because we understand and respect their dress code. This is nothing special just like seeing our fellow Sikh brothers wearing turbans.

    So stop talking about difficulties or social acceptance of such. If private sectors have no problem about tudung why should the Government has any problem with that?

     

    Source: Goh Meng Seng

  • Walid J. Abdullah: Politicians Should Reflect Whether They Are Serving The Needs And Interest Of People, Not Be Blindly Loyal To Party

    Walid J. Abdullah: Politicians Should Reflect Whether They Are Serving The Needs And Interest Of People, Not Be Blindly Loyal To Party

    Whenever I had the opportunity to have dialogues with Members of Parliament (especially during undergrad days), it is not uncommon to hear one or several of them say something to the effect of: ‘i remember 20 years ago, i was as enthusiastic and idealistic as you (read: naive and unrealistic), but now that i am older or now that i have access to data, my opinions on certain issues have changed.’

    Despite the apparent condescension in the statement, this is of course a possibility. One must be humble enough to admit – especially the younger ones – without experience and full access to information, one may not be able to fully comprehend a situation.

    At the same time, there exists other possibilities. It could also be possible that being bounded by a political party’s norms and values has changed an individual’s perspectives. The individual could then reason with himself that ‘oh it’s ok for me to sacrifice my values on this small matter, because in doing so i will generate greater good for my community’, when in fact he/she is in delusion. The ‘greater good’ consideration could just ultimately be an individual’s attempt to reconcile his/her cognitive dissonance.

    Just like how ordinary people should constantly reflect on whether their opinions are fair given the specific political circumstances, politicians should consistently contemplate whether they are serving the needs and interests of the people, or whether they are just being loyal to the party – any party – at the expense of others.

     

    Source: Walid J. Abdullah

  • Non-Graduate Teachers Feels New Remuneration System Is Fairer

    Non-Graduate Teachers Feels New Remuneration System Is Fairer

    In line with the move within the Public Service to recognise skills beyond paper qualifications, the Ministry of Education (MOE) will be abolishing the differences in salary structure for graduate and non-graduate educators, including allied educators.

    Also, some 30,800 educators in schools here will be getting a pay raise from October, to ensure their wages keep pace with the market.

    The merging of salary structures for teachers will kick in from October, while the same is targeted to take place next April for allied educators, who provide students with additional support such as in counselling in classrooms.

    With the latest change, non-graduate and graduate teachers may still start off at different salaries “reflecting market practice”, but both groups will progress and be remunerated along the same salary structure. The incentive for long-serving teachers will also no longer be differentiated between graduate and non-graduate teachers.

    Details of the merged structure for allied educators will be announced at a later date.

    About 30,000 teachers and school leaders will see their monthly salaries go up between 4 per cent and 9 per cent, depending on their seniority level, while some 800 allied educators will have their salaries increased by about 5 per cent.

    There are currently about 33,000 teachers and 2,300 allied educators. In response to queries, the MOE said for those who are not eligible for this round of salary adjustments, it is because “their salaries are generally in line with the market”.

    Commenting on these changes in a Facebook post today, Education Minister Heng Swee Keat said the move to create a single salary structure is “one of the most significant in recent years”.

    “We are going beyond qualifications … I am glad to see MOE taking the lead in changing mindsets about skills, and supporting the critical SkillsFuture initiative,” Mr Heng said.

    Speaking to reporters on the sidelines of the launch of commemorative notes for SG50 today, Mr Heng noted there will be no change in the way educators are being assessed, which includes criteria such as classroom teaching and how they develop students.

    “Our focus continues to be on performance of teachers … At the end of it, the assessment in promotion of teachers depends on performance and contribution and what they bring to the classroom and to the education system,” Mr Heng said.

    From next month, the Public Service Division will merge career tracks for graduates and non-graduates.

    Last August, the MOE announced that non-graduate teachers with outstanding performance would be placed on the graduate salary scale without the need to obtain a degree.

    Currently, the gross starting monthly salary of graduate teachers ranges from S$3,010 to S$3,310 while that of non-graduate teachers ranges from S$1,580 to S$1,920. For allied educators, salaries range between S$1,500 to S$4,300.

    The last round of salary adjustments for educators was in September 2012. Mr Heng, when queried, debunked talk that the increments were election-related.

    Salary revisions, he said, are “periodic”.

    “It is part and parcel of how the public service operates,” he said. “In this cycle, we took almost a year to finalise many of the details to create a single (salary) scheme of service to support the efforts of SkillsFuture, in creating (an) emphasis on skills to go beyond qualifications.”

    The MOE will also be giving cash payouts of between S$500 to S$700 to teachers every September from next year to educators for learning-related expenses such as computers and magazine subscriptions, instead of staff having to file claims for them.

    Non-graduate teachers TODAY spoke to welcomed the single salary structure, calling it a long-time coming. A 36-year-old teacher who is currently studying for his degree, and has been teaching for seven years, said non-graduate teachers “are always behind in terms of remuneration even when facing the same expectations … as graduate teachers”. He did not want to be named.

    Another teacher, 28, who does not hold a degree, and has been in service for the past six years, pointed out that all teachers have the same workload regardless of their qualifications. It is “fairer” to be remunerated on the same scheme, she said, adding: “Hopefully, this will make them more motivated and give them more opportunities in their career progression.”

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

deneme bonusu