Rilek1Corner

Category: Singapuraku

  • IOC Opens Door For Joint Hosting Bids From Countries

    IOC Opens Door For Joint Hosting Bids From Countries

    LAUSANNE: International Olympic Committee president Thomas Bach revealed on Tuesday (Nov 18) that the IOC were willing to consider joint bids between countries and cities in order to make hosting an Olympic Games more accessible.

    “Under certain conditions, mainly for reasons of geography and sustainable development, it might be possible to organise some events in other cities other than the host city, or even in other countries,” Bach told the press.

    “If a city says ‘we don’t have enough facilities for this sport, in this place, but there are some in a close city’ why not? In the Winter Games it already exists. If two countries share a mountain, then why not share a bid?” he continued.

    “In the Summer Games, it is more about small neighbouring countries where distances are close. It is about giving smaller countries the opportunity to organise Games.”

    The plan which it is also hoped will help reduce bidding costs are among 40 recommendations which will be voted on at a meeting of IOC members in Monaco on Dec 8 and 9.

    Another recommendation revealed at The Olympic Museum in Lausanne on Tuesday was to cap the number of sports and athletes, while giving a new sport or discipline an invitation to participate in the Games every four years.

    “These 40 recommendations are like pieces of a jigsaw puzzle,” explained Bach, a former Olympic gold medallist in fencing from Germany. “When you put them together, a picture emerges that shows the IOC safeguarding the uniqueness of the Olympic Games and strengthening sport in society.

    “We still want to limit the number of Olympic events but within this framework, we want to give more flexibility to sports which want to become Olympic,” Bach continued. “The Olympic Games mustn’t become bigger, but more diverse.”

    The recommendation on reducing costs for bidding also includes cutting the number of presentations that are allowed by bidding cities and “providing a significant financial contribution from the IOC”.

    The IOC also want to have an “invitation phase” for bidding during which cities will be “advised about the opportunities this new procedure offers”. The recommendations were announced to a round table of athletes, many of whom contributed to the ‘Olympic Agenda 2020’ process.

    “In the case of the Summer Olympics, it could be small countries with short distances. Sometimes the distances within a country are less important than in a metropolis of 15 million people,” said Bach. “The host contract is always signed with a city but in reality it would be the whole country that would be the partner.”

    Occasionally, the IOC has allowed co-organisation, particularly in the case of the Winter Games, among a host city and ski resorts, or for sailing events, often relocated during the Summer Olympics

    – AFP/de

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • The Decision-Makers Behind Government Grants For Town Councils

    The Decision-Makers Behind Government Grants For Town Councils

    In order to supplement town councils’ work in the estate, the government provides grants to them.

    The grants are disbursed through the Ministry of National Development (MND), to the grassroots organisations, in particular to the Citizens Consultative Committees (CCCs), which are at the apex of all grassroots organisations.

    The committee which oversees the approval of funds is the Community Improvement Projects Committee (CIPC).

    Opposition Members of Parliament have, through the years, accused the Government of withholding such funds from them, and that they are made subservient to un-elected grassroots leaders.

    We take a simple look at how this is set up.

    The Town Council Act empowers the minister to disburse the funds.

    “For the purposes of enabling a Town Council to carry out its functions under this Act or any other Act, the Minister may from time to time make grants-in-aid to the Town Council of such sums of money and subject to such conditions as the Minister may determine out of moneys to be provided by Parliament.”

    The Minister of National Development is:

    kbw

    The Government disburses funds to town councils through the Community Improvement Projects Committee (CIPC).

    “The function of the Community Improvement Projects Committee (CIPC) is to provide funding support for community improvement projects proposed by Citizens’ Consultative Committees (CCCs).” [Source]

    The 12 members of the Community Improvement Projects Committee are:

    CIPC MEMBERS

    CIPC funds are then channelled through the Citizens’ Consultative Committees (CCCs) which are often chaired by PAP members.

    The chairman of the CCC for Bedok Reservoir in Aljunied GRC, for example, is Victor Lye.

    Mr Lye is also a PAP branch chairman.

    victorlye

    Finally, according to a Straits Times report in January: “The adviser to these grassroots bodies, usually the People’s Action Party electoral candidate, has to apply for the grant.”

    An earlier Straits Times report in April 2012 confirms this:

    “The CIPC funds are disbursed by MND but any application for them needs the grassroots adviser’s endorsement.”

    As mentioned, this grassroots adviser is invariably a PAP MP or a failed PAP candidate, or a PAP member.

    What happens then if you are an opposition MP seeking CIPC funds?

    In July 2013, the Workers’ Party MP for Aljunied GRC, Pritam Singh, asked the Minister for National Development to clarify whether the guidelines for the utilisation of the Community Improvement Projects Committee (CIPC) funding will be made available in the public domain and furnished to all Town Councils.

    The Minister replied:

    “The Community Improvement Projects Committee (CIPC) provides funding support for infrastructural and recreational facilities, including general amenities for the benefit of residents in the whole constituency. Such facilities include covered walkways, footpaths, cycling tracks and playgrounds.

    “CIPC funds are disbursed through the Citizens’ Consultative Committees (CCCs) as they are close to the ground and will be better able to decide on the projects which will be most useful for the local residents. We give the CCCs flexibility to assess the relevance of any proposal and to prioritise them for implementation so that the CIPC funds are optimally utilised. The operating principle for the CCCs is to ensure that the approved CIPC projects are useful, functional, represent value for money, freely accessible to the community and properly planned.

    “Town Councils may approach their respective CCCs if they have other queries.”

     

    Source: www.theonlinecitizen.com

  • PAP Government Giving Free Scholarships to Filipinos!

    PAP Government Giving Free Scholarships to Filipinos!

    The PAP government is giving out scholarships specifically for Pinoys in Philippines to come to Singapore to study in our local universities (NUS, NTU, SMU). Each award is for three to four years of tertiary study and covers return air fare, full tuition, an accommodation allowance and a living allowance of S$4,300 (around P150,000) per annum. Applicants of the scholarship must be Filipino citizens with excellent academic records and a good command of English. A recipient of the scholarship may not concurrently hold any other scholarship, fellowship, grant or award without prior approval of the Singaporean government. (Source: http://globalnation.inquirer.net/114414/singapore-giving-out-scholarships/).

    Except for Medicine, Dentistry, Architecture and Law, all other disciplines are open to recipients of the scholarship. As Medicine, Dentistry and Law are elite courses, the Filipino scholars will instead be competing with average Singaporeans who usually take arts, science, business or engineering courses. It is therefore hard to imagine that most Singaporeans will not notice the privileges given to these special Pinoys.

    The PAP government seems to be keen on investing in Filipino talent development even though they do not even serve National Service. It is also stated in the terms of the scholarship that “the scholars are expected to return to their respective countries at the end of their studies to contribute to the development of their nations”. That means there is NO BOND so it is not required that these Pinoys serve NS or contribute to Singapore. The scholarship appears to be a charitable act by the PAP government towards Filipinos.

    Moreover, it has been revealed that many Filipinos have fake qualifications from universities like Recto University (http://edition.cnn.com/2012/01/17/world/asia/philippines-recto/index.html). With its failure to scrutinize foreign talents like Anoop Shankar, can NUS be totally sure that these Filipinos are talented?

    There was also no attempt to disguise the fact that the scholarship was provided by government agencies in Singapore. The following was stated:

    “For eligibility criteria, terms of award and application procedures, applicants may go to the website: http://www.mfa.gov.sg.scp.

    Completed applications must be submitted to the Singapore Embassy in Manila by Dec. 10. Applicants are encouraged to use the online application portal, http://singaporescholarship.scp.gov.sg., in addition to submitting the hard copies.”

    So if you’re a Pinoy hoping to live out the Singapore Dream and have a successful career, please go ahead and apply.

    I feel angry that the Singapore government is using taxpayers’ money to fund the development of a bunch of Pinoys. It shouldn’t be totally surprising, considering that we are already paying $25000 just to teach one PRC officer English.

    As a Singaporean, I am extremely disappointed with the PAP government for neglecting its own citizens while putting foreigners first. Many of our local Singaporeans are not on scholarships in local universities and they are burdened with a huge debt upon graduation. Several other Singaporeans, mainly poly graduates have to work part-time and pay higher fees to study at private universities because they couldn’t get into local universities. And it is not because their grades are bad; it’s because there aren’t enough vacancies available for Singaporeans. Finally, there’s the group of Singaporeans whose families have paid enormous amounts to send them abroad just so they can have a quality university education. The vast majority of Singaporeans are not on scholarships even though they are keen to get a degree and contribute to Singapore’s development.

    Why must we compromise our own human capital development just to do charity for third world countries?

     

    Muhd Hafiz

    TRS Contributor

     

    Source: www.therealsingapore.com

  • Khidmat Cemerlang SLTC Mohd Fahmi Aliman Diiktiraf SAF

    Khidmat Cemerlang SLTC Mohd Fahmi Aliman Diiktiraf SAF

    KESUNGGUHAN dan kecekapan Leftenan-Kolonel Kanan (SLTC) Mohd Fahmi Aliman berkhidmat dalam Angkatan Bersenjata Singapura (SAF), semasa bertugas baik di dalam mahupun di luar negara, diakui.

    Lantaran keberkesanannya memikul pelbagai tugas sepanjang berkhidmat dengan SAF, beliau dianugerahkan Pingat Kepujian oleh Kementerian Pertahanan (Mindef) dalam Anugerah Hari Kebangsaan.

    Sejumlah 81 Pingat Kepujian, 114 Pingat Kecekapan dan 415 Pingat Perkhidmatan Bakti Setia diberikan kepada anggota tentera dan bukan tentera.

    Seramai 14 kakitangan menerima kedua-dua Pingat Kepujian/Kecekapan dan Pingat Khidmat Bakti Setia.

    Seramai 596 kakitangan Mindef/SAF diiktiraf dalam Anugerah Hari Kebangsaan tahun ini.

    Menteri Kedua Pertahanan, Encik Chan Chun Sing, serta Menteri Negara (Pertahanan), Dr Mohamad Maliki Osman, menghadiri majlis tersebut di Mindef minggu lalu.

    Ketika ditemui, SLTC Mohd Fahmi, 42 tahun, berkata beliau berbesar hati sumbangannya diiktiraf.

    Beliau menyertai SAF 22 tahun lalu kerana ingin “menyentuh kehidupan orang ramai” dan menyumbang kepada masyarakat.

    Dalam tempoh khidmatnya, beliau antara lain mengetuai Batalion Pengawal yang meraih anugerah Unit Infantri Terbaik pada 2009.

    Pada 2011, beliau menjadi pegawai SAF Melayu/Islam pertama menjadi Komander Perbarisan Hari Kebangsaan sejak 2000.

    Pengalamannya tidak terbatas di dalam negara sahaja.

    Beliau dikerah ke Aceh pada 2005 dan Afghanistan pada 2012.

    Beliau terlibat dalam pasukan yang menyumbang kepada pelucutan senjata, demobilisasi dan integrasi semula Gerakan Aceh Merdeka (GAM) ke dalam masyarakat Aceh.

    Di Afghanistan, beliau bertugas sebagai perancang strategik di Ibu Pejabat Pasukan Bantuan Keselamatan Antarabangsa (ISAF).

    “Setiap pengalaman yang saya raih mengasah kecekapan saya dan mendorong saya agar terus menyumbang kepada SAF,” ujarnya.

    Apabila dikerah ke luar negara, beliau berjauhan daripada keluarga selama enam bulan.

    “Cabaran terbesar adalah membahagikan masa antara keluarga dengan kerjaya. Saya bertuah mendapat sokongan keluarga dan isteri penyabar,” ujar bapa empat anak berusia empat hingga 17 tahun itu.

    Isterinya, Cik Rohana Salleh, adalah guru sekolah menengah.

    SLTC Mohd Fahmi turut dirangsang pasukannya dan berpegang pada tiga ciri ketua yang cemerlang.

    “Kepercayaan, kehormatan, serta memperkasakan bakat dalam pasukan penting.

    “Di SAF, saya dibimbing oleh pegawai kanan dan diberi peluang mengembangkan kemahiran,” ujar SLTC Mohd Fahmi.

    Melalui SAF, beliau diberi peluang melanjutkan pelajaran hingga meraih ijazah Sarjana Muda dalam Kejuruteraan Elektrikal daripada Universiti Liverpool pada 1999.

     

    Source: www.beritaharian.sg

  • David Tan Tells Government To Trust Talented Malays

    David Tan Tells Government To Trust Talented Malays

    During my Raffles Institution (RI) teaching days, I had the privilege to have many Malay boys as my students. Many came from poor homes although they were bright, intelligent and very polite. Many of them loved to play soccer but after each game, were too poor to buy drinks to quench their thirst. I helped them out in small ways by forking out part of my meagre salary to buy bottles of syrup drinks so they could mix with tap water to drink. I took many photographs with them during those RI days. Most of them were very good looking and talented in soccer, music and art.

    I was extremely delighted when one of the boys, now a pilot with SIA invited me to one of his daughters’ wedding. Many of my ex-RI Malay students were invited too. I had a great time with them but it took me a while to recognize some of them. I was so proud of what they are today. Among them are senior government officials, diplomats, pilots, heads of organizations and other professionals. They have proven that race is never a part or component of one’s success.

    They are the evidence of a responsible minority group of Singaporeans who have succeeded and contributed to our nation. One of the feedback from them included their unhappiness over being ‘passed over’ for Officer Cadets’ courses when they were called up for national service. Most of them possessed the necessary physique, academic and moral qualities to be selected for the Officer Cadets’ course but ended up being clerks, storekeepers or performing other unimportant administrative tasks in the army. What a shame and a waste of talent! This lack of trust by our current government must be changed and rectified for our minority races.

    I am humbled by their remembrance and their respect for me. I am also extremely happy that many of them are in regular communication with me. Being a teacher has its rewards!

     

    *Article was written by David Tan and first appeared on http://singfirst.org/2014/11/16/david-tan-our-malay-students-are-under-utilised-and-under-nurtured/

    Source: www.therealsingapore.com