Category: Singapuraku

  • 10 Things To Love And Hate About  A Government Job

    10 Things To Love And Hate About A Government Job

    Author’s Note

    My interviewee once joined a government agency straight out from university, excited at the prospects of being able to help shape the future of Singapore. He left the organisation a couple of years later, feeling jaded but also thankful for the things he has learnt and contributed to. Following that, he swung to the other extreme to do sales in a fast-paced private MNC environment. Having been on both sides now, he’d like to share his candid thoughts about working in the government.

    Note that his experience may differ from others in the public sector, and the culture differs between various government bodies too. This article hence seeks not meant to be a factual generalisation but rather a personal observation based on his limited time there. For ease of reading, it will henceforth be written in the first-person.

    “Not for me now; maybe at retirement”

    “Will you consider work in the government sector?”

    This is the question I posed to 3 fellow Singaporeans recently, all of whom replied with a similar answer, “Not now, but perhaps later when I want a slower pace of life, or if I’m about to retire”. For manySingaporeans, a government job seems to have a strong stereotype of being slow-paced and bureaucratic. But a government position is typically well respected in most countries worldwide; you’d think that this will hold true especially in Singapore which has, undeniably, one of the most efficient government organisation in the world. Why then are so many locals dissing at the suggestion of a government job? Being there, I do agree that there’s some parts that can be better, but to be fair, it’s not all bad.

    To set the record straight, allow me to share the 10 things I love and hate about a government job.

    5 things I hate about a government job

    1. Budget papers and long procurement processes

    We have to start the list with the dreaded budget paper of course! To carry out any projects that require spending anywhere above $3000, you will have to write an official budget paper to justify the expenditure to get it approved. A moderate budget requires at least 2 to 3 levels of approval, and the process is dragged if one of the signatories is away. It’s common to have budget papers thrown back for better justification or re-wording (sometimes it’s down to grammatical errors!). It sometimes makes you feel like you’re submitting your communications 101 homework.

    Once budget is approved, you’ll still need to launch a public invitation-to-quote on Gebiz*, and evaluate which vendor is the best. The entire whole process takes anywhere between 3 weeks to 3 months, which is a long time (it could take longer with tender processes if much bigger budgets are needed). The entire process is painfully slow and frustrating, and you’d constantly wonder why you’re wasting so much time and effort on the procurement process rather than implementing the project.

    *Gebiz is Singapore’s government electronic procurement system.

    2. Endless meetings (and minutes to write)

    There’s a huge number of meetings that government officers are pulled into; there will always be multiple agendas related to your organisation’s industry that requires an inter-departmental or whole-of-government approach, but there’s only so few officers. Within my first few months in the job, I was already ‘arrowed’ to participate in various task force and inter-governmental discussions. Many a times, I was questioning why I’m part of the discussion, and it’s common to see some officers typing away on their emails instead of participating in discussions.

    Then there’s minutes. Most meetings, both internal and external, require someone to document minutes or notes. There is typically a standard template to adhere to, and you may need to have to have your minutes vetted or approved. Writing minutes in this way, in my personal opinion, is a chore and a waste of time. While it’s important to note down key discussion points and next steps, a more efficient way is to send everyone a simple summary email with follow-up items.

    3. Hierarchical… and some bosses still expect to be served

    While the hierarchical structures are slowly giving way to modern, open-office concept, it may take another full generation to fully change this. There’re many stories of officers being told not to skip the chain of command, or being blamed for approaching another department head directly. I personally had been stopped by the Personal Assistant of my director when I wanted to knock on his door for a quick chat. I didn’t expect to have to schedule a time through the Personal Assistant to meet my own boss..

    4. Urgency please?

    The most common stereotype of working in government seems to be that things move slowly. It takes forever to start something (remember the budget papers and internal approval processes?), and it takes even longer to get everyone on board to implement a project quickly. Everyone has their own projects on priority, and your project seems to always be on the backburner. It takes numerous discussions for all stakeholders to agree on something, which would already have taken weeks if not months. If you’re a young officer eager to make your mark and shape the future of Singapore, I’m afraid you’ll have to be extremely patient as your enthusiasm is most likely to wear off before any actual work gets done due to the many layers of approvals required.

    A side note to this is the way remuneration works in the government: one is sometimes “punished” for doing fast and effective work by receiving more work. On the other hand, if you do what’s expected well enough, you will enjoy a long stable career. Nothing fanciful, but it works. Maybe that explains the lack of urgency. To be fair, this is a common problem in many organisations, but in the government it’s especially prevalent, since hires and fires don’t happen as rapidly, and profits aren’t the only bottom line.

    Maybe another explanation for the lack of urgency, is…

    5. Strategy overdo

    Strategy is a big word thrown out often too many times in the government, though the frequency varies among various organisations. While the job of the government is to develop strategic policies, it becomes frustrating when projects are always stuck at the strategy phase, or when long-term strategies change, ironically, every year. I’ve seen how strategic plans are revised multiple times a year to the point where employees roll their eyes when they hear the big word. It is especially frustrating when your personal performance indicators and projects are part of an approved strategy and is now on hold because management is re-looking into the strategy. With this in place, any form of urgency gets squelched for practicality: let’s go slow and see if they change their mind, again.

    5 things I love about a government job

    Its not all gloom and doom though, and here are the 5 things I loved about my time in the government.

    6. Strategic thinking skills

    Ironically, getting involved in strategy work also means that you get to develop your strategic thinking skills. Since any projects or policies you implement will involve taxpayers’ money, you have to make sure that it’s sustainable, fits into the bigger Singapore growth roadmap and pays off in the long run. While it can be frustrating at times, it did force me to think strategically all the time, and over time, it developed me to be more strategic, and think in a big-picture manner. Even the dreaded exercise of writing budget papers trained me to be focused in my thoughts, giving them clarity.

    7. Leaving a legacy and making an impact on society

    The impact you make in a government body benefits the society you live in. You’d feel good knowing that you’ve contributed back to society in a big way, having satisfied the inner desire to make a difference to the community. You’re not just working towards the bottomline of a company, but sacrificing your time and efforts for the greater good. There’s not many other workplaces where you can say the same thing, and it is deeply fulfilling and meaningful.

    If you are in the Singapore Economic Development Board (EDB), you will be opening industries and attracting MNCs that will employ thousands of people. If you are part of the Infocomm Development Authority of Singapore (IDA), you will be helping to build a futuristic smart nation. If you are in the National Environment Agency (NEA), you will be creating a sustainable environment for us and our children. And these are just three of the many agencies around. I once established a strategic partnership (during my days in the government sector) that brought revenue contribution to local businesses, and I felt proud knowing that it had contributed to the economy of the country, akin to leaving an important legacy behind.

    8. Involved in latest events and community news

    Being the champion of an industry (eg. Tourism Board for tourism) also means that you get the first chance to experience new stuff. If you like to be seen as the hipster who’s been to the River Safari first or launch of the National Gallery, then being part of the government is for you.

    9. Family-oriented, good benefits, and lunch culture

    The public sector is a family oriented environment in general, with generous benefits and family-oriented policies. Leave entitlements in particular trump many private sector companies, which is why it is the pro-baby workplace as most people know it as. It is also not uncommon for employees to take no-pay-leave for sabbaticals, or exam leaves for studies. And on the compensation side, there’s always the sweet 13th month bonus every year and the occasional mid year bonuses.

    There’s typically a strong local (food) culture as well (you can trust Singaporeans to love their food!). I always look forward to lunching together in groups, sometimes even travelling out far for the best food. There’s typically no strict lunch hours, and there’ll always be celebratory meals for new joiners or birthday colleagues.

    10. Gain global outlook and CEO exposure

    Depending on your role and employer, public officers do enjoy quite a bit of opportunities to travel overseas for work. These could be market study trips, meetings or representing Singapore in overseas conferences and seminars. You’ll be exposed to international best practices, different cultures and they all help you develop a global outlook.

    As a young, inexperienced employee in many other companies, you may not get a chance to interface with senior leaders in other organisations. However, because you represent the government of Singapore, senior business leaders are willing to meet you for various reasons such as gaining tax concessions for locating regional HQs here or to obtain government grants for their businesses. With the government’s trust in the abilities of its young officers, you could use the experience to develop into a well-rounded professional. For example, EDB is especially known for exposing young officers to senior management leaders of MNCs.

    Concluding thoughts

    When people ask me what’s the difference between my previous government role and the current private sector role, I have lots of mixed feelings. When I was in my prior role, I was feeling worn-out (and sometimes cynical) by the long drawn processes. I wanted to go faster and do more, but I felt hampered by bureaucracy. But it wasn’t all bad. In retrospect, I realised that the training and exposure I had helped me develop very useful skills that will carry me far. And I do sometimes miss the noble mission that every government officer is set on – the mission to create a better home for us all.

    Every sector has it’s good and bad side. I sure have grumbles about working in the government sector, as with many others I believe. But I do admit too that it can be a great place for professionals to develop into an all-rounder and do meaningful work for their country at the same time.

    Look beyond the stereotypes associated with a government job, and you may perhaps find your dream job in this sector.

     

    *Article first appeared on www.17wakinghours.com

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

  • Potty Training Near Restaurant at MBS For Caucasian Toddler

    Potty Training Near Restaurant at MBS For Caucasian Toddler

    It was definitely a sight that visitors would not expect to see at a world-class casino-resort.

    A beautiful Sunday outing was somewhat ruined for some visitors and diners at Marina Bay Sands resort yesterday when they saw a toddler doing her business in public.

    A woman from a group dining at the atrium area of a restaurant at lunch-time had arranged a potty for the girl to relieve herself, just a few metres away from their table.

    Instead of taking the girl, who looked like she was two years old, to the toilet, which was located nearby, the woman was tending to her without a care for diners dining metres away at two restaurant, or visitors who were walking past.

    Also nearby was a foodcourt which was filling up with a lunch crowd.

    Said a flabbergasted diner: “How can they let the girl do her business in public? They should just take her to a toilet nearby. It’s so near. Furthermore, she’s not a baby. She looks like she’s more than two years old.”

    Wait staff serving the group seemed oblivious to what was happening, as the toddler, partially hidden by a standy, was out of their view. She seemed quite happy to be ensconced on the potty for a good 20-to-30 minutes.

    After finishing her business, the girl was seen playing and running around the area with another young girl.

     

    Source: http://news.asiaone.com

  • Elderly Man Dead After Accident Involving SMRT Bus

    Elderly Man Dead After Accident Involving SMRT Bus

    An accident involving an SMRT bus and a pedestrian left one elderly man dead on Monday (Nov 17).

    The Singapore Civil Defence Force said they were alerted to the incident along Jurong East Street 32 at 11.57am. They sent one ambulance to the scene, but the man in his 70s – later identified by SMRT as Mr Tan – was pronounced dead at the scene.

    Channel 8 News quoted eyewitnesses as saying that the lower half of the elderly man’s body was mangled, while a walking stick was seen on the road. It also said the bus windscreen was shattered in the accident.

    The driver was reportedly a 34-year-old female, according to Channel 8 News. Her relatives told Channel 8 News that she had only joined SMRT eight months ago, but had 13 years’ experience driving buses in Malaysia.

    An SMRT spokesperson said: “We would like to express our deepest condolences to Mr Tan’s family. We are currently cooperating with the traffic police on the investigations. We have contacted Mr Tan’s family and will render assistance as best as we can during this very difficult time.”

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Being a Singaporean Is NOT Easy!

    Being a Singaporean Is NOT Easy!

    It ain’t easy being Singaporean.

    Your life is run by a series of acronyms like ERP, COE, CPF, PSLE, NS, PMS; you have to endure the relentless tropical heat; you have nothing to read butThe Straits Times; your national culture consists of shopping and whining (I’m nothing if not patriotic); and it’s still considered a crime to strangle Gurmit Singh. You get called names like ‘little red dot’, ‘useless piece of snot’ and even Jacky Chan craps all over you. Let’s face it, when a man who made his living jumping around like a monkey says you have “no self-respect”, well, it ain’t been a good week.

    But still, you try. The great Romantic poet John Keats once wrote:

    It matters not what the crowd bays

    Or what the angry gods may say

    For all that matters is the heart

    And the values you cling hard

    What beautiful lines. It means that regardless of what people may say or think about you, what matters is what you believe in. Words deserving of colourful embroidery indeed. Ok, I completely made the lines up. Keats never said that. I could have looked him up but I really can’t be bothered. Laziness is one of my many charms. But don’t let that take anything from the message. It’s still pertinent.

    And so I try, as a citizen, to narrow the gulf between our national values and what we do as a country. After all, if morality means practicing what you preach, then being a great country means practicing what you teach. Under George Bush, America tore up their Constitution, practiced torture, invaded the wrong country and became the pariah of the international community. Under Barack Obama, America is heeding the call of its ideals and founding principles and, in the process, is becoming great again.

    I think a little red dot can be great too. I think greatness is not limited to the measure of size and might, but the loftiness of one’s ideals and one’s faithfulness to them. By this definition, Singapore can be great.

    And so I turn my eyes towards our ‘Shared values’. Phrases like “Nation before community and society above self” ring so sweet. They stir up a sense of pride deep inside. They make me want to do something. Oh shut up, it’s true. They really do make me want to give of myself.

    But then I see our ministers’ legendary salaries and their need to “facilitate the recruitment and retention of the quality of talent we need for the government and public sector.” My enthusiasm becomes more flaccid than an 80 year old man in a cold shower.

    What about Shared value #3 -“Community support and respect for the individual”? Pretty uncontroversial, we can’t go wrong here. 377A, AWARE new exco, Thio Su Mien – enuff said.

    What about Asian values and Confucian ethics ? I think to myself, well, perhaps cynicism aside, the clarion call to be moral, ethical and righteous, regardless of their political intent, is worth heeding. My cynicism is about to slip away when I also recall our on-going manufacture of landmines, their sale to war-torn countries, our economic dealings with the Myanmar junta, our medical offerings to Robert Mugabe, and most recently, our welcome of North Korean President Kim Yong Nam. Ah well, you know what they say, we’re just a little red dot and must look out for our national interests.

    Pragmatism is a wonderful device. It allows you to do anything you want, however you want, and then blame it on reality. It’s an excuse for abandoning higher morals and ethics without looking like a dick. It makes you a man because you’re seen to be ‘realistic’ and ‘grounded’. It’s the ultimate backstage pass, allowing you to bypass everyone to get straight to the goodies. And being pragmatic also means that you have to pretend to have values, whether shared or of the Asian variety because there are idealistic saps out there who, believe it or not, romanticise principles. It’s just pragmatic to be an ethical Confucianist.

    It’s hard being Singaporean. It’s damn hard. Screw it. I’m going shopping.

     

    Article first appeared on groundnotes.wordpress.com

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

     

     

  • Are HDB Flats Affordable For Low-Income Singaporeans?

    Are HDB Flats Affordable For Low-Income Singaporeans?

    Can a Singaporean who earns $850 a month afford to buy a Housing Board flat?

    Mr Mohammad Charlie Jasni says yes.

    The odd-job labourer earns that amount, and he and his family will be moving into a new two-room HDB flat in Punggol by the end of the year.

    He had successfully balloted for the 45sq m build-to-order unit in August 2009.

    It cost $99,220, but because he earns less than $5,000 a month, he qualifies for a government housing grant that gives him $40,000 to offset the flat’s price.

    This means he has $59,220 left to pay, which he will do using his Central Provident Fund (CPF) savings.

    He and his wife already have about $40,000 in their CPF accounts, and this will grow as he continues to work.

    Based on HDB’s calculations, he needs to pay a monthly housing instalment of $83 over 30 years.

    ‘By paying the $83 out of my CPF, it means I have that little more for daily expenses,’ said Mr Charlie, 33.

    He is currently living with his wife and two children in a two-room rental flat in Beo Crescent. They pay $44 a month for that flat.

    They are excited about their upcoming home and are already discussing renovation ideas and shopping for furniture.

    ‘It is good to have a home of our own,’ he said.

    Mr Charlie’s story puts a face to a statistic that has been debated in the last week.

    In Parliament last Thursday, Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam revealed that ‘a family with $1,000 income can now, through our housing subsidies, purchase a small flat’.

    He was responding to Workers’ Party member Gerald Giam’s comments about Singaporeans being unable to afford a flat.

    The minister’s remarks sparked off much discussion in both cyberspace and coffee shops alike. Some wondered how $1,000 could buy anyone a flat, given that sum was hardly enough to support a family’s daily living expenses.

    The next day, National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan explained that Mr Tharman was referring to a new two-room flat.

    He added that the subsidised price of such flats was about $100,000 if the applicant was a first-time buyer. He would also be entitled to housing grants of up to $60,000.

    The net selling price would thus be $40,000, and the monthly mortgage payment can be fully paid from his CPF contribution, Mr Khaw said.

    In response to queries from The Straits Times, the HDB said it was unable to say how many households earning $1,000 a month own two-room flats. But it pointed to how that it has two schemes that target low-income, first-time buyers.

    The Additional CPF Housing Grant Scheme (AHG) benefits households whose income is not more than $5,000 a month. The maximum grant quantum is now $40,000, and it benefits 8,000 households every year, said the HDB.

    The Special CPF Housing Grant (SHG) is given to first-timer families earning up to $2,250 a month to buy a small flat. Those earning $1,500 or less get a $20,000 grant. SHG is over and above regular housing subsidies and the AHG.

    The HDB estimated that about 700 tenants currently renting flats under the Public Rental Scheme can benefit from the SHG if they decide to buy a flat. To date, the scheme has benefited 53 households who have bought two-room flats.

    The HDB also gave The Straits Times five recent case studies of households with monthly income of about $1,000 who bought two-room flats. Four managed to buy new flats with the help of both housing grants. The fifth used only AHG as SHG had not been implemented when he bought his flat.

    Out of the five families, three were rental tenants who have bought a new flat without taking any loan because they used the housing grant and their own CPF savings. The other two were families currently living with relatives who have bought new flats using both grants and their CPF savings.

    In one case, a couple who lived in a rental flat bought a new flat in Bukit Panjang. At the point of applying for a flat, their monthly income was $900.

    The flat cost $106,350. They got the maximum total housing grant of $60,000 – $40,000 AHG and $20,000 SHG. This, together with their CPF savings, meant they did not have to take any loan.

    In another case, a man and his mother bought a new flat in Sengkang for $117,750. They got $60,000 in grants, and took a 17-year loan with a monthly instalment of $131.

    Schemes to help with expenses

    THE Straits Times visited five blocks of two-room flats in the Woodlands and Ghim Moh areas this week and spoke to people in over 30 homes.

    Most of the residents there were renting their units.

    Of the four who owned their flats, one had downgraded from a four-room unit, while three others had downgraded after selling their previous flat in the Selective En Bloc Redevelopment Scheme.

    Among those renting, many were in their 60s and 70s and retired. They said they do not have much in their CPF or bank accounts, which is why they cannot buy their own units.

    Madam Tan Chui Eng, in her 70s, and her husband, Mr Teo Kim Wee, in his 80s, said they have been living in a two-room rental flat in Ghim Moh for six years.

    Most of the money in their CPF accounts has been used for medical expenses, they said. They have three daughters who pay their monthly rental of $61 and utility bills. ‘Of course, we would like to buy our own flat, but we cannot afford it,’ said Madam Tan in Teochew.

    MPs said that with grants and other assistance schemes, households earning $1,000 should be able to afford a two-room flat.

    Mr Vikram Nair, an MP for Sembawang GRC, said he knows of such households who rely on CPF contributions to finance their purchases.

    As to whether $1,000 is enough for a family to survive, he said there are public assistance schemes, such as GST vouchers and Workfare Bonus, which can help low-income families cope with daily needs.

    Mr Liang Eng Hwa, MP for Holland-Bukit Timah GRC, said regardless of whether they buy a flat, low-income households have little cash on hand. But rather than use cash to pay rent, ‘why not use the CPF to pay for a flat?’

    ‘The cash they save by not paying rent may not be much, but still it gives them that little more for daily expenditure,’ he added.

    For odd-job labourer Mr Charlie, every bit saved helps to pay for living expenses. His wife does part-time administrative work.

    He did not think he could afford a flat ‘but when HDB re-introduced two-room flats again, I felt that perhaps I could afford one’.

    In 2006, HDB resumed construction of two-room flats after 20 years, to give more housing options to low-income households.

    He decided to wait a bit because he wanted to build up his CPF account first. Now that he has bought a home, he feels the pressure of maintaining his CPF account so that the flat can be paid off.

    ‘Some companies are cutting back on manpower and I’m scared that I may lose my job,’ he said.

    But he does not regret buying the unit. He hopes to pass the flat – or a bigger one should they ever upgrade – to his children.

    How he pays for his flat

    Monthly income: $850

    Total household CPF: $40,000

    Cost of build-to-order flat in Punggol: $99,220

    Additional CPF Housing Grant Scheme: $40,000

    Remaining cost of flat: $59,220 ($99,220 less $40,000)

    Estimated monthly instalment for payment: $83 for 30 years

    Deduction from CPF: $83

    Cash outlay: $0

    _________________________________________________

    Housing help for low-income families

    THE Housing Board (HDB) offers two grants to low-income families so they can buy their own flats:

     

    • Additional CPF Housing Grant Scheme (AHG)

     

    THIS was introduced in 2006 to help lower-income Singaporean families buy their first HDB flat. It is targeted at households with incomes of not more than $5,000 a month.

    The size of the grant is based on the applicant’s average gross monthly household income. The grant varies between $5,000 and $40,000. Households earning $1,500 or less a month will get $40,000.

    AHG is an additional subsidy over and above the regular market subsidy and CPF Housing Grant. Both new and resale flat buyers are eligible for AHG.

    It offsets the purchase price of the flat, thereby further reducing the loan a flat buyer needs to take. It is estimated to benefit 8,000 households a year.

     

    • The Special CPF Housing Grant (SHG)

     

    THIS was introduced last year as an additional grant for first-timer low-income families earning up to $2,250 a month, so they can buy a small flat from the HDB.

    The SHG is given out over and above regular housing subsidies and the AHG. Households earning $1,500 or less a month will get $20,000 in SHG. About 700 tenants currently renting flats under the Public Rental Scheme can benefit from the SHG if they choose to buy a flat.

     

    Source: http://www.stproperty.sg