Tag: Singtel

  • Singtel Subscribers Hit By Phishing E-mail. Beware!

    Singtel Subscribers Hit By Phishing E-mail. Beware!

    Some Singtel subscribers have received phishing e-mails, seemingly sent by the telco, telling them “Your Singtel bill is now available for download”.

    The bills are all in the $200 range. Some e-mails were sent from a Singtel e-mail address and others from SingNet.

    Singtel subscriber Steven Low, 39, received the first e-mail last Friday. His bill was given as $234.19 and there was an attachment that he did not open.

    The civil servant, who called The New Paper’s hotline, said: “The bill was significantly higher than usual, but because I went overseas this month, I thought it contributed to the amount.”

    Mr Low, who pays his Singtel bills by Giro, received another five similar e-mails.

    “More warning bells rang when I realised the amount in each e-mail was different. I was worried and called Singtel’s customer service. Some customers may not check and just pay.”

    Another Singtel subscriber, Mr Jasper Loh, 38, a helpdesk engineer, also received similar phishing e-mails.

    He said: “I clicked on the link, which opened a blank page and downloaded a file. Luckily, my company’s website security blocked the download. I’m guessing the file will install a virus.”

    “Singtel should do something to stop these phishing e-mails,” he added.

    When contacted, a Singtel spokesman said it was aware of the issue.

    She said: “These are phishing e-mails and are not from Singtel. We advise recipients of these e-mails to delete them immediately.

    “Once informed of such malicious e-mails, we took prompt action to take down the malicious sites linked to these e-mails and to block them.”

    Mr David Maciejak, head of cybersecurity firm Fortinet’s FortiGuard Lion R&D team for Asia Pacific, told TNP it is dangerous to click on the links.

    “The links lead to domains which have been flagged as malicious by our FortiGuard Labs malware detection engines,” he said.

    “A malware file will be downloaded onto the user’s computer… and facilitate the downloading of more malicious files.”

    Mr Maciejak added that anything can be downloaded, including ransomware that will lock up the user’s computer, or malware that may be able to access and steal personal details.

    Mr Tony Jarvis, Check Point Software Technologies’ chief strategist for threat prevention in Asia Pacific, Middle East and Africa, said the links pointed to free online servers with short lifespans that will automatically download files to the end user machine.

    Mr Jarvis said the Singtel e-mail address could be forged by e-mail spoofing.

    He said: “It’s the creation of e-mail messages with a forged sender address. It can be easily achieved by using the right tools and can be done at no cost.”

    He reminds users to read the entire e-mail, especially if they are worried about its validity.

    “They should contact their service provider if they have any doubts. If the e-mail is about their billing, users can think back if the e-mail is sent in their usual billing cycle,” he said.

     

    Source: TNP

  • Live Coverage Of Olympics: Lessons To Learn For 2020

    Live Coverage Of Olympics: Lessons To Learn For 2020

    It has been looming on the horizon but the time has finally come – Singapore has said no in the face of escalating broadcast rights fees.

    By declining to provide extra funds for Mediacorp to secure live coverage of the Olympics, the Government is sending a clear message: It will not be held to ransom by broadcast rights holders.

    One can say that the writing was on the wall. Ever since Singtel’s excessive 2009 bid for the English Premier League, Singapore’s broadcaster and pay-TV operators have earned a reputation for being able and willing to pay top dollar for televised sports.

    As far as rights holders were concerned, it set the tone for future negotiations.

    The 2010 World Cup was secured only 35 days before kick-off as both sides pushed for a better deal.

    Last season, Spain’s La Liga was screened only four months into the campaign.

    But, with less than two weeks to the Olympics, where Team Singapore could return with their best medal haul, one wonders if this fiasco could have been avoided with better planning.

    Yes, bottom lines have to be respected.

    If broadcasters are unable to monetise the Olympics coverage, in part due to the Games’ odd hours that are unattractive to advertisers (Rio de Janeiro is 11 hours behind Singapore), it would be unwise to fork out an astronomical sum.

    Yes, with escalating broadcast rights fees, as Singaporeans have experienced first-hand with the World Cup and English Premier League, perhaps it is time to draw the line and say enough is enough.

    The escalating cost is not helped by the International Olympic Committee’s decision to award broadcast rights to a third party – one whose primary concern is to maximise profit – over a national broadcaster like Mediacorp.

    But there are valuable – and painful – lessons to be learnt here.

    First, Dentsu was awarded the rights in 2013 and opened talks with Mediacorp the same year.

    It is hard to understand how, after three years, no deal for live coverage could be struck, especially as the 16 other territories under Dentsu have already done so.

    Second, for the sake of viewers, it is imperative that the Government and local broadcasters decide once and for all the importance of beaming the Olympics live, and find a balance between commercial viability and national interest.

    One alternative could be the national broadcaster and the telcos combining to submit a joint bid, as was the case when Singtel and StarHub bid for the 2010 World Cup to share costs.

    Last year’s Budget saw annual funding for Mediacorp rise by 28 per cent to $250 million over five years. Can more of that be set aside for major events like the Olympics, especially if Singapore continues toproduce more world-class athletes?

    The private sector can also step in, by way of sponsorship for Olympic programming. Companies like Samsung, McDonald’s and Panasonic are all Olympic sponsors. Why couldn’t they be persuaded to come on board locally?

    Broadcasters and pay-TV operators need to be consistent with the message they are sending.

    Can Singapore claim to be serious about promoting local sports when it can pay more than $200 million for three seasons of English Premier League action, but baulk at spending less than 5 per cent of that on the Olympics, where 25 of the nation’s best athletes are pushing themselves to their limits?

    Are we taking ourselves seriously as a sporting nation if we invest $40 million in high- performance athletes but, when they have reached sport’s grandest stage, deprive them of sharing the moment with their supporters?

    Broadcast rights fees are only going to increase. Which is why, painful as it will be to miss out on a potentially monumental 2016 Olympics, all parties need to start planning to avoid a repeat four years from now.

     

    Source: The Straits Times

  • Open Letter To SingTel Group CEO: Stop Colluding With VIPGames To Cheat Unwitting Customers

    Open Letter To SingTel Group CEO: Stop Colluding With VIPGames To Cheat Unwitting Customers

    Open letter to SingTel Group CEO

    06 Mar 2016

    Madam Chua Sock Koong
    Group CEO of SingTel

    It pains me to bring to your attention that SingTel has become an accomplice with one of its third party partners in a scheme to dupe subscribers into signing up for video games.

    I happen to be one of its unwitting victims. I shudder to think of the thousands of other unwary subscribers who have been lured, trapped and then hooked to such mindless games (See attachments)

    The culprit in question is VIPGames. As I see it, its modus operandi is to send innocuous-looking SMS to SingTel subscribers. If anyone opens it unwittingly, as I must have done, it automatically assumes that the respondent wants to subscribe to its games. This is both an unethical and illegal sales tactic.

    Ismail Kassim 1

    Ismail Kassim 2

    Ismail Kassim 3

    It then informs SingTel to collect the fees on its behalf. Of course, SingTel will only be too happy to do so, as it will keep a substantial portion as its commission, before handing over the balance to the said third party.

    By agreeing to act in concert, SingTel cannot absolve itself of any blame. It is like a gangster collecting protection money on behalf of the mafia.

    Ismail Kassim 4

    Ismail Kassim 5

    It does not matter that a subscriber can cancel the subscription that he did not in the first place want by simply calling up the SingTel complaint line. The point is that subscribers should not be subjected to such gangster-like harassments.

    Madam, do you realise that more and more Singaporeans, especially the young are becoming addicted to such games? If not checked now, it can become a serious national problem later on.

    What is the point of earning a few more dollars through such dubious means? Why help a business partner to undermine the moral fabric of our society for such petty gains?

    As one of Singapore prominent corporations, surely you will agree that SingTel should give top priority to protecting its image. Surely SingTel would also want to contribute towards strengthening the work ethics of the young?

    Surely SingTel should choose its business partners with care and avoid those with a propensity to cheat and deceive.

    I hope you will use your good office to put a stop to such immoral business tactics.

    Regards

    Ismail Kassim

     

    Source: Ismail Kassim

  • Unlimited Data Plans For The Future?

    Unlimited Data Plans For The Future?

    Data is the new competition arena for telcos, as they strive to find new revenue streams, and consumers shift toward data-intensive applications.

    Analysts said one key area will be managing network and infrastructure costs while still providing a good user experience. As data consumption continues to increase, industry watchers said data analytics will be another growth area.

    MyRepublic has said it plans to set large data caps of 12 gigabytes or more, should it be awarded the fourth telco licence by the Infocomm Development Authority of Singapore (IDA). If MyRepublic does that, some analysts have said this could put pressure on current pricing of tiered data plans, forcing the three major telcos M1, StarHub and Singtel to be more generous.

    While this may be good news for consumers, it could impact the margins for telcos and their investment in infrastructure.

    “With the potential of another operator coming to the market, the prices will go down and you might one day have unlimited packages,” said Mr Dustin Kehoe, programme director of AP Telecommunications at IDC Asia Pacific. “But you still have to ask the bigger question. If telcos are not making money, then they are not going to be investing in networks. And if they are not investing in any networks over time, the user experience will deteriorate.”

    Singtel, StarHub and M1 have spent millions of dollars on data infrastructure and improving mobile connectivity. This includes seeking ways to switch subscribers seamlessly to wireless broadband networks to relieve the load on their mobile network.

    Such solutions would improve the quality of the mobile network and potentially keep a rein on costs. The three telcos are already testing out solutions, most notably, in IDA’s heterogeneous network (HetNet) trial in Jurong Lake District.

    “The answer to this is offloading this to Wi-Fi – offloading the data to fixed line network,” explained Mr Sachin Mittal, vice president of equity research at DBS. “Mobile has only limited capacity and it causes congestion, unless you offload to the fixed line. You need to put incrementally more and more capex and that is something they won’t do for free. So Singtel came up with this Wi-Fi offloading solution where you get a couple of gigabytes if you use their mobile network and the Wi-Fi.”

    At the same time, growing data consumption provides more opportunities to grow revenue. Data analytics will continue to be an area of growth for telcos, especially if they can find creative insights and applications.

    “Getting into things like precision advertising. Knowing something about your customers and offer them something relevant, given the context of a situation, maybe passing by a retail store and having something offered to them that is relevant. Another thing, they are doing here in this country in particular, is the analytics of tourists,” said Mr Kehoe.

    “This is actually interesting information to pass on to retailers, to local governments for money, and that is another way to take data that you have on your network, anonymise it and monetise it,” he added.

    Both Singtel and StarHub have already established analytics teams in a bid to capture growth in the segment.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Singtel Acquired US-Based IT Security Firm, Trustwave for US$810 Million

    Singtel Acquired US-Based IT Security Firm, Trustwave for US$810 Million

    Singapore telco Singtel has acquired US-based information security firm Trustwave for US$810 million in its bid to strengthen its cyber security capabilities globally.

    In a news release on Wednesday (Apr 8), Singtel said it will own a 98 per cent stake, while Trustwave chairman and CEO Robert J McCullen will hold the balance 2 per cent equity interest.

    Following the acquisition, Trustwave is set to continue operating as a standalone business unit, while leveraging Singtel Group’s assets and marketing presence to broaden its portfolio in the Asia Pacific region.

    The acquisition will expand the telco’s existing portfolio of cloud-based solutions, said Singtel, adding that it will leverage Trustwave to meet the demand for managed security services in North America and the Asia Pacific region.

    The enterprise value of Trustwave is US$850 million, and the transaction is expected to be EBITDA positive from the second year of acquisition, said Singtel.

    Singtel added that the transaction is subject to approval from regulatory authorities and other third parties, and is expected to be completed in three to six months.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com