Author: Rilek1Corner

  • Religion Problem Should Be Settled By Religious Bodies: MUIS Can Do It

    Religion Problem Should Be Settled By Religious Bodies: MUIS Can Do It

    Assalamualaikum,

    Because of a video footage that was shared around Facebook, an imam at Masjid Jamae and Khairudin Aljunied become involved in a police investigation. The imam was alleged to have promoted ill will or violence against the Jews and Christians in our country. And Mr Khairudin is being investigated for encouraging vilification. All because of one busybody who take video and spread around, a small matter that can be peacefully resolved jadi besar. Since the thing already happened, our Muslim community have to look forward and work together to settle the problem.

    But how can a religion problem be investigated by police or secular body? It was a good thing that some MPs suggested that MUIS and PERGAS help in the case and assist along the police. Isn’t this a problem in the muslim community, so we muslims people should have a say and right to the way the matter is settled. Right?

    As for the imam, clearly something is wrong until someone decide to take a video of his sermon. But what the Imam say is from the Quran. We cannot challenge what is written and said in the Quran. MUIS should look into it as nowadays mosque sermons is handled by them, so MUIS is relevant in the investigation.

    It is not saying without MUIS we cannot have racial harmony or peace with other religion. Let me esplain, the case is posted on the internet meaning everyone can reply to this. But until today, did anybody comment help to slow down tension and settle the problem? Saya rasa tidak kan. Thats why we need MUIS assistance to coordinate and help make all our voices become one.

    I might not know much but I hope that this religion issue can be settled by our own muslim community and not involve others or government. It is a small issue, it can be solved. Banyak masalah akan timbul jikalau terlalu banyak tangan terlibat.

    Terima kasih dan salam sejahtera.

     

    Contributor

    Mohd Noh

     

  • Commentary: Muslims Have No Authority To Punish Unbelievers

    Commentary: Muslims Have No Authority To Punish Unbelievers

    There is no Holy Scripture that declares categorically that “there shall be no compulsion in religion” but the Holy Quran. Even though the Quran addresses the word “disbelief” more than 150 times, Muslims have never been given the authority to punish disbelievers.

    The Quran says repeatedly in its verses that Muslims can only rebuke non-Muslims regarding religious matters. Because religious matters are never mentioned in the Holy Book as crimes to be dealt with via secular punishment, to what extent is blasphemy acceptable and punishable?

    Blasphemy in Islam is a strange concept. The notion “blasphemy” stems from the old English word blasfemen, French blasfemer and Latin blasphemare, meaning “I harm.” Based on this meaning, rulers used laws to victimize nonmembers of the ruling group and their dissidents. Nation states that had a state religion used it frequently to serve the interests of the people in power.

    The third Judaic book of Torah Leviticus 24:16 declares that those who speak blasphemy shall surely be put to death. In addition, the seven laws of Noah prohibit blasphemy. In Christianity, the Gospel of Mark 3:29 describes blaspheming the holy spirit as an unpardonable eternal sin.

    Thomas Aquinas regarded blasphemy a major unforgiveable sin, more grave than murder. Meanwhile, blasphemy against God and the Church was a crime punishable by death in much of the Christian world.

    The Quran and the authentic teachings of the Prophet Muhammad describe the practice of showing disrespect or mockery to God and His messenger as acts of ignorance, deliberate provocation or hatred.

    Prior to his move to Medina, most people in Mecca opposed the Prophet as the Messenger of Allah; most of them opposed him, disgraced him, cursed or blasphemed him or even tried to kill him. Nonetheless, he preferred to exercise forgiveness and sought divine mercy for them.

    Even in the case of those who leave Islam, the Prophet Muhammad validates the view that punishment for apostates doesn’t exist in Islam. Islam is the religion of peace. Islamic teachings thus never condone Muslims taking justice on religious matters into their own hands.

    The Surah Ash Shuraah reads, “Those who avoid the greater crimes and shameful deeds, and, when they are angry even then forgive. “Any punishment for socalled blasphemy or apostasy is a matter between the Almighty and the person. Accordingly, the Quran repeatedly condemns those who create disorder and violence.

    The teachings of Islam direct Muslims to treat others well no matter how they treat Muslims. The claim that Islam is the religion of peace is not derived from thin air but from the essence of the concept of “Islam” itself. The word Islam means surrender of all religious matters to the justice of the Almighty.

    Muslims have thus experienced first-hand what blasphemy is. One of the most important cases was the accusation of blasphemy against the writer Salman Rushdie.

    On Feb. 18, 1989, Iran’s Ayatollah, Rohullah Khomeini, issued a fatwa justifying and encouraging the murder of the writer of the novel The Satanic Verses.

    Debate among Muslim scholars about this fatwa ended in undecided conclusions, but they agreed that ulema have mixed up religious matters with political affairs. Thus, the accusation of blasphemy in Islam might be rightly called a political movement and decision that uses religious justification and affirmation.

    Such misleading actions happen anywhere in the world where Islam has been used to justify violent jihad.

    The problem of anti-Islam is not about its religious teachings and practices. Rather, the issue here is about the incompetence of the ulema to deal with the perceived hedonism of modernity and the global capitalist economy. Most scholars on Islam are more focused on the technicalities of reading and reciting the Quran and the Hadith, but they are not ready for discourse or academic debate on Islamic theology.

    The outcome is obvious in the way most ulema respond to current issues and lead followers with traditional and patriarchal authority. Studies of Islamic history and its teachings have barely achieved an open and transparent discourse based on intellect and fairness.

    The tragedy is that some ulema feel and think they are more morally superior and bigger than life itself and so think they are obliged to tell people what’s right and wrong and who will go to heaven or hell.

    To gain more followers, some ulema use sermons to scare people with condemnations of hell. Only a few preach with peaceful tones that embrace all people with care and compassion, such as Mustofa Bisri and Quraish Shihab.

    Actually, Islamic teachings guide people toward better manners and social behavior that upholds the dignity of humankind and social justice. All this is based on the imperative of Islamic teachings for peace, fairness and respect and never taking the law into our own hands. Justice is good but forgiving is best.

    The world is now waiting to see how just how civilized the Islamic community in Indonesia is.

    Source: JakartaPost

  • Shanmugam: Religious Preachers Who Attack Other Religions Won’t Be Tolerated

    Shanmugam: Religious Preachers Who Attack Other Religions Won’t Be Tolerated

    Religious preaching that encourages violence or pits one religion against another will not be tolerated in Singapore, said Minister for Home Affairs and Law K Shanmugam in Parliament on Friday (Mar 3).

    Referring to a video posted on social media which purportedly shows an imam saying “God grant us victory over Jews and Christians”, Mr Shanmugam said the context of what the imam said will be clear once investigations are completed.

    “If the imam had referred to the phrase, to say, for example, that such phrases can promote ill will, hatred, enmity or violence against other communities, and that this is not acceptable in a multi-religious society, then there can be no objection.

    “But if he had said that Jews and Christians should be defeated, and for God to grant Muslim brothers victory over them – to make that very point – then that is completely unacceptable.

    “The Government has taken a strict position when Muslims have been attacked. People have been charged and sent to jail,” he said. “The same applies to any attack on any other religions.”

    He cited the example of a Christian couple sentenced to eight weeks’ jail in 2009 for distributing material that cast Islam in a negative light.

    Mr Shanmugam said the Government’s position has to be made clear because “matters like this have the potential to escalate, with people jumping in, opinions being formed, hardened, along religious lines”.

    If the imam did not make any inflammatory suggestion, no action will be taken and the authorities will issue a public statement, Mr Shanmugam said. But if the imam had engaged in such preaching, “some appropriate action” will be taken.

    “We have to be fair to the imam,” he said.

    Mr Shanmugam also criticised NUS academic Khairudin Aljunied for encouraging vilification of the individual who posted the video online.

    “Looking at what Mr Khairudin has said, he seems to suggest that it is okay for the imam to say that Jews and Christians should be defeated. He assumes that the imam intended to mean that, and Mr Khairudin sees nothing wrong with that.

    “Mr Khairudin’s position and actions are quite unacceptable. He has jumped into this, without verifying the facts and without checking the context. And supports a position that is quite contrary to the norms, values and laws in Singapore.

    “The police will look into the issues, and the conduct of all involved – quite thoroughly,” Mr Shanmugam said.

     

    Source: CNA

  • Someone Who Doesn’t Wear A Hijab Is Not Any Less A Muslim Than Someone Who Wears It

    Someone Who Doesn’t Wear A Hijab Is Not Any Less A Muslim Than Someone Who Wears It

    What makes a Muslim, a Muslim? Just being born into a Muslim family sure doesn’t make one a Muslim. So what is it?  Is it the five daily prayers? Is it the regular remembrance of God? Or is it the hijab for women? In my opinion, what makes a Muslim, a Muslim is his or her Iman. Iman or the faith in one God and His teachings is the foundation of Islam. It’s the faith in your Lord that differentiates you from the others. This is something that is intangible, something that can’t be seen and can only be felt in the heart. When you have Iman, the other things follow.

    Hijab is usually described by a head scarf worn by women to guard their beauty. However, the proper meaning of hijab is not just the head scarf, but also loosely fitted attire which cloaks the shape of a woman’s body. For the women in Islam, it is advised that they wear a hijab. A significant amount of people consider the hijab as a reflection of submission towards God, which is very true. Nonetheless, someone who doesn’t wear a hijab is not any less a Muslim than someone who wears it. Something as trivial as the head scarf can’t determine the level of faith and belief towards God. Hijab doesn’t indicate if she is regular in her daily prayers or not.  Hijab doesn’t determine if she is kind to her fellow Muslims or not. But, maybe someone without a hijab has the Quran memorized and is living a more pious life than someone who is wearing a hijab. Maybe, someone without hijab has better manners than someone with it. Your relationship with God is something spiritual which can’t be seen from outside. Whether you wear a hijab or not, doesn’t determine the closeness to your Lord. Just because someone wears a hijab, they can’t say that someone who doesn’t has any less Iman than they do. They might be following God’s will in other ways that a hijabi isn’t. You can’t say or interpret what a person is thinking just by looking at his or her face. The same logic applies here. You can’t possibly know the intensity to which someone is devoted towards their God just by looking at their outlook or by what they wear and how they dress up.

    I’ve heard stories from a fellow non-hijabi who went to pray at a mosque only to be questioned if she was actually a Muslim, that she sure didn’t look like one. What we don’t understand is that, if she didn’t have the spiritual connection with God, she wouldn’t have been present in the mosque for prayers in the first place. This surely represents her level of Iman.

    Every Muslim is struggling in a way or the other. Someone who doesn’t wear a hijab is someone who’s struggling with it. She might have every intention of wearing a hijab and might have even tried wearing it multiple times, but she might have a medical condition where she gets heat stroke if she keeps her head covered. She might want to start hijab but can’t because of a hundred reasons we will never understand because we are not in her shoes. The bottom line is, where a hijab is a garment worn to show respect to the teachings of our Lord, not wearing it doesn’t make one any less of a Muslim than someone who wears it. The reason behind being, there are thousands of ways you can please your God, be it helping an animal or giving charity, be it praying regular prayers or just a simple thank you conveyed to your Creator  in the middle of the day. What actually matters is how you feel when He comes to your mind, how often you keep everything else on hold and let yourself feel the blessings of God all around you. You don’t need to be wearing a hijab to feel close to God, it’s what in the heart that matters.

    In a nutshell, just wearing a hijab doesn’t determine how good a Muslim you are. Someone who doesn’t wear one might just well beat you to it. The judgment based on someone’s outlook has been going on for quite some time. It’s time we get rid of this prejudice and move on; learn to accept people for who they really are and not by how they look.

     

    Source: Mvslim

  • Komentar: Apabila Agama Dijadikan Komoditi

    Komentar: Apabila Agama Dijadikan Komoditi

    Fenomena perniagaan mempergunakan agama yang semakin ketara sejak kebelakangan ini telah mengundang perdebatan hangat di kalangan sebahagian masyarakat Melayu/Islam. Meskipun ada yang menuduh para pengusaha bisnes sedemikian sebagai sekadar “penjual agama”, apa yang lebih penting ialah memahami mengapa fenomena ini berlaku. Pelajar pos-siswazah Nurul Fadiah Johari berkongsi tentang faktor-faktor di sebalik gejala ini dan kesan-kesannya terhadap masyarakat Melayu/Islam, serta apa yang dapat dilakukan untuk menghadapinya dengan berhemah:

    (Gambar: Valet Doa/ Facebook)

    Fenomena Valet Doa, yang kita saksikan baru-baru ini, telah menggemparkan ramai orang, terutama di ruang-ruang media sosial. Ramai yang membantah, malah meluahkan kritikan-kritikan tertentu tentang produk ini. Pengasas Valet Doa dituduh sebagai “penjual agama” dan sebagainya, dan ramai pula yang mengatakan bahawa ini merupakan salah satu tanda akhir zaman.

    Ada juga laporan baru-baru ini mengenai kelas mengaji al-Quran yang diajar dalam pesawat privet yang berharga sehingga AS$7,500 (S$10,600) sejam. Bukan ini sahaja, terdapat juga contoh-contoh lain yang amat aneh, seperti ayam yang dibela dalam gelombang al-Quran dan sebagainya.

    Walaupun sesetengah kritikan ini adalah munasabah (kerana sememangnya menjual-beli agama demi keuntungan diri itu tidak bermoral), apa yang lebih penting adalah pemahaman atas mengapa fenomena ini berlaku. Tanpa sebarang analisis terhadap fenomena ini, kita tidak akan mampu mengkritik fenomena ini secara berkesan, dan justeru akan terus menyumbang kepada perkembangannya yang berleluasa.

    SIMPTOM MASALAH

    Malah contoh-contoh yang diberikan di atas, menurut saya hanya berupa simptom sebuah masalah yang lebih mendalam. Sebenarnya, konsumsi produk-produk keagamaan sudah menjadi suatu perkara yang lumrah dalam masyarakat kapitalis kita.

    Malah, budaya konsumeris sedemikian sudah dianggap sebagai satu kebiasaan kerana masyarakat Islam semakin menyesuaikan diri dengan arus kemodenan dan globalisasi yang berlandaskan sistem ekonomi pasaran bebas (free market economy).

    Lihat saja bufet-bufet untuk berbuka puasa di hotel-hotel mewah, atau tudung-tudung berjenama eksklusif yang mahal, mahupun seminar atau forum agama yang diadakan di kapal persiaran atau hotel mewah. Ini semua termasuk dalam fenomena yang semakin meluas ini. Justeru, apa yang diperlukan sekarang adalah pemahaman dan analisa yang kritis tentang fenomena ini.

    Dalam pandangan saya, terdapat dua faktor penting yang menyumbang kepada fenomena ini, iaitu perkembangan sistem kapitalisme di negara-negara majoriti Islam serta kebangkitan Islam atau Islamisasi.

    Apa yang dapat kita saksikan di sini adalah sebenarnya fenomena komodifikasi agama, di mana simbol-simbol, ritual dan amalan keagamaan dijadikan sebagai sebuah produk atau komoditi yang dapat dijual-beli dengan harga yang ditetapkan.

    Fenomena ini telah berkembang di rantau Asia Tenggara semenjak ia melalui proses pemodenan dan pembangunan ekonomi di zaman pasca-kemerdekaan. Agama Islam bukanlah satu-satunya agama yang dilanda arus komodifikasi ini. Namun, apa yang ketara ialah bahawa perkembangan ekonomi di negara-negara majoriti Muslim berlaku seiringan dengan kebangkitan Islam atau Islamisasi.

    Umat Islam bersolat jemaah di masjid. (Gambar: SAEED KHAN / AFP)

    ISLAM KELAS PERTENGAHAN

    Proses Islamisasi yang berlaku sejak zaman 1980an menjuruskan masyarakat Melayu ke arah kesedaran identiti Muslim yang semakin ketara. Ia menumpukan pada pandangan terhadap Islam sebagai sebuah gaya hidup yang menyeluruh, dan ini berasaskan budaya konsumsi dan penekanan pada simbol luaran.

    Ini lebih ketara di antara kelas menengah baru di kalangan masyarakat Melayu, yang ingin berketrampilan lebih Islamik sebagai cara untuk menyesuaikan diri dengan kemewahan yang baru dikecapi.

    Ini adalah satu cara untuk menjustifikasi perbelanjaan serta kemewahan yang semakin meningkat. Modenisasi dan kapitalisme tidak seharusnya menjurus ke arah pembaratan, dan justeru umat Islam juga ingin meraih manfaatnya, tetapi disesuaikan ke dalam bentuk “Islamik”. Sistem bureaukratik yang menjaminkan nilai dan identiti keislaman bagi umat Islam juga menyumbang kepada kesedaran identiti keislaman ini.

    Kesedaran akan identiti yang lebih Islamik ini juga bermaksud bahawa permintaan untuk produk-produk yang dilabel halal semakin meningkat, dan justeru produk-produk Islamik menjadi sebuah strategi pemasaran yang berkesan. Dengan itu, label Islam atau status halal menjadi sebuah jenama.

    Pada masa yang sama, pemikiran dan bahasa keagamaan juga dimuatkan ke dalam kerangka kapitalis, seperti “melabuh pahala untuk meraih saham akhirat”, serta penekanan kepada semangat keusahawanan Nabi Muhammad dan isterinya Siti Khadijah untuk menggalakkan umat Islam untuk membangun dari segi kewangan dan keusahawanan.

    Pada dasarnya, meskipun dari segi identiti, umat Islam semakin memaparkan ketrampilan yang moden dan Islamik, namun pada tahap pemikiran dan orientasi keagamaan, ramai yang masih berpandukan pemikiran keagamaan yang bersifat ritualistik dan konservatif.

    Sebagai contoh, bisnes Valet Doa yang berasaskan kepercayaan bahawa berdoa di hadapan Kaabah itu lebih mustajab (sedangkan kita digalakkan untuk berdoa di mana-mana sahaja), atau kelas-kelas mengaji di pesawat, yang sememangnya tidak berbeza daripada kelas-kelas mengaji biasa, di mana penekanannya adalah terhadap mengaji tanpa mendalami isi kandungan al-Quran.

    KURANG SEMANGAT INTELEKTUALISME

    Kurangnya penekanan pada semangat intelektualisme dalam pemikiran keagamaan masyarakat kita juga jelas diperlihatkan dalam wacana-wacana yang agak dangkal dan simplistik.

    Pemikiran dominan tentang agama masih lagi menumpukan pada isu-isu halal dan haram, sama ada sesuatu perkara halal atau haram untuk dilakukan atau dikonsumsi.
    Apa yang diutamakan adalah status atau jenama halal itu, bukan proses produksi dan pelabelan halal di sebaliknya yang memerlukan renungan yang lebih bernuansa.

    Sama juga dengan penekanan terhadap amalan-amalan ritual, di mana apa yang lebih diutamakan adalah melakukan ritual tersebut, seperti menahan lapar dan dahaga ketika berpuasa, tanpa mengira pembaziran yang berlaku sewaktu berbuka di hotel-hotel atau restoran-restoran mewah.

    Pemikiran umat Islam di sini tidak mengarah kepada perkembangan progresif yang membangunkan wacana dan semangat keadilan sosial yang mengkritik sistem kapitalis yang banyak mendatangkan ketidakadilan.

    Ini justeru tidak menghairankan mengapa golongan usahawan, termasuk yang kecil-kecilan, sekadar mampu menghubungkan idea-idea bisnes mereka dengan pemahaman agama yang dangkal. Dalam hal itu, mereka hanya mengambil kesempatan atas idea-idea dan amalan-amalan keagamaan yang sudah ada dalam masyarakat.

    (Gambar hiasan: AFP/TENGKU BAHAR)

    KESANNYA TERHADAP MASYARAKAT

    Satu kesan yang ketara daripada fenomena ini adalah kurangnya kesedaran terhadap ketidakadilan struktural dalam masyarakat. Sekiranya pemikiran keagamaan masih banyak menumpukan pada pelakuan ritual dan amalan-amalan zahir, kita kurang peka terhadap kondisi-kondisi masyarakat yang tidak adil, seperti kemiskinan.

    Sementara golongan yang bermampu dapat melakukan umrah dan haji berkali-kali atau menghadiri forum-forum perdana di hotel mewah, ada pula dalam masyarakat yang masih bertungkus-lumus untuk memberikan keperluan asas untuk keluarga mereka.

    Masyarakat pula dilalaikan dengan produk-produk yang berlabel Islamik, tanpa menyedari akan masalah pembaziran dan konsumsi yang melampau, sedangkan pembaziran itu amat dihina di sisi Islam.

    Pemikiran keagamaan yang dangkal dan tidak berkembang juga terus berleluasa, sekiranya kita mendasari kehidupan beragama dengan budaya konsumeris yang meluas. Masalahnya adalah apabila penjelasan keagamaan digunakan untuk membenarkan budaya konsumeris, bukannya mengkritik budaya tersebut.

    Pandangan bahawa umat Islam semakin moden, malah mahu mengekalkan identiti keislaman amat kekurangan sekiranya apa yang dimaksudkan sebagai identiti keislaman itu hanya dipaparkan secara luaran, tetapi tidak merangkumi suatu visi kemasyarakatan yang mengangkat nilai-nilai universal seperti keadilan dan kepekaan terhadap alam sekitar.

    APA YANG DAPAT DILAKUKAN?

    Apa yang sangat diperlukan adalah pemikiran kritikal di kalangan masyarakat kita, agar tidak terjebak, malah mampu mengkritik fenomena ini dengan rasional. Masyarakat juga perlu memahami keadaan-keadaan struktural, politik dan ideologi yang menyumbang kepada fenomena ini.

    Dengan itu, kita perlu mengkritik trajektori proses Islamisasi yang semakin berkembang dalam masyarakat Melayu. Adakah ia sebuah perkembangan yang bermanfaat buat masyarakat, dan apakah kekurangan atau kesan-kesan negatif yang timbul daripada perkembangan ini?

    Masyarakat juga seharusnya bergerak dari sekadar menggunakan wacana teologi yang simplistik, terutama di kalangan asatizah dan elit agama. Ini bermaksud bahawa kritikan terhadap fenomena ini tidak seharusnya terhad kepada mengatakan bahawa perbuatan “menjual-beli agama” itu salah, atau bahawa kita boleh berdoa di mana-mana sahaja.

    Kurangnya analisis dari segi sosiologi serta fahaman Islam yang lebih intelektual dan progresif akan hanya mendatangkan respons-respons yang berjangka pendek dan tidak akan menyelesaikan masalah ini.

    PEMAHAMAN SISTEM DAN STRUKTUR

    Lebih daripada hanya mempersalahkan individu-individu tertentu dengan menuduh mereka sebagai “penjual agama” atau mengharamkan mereka, apa yang lebih diperlukan, pada pandangan saya, adalah pemahaman tentang sistem atau struktur masyarakat yang melahirkan bisnes-bisnes dan program-program sedemikian. Seperti yang telah dikatakan, fenomena pengkomersilan agama itu sudah berleluasa dan menjadi lumrah dalam masyarakat kita hari ini.

    Dengan itu, wacana agama juga harus berkembang, dengan memupukkan lebih kesedaran sosial dan semangat bertanggungjawab terhadap masyarakat umum dan alam sekitar. Penekanan terhadap perangkulan pahala dan kehidupan beragama yang mementingkan diri sendiri juga seharusnya dikritik.

    Kita juga perlu membangunkan budaya konsumsi yang lebih beretika dan berlandaskan nilai-nilai Islamik yang universal, bukan sahaja berpandukan pada label halal. Ini bermaksud membangunkan budaya yang lebih peka terhadap alam sekitar, terhadap isu-isu pembaziran dan eksploitasi para pekerja, terutama di negara-negara membangun. Sebagai contoh, kita dapat menggalakkan amalan kitar-semula secara lebih meluas, tidak kerap membeli barangan baru dan sebagainya.

    Kesedaran agama itu seharusnya berkembang dengan kesedaran terhadap nilai-nilai kemanusiaan universal. Dengan itu, barulah umat Islam dapat menyumbang kepada dunia moden secara bermakna.

    MENGENAI PENULIS:

    Nurul Fadiah Johari, pelajar pos-siswazah peringkat Sarjana di Jabatan Pengajian Melayu Universiti Nasional Singapura (NUS) dan aktivis wanita AWARE bagi projek kesetaraan jantina Gender Equality is Our Culture (GEC).

    Source: BeritaMediacorp

deneme bonusu