Category: Komentar

Send in your opinion to [email protected].
Kirimkan pandangan anda kepada [email protected].

  • Ng Kok Lim: Don’t Give Thanks To Lee Kuan Yew

    Ng Kok Lim: Don’t Give Thanks To Lee Kuan Yew

    MC First wrote:

    To me, the thing is simple. No ah gong means no today’s Singapore.

    Hong Kong progressed just as well without Lee Kuan Yew but with British governors. Is MC First going to say no British governor means no today’s Hong Kong? Then we can turn things around and say without Lee Kuan Yew, we would still have today’s Singapore because a British governed Singapore would have turned out just as well.

    MC First wrote:

    This is something that we can never take away from him and it is a legacy he has left behind. Ah gong is like our parents, a lot of times they dish out very good advice, but we just don’t want to listen.

    There is no legacy to take away from Lee Kuan Yew because the legacy of Singapore is not Lee Kuan Yew’s but that of past British governors and generations of Singaporeans past and present.

    Lee Kuan Yew’s advice was always about highlighting the 10 cents of good for you leaving you to figure out for yourself the $100 of good for him and his party.

    MC First wrote:

    Without a single doubt, ah gong was a man of integrity.

    Without a doubt, Lee Kuan Yew wasn’t a man of integrity. As an opposition MP in the 1950s, he championed for press freedom only to turn his back on it once he cemented his power. Back in 1965, he pointed to the people as the ultimate determinant of the nation’s success. Many decades down the road, he pointed to his own party as behind Singapore’s success.

    MC First wrote:

    He ate and breathed Singapore.

    LKY consumed the soul of Singapore to such an extent that more than half are left with either no balls or no brains.

    MC First wrote:

    YES, he was utterly ruthless against opposing politicians. But which politician is ever benevolent?! Politics is a dirty, dirty game. For instance, even the supposed enlightened Tang Emperor Li Shi Ming. He too had to kill his own brothers in order to become the Emperor. What you and me – people on the street, should really be concerned about is whether the power taken has been used to do GOOD or do EVIL?

    There is a big difference between Lee Kuan Yew and Li Shi Ming. Lee Kuan Yew continued to do evil even after he has won power whereas Li Shi Ming did not. Why did Lee Kuan Yew have to detain Dr Chia Thye Poh and Dr Lim Hock Siew for 32 years and 19 years respectively? Surely the struggle to survive had long passed after 32 years and 19 years respectively?

    MC First wrote:

    From kampong to metropolis in less than FIFTY years, you think this is an easy feat?

    Bullshit. Lee Kuan Yew himself boasted to businessmen in Chicago that Singapore was already a metropolis back in 1968. There’s no way Singapore could have transformed from kampong to metropolis in three years. Singapore was already a metropolis or nearly so by the time Lee Kuan Yew took power.

    MC First wrote:

    Just go across the Causeway and take a look at JB, and you can easily tell the difference.

    But that difference had already existed long before Lee Kuan Yew took power. Singapore was already much better developed than JB during colonial times as one of three Straits Settlements and as a British Crown Colony.

    MC First wrote:

    In a land that is surrounded all over by Muslims, we are effectively a mini-Israel, but who has ever dared to challenge our sovereignty?

    Our law minister Shanmugam has made it clear that that is largely due to US military presence in the region, not due to Lee Kuan Yew.

    MC First wrote:

    The SINGAPORE passport today is one of the few passports that allows you to travel uninhibited to any part of the world. Ah gong’s international diplomacy is the result for this convenience.

    That’s nothing to boast about. Malaysian passport is not far behind with a Visa Restrictions Index of 163 compared to Singapore’s 167 (Straits Times, “Which passports are most accepted around the world?”, 18 Apr 2014).

    By comparing Singapore’s score of 167 with Malaysia’s score of 163, MC First can at most say that Lee Kuan Yew diplomacy resulted in a measly 4 extra points compared to Malaysia’s 163 points or 2.5% extra convenience only.

    MC First wrote:

    My dad was a taxi-driver and my mum a housewife, yet they managed to buy a flat for $8,000 so that my family could have a roof over our head. All these were made possible by ah gong and his generation of pioneers!

    You look at the advertisements all over MRT trains asking people to sell their flats back to the government for retirement funds. Hopefully, MC First can see that having a roof for two, three decades only to sell the roof back to the government means no roof at the end of the day. So at the end of the day, that was what Lee Kuan Yew gave many of the pioneer generation, the illusion of a roof over their heads.

    MC First wrote:

    They had integrity and were SELFLESS!!

    If Lee Kuan Yew had integrity, how come he never admitted to his mistake of killing Singapore’s birth rate? If he had been selfless, how come he didn’t volunteer to fight the Japanese like Lim Bo Seng did?

    That’s why ah gong deserved a grand send-off.

    For all those reasons, Lee Kuan Yew did not deserve a grand send off.

    So, we must give credit when it is due.

    If credit due must be given, then credit must be given to Dr Albert Winsemius, not to Lee Kuan Yew as it was Dr Winsemius who masterminded our industrialization, not Lee Kuan Yew.

    Ah gong did his very best to shape Singapore and we must ALWAYS be grateful for that.

    Lee Kuan Yew did his best to consolidate his power. Instead, it was Dr Winsemius who gave us the plan and the ideas to shape Singapore’s post independence economy. MC First must not forget that Lee Kuan Yew himself said that both he and Singapore are indebted to Dr Winsemius. Thus, MC First should listen to his Ah gong Lee Kuan Yew and be grateful to Dr Winsemius instead.

    Thank you

    Ng Kok Lim

    * Ng Kok Lim is a regular TRE contributor who specialises in rebuttal.

     

    Source: www.tremeritus.com

  • Mass Graves Of Rohingya Muslim Migrants Found In Malaysia

    Mass Graves Of Rohingya Muslim Migrants Found In Malaysia

    Malaysia today said it has found mass graves, feared to contain bodies of Bangladeshi and Rohingya migrants from Myanmar, near detention camps used by human traffickers on the border with Thailand, weeks after its police unearthed several bodies from similar shallow graves.

    The mass graves were found near 17 abandoned camps in Padang Besar area on the Thai side of the border and they are believed to be a part of human-trafficking activities involving migrants, Home Minister Zahid Hamidi said.

    The Minister said the General Operations Force (GOF) had found 14 large tents and three other smaller tents, believed to have been operational for at least five years but were abandoned when the authorities came to the location.

    “Today, the inspector-general of police (IGP) and his deputy are at the Malaysia-Thailand border for identification and confirmation. The graves were identified as those for the refugees in the human trafficking trade. Probably, one grave has maybe three, four bodies or maybe only one. So we are counting at the moment,” he said.

    As governments in Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia have launched crackdowns amid intensified international spotlight, human traffickers have abandoned camps on land and even boats at sea to avoid arrest.

    In many instances, these traffickers have been paid by the miniority Rohingya Muslims from Myanmar to help them flee to Malaysia or Indonesia.

    The traffickers reportedly held them to ransom in the jungle camps demanding more money and in many cases leaving them to die quickly burying them in mass graves.

    A few weeks ago hundreds of Muslim Rohingyas were found crammed in boats heading to Malaysia and Indonesia.

    Human rights groups and activists say the area on the Thai-Malaysia border has been used for years to smuggle migrants and refugees, including Rohingya Muslims, a persecuted minority in Myanmar.

    Since May 10 alone, more than 3,600 people – about half of them from Bangladesh and half Rohingyas from Myanmar – have landed ashore in Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand.

    Thousands more are believed to be trapped at sea in boats abandoned by their captains.

    Mass graves were discovered in Thailand earlier this month mostly in southern Songkla province bordering Malaysia.

    The Rohingya, numbering around 1.3 million in Myanmar, are believed to be one of the most persecuted minorities in the world.

     

    Source: www.siasat.com

  • Zulfikar Shariff: Benarkah Pemerintahan Lee Kuan Yew Berasaskan KeIslaman?

    Zulfikar Shariff: Benarkah Pemerintahan Lee Kuan Yew Berasaskan KeIslaman?

    Dulu ada MP Melayu yang cakap…Lee Kuan Yew ada ciri-ciri Rasulullah.

    Sekarang ada event yang meraikan Nabi Muhammad….Lee Kuan Yew pun turut diraikan.

    Pemerintahan Lee Kuan Yew Berdasarkan KeIslaman 1 Pemerintahan Lee Kuan Yew Berdasarkan KeIslaman 2 Pemerintahan Lee Kuan Yew Berdasarkan KeIslaman 4 Pemerintahan Lee Kuan Yew Berdasarkan KeIslaman 5

    Dah angkat si Firaun.

    Semasa dia hidup, dia kutuk islam, dia paksa orang Islam tinggalkan keIslaman. Dia zalimi muslimah.

    Bila dia mati, kita puji dan puja.

    Macam mana lah Islam tak kena abuse. Orang Islam puji orang yang benci Islam.

     

    Source: Zulfikar Shariff

  • Roy Ngerng: Don’t Let The PAP Change The Law On Lee Kuan Yew’s Image Rights To Protect Their Own Interests

    Roy Ngerng: Don’t Let The PAP Change The Law On Lee Kuan Yew’s Image Rights To Protect Their Own Interests

    Now is the time to make fun of Lee Kuan Yew before they make it illegal. For goodness sake, he is not my founding father.

    “We’ve built a nation with our hands, the toil of people from a dozen lands” – this was what the National Day Song in 1990, One People, One Nation, One Singapore, started with.

    So before we go all crazy over one man, let’s not forget that it is the hard work of each and every Singaporean that made Singapore happen. And unless we are going to protect each and every Singaporean, there is no need to change the law to protect one single individual, especially not a dead one.

    Do you know what this means? This means that in future, if anyone wants to write a book or make a movie to talk about Lee Kuan Yew and the atrocities that he had done, they wouldn’t be able to do so and the PAP can criminalise them if the PAP wants. This law would allow the PAP to whitewash the truth about what Lee Kuan Yew did.

    Don’t let the PAP pass or change the law to cover their own ass.

    If the PAP so believe in self-reliance, then let’s stop relying on the over-glorification of one man and please start running the country.

    There are more important things to do, like reducing poverty and income inequality, and increasing wages for Singaporeans, rather than spend meaningless time evangelising over one man. It’s mortifying.

    The man is dead. Dead. For crying out loud.

     

    Source: Roy Ngerng Yi Ling

  • Amos Yee: Christians Against Pink Dot Don’t Know What They Believe In

    Amos Yee: Christians Against Pink Dot Don’t Know What They Believe In

    So in lieu of the upcoming event that is Pink Dot, fundamentalist Christian cunts have gone onto Facebook and tried to hope for the worst possible things to happen on that day, huge rainstorms, Jesus to open their eyes to their horrid sexual orientation, pray the gay away, as they say, the assonance is remarkable.

    So let’s imagine, that we are in some kind of alternate reality, and all the bullshit in the Christian bible is for real.

    And if that’s the case, then yes, we should condemn all the fucking gays and lesbian demons from ever having existed, those unnatural homosexual spawns of satan:

    ‘If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. -Leviticus 20:13

    However, later on in the bible, God also tells us to:

    Not wear clothes of mixed fabric:

    ‘Thou shalt not wear a garment of divers sorts, as of woollen and linen together.’ -Deuteronomy 22:11

    To hate our families:

    If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple. -Luke 14:26

    And in all circumstances, not to save money:

    ‘Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal’
    – Matthew 6:19

    So which verses do I follow? Oh my gosh I’m so confused. I mean the priest obviously takes and saves a lot of money, that church seems really fucking big.

    As an Athiest,I have the luxury of not having to deal with all this shit, but for Christians, you guys must be stressed as fuck, which words of God do you follow? You guys aren’t following the words of god aren’t you, you’re just following whatever the hell you guys want and saying that it’s the word of God.

    Ah hah, I got you there Christians, you can’t fucking hide from me.

     

    Source: Amos Yee

deneme bonusu