Tag: Zulfikar Shariff

  • Zulfikar Shariff: Duterte – Beneath Tough Talk, Is He A Potential Peacemaker?

    Zulfikar Shariff: Duterte – Beneath Tough Talk, Is He A Potential Peacemaker?

    The election of the Philippines’ President-elect Rodrigo Duterte signals an important shift in the country’s internal politics.

    A lot has been made of Mr Duterte’s tough-speaking, no-nonsense approach to crime in Davao. His two decades as mayor of Davao City in Mindanao have seen a drop in violent crime. This drop is attributed partly to his support of the “Davao Death Squad”, a vigilante group that conducts extrajudicial killings of criminals.

    In a region where violence (criminal and political) is part of the local history, Mr Duterte’s approach was widely supported. However, beyond the tough, warrior-like front, he has also cultivated another persona – as a peacemaker. And ironically, he is possibly one of the best hopes for lasting peace in the Philippines.

    RELATIONSHIP WITH JOSE MARIA SISON

    A Maoist-inspired Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP) rebellion that seeks social and political reform has lasted more than 40 years and claimed about 30,000 lives.

    The CPP is supported by its military wing, the New People’s Army (NPA) while the National Democratic Front of the Philippines (NDFP) is the political front.

    It seeks the removal of US influence and dismantling of traditional power structures that dominate relations between the peasantry and political elites. At its height in the 1980s, the CPP numbered more than 25,000 members. Its membership has dwindled to about 4,000, mainly from the peasant and indigenous communities.

    Negotiations between the CPP and the government have repeatedly broken down amid accusations of bad faith and insincerity. In 2013, negotiations were called off after the CPP demanded that its rebels held in detention be released. The Philippine government rejected the demand, citing difficulty in ascertaining a rebel from a criminal.

    Mr Duterte’s longstanding relationship with the CPP’s founder and ideologue, Jose Maria Sison, may provide a solution to the conflict.

    Sison, who was Mr Duterte’s lecturer at Lyceum University, has been in a self-imposed exile in the Netherlands after the Philippine government cancelled his passport while he was on a European lecture tour.

    Mr Duterte’s overtures to the CPP have been received positively by its leadership. Soon after his election, he met NDFP chief negotiator Fidel Agcaoili and committed to peace talks and amnesty for political prisoners.

    He further offered the CPP four Cabinet posts in the labour, agrarian reform, environment and social welfare departments.

    This offer does not mean the CPP would necessarily be part of the administration.

    As Sison has made clear, the offer can only be accepted once there is a negotiated truce. With Mr Duterte due to be sworn in on June 30, it is unlikely that any CPP members would be part of the Duterte administration for now.

    It, however, strengthens the hand of CPP leaders who are more inclined towards peaceful negotiations over armed rebellion.

    The rapprochement has, however, been rejected by some members of the Filipino military and political establishment.

    Former navy officer and coup plotter Senator Antonio Trillanes, and former police intelligence chief Rodolfo Mendoza have both discussed the possibility of a coup if Mr Duterte proceeds with his plans to bring the communists into his administration.

    BANGSAMORO

    The Muslims in Southern Philippines (Bangsamoro or Moro nation) have resisted Spanish and American colonisation for 300 years. Since independence, that resistance is focused on the Philippine state.

    At stake is the autonomy of Mindanao and its surrounding islands.

    In 1989, an Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao was created as part of the peace agreement between the Philippine government and the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF).

    As mayor of Mindanao’s largest city and with family members from among the Bangsamoro, Mr Duterte’s candidacy was strongly supported by the Bangsamoro groups.

    His backing for the enactment of the Halal Ordinance in Davao City, which facilitates and regulates halal food compliance, and his support for the Bangsamoro Basic Law (BBL) have won him favours in the restive region.

    The basic law would have resulted in the creation of a Bangsamoro Autonomous Region, granting greater autonomy for the region and a demilitarisation of the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF).

    There are, however, other complications.

    Mr Duterte’s running mate, Senator Alan Peter Cayetano, is opposed to the basic law, saying it would lead to civil war and strengthen the MILF.

    The weakening MNLF has thus far rejected the basic law while the MILF has declared that its demilitarisation is conditional on the BBL being passed into law.

    Mr Duterte now appears to have moved away from his support for the basic law and is pushing for federalism of the Philippines. While federalism would potentially grant local autonomy to the Mindanao (among others), they would remain as just another region within the Philippine state.

    Still, the Bangsamoro appear to be hopeful of Mr Duterte’s next moves. Having worked closely with him over the years, there is optimism that he will be an honest broker and help initiate peaceful settlements.

    NAVIGATING INTERESTS

    While Mr Duterte appears to have the force of personality and longstanding relationships with leaders of the CPP and the Bangsamoro, he still needs to navigate a political system that has failed to find a solution.

    Sections of the military that have spent decades fighting the CPP and MILF appear to reject any settlement with the two groups.

    The failed negotiations over the years have also created a distrustful environment among political elites on each side.

    His challenge is not merely to negotiate a workable agreement but to convince every party to let go of the legacies of conflict and distrust. At the same time, he needs to assure the elements within the military and political elites and the rebel groups that they will remain relevant and influential.

    While his extending the olive branch to the CPP and MILF is a positive start, Mr Duterte still needs to convince his administration that lasting peace is the best hope for the country. And hope that the CPP and MILF keep to their end of the deal.


    • The writer is a final-year PhD candidate at La Trobe University, Australia (International Relations). He researches International Institutionalism with a focus on Asean.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Zulfikar Shariff: Racism Against Malay Community Finally Getting Attention

    Zulfikar Shariff: Racism Against Malay Community Finally Getting Attention

    For the last 17 years…. PAP Malay MPs have blamed me for discussing how Malays are discriminated in Singapura.

    I have been threatened, abused, attacked…

    They said I should not raise these issues.

    That we should compromise.

    Give and take.

    That I should encourage the community to support them so their party would see them as being relevant and they can do more.

    That discrimination is isolated.

    And now….we are starting to hear regular cases of discrimination.

    These cases are becoming common not because society is becoming more racist.

    But because the Malays used to accept being discriminated and kept quiet.

    We did not have any avenue to raise it.

    The media would not publish anything beyond government narrative.

    The Malay MPs would reject, ignore and give platitudes when told of racism.

    Malay organisations are powerless and (still) do not want to affect their standing.

    But now with social media…we are beginning to see how Malays are actually treated.

    And it is when we start to speak up, when we reject these discriminatory practices…

    When we resist…

    That we will finally be able to change the situation Insha Allah.

    Racism has been ingrained in Singapuran society and institutions for years…

    It finally is getting the attention it deserves.

     

    Source: Zulfikar Shariff

  • Zulfikar Shariff: Islam Is Different From The West

    Zulfikar Shariff: Islam Is Different From The West

    One major difference between Islam and western civilization is that we have a specific, clear reference point.

    A perfected ideal.

    We know what we are heading towards.

    And our progress is not based on time but of character, values, behavior.

    The ideal is on being the best human we can be.

    Western civilization moves through time in search of an elusive enlightened man.

    It builds, create material, develop wealth and point to these developments as the fruit of progress.

    Man is debased from his higher, noble virtues for primal, unrestrained materiality.

    That is not our world. We do not reject material development.

    But that is not the measure of our progress.

    Islam has a clear ideal.

    We know what we are heading to.

    We do not assume time or matter to be a yardstick.

    Man today is not necessarily better than we were 100 years ago.

    The criteria is not technological advancement or material.

    Our reference point is not an uncertain future.

    The noblest, the one with the most excellent virtues…

    Whose values and character we emulate lived 1,400 years ago.

    That is our reference point.

    We progress by becoming more and more like him.

     

    Source: Zulfikar Shariff

  • Zulfikar Shariff: Racism In Singapore Is Not New

    Zulfikar Shariff: Racism In Singapore Is Not New

    There seems to be more and more posts how Malays and Indians are treated by some racists in Singapura.

    Whether it is about a Chinese woman moving away with irritation from an Indian man who sat beside her on the MRT..

    a Malay man “paid” $20 to move away from a table because the payer’s children do not want to sit beside a Malay..

    A Hijabi told she had to remove her hijab if she worked at a Montessori preschool because Chinese children will be scared if she wore her hijab…

    An older Chinese man in Jurong who pulls off hijab of Muslim women who walk past…

    And some of us assume there is a change….that Singapura is becoming more racist.

    No it is not.

    Racism has been there for a long time. I still remember being called “kiao tor” (dig mud/ skin like mud) from when I was a kid…

    Used to work in sales and when I spoke with prospects in English..being told “if you cannot speak Chinese don’t talk to me”…

    Told “this is Chinese country why dont you speak Chinese?”

    When I worked for a shipping company…my Chinese colleague telling me that there was no way Malays and Indians would be promoted…

    When I told him a senior manager is Indian he replied…”because he has 7 different degrees. Dont think we would promote Indian if his qualification is the same with a Chinese”…

    My 15 year old Malay neighbour giving up and asked me why I bother to take A Levels….and said..

    “why do you bother to study? we are Malays…we cannot go anywhere” (Kau belajar tinggi tinggi buat apa? kita Melayu…tak boleh pergi mana mana).

    Applying to join the Navy when I was in school and told when I submitted the papers… not to bother because I am Muslim.

    Relatives told to remove hijab at work because their bosses do not like it.

    Hearing Chinese friends tell a joke “what do you call an Indian under a tree? Fertilizer”.

    And lots of other similar comments.

    Racism in Singapura is not new.

    There is no change to a more racist society.

    What changed is that there is now social media to show its existence.

     

    Source: Zulfikar Shariff

  • Zulfikar Shariff: Remember The Malay Regiment?

    Zulfikar Shariff: Remember The Malay Regiment?

    The Malay Regiment was established in 1933 as “a body of Malay
    troops who would share the responsibility of military defence and protection of their homeland”.

    The British were initially hesitant to train the Malays since they were known to be warlike and were fighters.

    They felt the problem was “not to get the Malays to fight (at which they had shown themselves only too ready) but to prevent them from fighting.”

    Johor established a Malay Regiment in 1885 and its success was used as proof of the efficacy of the project.

    The first batch of 25 soldiers from Malaya were selected from 1,000 applicants. This ensured a very high standard of recruits.

    During the Japanese invasion of Singapura, the Malay Regiment fought with their heart and their blood to defend the island.

    In the words of General Percival, the Malay Regiment “acquitted themselves in a way which bore comparison with the very best troops in Malaya.

    In particular, by their stubborn defence of the Pasir Panjang Ridge at the height of the Battle of Singapore, they set an example of steadfastness and endurance which will become a great tradition in the Regiment and an inspiration for future generations.”

    On “the morning of the 14th again saw enemy shells falling steadily on the Malay Regiment area and casualties mounted.”

    After heavy fighting, including some hand to hand combat, the Japanese army tried to trick the Malay Regiment by dressing like Punjabi soldiers.

    But the Malays quickly realised the trick and gunned down the enemy “at close range (which) left about 22 (Japanese) lying on the ground dead or wounded.

    The ruse having failed, the Japanese staged a determined attack about two hours later in overwhelming strength. Although the defenders fought bitterly with grenades and automatic weapons they were unable to hold the hill.”

    “Lt. Adnan, commander of Platoon No. 7,… encouraged his men. Mortally wounded he ordered his men to fight on to the last man.”

    Many of the men and all the officers (except Second-Lieutenant Abbas) died in the close and at times hand-to-hand fighting which developed. A number of the captured survivors were massacred by the Japanese.

    Lt. Adnan who, along with his brother officers, fought gallantly in this action was shot down and bayoneted by the enemy.

    His body was then hung upside down from a nearby tree; no one was allowed to cut it down for burial.”

    British “surrender did not mean the end of casualties to the Regiment.

    Within a fortnight five Malay officer-internees of the Regiment were summarily executed for refusing to serve under the Japanese or, alternatively, to put on civilian clothes and accept release.

    Most officers and men who escaped internment at Singapore were arrested on their return home during the year and imprisoned for a while.

    A number of the other ranks were pressed into forced labour gangs and sent to work as far afield as Siam and Indonesia.

    The majority were released from prison camps in Singapore at different dates in March when all up-country evacuees in Singapore were ordered to return home.

    Several of them in a party of 98 Malay personnel serving with the Imperial forces were removed by the Japanese military police and machine-gunned near the Gap.”

    Reference:

    Ramli, Dol. “History of the Malay Regiment 1933-1942.” Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society (1965): 199-243.

    Picture: NCOs and Men of The Malay Regiment 27th May 1941.

     

    Source: Zulfikar Shariff