Tag: The Workers’ Party

  • Masagos Zulkifli: Faisal Manap Constantly Bringing Up Race & Religious Matters Is Divisive

    Masagos Zulkifli: Faisal Manap Constantly Bringing Up Race & Religious Matters Is Divisive

    Environment and Water Resources Minister Masagos Zulkifli criticised an opposition MP’s tendency to raise divisive issues relating to the Malay/Muslim community in Parliament on Tuesday (Apr 4).

    At the debate on supporting the aspirations of women in Singapore, Workers’ Party MP Faisal Manap (Aljunied GRC) called for Muslim nurses and uniformed officers in the Home Team and armed forces to be allowed to wear the tudung, or headscarf, at work.

    He said countries like Australia and the United Kingdom had allowed this, and asked when Singapore would take a similar step.

    Responding, Mr Masagos said he found Mr Faisal’s approach “worrisome”, as he had used the motion “to focus on differences instead of rallying people to be united”.

    “He dwells on issues that can injure or hurt the feelings of the community rather than inspire them. In fact, Mr Manap has used many occasions to raise potentially discordant issues in this House,” he added.

    The minister cited issues Mr Faisal raised in past sittings, such as the need for halal kitchens in Navy ships and the perceived discrimination of Malays in the armed forces.

    He asked: “Is it his or his party’s position that these issues are the top concerns of the community?”

    The minister said Mr Faisal’s approach needled the community’s sensitivity “subtly and frequently”.

    “It leaves a lingering feeling of (something) unsolved and unsolvable, and impatience that one day I believe will explode. Is that what Mr Faisal wants?” he asked.

    Mr Masagos noted the Government had responded to Mr Faisal’s queries before, and said he would not elaborate except to emphasise “we are in a multiracial society and we all have a role to play to enlarge our common space”.

    Religion is important, he said. “I too want to see progress in the tudung issue and religious matters that are dear to Muslims,” he added.

    But he noted that Government and community leaders of all races and religions had been discussing such deeply emotive matters behind closed doors.

    “There is a right time, a right place and right way to discuss this.”

    “The way to make progress is gradually and quietly, working under the radar to strengthen mutual trust and understanding among Singaporeans so that we can move forward step by step,” he added.

    In contrast, championing issues “in a higher-profile way like the member always does once in a while, using them to score political points, will not strengthen trust.”

    “It will only raise the temperature and actually make the problems harder to solve,” Mr Masagos said.

    He cited an old social media post by Mr Faisal, in which he posed for a photo during the Wear White campaign in 2014 with Zulfikar Shariff, who was arrested under the Internal Security Act last year for his support for ISIS. Mr Masagos said: “It makes us wonder whether it is Mr Faisal who is supporting Mr Zulfikar or Mr Zulfikar supporting Mr Faisal, or are they together in this because of a common cause.”

    Mr Faisal replied he was there only to support Wear White, which opposes homosexuality: “I’m not so sure what’s behind minister’s mind when he tried to link me to Zulfikar and I’m a bit distraught by his effort to paint me negatively.”

    He also disagreed he was sowing discord and said as an elected MP, he had the right to voice concerns of his community in Parliament.

    Mr Masagos said Mr Faisal was “not repentant or apologetic”, and “insists his strident approach is the correct way”, although it puts Singapore’s multiracial harmony at risk.

    “If each community pushes its own claims aggressively, there will be pushback, there will be animosity,” said the minister.

    Mr Faisal replied all he had been asking since he was elected was for the Government to address the issue: “How does that cause divisiveness and discord?”

    Mr Masagos pointed to his “practice of subtly and frequently bringing issues that are sensitive to the community, knowing (they are) not easy to resolve and cleverly turning it into a state versus religion issue.”

    “These are all very dangerous moves. I actually wonder whether the WP and its leadership are committed to the racial and religious harmony which underpins the security of this country,” he added.

    “Do you want to go back to the politics of race and religion of the 1960s, the politics we wanted to avoid when we left Malaysia? If we don’t want that, why do we let a member constantly raise these issues to stir the community?”

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Watergate: MIW Caught With Pants Down

    Watergate: MIW Caught With Pants Down

    PAPpies and their running dogs in the constructive, nation-building media and academia and on social media say that the price of water hasn’t been changed for years, so we shouldn’t be getting worked up about the 30% hike (peanuts, really).

    But 18 months ago, Vivian B said (see below) there was no need to change the price because PUB has improvements in membrane tech and productivity and that the water tariff and WCT reflect the scarcity of water.

    So what has changed in 18 months?

    Either in 2015 (before GE) the PAP administration didn’t do their homework leading a minster to mislead S’poreans and parly, or in 2017 the cabinet didn’t read what the then minister said in 2015 when making the decision to raise prices.

    But then maybe before GE 2015, PAP wanted to get rid of its “Pay and Pay” tag?

    Kudos to whoever originally dug this up. I think it is Chen Jiaxi Bernard, a WP man. Well done.

     

    Source: https://atans1.wordpress.com

  • Sylvia Lim: Appointment Of Hri Kumar As Deputy Attorney-General Not Ideal

    Sylvia Lim: Appointment Of Hri Kumar As Deputy Attorney-General Not Ideal

    PMO has announced that Mr Hri Kumar, former PAP MP, will be appointed Deputy Attorney-General with effect from March 2017.

    I was asked by a local paper whether I had any concerns about partisanship, given that Mr Kumar was such a strong critic of AHPETC, our WP-run Town Council.

    I gave my response as follows (which I was just told would not be published due to lack of space):

    “It is critical that persons entrusted with vast prosecutorial discretion act in the public interest, and not for partisan political gain. The appointment of a former PAP MP to such a post is not ideal. Whether my concerns prove to be founded or otherwise – remains to be seen”.

    #DAG

     

    Source: Sylvia Lim

  • Gerald Giam: Neighbours Need To Live At Peace With Each Other

    Gerald Giam: Neighbours Need To Live At Peace With Each Other

    Had to mediate several disputes between neighbours on the same floor during house visits last night. There were four households in the fray! It was clear they were vexed over noise, smoking, rude behaviour and other issues. Even the police and HDB had been called in previously, but weren’t able to take any action.

    It took some time for me to hear out each resident’s complaints and convey their salient concerns to their neighbours, to try to convince them to see things from each others’ perspective, empathise with their neighbours’ concerns and change their behaviour.

    As with most community disputes, it helps if neighbours are considerate to each other in the first instance, but even when they are not, to be pleasant-mannered when communicating one’s unhappiness to neighbours, so as not to breed animosity.

    Easier said than done, but there is no better way for all of us to live at peace with each other.

     

    Source: Gerald Giam 严燕松

  • Leon Perera: One-Party System Cannot Last Forever

    Leon Perera: One-Party System Cannot Last Forever

    In the coming century, I hope that my children and grand-children grow old and raise my great-grandchildren in Singapore long after I’m gone. But I fear that the government in our one party dominant system may fail one day. I fear that there will be no able, responsible and electable Opposition to take its place if that happens.

    A one party system makes it very hard for such an alternative party to exist. A one party system makes it likely that the ruling party – facing no viable competitors – will eventually lose its way. A one party system makes it likely that the ruling party will get away with changing the Constitution and changing Singapore to something other than a democracy, to keep itself in power forever. So that the system becomes practically uncontestable. What would stop them?

    Minister Ong’s recent comments are consistent with DPM Teo’s confirmation in Parliament on 9 November 2016 that the ruling party hopes to win 100% of all fully elected seats at the next GE.

    But can one party solve all of Singapore’s problems today and tomorrow? Can one party generate all the good ideas Singapore needs to keep going? Has any one party state on earth thrived for 100 years or more as a developed country?

    If a one party system cannot last forever, will there be another good party around when Singapore’s time for change comes, as it inevitably will? Or will a new, extremist party fill the political vacuum when a crisis hits and steer Singapore into the abyss?

    We can ignore these inconvenient truths and keep kicking the can down the road. Because it’s always easier to go with the flow.

    But I hope we won’t.

    The onus is on all of us who share such ideals to convince our fellow Singaporeans of these truths and inspire them to act. So that your great-grandchildren and mine will still proudly pledge themselves “to build a democratic society based on justice and equality”…and remember us for having done our part.

     

    Source: Leon Perera