Category: Politik

  • Menteri Pengangkutan Malaysia: Penguatkuasaan Sistem VEP Tetap Akan Diteruskan

    Menteri Pengangkutan Malaysia: Penguatkuasaan Sistem VEP Tetap Akan Diteruskan

    Kerajaan Malaysia tidak mempunyai rancangan untuk membatalkan pelaksanaan Permit Kemasukan Kenderaan (VEP) dan menyatakan bahawa ia akan disambung semula sebaik sahaja sistem tersebut bersedia untuk dikuatkuasakan.

    Menolak laporan awal, Menteri Pengangkutan Malaysia Liow Tiong Lai sebaliknya menekankan bahawa penguatkuasaan sistem VEP tidak tergendala, lapor The Rakyat Post.

    “Jangan dengar khabar angin. Kerajaan akan tetap menguatkuasakan (VEP). Bukan hanya di Singapura bahkan juga (di sempadan-sempadan kita) di Thailand, Kalimantan dan Brunei. Kami tidak membeza-bezakan, semua sempadan akan dikenakan VEP,” tegas beliau.

    “Kami akan bermula dengan Singapura (kenderaan berdaftar) terlebih dahulu dan kemudian ke sempadan-sempadan lain,” tambah beliau seperti yang ditukil The Rakyat Post.

    Encik Liow berkata demikian sebagai menjawab pertanyaan mengenai sama ada VEP akan dibatalkan memandangkan proses penguatkuasaannya berdepan dengan “gangguan-gangguan” dan terlepas tarikh yang sepatutnya VEP dikuatkuasakan.

    “Ia akan mengambil masa untuk dilaksanakan memandangkan kami mahu memastikan tiada gangguan setelah kami mulakannya. Jika sekarang dalam tempoh percubaan ia hanya berjalan selama 12 jam, kami mahu sistem tersebut berjalan selama 24 jam sekurang-kurangnya dalam masa sebulan dua,” jelas beliau.

    Sistem VEP, yang disarankan pada 2006, sepatutnya mula mengenakan bayaran RM20 (S$7) bagi kenderaan asing yang memasuki Johor pada 16 Julai – namun ditangguhkan buat kali keempat berturut-turut, menurut The Rakyat Post.

    Source: Berita MediaCorp

  • New Report On Iraq Invasion Raises Questions Around Singapore’s Involvement

    New Report On Iraq Invasion Raises Questions Around Singapore’s Involvement

    In 2003, Singapore deployed servicemen, ships and aircraft to the Persian Gulf in support of the Iraq war, as part of a mission to “maintain security” and to see Iraq achieve self-government through a political transition.

    Singapore was officially part of the Multinational Force — Iraq (MNF-I) from then until 2008, with the Defence Ministry describing it as supporting “reconstruction efforts” in Iraq.

    The Government publicly showed its support for the US-led invasion of Iraq, in what is perceived as it acting without the mandate of the United Nations Security Council. On March 14, 2003, in response to questions raised by Members of Parliament, then Foreign Minister, Professor S Jayakumar, asserted that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction.

    Former Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong and President Tony Tan (then Defence Minister) issued similar statements asserting the legitimacy of the invasion of Iraq.

    Earlier this month, on July 6, the Report of the Iraq Inquiry was published by the United Kingdom and it seriously questioned any purported justifications for the invasion. The report unanimously concluded that peaceful options for disarmament had not been exhausted and therefore, military action was not a last resort.

    Significantly, the report also concluded that “(t)here was no imminent threat from Saddam Hussein”.

    The effects of the illegal invasion of Iraq were devastating, and continue to be so. Between March and April 2003 alone, 6,882 civilian deaths were caused by US-led forces. Even today, Iraq may be viewed as entering a phase that could prove every bit as destabilising — perhaps even more so — than the war against the Islamic State.

    But the report also raises important questions for Singapore: Was the Government independently satisfied of the factual and legal basis for invading Iraq, or did it take the US’ word for it, as the UK did?

    Did the Government feel compelled, as Tony Blair did, to stand together with an important ally? How does our involvement square with our oft-stated principle of acting according to the rule of international law?

    The answer is important not only because it goes to the heart of our foreign and defence policy, but also because Singaporean lives were put on the line. Singaporean assets deployed to support the illegal invasion of Iraq were withdrawn only in March 2005.

    With respect to the democratic values of accountability and transparency in government, and for the rule of law, I appeal to the Singapore Government to address these issues in Parliament.

    As our elected representatives, the decisions made by our Government reflect our entire nation. As a member of the global community, the devastation of the Iraq invasion is a responsibility borne by us all.

     

    Source: TODAYOnline

  • K Shanmugam: We Don’t Live In Fear Of Anyone Else

    K Shanmugam: We Don’t Live In Fear Of Anyone Else

    SINGAPORE — Singapore may be small, but it is respected and successful, and “we don’t live in fear of anyone else”, says Home Affairs and Law Minister K Shanmugam, in response to ‘taunts’ by an Indonesian minister.

    In a Facebook post on Saturday (July 23), Mr Shanmugam said he did not understand why “there is this constant attempt (by Indonesian ministers) to put us (Singapore) down and taunting us that we are small”.

    He said that both countries benefit from good relations over the last 50 years and have cooperated on many matters. But he noted, “every now and then, someone in Indonesia will tell us that we should know our place, a little red dot.”

    “Yes, we are a little red dot. We may be small. But we are respected and successful. And our people lead meaningful lives. And we don’t live in fear of anyone else,” Mr Shanmugam wrote.

    His remarks came after Indonesia’s Finance Minister Bambang Brodjonegoro was quoted in Indonesian media on Tuesday saying that he was “not afraid of Singapore which is just a small country like that”.

    Mr Brodjonegoro and other Indonesian ministers this week have made several remarks about Singapore as their country attempts to recover millions stashed by Indonesian citizens overseas via a tax amnesty programme. Several Indonesian media reports have accused Singapore and its banks of coming up with a special scheme for Indonesians to leave their assets in Singapore instead of repatriating them home.

    The Ministry of Finance (MOF) and the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) refuted these claims on Saturday.

    “Recent claims in the Indonesian media that Singapore is implementing policies to ‘thwart’ Indonesia’s tax amnesty programme are untrue. Singapore has not cut tax rates or changed any of our policies in response to Indonesia’s Tax Amnesty Programme,” said the MAS and MOF in a joint statement.

    “We subscribe to internationally agreed standards for combating money laundering and for exchange of information. If there is any case of suspected cross-border tax evasion, concerned authorities can approach Singapore – we have assisted and will continue to assist in line with the international standards,” the two agencies added.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Singapore Bans ISIS-Linked Newspaper Al Fatihin

    Singapore Bans ISIS-Linked Newspaper Al Fatihin

    A newspaper linked to the Islamic State Group has been gazetted a prohibited publication under the Undesirable Publications Act.

    Al Fatihin, which is published by Furat Media, an ISIS affiliated media agency, has been circulated across South-east Asia including in Malaysia, Indonesia, Brunei, Singapore, southern Thailand, as well as southern Philippines, according to reports.

    It will be an offence to distribute or possess the newspaper, or come into possession of the newspaper, but fail to deliver the copy to the Police. Those convicted of an offence may be liable to a fine, imprisonment or both.

    “The Singapore Government has zero tolerance for terrorist propaganda and has therefore decided to prohibit Al Fatihin in Singapore,” said the Ministry of Communications and Information (MCI) said on Friday (July 22).

    “ISIS’ intention to use the newspaper, Al Fatihin, to spread extremist ideology in the region is deplorable. The contents of Al Fatihin and the fact that it is published in Bahasa Indonesia, which is used by many in this region, confirm the objectives behind the publication to influence the people in this region and to cause disharmony,” said Dr Yaacob Ibrahim, Minister for Communications and Information and Minister-in-charge of Muslim Affairs.

    “Extremism has no place in Singapore – it cannot and must not take root here,” said Dr Yaacob. “We take a very strong stance against terrorist propaganda and we will take decisive action as necessary. Hence, I have instructed for the publication to be prohibited in Singapore.”

     

    Source: TODAY Online

  • ‘Malaysians Defrauded On Enormous Scale, 1MDB Funds Used To Pay Gambling Debts’

    ‘Malaysians Defrauded On Enormous Scale, 1MDB Funds Used To Pay Gambling Debts’

    1MDB funds were used to pay for gambling debts in Las Vegas, said US investigators.

    “Funds were stolen under the pretense of a 1MDB investment in oil exploration.

    “On paper the US$1 billion was for resource rights, instead (it was) used for personal enrichment…(including) gambling debts in Las Vegas casions, a luxury yacht, interior decorators in London, millions in property including a Bombardier jet costing US$35 million,” said Deputy Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation Andrew McCabe.

    He said this at a US Department of Justice press conference on the civil complaints lodged by the department to seize approximately US$1 billion of assets linked to 1MDB.

    “The Malaysian people were defrauded on an enourmous scale (in) a scheme which tentacles reached around the world,” he a said.

    Other assets listed by the department in its lawsuits filed today include:

    • Artworks from Claude Monet and Vincent Van Gogh;
    • About US$250 million investment in Parklane Hotel, New York;
    • US$176 million invested in EMI Music;
    • US$100 million worth of real estate in the US, United Kingdom and elswhere, including a mansion in Beverly Hills, a condominium in New York and a townhouse in the United Kingdom; and
    • Proceeds from the film ‘The Wolf of Wall Street’ which Red Granite Pictures has rights to.

    Below is the press statement from the US Department of Justice in full:

    Attorney General Loretta E Lynch announced today the filing of civil forfeiture complaints seeking the forfeiture and recovery of more than US$1 billion in assets associated with an international conspiracy to launder funds misappropriated from a Malaysian sovereign wealth fund.

    Today’s complaints represent the largest single action ever brought under the Kleptocracy Asset Recovery Initiative.

    Attorney General Lynch was joined in the announcement by Assistant Attorney General Leslie R Caldwell of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, US Attorney Eileen M Decker of the Central District of California, FBI Deputy Director Andrew G. McCabe and Chief Richard Weber of the Internal Revenue Service-Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI).

    According to the complaints, from 2009 through 2015, more than US$3.5 billion in funds belonging to 1MDB was allegedly misappropriated by high-level officials of 1MDB and their associates. With today’s complaints, the United States seeks to recover more than US$1 billion laundered through the United States and traceable to the conspiracy.

    1MDB was created by the government of Malaysia to promote economic development in Malaysia through global partnerships and foreign direct investment, and its funds were intended to be used for improving the well-being of the Malaysian people.

    Instead, as detailed in the complaints, 1MDB officials and their associates allegedly misappropriated more than US$3 billion.

    “The Department of Justice will not allow the American financial system to be used as a conduit for corruption,” said Attorney General Lynch.

    “With this action, we are seeking to forfeit and recover funds that were intended to grow the Malaysian economy and support the Malaysian people.

    “Instead, they were stolen, laundered through American financial institutions and used to enrich a few officials and their associates.

    “Corrupt officials around the world should make no mistake that we will be relentless in our efforts to deny them the proceeds of their crimes. ”

    “According to the allegations in the complaints, this is a case where life imitated art,” said Assistant Attorney General Caldwell.

    “The associates of these corrupt 1MDB officials are alleged to have used some of the illicit proceeds of their fraud scheme to fund the production of ‘The Wolf of Wall Street’, a movie about a corrupt stockbroker who tried to hide his own illicit profits in a perceived foreign safe haven.

    “But whether corrupt officials try to hide stolen assets across international borders – or behind the silver screen – the Department of Justice is committed to ensuring that there is no safe haven.”

    “Stolen money that is subsequently used to purchase interests in music companies, artwork or high-end real estate is subject to forfeiture under US law,” said US Attorney Decker.

    “Today’s actions are the result of the tremendous dedication of attorneys in my office and the Department of Justice, as well as law enforcement agents across the country.

    “All of us are committed to sending a message that we will not allow the United States to become a playground for the corrupt, a platform for money laundering or a place to hide and invest stolen riches.”

    “The United States will not be a safe haven for assets stolen by corrupt foreign officials,” said Deputy Director McCabe.

    “Public corruption, no matter where it occurs, is a threat to a fair and competitive global economy.

    “The FBI is committed to working with our foreign and domestic partners to identify and return these stolen assets to their legitimate owners, the Malaysian people. I want to thank the FBI and IRS investigative team who worked with the prosecutors and our international partners on this case.”

    “Today’s announcement underscores the breadth of the alleged corruption and money laundering related to the 1MDB fund,” said Chief Weber. “We cannot allow the massive, brazen and blatant diversion of billions of dollars to be laundered through US financial institutions without consequences.”

    As alleged in the complaints, the members of the conspiracy – which included officials at 1MDB, their relatives and other associates – allegedly diverted more than US$3.5 billion in 1MDB funds.

    Using fraudulent documents and representations, the co-conspirators allegedly laundered the funds through a series of complex transactions and fraudulent shell companies with bank accounts located in the Singapore, Switzerland, Luxembourg and the United States.

    These transactions were allegedly intended to conceal the origin, source and ownership of the funds, and were ultimately processed through U.S. financial institutions and were used to acquire and invest in assets located in the United States.

    In seeking recovery of more than US$1 billion, the complaints detail the alleged misappropriation of 1MDB’s assets as it occurred over the course of at least three schemes.

    In 2009, the complaints allege that 1MDB officials and their associates embezzled approximately US$1 billion that was intended to be invested to exploit energy concessions purportedly owned by a foreign partner.

    Instead, the funds were transferred through shell companies and were used to acquire a number of assets, as set forth in the complaints.

    The complaints also allege that the co-conspirators misappropriated more than $1.3 billion in funds raised through two bond offerings in 2012 and $1.2 billion following another bond offering in 2013.

    As further detailed in the complaints, the stolen funds were laundered into the United States and used by the co-conspirators to acquire and invest in various assets.

    These assets allegedly included high-end real estate and hotel properties in New York and Los Angeles, a US$35 million jet aircraft, works of art by Vincent Van Gogh and Claude Monet, an interest in the music publishing rights of EMI Music and the production of the 2013 film The Wolf of Wall Street.

     

    Source: MalaysiaKini

deneme bonusu