Category: Singapuraku

  • An Encounter With A Young And Arrogant IRAS Tax Officer

    An Encounter With A Young And Arrogant IRAS Tax Officer

    Such claims and actions by the PAP Town Council such as lawyers letters, etc are certainly typical.

    A visit to the Income Tax office informing the officer of my reasons for not being employed for a certain period of time plus proof of non payment such as mortgage, PUB, etc, and thus not able to pay my outstanding income tax on previous years was rejected by the young BITCH officer. Her demeanour during the interview came across rather pompous and arrogant. She asked me to wait for her foe about 30 minutes while she reviewed my case with a SENIOR officer.

    She got back to me after 50 minutes and told me that she did NOT believe my reasons for non payment thus she has to impose a penalty fee.

    These young and stupid bookworm Tax officers, WHAT do they know about hard life? They come from comfortable generation and up bringing and is now being put in the TAX Government office as a intern/under study and behave like Demi Gods in deciding the faith of pheasants.

    Not accepting the outcome, I decided to ask to speak with the senior officer whom she claimed to have a discussion regarding my case. This b*t*h told me that the officer in charge is engage in a staff meeting. I then told her to assign me to another officer. She told me they are all engaged. Thus, I told her that I will wait for the senior officer to finish the meeting and to get back to me while I wait at the desk where I was interviewed.

    The b*t*h officer tried to wayang with me and told me she would try her best to get the officer to attend to me. Five minutes later, the senior officer attended to me. It took me within 5 minutes to explain my predicament, showed paper proof and mentioned of the wasted time which the young b*t*h officer had put me through including the statement she made to me earlier regarding her disbelieve. The senior officer returned within 5 minutes and gave me an acceptable solution. The young b*t*h who was with her appeared slightly upset and her demeanour seems deflated. My point is some of the officers working in PAP Government offices or under the umbrella of the PAP acts like a big fcuk thinking that we owe them even after we show proof of our predicament.

    Please note that the income tax office of Sinkapore uses high end PLANTRONICS earphones and some high end Herman Miller office chairs. Tax payers are paying for expensive chairs in the Tax Dept to accommodate to these tender backsides working there. Is it necessary??

    GOH PANG SAI

     

    Source: www.therealsingapore.com

  • Khaw Boon Wan: Housing Policies Continue To Support Family Formation And Ties

    Khaw Boon Wan: Housing Policies Continue To Support Family Formation And Ties

    National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan said on Monday (Dec 1) that housing policies will continue to support strong family formation, and more will be done to help extended families live close to each other in 2015.

    In a blogpost, Mr Khaw said in the November Build-To-Order (BTO) exercise, there were several firsts. Firstly, the Housing & Development Board (HDB) launched the first housing project in Tampines North, and with about 1,500 units, it is HDB’s largest offering in a mature estate in a long time.

    “Children growing up with their parents in Tampines can now hope to buy new flats near them,” he wrote.

    Secondly, 56 units of 3Gen flats were offered – the first time these are available in a mature estate such as Tampines. Lastly, MND introduced quotas to make it easier, and offered greater priority, for married children and their parents to apply to live together or close by through the enhanced Married Child Priority Scheme (MCPS).

    Close to 6,000 family applicants have applied to live with or close to their parents and married children through the enhanced MCPS. The enhancements started from November’s BTO and Sale of Balance Flats exercises, which were launched on Nov 25.

    “Not surprisingly, the response to these initiatives was very positive. One in three family applicants applied to live with or close to their parents or married children through the enhanced MCPS,” Mr Khaw revealed.

    “One hundred and twenty-three multi-generation families applied for the 56 units of 3Gen flats at Tampines GreenRidges. The supply at Tampines North was oversubscribed by more than 1.3 times,” he added.

    Property firm ERA Realty said the numbers showed that housing demand for BTO flats has stabilised. “HDB’s move to ramp up the BTO (supply) from 2011 to 2014 has paid off, and it is timely that they slow down the BTO programme for 2015 to about 16,000 flats,” said ERA Realty’s key executive officer, Mr Eugene Lim.

    “By also conducting four BTO launches next year (once a quarter) versus the six BTO launches in the past (once every two months), the resale HDB market could see the return of more buyers and hopefully in 2015, will see an increase in transactions from the expected all-time low resale volume this year of around 17,000 units,” he added.

    For 2015, even more will be done to help families stay close to each other. HDB will launch another 360 3Gen flats, including 150 units in Tampines. It will also launch another 1,200 new flats in Tampines North, giving priority to those whose parents or married children are already living in the neighbourhood.

    HDB will also launch its first BTO project in Bidadari, with over 2,200 units to be put on offer in the second half of next year. Parents or married children currently living in Toa Payoh will get special priority under the MCPS for the Bidadari project, the minister pointed out.

    “Our family is what makes us happy, and that which gives meaning to our life. As 2014 draws to a close, let us be reminded again, to always make time to spend with our family and loved ones, and enjoy life to its fullest,” Mr Khaw said.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Bernd Stange The Wrong Choice From The Beginning

    Bernd Stange The Wrong Choice From The Beginning

    It would be a miracle if Singapore national team head coach Bernd Stange were to see out the remainder of his two-year contract with the Football Association of Singapore (FAS) after an Asean Football Federation Suzuki Cup campaign that concluded with a 1-3 loss to Malaysia last night.

    For the 66-year-old German to see out his first and last competitive regional campaign was already remarkable. A poor AFC Asian Cup qualifying campaign could have seen him being given the boot by more impatient football associations.

    It was not too long ago that under Avramovic, Singapore were punching above the weight in Asia. However, our elimination following last night’s 1-3 loss to Malaysia showed how far we have fallen after just less than two years under the German.

    While the effort was there, the lack of direction under Stange’s stewardship prior to the tournament should have sounded more than just a few alarm bells.

    The final panel of four responsible for the selection of Stange in 2013 – comprising of FAS President Zainudin Nordin, FAS Advisor Associate Professor Ho Peng Kee, FAS Secretary-general Winston Lee and 2014 Asian Games chef-de-mission and Singapore Bowling Federation President Jessie Phua – showed a lack of thoroughness in putting his career under intense scrutiny.

    Had they gone over his record as the head coach, especially with the national teams of East Germany, Iraq and Belarus, more closely, they might have come to the conclusion that his record in leading these teams has been pretty mediocre – teams which had much better players and stronger football infrastructure and culture than Singapore, based on results in qualifying alone.

    While he might have laid the framework for the Iraqi national team, he would not have inspired them the manner Jorvan Vieria did as they embarked on a fairy-tale run towards the historic 2007 Asian Cup triumph.

    Thus, bereft of any significant achievement despite his journeyman reputation in trawling across clubs and national teams across Europe, Asia and Australia, Singapore looked like a tempting opportunity to create his own legend – even if it meant destroying all the decent work his predecessor Radjoko Avramovic made during a ten-year tenure before him.

    Knowing our country’s obsession with rankings and capitalising on it, he declared his first target to raise our world football ranking. That was to be his first of several missteps he would make during his one-and-a-half year reign with the Lions thus far.

    While that sounded noble, the flawed nature of the rankings, which was based on a mathematical formula over a four-year period with previous years’ points earned depreciating in value, would not correctly reflect the relative strength of the Southeast Asian football region.

    For that to happen, Stange and the FAS National Teams Department would have to arrange regular sparring matches against nations higher ranked than them. Easier said than done though, chiefly because the leading Asian football nations would already have their friendly match schedule packed at least a year in advance, making any chance of a Singapore friendly slim.

    Furthermore, unless they had a specific reason to prepare, like dealing with another Southeast Asian country in a qualifier, a friendly match with Singapore would not be of much competitive value and thus undesirable.

    Distance – given the humongous stretch of land and sea mass from Amman to Canberra – and cost were further challenges.

    Avramovic faced these challenges too, but yet he was usually able to bring the national team out for regular trips to the Middle East partially due to his sound reputation as a coach in that region, while Stange did not have the credibility to replicate the same.

    Reduced to scouring for similar or lower-level opponents in Asia, the incumbent sought to remove as many signs of the Serb’s legacy as he could.

    That would lead to dropping several players who had served so loyally under Avramovic as he tried – as he mentioned several times early in his term – to impose his own preferred tactical system to the national team.

    From removing all the foreign-born nationals to deliberate errors of omission in some experienced locals, he opted to disregard their prior experience in taking on second-tier Asian football nations. Those who had been deeply ingrained in the Avramovic system, save for a few, would be slowly sidelined.

    What he was trying to do would have been more suitable for the inculcation of local children and teenagers as a technical director, rather than the adults who went through the Serbian’s football lessons while making their breakthroughs in the national team under the predecessor.

    That insistence to have the Lions play his way – and no other way – has often left his players befuddled, with the last straw coming from the uninspiring 4-2 win over Cambodia.

    To the Lions’ brave credit, they chose to abandon that concept and do what they knew best during the Suzuki Cup. While it was too late to erase the confusion that resulted in defeats against Malaysia and Thailand, their labour saw them lauded by our compatriots who are no fools when it comes to appreciating effort given.

    The most fatal misstep Stange committed was to ignore the usefulness of those experienced hands that could have come in handy against regional opposition in the biennial tournament. His explanation given at the post-match conference following the Malaysia debacle was they would have been disadvantaged in terms of pace as today’s game was one “for the young men”.

    People can say that he removed the foreign-born players from the national team and had to deal with a transitional squad ahead of the tournament. While these arguments were valid, the game at this level is still quite sedate, in comparison to the fast-paced game often seen at the higher echelons of world football.

    While that would have been plausible against the teams outside of the region, Malaysia and Thailand were similarly paced and the likes of Fahrudin Mustafic and Shi Jiayi would have brought composure in such high-pressure situations. By discarding them at the first go, he clearly believed the Avramovic influence would undermine what he – and his ego – desired to achieve.

    As if that was not enough, dropping one of the most experienced internationals, Isa Halim, by deeming him unsuitable for his football system in the national team was puzzling because the 28-year-old LionsXII player could still offer something despite a poor season at club level. He would certainly have provided more protection for the defence with his resoluteness on the pitch and versatility in occupying the right-back position, one he has played several times in his career.

    While the starting right-back Ismadi Mukhtar had a decent tournament debut at the age of 31 until his late horror show against the Causeway rivals, his call-up raised questions. As credible as the Tampines player is, he lacks the international experience and composure Juma’at Jantan and Ismail Yunos, who were both also overlooked, could have offered.

    His choices of Ismadi and several Courts Young Lions players were primarily motivated the fact that he was too keen to erase any trace of Avramovic, and these were the ones who were not influenced by the Serbian then and would make easy moulding for him to shape how he desired in his ideal Lions set-up.

    In his desperate attempts to stamp out the shadow of Avramovic that was still lurking large in the local set-up, he got himself into a huge mess thanks to these major mistakes he committed. Six out of eight wins during his 20-match stint with the Lions came against Asean minnows – Myanmar (twice), Laos (thrice) and Cambodia. Another came against lowly-ranked Oceania side Papua New Guinea and the last was a lucky 2-1 Asian Cup qualifying home win over Syria.

    Failure to deliver results when it really mattered – in the Asian Cup qualifiers and Suzuki Cup – showed he had failed miserably at his job. If Vincent Subramaniam and Jan Poulsen were sacked after failing to get past the group stage of the biennial regional showpiece – and losing to Malaysia in the group, why should Stange be given the a of execution after similarly poor results in the tournament capped by a deserved loss to our causeway rivals?

    Never in the class of his more esteemed compatriots Otto Rehhagel, Ottmar Hitzfield and Jupp Heynckes, the only viable option is for Stange to go. Only then can Singapore football be freed from a tragi-comedy that has lasted way too long.

    Whether it is a foreigner or a local, the next person to take the hot seat has to show confidence and not to be overawed by Avramovic’s shadow. Any incoming coach needs to build on the decent legacy the Serbian has left, instead of indulging in the shambolic mess we are now left with.

    Please go, for your own good, Bernd Walter Stange. You are out of depth, even in Southeast Asia, and talk too much of a good game but fail to deliver. Singapore has seen and heard enough.

     

    Source: http://www.fourfourtwo.com/sg

     

  • If You Aren’t Chinese You Can’t Compete In Singapore

    If You Aren’t Chinese You Can’t Compete In Singapore

    NOVEMBER 30 — The owner of the famous local briyani restaurant Blue Diamond, Abdul Hameed Mohamed Farook, is being prosecuted for hiring workers on an S pass (a visa category that requires a salary of S$2,200 or RM5,708 a month) but paying them far less.

    This might appear quite patently dishonest and illegal, and I’m all for paying workers a fair wage, but it seems to me he had little choice.

    His business is an Indian restaurant and to run an Indian restaurant you need Indian workers, or in a pinch maybe Pakistani or Bangladeshi workers.

    However, Singapore doesn’t in fact allow you to hire Indian or any South Asian workers as restaurant staff. In fact, they can’t be given work permits for any jobs in the service sector which includes Retail, Restaurants, and Beauty among others.

    The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) which regulates labour on the island has decreed that work permits in the service sector must only be granted to workers from North Asian sources; the People’s Republic of China, Hong Kong, South Korea, Macau and an exception is made for Malaysia. (http://www.mom.gov.sg/foreign-manpower/passes-visas/work-permit-fw/before-you-apply/Pages/service-sector.aspx)

    Now, Singapore is reliant on foreign labour. Any large scale business must hire foreigners — to stack shelves, to staff kitchens, to man pliers and tweezers.

    But according to the MOM these foreigners can only come from one country — the People’s Republic (and to some extent Malaysia). Because no one is really going to be importing shelf stackers and pot stirrers from Hong Kong or South Korea.

    This puts any non-Chinese business at a disadvantage as PRC workers tend to speak only Chinese and it is never easy to manage staff you can’t communicate with. It puts these community facing businesses at a particular disadvantage; perhaps an Indian-run shop can make do with PRC shelf stackers, but a Malayalee restaurant or saree store is unlikely to be able to manage.

    Now you can say this is all to protect some sort of ethnic balance because there are so many Indian and Bangladeshi workers in construction that having service sector workers from China balances things out.

    But firstly isn’t maintaining a “correct” race balance in itself a dubious exercise? And even if we accept this need for racial quotas, exceptions must be made for community facing businesses.

    The local Indian community is simply too small and the Malaysian Indian community hardly large enough to provide the labour for local Indian restaurants, beauty parlours, flower shops and the like. And the fact that Chinese shops, hairdressers and restaurants have access to effectively unlimited cheap labour gives them an innate advantage.

    The situation is patently unfair as it privileges one race over the other.

    What does this policy say to us? That Filipinos can be maids but not servers? Indians are good for being construction coolies but we don’t want to see them as hotel staff? This is why you see Mandarin-speaking servers struggling to pronounce Palak Paneer across the curry houses of Singapore.

    It’s destroying Singaporean businesses: Indians, Malays and Eurasians have been put in a position where they can’t compete on equal terms. The incentive to break and bend the rules in order to hire staff you can communicate with is very high and Blue Diamond is very unlikely to be the only offender.

    For simply wanting to hire staff who speaks their language, a whole community is liable to be criminalised and if you ask me, that’s racist.

    *These are the opinions of the columnist, Surekha A Yadav.

     

    Source: http://www.themalaymailonline.com

  • Stepping Into The Shoes Of A Taxi Driver

    Stepping Into The Shoes Of A Taxi Driver

    On my fourth day as a taxi driver, I drove for six hours at night with just one five-minute toilet break.

    It was past midnight when I headed home and absent-mindedly got into the wrong lane at the junction of Bishan Road and Ang Mo Kio Avenue 1. The traffic lights turned green and I took off, almost hitting another taxi.

    When I got home, my wife greeted me with a hug and said: “You have the taxi driver smell.”

    “It is the smell of hard work,” I said. It was the odour of being cooped up for hours in stale air. I didn’t mention my near accident.

    I have always been fascinated by cabbies. As a manpower reporter, I have interviewed numerous drivers, yet there remained so much I did not know about them. Topmost on my mind as I embarked on a two-week stint as a cabby were these questions: How hard is it to be a cabby? And how much can a cabby earn?

    So my SMRT cab, a Toyota Prius with the registration number SHC4123S, became my second home for 10 to 12 hours a day. I split a typical day into two, plying the roads from 6.30am to 11am, and from 5pm until I was too tired to go on.

    Every morning I would head first to Serangoon North or Ang Mo Kio housing estate, near my home. There are always passengers going to work from Housing Board estates.

    After that, there was no telling where I would end up.

    I thought I knew Singapore well, but my stint as a cabby took me to places I never knew existed. I picked up passengers from obscure spots like a sprawling offshore marine base in Loyang, and Punggol Seventeenth Avenue in an area that somehow doesn’t have Avenues One to Sixteen.

    I discovered that Tampines housing estate is so huge it is sandwiched between Tampines Expressway and the Pan Island Expressway, and is accessible via no fewer than seven expressway entrances and exits. I found myself in Tampines almost every other day during my cab driving stint.

    Lessons from passengers

    On Day 1, my first passenger was a man in his 30s, dressed in a blue long-sleeved shirt and black trousers.

    He got into my cab at 6.50am along Ang Mo Kio Avenue 9 and said: “Pandan Crescent, go by Upper Thomson, Lornie, Farrer, AYE.”

    Those were the only words he uttered and he kept his eyes locked on his smartphone for the rest of the journey. He did not notice that in my excitement at picking up my first fare, I had forgotten to start the meter until about seven minutes into the trip. His fare was $23.73 and I must have saved him about $2.

    He gave me a hint of what was to come – that most passengers prefer to be left alone.

    The rest of that day took me to Changi Airport, Bedok, Pickering Street, Alexandra Road, Amoy Street and Upper Bukit Timah Road in the morning. That evening, I went to Serangoon Road, Mount Vernon Road, Yishun, Woodlands, Sembawang Road, Tampines, Bedok, Bishan and Paya Lebar.

    All my passengers were people who flagged me on the street. I was not confident enough to respond to radio bookings, which would have needed me to reach the pick-up point within five, seven or nine minutes of a call. So I ended up cruising empty most of that day, with the longest stretch of over an hour in Woodlands.

    My best passenger was a woman in her early 40s who got into my cab along Alexandra Road. I chatted with her and eventually revealed that I was driving the cab for charity. She handed me $12 for her fare of $11.18 when she reached her Amoy Street office and said: “Keep the change.”

    The worst experience was after I picked up a woman at Khoo Teck Puat Hospital in the evening. She wanted to go to a condominium in Jalan Mata Ayer, off Sembawang Road, which I was unfamiliar with. She was from Myanmar, and I misunderstood her directions, given in halting English. When I took a wrong turn, she let fly with a rebuke in Myanmarese. The taxi meter showed $9.44 but I said she could pay just $8. That pacified her a little.

    My first day ended at midnight when I pulled into my regular Caltex petrol station in Lorong Chuan to refuel and wash the cab. My usual car washer Zainal did not recognise me until I waved at him – twice. “Times are bad huh? You started driving taxi part-time?” he asked.

    I was too tired to explain. I had driven 246km and taken 14 people on 13 trips. My takings, after deducting petrol cost, taxi rental and $4 for washing the cab, came to just $29.66 for 12 hours’ work.

    Thankfully, things got better over the following days. I kept to the same work routine except on weekends, when I drove from noon to midnight.

    By the end of Day 2, I had fine-tuned my greetings to these:

    “Good morning, Sir!”

    “Good evening, Madam!”

    “Heading to work, Sir?”

    “Going shopping, Madam?”

    “You’re going to work early, Sir!”

    “Long day at work, Madam?”

    If the passenger did not reply or uttered only a monosyllabic answer, I took it as my cue to be quiet and to just drive.

    Passengers travelling in groups tend to ignore the cabby, talking among themselves as if you are not there. So I couldn’t help overhearing people complaining about the Government, and workers complaining about their bosses. A young couple having a tiff complained about each other all the way from Sembawang Shopping Centre to Toa Payoh Lorong 1. “I am breaking off with you,” yelled the woman as she stormed off.

    There were some passengers who, literally, made me feel sick.

    Like the young woman I picked up in Jurong East who coughed and sneezed all the way to Choa Chu Kang. When it came time for her to pay, I hesitated when she handed me the money. After she left, I sprayed the cab generously with the Lysol disinfectant I kept in the cab’s glove compartment.

    Then there was the man who sounded like he was from China. Getting into my cab near Bugis Junction, he burped. And burped. And burped. It was obvious that he had just eaten “ma la huo guo”, or spicy steamboat, for dinner.

    An elderly man who got into my cab in Coleman Lane, at the Grand Park City Hall hotel, wanted me to reverse about two car lengths back into Coleman Street to avoid going round the block so he would save 30 cents.

    In Chinatown, a man heading for South Bridge Road told me to take a “short cut” through Temple Street from New Bridge Road. I did, only to find traffic at a standstill along Temple Street – and that was when he paid up and jumped out, leaving me stuck for 15 minutes.

    I have to say something about people who eat in taxis. While drivers cannot stop people from eating in their cabs, most dislike it because of the smell and the mess left behind. Thankfully I met only one passenger who ate on the go. The young mother insisted on feeding her toddler biscuits despite my asking her not to eat in the cab.

    “The boy is hungry,” she insisted.

    They left such a mess that I had to spend 30 minutes and more than half their $8.30 fare to have the cab cleaned at a petrol station.

    My most unpleasant ride of all was with a woman in her 50s who complained non-stop about my driving from Tagore Industrial Park to Yishun Avenue 3. Her beef was that I drove too slowly and braked too hard.

    “You are a new driver and it is my bad luck getting into your cab,” she ranted. “I was planning to buy 4D but I will not, because it is bad luck meeting you.”

    I just bit my tongue.

    But my worst passengers were the ones I never met. They were the people who made taxi bookings, then failed to show up.

    On a rainy Wednesday morning I was in Telok Blangah Way when I accepted a call booking for Delta Avenue, and headed there rightaway. It took five minutes and I passed more than five passengers trying to hail cabs in the rain. When I got to the pick-up point, the passenger was nowhere to be found.

    It was one of three “no shows” I encountered during my stint. Taxi drivers are helpless when this happens.

    Each day, however, I would meet at least one or two passengers who stood out by being pleasant, saying “please” or “thank you”, or making conversation that helped to make a lonely job less monotonous.

    I took three British Airways pilots from Mandarin Hotel in Orchard Road to the Esplanade, where they were going to have supper at Makansutra Gluttons Bay. When we got there, they invited me to join them. “C’mon, take a break,” one of them said, and he meant it. I declined because I was just too tired.

    A teacher and an architect who spoke with me long enough to learn I was a reporter on assignment and that all my earnings would go to charity paid me in $50 notes and told me to keep the change – which added up to $43.

    A passenger I took from the Botanic Gardens to Battery Road sent SMRT an e-mail complimenting me, saying: “I feel that he really went the extra mile to provide a comfortable journey for all his customers and I am really impressed. Thank you, Uncle!”

    It made my day.

    As my days of being a cabby progressed, I found that my earnings were decent, if not very high.

    The most I earned in a single day – after driving 12 hours and deducting what a cabby usually pays for taxi rental and fuel – was $141. It would mean a monthly income of more than $4,000 if every day was like that and I worked a full month. My typical daily takings were between $90 and $100, or about $3,000 a month, and even that would call for driving 10 to 12 hours a day, with no day off.

    The median gross monthly income of Singaporeans and permanent residents in June this year, excluding employers’ CPF contributions, was $3,276.

    My stint was too short for me to befriend other cabbies at coffeeshops, but I managed to pick up some secrets of the trade.

    • It’s easy to get passengers in the morning when people are heading to work from HDB estates.
    • To earn $3 more in the evening, go into the CBD and pick up passengers while the CBD surcharge applies from 5pm to midnight. Sorry, but people waiting just outside the CBD will have to just keep waiting. Even inside the CBD, cabs will be scarce just before the surcharge hours begin.
    • Heartland towns like Woodlands and Sembawang offer slim pickings in the evenings, because residents hardly go out then. But hospitals everywhere are good places to find passengers, especially after evening visiting hours.
    • Overall, demand for taxis far exceeds supply during the morning and evening peak hours, so a cabby who is disciplined about driving during these periods can earn a decent living.

    There are downsides as well.

    The long hours on the road affected my sleep, and most nights I slept barely six hours. By Day 3, I was resorting to taking two Panadols before hitting the road.

    Backaches were a frequent bother, from sitting so long.

    Cabbies need toilet breaks, and the most convenient stops are at petrol stations. I found that many do not have soap, and at a Geylang petrol station, the toilet has no door.

    There are simply no convenient public toilets in the Orchard Road area for taxi drivers, but I discovered that the Ba’alwie Mosque off Dunearn Road lets cabbies use its toilet. I blessed the good people of the mosque when I needed to go desperately one night.

    My cab-driving days ended on Day 11 of my stint. It wasn’t a good day for me.

    Early that morning the 16-year-old schoolboy in my cab was late for school and begged me to drive faster. I relented, stepped on the gas and ran a red light at 6.47am. Instantly, there were two camera flashes and I knew I had been caught by the traffic light camera. That meant $200 gone in less than a second – my earnings from about 18 hours of work!

    But that wasn’t why I stopped driving. The trouble had begun two days earlier, when I discovered I’d developed a haemorrhoid from nine days of sitting for hours. I learnt that haemorrhoids are a common ailment among cabbies, along with backaches and high blood pressure.

    The pain had become unbearable, so I decided to end my cab-driving experiment three days earlier than planned.

    A month later, the traffic summons arrived. I hoped the Traffic Police would be sympathetic, but my appeal drew a swift rejection and a chiding: “Make a conscious effort to comply with traffic rules and regulations which are made for your own safety and that of other road users.”

    Looking back, I still wonder why even passengers much older than me called me “Uncle”. It seems that if you drive a taxi in Singapore, you’re everyone’s Uncle or Auntie.

    I returned the cab to SMRT after clocking 2,739km, having earned $2,294.60 for charity and gaining a newfound respect for taxi drivers.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com