Category: Komentar

Send in your opinion to [email protected].
Kirimkan pandangan anda kepada [email protected].

  • Curse Of The Stanford Duck Syndrome

    Curse Of The Stanford Duck Syndrome

    When Stanford University medical student Tarub Mabud, 24, gets together with his fellow students, they never talk about how hard they study or the challenges they face with their course work.

    “It’s an unwritten rule, when you hang with med school friends, you don’t talk about med school,” he said.

    It has become part of the school culture for students to pretend to be gliding effortlessly through their courses, when they are actually paddling furiously to stay afloat.

    A term has even been coined for this behaviour: Stanford Duck Syndrome.

    While the syndrome is not a proven medical condition, the pressure to keep up appearances could cause students to feel added stress and, in extreme cases, develop mental health issues such as depression and anxiety, psychologists and counsellors told The Sunday Times.

    Stress in elite American universities, especially exacerbated by behaviour like the Stanford Duck Syndrome, has come under the microscope in recent weeks after Singaporean student Ouyang Xiangyu, 26, was charged with four counts of poisoning her lab mates at Stanford.

    She told police that she had been to see a counsellor and psychiatrist last year, and that she was suffering from depression, stress and insomnia.

    At the University of Pennsylvania (U Penn), a 19-year-old freshman committed suicide last year, and reports said her death was linked to the stress of having to maintain good grades. In February this year, her university, which launched a task force last year after two consecutive suicides, released a report which recommended addressing a perceived perfectionist culture among students.

    “Such perceptions may lead to pressures to succeed both academically and socially, that may be unrealistic and lead to feelings of being overwhelmed,” said the report.

    Students have also identified a phenomenon similar to the Stanford Duck Syndrome. Those with “Penn Face” put on a perfect front to hide any emotions – be it stress or sadness – that they might feel.

    But Mr Manud, the medical student who studied at U Penn before heading to Stanford in California, on the west coast, said he did not feel the pressure to keep up appearances on the east coast.

    “On the east coast, it’s a point of pride to not be sleeping – you’re a badass. Here, it’s different… There are times when people are going to feel stressed by work but have to keep up a facade.”

    Some students believe the Californian sunshine and the image of students wearing T-shirts and shorts make everyone feel like they should be calm and relaxed all the time.

    Said Ms Rachel Peters, a physical therapist who graduated from Stanford in 1997 and still works on campus: “You always see people in their bikinis on the lawn. They are lounging in their bathing suits, but they are actually studying.”

    While there are no studies to prove it, Vanderbilt University professor of psychology Steven Hollon said he “wouldn’t be surprised” by the east coast-west coast divide. “It would certainly fit the ambience,” he said.

    But “having to put up the image of perfection is just one more source of stress on top of the work load”, said Mr Kevin Kruger, president of Naspa, an association for student affairs administrators in higher education.

    Across the United States, an increasing number of college students are reporting severe mental health issues.

    Of more than 200 counselling centre directors who were surveyed in the National Survey of College Counselling Centres, 94 per cent said recent trends pointing to a greater number of students with severe psychological problems are apparent on their campuses. The centres also reported that 26 per cent of students were on psychiatric medication last year, up from 17 per cent in 2000.

    Many students “do not handle stress well”, said Ms Amy Lenhart, president-elect of the American College Counselling Association (ACCA).

    Part of it has to do with the different parenting styles that have emerged, she added.

    There are “helicopter parents” who hover excessively around their children tending to their every need, and “trophy kids” – a term used to describe the generation of children unaccustomed to failure – receiving a trophy even for participating in an event.

    “They don’t have the resilience and coping skills that previous generations have,” said Mr Kruger.

    “There is also pressure to get a good job because of the increase in tuition and student debt, which has added to the level of stress among students,” he added.

    A survey by the American College Health Association covering nearly 80,000 students and released last year showed that in the previous 12 months, 86 per cent of respondents felt overwhelmed, 54 per cent felt overwhelming anxiety and about 32 per cent were so depressed that they found it difficult to function.

    Mr Rusty Selix, executive director of policy and advocacy at the Mental Health Association in California, said stress is a major cause of depression and anxiety.

    “For busy graduate students, not getting enough sleep in itself can cause depression and anxiety,” he said.

    Another stress-inducing behavioural pattern that counsellors, psychologists and students raised is the “imposter syndrome”, a phenomenon found both in an academic and professional setting.

    It is a feeling of inadequacy often felt by bright, successful people, who believe they managed to fool others into thinking they are more intelligent than they believe themselves to be. As a result, they often fear being “found out”.

    Said Mr Francisco Gimenez, 28, a biomedical informatics graduate student at Stanford: “It was talked about a lot in the first year. You feel you’re not good enough, seeing everyone else doing amazing things.”

    “Many feel like they do not belong, or they are not worthy, especially those in elite schools,” added Mr Kruger.

    ACCA’s Ms Lenhart said this might be more pronounced now because of social media, where young people are “constantly being evaluated by their peers and they feel like they are under a microscope”.

    But students should never feel like they have nowhere to turn to.

    Ms Lenhart said schools have outreach programmes to make sure students know of the counselling services available, and there is also the National Depression Screening Day, which is an opportunity for students to connect with counsellors for treatment.

    A therapist can help students recognise negative thought processes and encourage them not to isolate themselves.

    “They need to know feelings of depression are real – it is not something just in their heads,” said Ms Lenhart.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Chee Soon Juan: Let SDP Reform And Modernise Education System

    Chee Soon Juan: Let SDP Reform And Modernise Education System

    Our schoolchildren are driven to psychological despair as they struggle to cope with their schoolwork and exams: 22% of Singaporean children between 6-12 yrs thought of killing themselves. Many children actually commit suicide as a result.

    Of those who survive, the majority are conditioned to hate books because they associate reading and learning with exams. Experts warn that such a system deprives society of creativity and innovation, hurting our economy in the longer term.

    Even PAP MPs have voiced their concerns about the tuition culture but have not the courage to point out that it is the education system put in place by their party that is driving parents and pupils to such desperate lengths.

    If elected, SDP MPs will work to reform and modernise our education system which is stuck in the past.

    The recent mathematics question, now popularly called the Cheryl’s Birthday problem, seems to have amused (and stumped) the world. It first appeared on the Internet when it was reported as primary 5 level question.

    The problem is that such difficult questions are not a rarity in exam questions for primary schoolchildren. These questions are meant to identify top performing students so that the Government can groom them for high-paying state positions.

    Such a narrow practice of education feeds the fear in parents that their children’s future well-being is tied to doing well in exams. This drives them to absurd levels of expectations where they engage expensive private tutors to help their children perform – even to the extent of engaging tutors to do their children’s homework.

    The MOE is only too happy to allow such a system to carry on because the billion-dollar tuition industry enables it to out-source the teaching of pupils to the private sector.

    All this comes at a horrendous price. Our schoolchildren are driven to psychological despair as they struggle to cope with their schoolwork and exams:

    • 22% of Singaporean children between 6-12 yrs thought of killing themselves.
    • The no. of children warded for “aggressive, suicidal or hallucination tendencies” at IMH jumped by 35% between 2005-2010. Mental health professionals attribute these problems to academic stress.
    • One in three students say they sometimes think that life is not worth living because of the fear of exams.

    Many children actually commit suicide as a result. One is 10-year-old Lysher Loh who jumped to her death when she fared poorly in her mid-year exams. (Read Why do we do this to our children?)

    Of those who survive, the majority are conditioned to hate books because they associate reading and learning with exams. Experts warn that such a system deprives society of creativity and innovation, hurting our economy in the longer term.

    In fact, studies show that overloading our pupils with work and tuition harm, rather than help, their school performance and acquisition of life-skills.

    Even PAP MPs have voiced their concerns about the tuition culture but have not the courage to point out that it is the education system put in place by their party that is driving parents and pupils to such desperate lengths.

    Let’s stop the madness already. If elected, SDP MPs will work to reform and modernise our education system which is stuck in the past. Specifically, we will:

    1. Remove PSLE. As pointed out, the stress of exams inflict horrific psychological trauma on our children. What’s more, it is not an intelligent approach to assess the abilities of primary-school students on a single exam.

    2. Cultivate creative minds. Build confidence in children by helping them adopt an attitude of independent thinking, willingness to make mistakes, and persevere in the face of failed attempts.

    3. Reduce syllabus, broaden curriculum. The syllabi for existing subjects will be reduced while subjects such as music appreciation, speech and drama, literature, etc. as well as periods for students to collaborate and interact to develop creativity will be introduced to provide a well-rounded curriculum.

    4. Reduce class size. The SDP will reduce class size in our schools to 20 pupils/class from the current 40 to provide students the individual attention they need to succeed.

    5. Scrap school and class ranking. Comparing exam results and ranking students and classes will detract from the real purpose of education which is self-improvement and self-actualisation.

     

    Source: http://yoursdp.org

  • Tan Chuan-Jin: Government Policies To Benefit All, Regardless Of Party Voted For

    Tan Chuan-Jin: Government Policies To Benefit All, Regardless Of Party Voted For

    The Government will continue to make policies that benefit all Singaporeans, regardless of how they voted, said Minister for Manpower and Social and Family Development Tan Chuan-Jin, during a visit to opposition-held Aljunied Group Representation Constituency (GRC).

    Reassuring residents of Serangoon ward there that they have not been forgotten by the People’s Action Party (PAP), Mr Tan told them at the start of a dialogue: “Let’s put it this way, it’s a democracy … you decide what you want to choose, for better or worse. I will tell you that we will endeavour to do our best, whatever the outcome.

    “All of you remain Singaporeans. You don’t vote for us but we are here to still continue to provide policies that cut across every division,” he added.

    But he pointed out that while policies are crafted to benefit Singaporeans, they need to be balanced with societal needs and considerations for the future. “On our part as the Government, we do the best we can,” he said.

    Giving little away on the ruling party’s strategy to regain the constituency from the Workers’ Party at the next General Election, which must be held by January 2017, Mr Tan told reporters yesterday: “Strategy-wise, I guess we have to work that out. But our responsibilities as a Government don’t change.”

    The Workers’ Party, led by its chief Low Thia Khiang, fielded a team including chairman Sylvia Lim and star catch Chen Show Mao, to wrest the constituency from the PAP at the 2011 polls, representing the first time an opposition party has won a GRC.

    Asked by reporters for his take on ground sentiment after a community dialogue at The Serangoon Community Club, Mr Tan said the reception, by and large, has been warm.

    He added that he has also visited other areas in Aljunied in recent years to “touch base with the people here”.

    “Yes, it’s organised but people are there, and a lot of people. They come forward, they share their views, whether in a dialogue or during the course of the visit,” he said.

    Municipal issues have been raised by residents but they were “nothing peculiar” and something he also encounters in his ward in Marine Parade GRC.

    During his six-hour ministerial community visit to Serangoon division, Mr Tan mingled with residents at coffee shops, Tavistock Avenue Park and other venues. He was hosted Mr David Tay, adviser to the Serangoon Grassroots Organisations and accompanied by the visit’s organising chairman Chan Hui Yuh and other grassroots leaders.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • The Singaporean In The Digital Ether: An Evolving Identity

    The Singaporean In The Digital Ether: An Evolving Identity

    In this “Wild Wild West” as the Internet has been called, individuals and communities band together to speak out on policies, raise petitions for causes they believe in and aid hapless tourists.

    On the flip side, lynch mobs and vigilantes thrive in this space, and bad behaviour often ends up amplified.

    Without a doubt, like many around the world, Singaporeans are turning to the Internet to spark positive change in their society, as recent incidents have shown. Observers and netizens say this is an online manifestation of a change in Singapore society — with people less afraid of expressing their views — but several also point to the Internet’s role in helping to catalyse this vocality.

    But with the good, comes the bad and the ugly. As many observers have pointed out, the Internet has brought out the best and worst in Singaporeans. The hope is that, over time, as more Singaporeans become comfortable with the medium and speak out against trolls — there are some signs of this, experts and bloggers point out — behaviour online will veer towards healthier norms.

    To Dr Terence Chong, a sociologist and senior fellow at the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS), Singaporeans do not behave worse online than offline. “But because the Internet allows for split-second reactions, the most poorly thought out sentiments and responses are captured for all to see,” he said.

    “The instantaneousness, publicness and permanency of the internet tend to accentuate bad behaviour.”

    However, Dr Chong pointed out that there is also a “natural tendency towards equilibrium” online because the Internet is a public sphere. “The worst of Singaporeans is often countered and checked by more moderate and fair-minded Singaporeans,” he said.

    Blogger Lee Kin Mun, famously known as mrbrown, agreed: “Maybe not everyone, but enough people will say ‘okay, I think you shouldn’t be going after the guy’s kids’… While (the Internet) is open to mobs, it’s also open to collective, moral outrage … there’s space for all of that.”

              

    THE GOOD

    Late last year, a Vietnamese tourist fell victim to a rogue trader at Sim Lim Square, prompting netizens to spring into action — Some sought to punish the shop owner, others aided the tourist. Eventually, the Government and consumer watchdog stepped in, with the former now looking at how to bolster legislation to better protect consumers.

    Months earlier, an outcry broke out over the National Library Board’s (NLB) removal of three controversial children’s titles containing homosexual references. There was an outpouring of views on social media, petitions were made online, a reading event was held, and local writers also pulled out of NLB events.

    Eventually, Communications and Information Minister Yaccob Ibrahim instructed the NLB to place two of the titles in the adult section. On Wednesday, a 19-member independent committee to review titles for the NLB was unveiled.

    That people are being vocal is proof of a greater sense of self-efficacy – an emerging aspect of Singapore identity especially among the digital natives, said Professor Ang Peng Hwa, from the Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information, Nanyang Technological University (NTU).

    “The online people can connect … they feel like they can make some difference,” he said. In comparison, people of his generation – the baby boomers – “don’t feel so self-efficacious”, in part because many things were done by the Government previously and also because “you (didn’t) have the resources, you (didn’t) know where to go, how to do it”.

    Adding that the Internet “has become a vital tool for mobilisation and organisation”, Dr Chong said: “People are more able than ever before to spread news, garner support and organise themselves whether in the form of reading sessions like the recent ‘penguingate’ saga or through petitions… The ease with which we are able to organise ourselves will normalise dissent, advocacy or contention.”

    Dr Carol Soon, a research fellow at the Institute of Policy Studies, said social media grants different voices “an accessible outlet”.  “Minority groups can now contest dominant discourse with greater ease,” said Dr Soon, whose areas of research include digital engagement and how new media can be used to cause political and social change.

    Mr Belmont Lay, founding editor of Mothership.sg noted that social media has allowed coffee shop chatter to seep into the open. “The move vocal people get, perceived or real, the more vocal they will be. It feeds unto itself,” he said.

    Blogger Mr Lee added: “The fact that you have more ubiquitous access to the Internet now has helped catalyse the attitude. “We didn’t have a medium in the past … Now everybody is allowed to have a voice, for better or for worse.”

    THE BAD

    There are times, however, that the Singaporean seems more intolerant, insensitive in cyberspace than they may be offline.

    Hate speech and harsh anti-foreigner sentiment is abundant online. In January, former president S R Nathan raised concerns about rising discontent in Singapore, with some of this dissatisfaction amplified by social media. “Reasoned political discourse and intelligent, constructive criticism are rare in this online world,” Mr Nathan had said.

    On another occasion, a Miss Singapore Universe 2013 finalist caused a minor ruckus online last year when she mocked a food stall helper for wearing a shirt with a hole in it on Facebook.

    Following instances such as when Briton Anton Casey had been flamed for his derogatory comments about the public transport system and former National Trades Union Congress employee Amy Cheong condemned online for posting racist comments, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong last year cautioned Singaporeans against having a lynch mob mentality.

    Mr Lee had said: “Yes, somebody has done something wrong, repudiate it, condemn it, but do not lower ourselves to that same level to behave in a way which really makes us all so ashamed of ourselves to become abusive, hateful mobs, especially online and anonymously.”

    Most recently, teenager Amos Yee became the target of outrage when he made disparaging remarks in a YouTube video about the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew and of Christianity. He has since been charged for his comments.

    Mr Choo Zhengxi, lawyer and co-founder of socio-political site The Online Citizen, highlighted how the “anonymising power (of the Internet) has emboldened people to say things online that they may not say offline”.

    And this could be very threatening, he noted. “It has the potential to unleash vigilante justice on individuals who might not necessarily deserve it,” he said.

     

              

    …AND THE ANONYMOUS

    A survey last year by market research firm GlobalWebIndex, which profiles the Internet population across 32 countries and covers 90 per cent of the world’s Internet audience, found that 55 per cent of Internet users in Singapore prefer to be anonymous online, slightly higher than the global average of 52 per cent.

    Data from the first quarter of this year showed that this figure rose to 59 per cent in Singapore, while the global average remained the same.

    Mr Choo cautioned of the “chilling effect” anonymity could have on free speech if people “act with impunity”. He hopes for more Singaporeans to grow comfortable with putting their names to their critiques. “Once things go viral, it’s difficult to rectify the damage that can be done, which can be disproportionate to the wrong being committed,” he said.

    Given that the online environment can be harsh, perhaps, the Singaporean in cyberspace – an active participant at the least – is one who has developed a thicker skin. Mr Lee felt that those who want to give an opinion must be “prepared to defend it”.

    “If you don’t have a thick enough skin to deal with it, maybe just stay out of the kitchen – don’t participate, be a lurker,” he quipped.

    He added that there are many options in cyberspace, and there is no need to engage others in a space that is “negative and toxic”. Drawing parallels with situations in the physical world, he said: “People will gather where they think their views are heard. Not everyone will be comfortable in a robust environment.”

    In time to come, however, even the quieter Singaporean may find his or her voice in cyberspace. “The issue of the silent majority will become less and less pronounced,” Dr Soon said. This will come as healthier norms develop online, and people speak up against trolls or those who are “very acerbic or abusive in their comments”.

    “We’re seeing more incidents where people stand up in cyberspace to condemn certain behaviours and speech. So as more and more people find the gumption and conviction to do so, we will see healthier online norms,” Dr Soon added, citing for example those who stand up against xenophobic speech.

    “(This) is part of a changing society where people are more educated, people are more civic minded. They feel that by voicing their opinions… they may be doing their part as citizens.”

     

              

     

    Singaporeans Online

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Hypocrisy In Dealing With Muslims Must Be Addressed

    Hypocrisy In Dealing With Muslims Must Be Addressed

    Our Mufti questions whether terrorism can solely be attributed to misinterpretation of texts. He then suggests that the reasons could be multi-faceted, and include disenchantment towards the state.

    Thanks to our Mufti for saying something that has been ignored for far too long, by far too many people (‘experts’).

    If i may add: the hypocrisy in dealing with Muslims must also be addressed. When a Muslim commits a terrorist act, everyone rushes to condemn – Muslim ‘spokesmen’ and leaders included – and words such as ‘lone wolf terrorist’ are used. When Muslims are the victim of such attacks – as in the case of the Chapel Hill shootings – not only do these spokesmen disappear, but the perpetrators are described as people with ‘mental issues’.

    There can be no peace without justice.

     

    Source: Walid J Abdullah

deneme bonusu