Category: Singapuraku

  • Amos Yee Recommended For Reformative Training

    Amos Yee Recommended For Reformative Training

    The prosecution in the Amos Yee trial on Wednesday (May 27) called for the teen to be sent to the Reformative Training Centre (RTC) instead of probation.

    He was back in the State Courts on Wednesday for an urgent hearing after his probation officer filed a report to the State Court, indicating what had transpired between Yee and the officer after the accused was found guilty on May 12.

    The teen refused to attend any interviews with the probation officer and has informed her that he does not want probation, since the Court made the order for a probation report on May 12.

    Yee was found guilty of two charges – one for making offensive or wounding remarks against Christianity and another for circulating obscene imagery. A third charge, for the teen blogger’s statements to the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew in a YouTube video, was withdrawn.

    It was made known to prosecutors on May 21 that Yee had republished the offending video and image pertaining to the case. He was asked to take both materials down when he was charged for his offences.

    Prosecutors said to media after a short hearing on Wednesday that recommending an RTC charge for Yee would be in line with attempts for rehabilitation as it was understood that a jail term or fine would not have rehabilitative effects on him.

    Reformative training at the RTC is an option for young offenders aged between 16 and 18 years old who are assessed to be unsuitable for probation. Offenders will be detained for a minimum of 18 months in the RTC.

    Yee’s defence lawyers have asked for time to convene and come to a decision on the RTC request that the prosecution has surfaced.

    The trial will reconvene on Jun 2. If the judge makes a decision in favour of RTC, Yee will have to be remanded for up to four weeks for a report to be conducted on his suitability for an RTC sentence.

    Yee remains out on bail at the S$10,000 pledge.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Residents Forced To Clean Common Areas, Query AHPETC Collection Of S&CC Charges

    Residents Forced To Clean Common Areas, Query AHPETC Collection Of S&CC Charges

    SINGAPORE — For more than seven months, the residents and the developer of a Design, Build and Sell Scheme (DBSS) project at Upper Serangoon Road had to clean and maintain the common areas themselves, because of an impasse involving the Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC) and the Housing and Development Board (HDB) over maintenance documents.

    Following discussions, the standstill at Parkland Residences was recently resolved and from next month, the town council will fulfil its duty to manage common property in public housing estates as stipulated under the Town Council Act.

    However, as far as the residents and the developer are concerned, the matter is not fully resolved: Residents, several of whom had moved in as early as October last year, said that during that period, some of them continued to pay service and conservancy charges (S&CC), even though others had stopped paying as a matter of principle. Meanwhile, the developer, Kwan Hwee Investment, said it hopes to seek reimbursement for the expenses it had incurred for taking care of the common areas between November and this month.

    The situation came to light after TODAY reader Julia Ng wrote to the newspaper last week about the problems she and her neighbours face at Parkland Residences.

    Among other things, Ms Ng wrote about how residents were billed for the S&CC upon collecting their keys but “there were no subsequent reminders, and many of us have not been making payment”.

    She added: “It did not seem required, since there was no maintenance as evidenced by the dirty corridors and surroundings, especially in the earlier months when many residents took it upon themselves to clean the corridors.”

    Ms Ng said the residents understood that the development had not been handed over to the town council and that the S&CC “were collected on behalf of the HDB, which the latter denied”.

    Replying to Ms Ng’s letter, HDB director (land administration) Koo-Lee Sook Chin clarified that the S&CC collected by AHPETC “are not collected on behalf of HDB”. She revealed that AHPETC had “refused to perform its duty until the developer handed over a list of documents and items specified by (the town council)”.

    “HDB has clarified that these documents and items were not required for AHPETC to carry out its day-to-day cleaning and maintenance,” Mrs Koo-Lee said.

    She added that as AHPETC had “refused to maintain the common areas”, the HDB asked the developer to clean the estate in the interim, “to ensure that the hygiene of residents’ living environment would not be compromised”. The developer has been cleaning the estate since Nov 12 last year, Mrs Koo-Lee said.

    “Pending AHPETC’s execution of its duties to maintain the estate, HDB will work with the developer to ensure that the estate is maintained in the interim, for the benefit of all residents,” she said.

    Speaking to TODAY, Mr Philip Tan, Kwan Hwee Investment’s project manager for Parkland Residences, confirmed that the AHPETC wanted HDB’s endorsement for maintenance documents — such as drawings of water supply and gas pipes and lift maintenance schedule — but the HDB disagreed.

    Mr Tan said these documents are needed to assist a town council in taking over the maintenance of services. He added that the developer had deployed cleaners on a daily basis. “We hope to seek some form of reimbursements for the cleaning work that we have done since November,” he said.

    Responding to TODAY’s queries, an AHPETC spokesman said the town council “agrees that there is room to improve the handover procedures between the developer, the HDB and the town council with regard to DBSS developments”. He added that the town council was “exercising its due diligence in the handover”. Nevertheless, the town council has since reviewed its internal process, he said.

    The spokesman did not reply to questions on the S&CC, including which period was the AHPETC collecting the S&CC and what it intends to do with the S&CC collected. Residents at Parkland Residences said the situation has improved, but they recalled their frustrations in the initial months.

    “There was a rat infestation at my block,” said resident Joyce Wong, 27. “The bins at the lift lobbies just started piling up because no one was clearing them. When residents complained, the developers took away the bins, but then we didn’t have anywhere to discard our rubbish at.”

    Another resident, a homemaker who only wanted to be known as Mrs Chan, said: “We asked the HDB whether we should pay (S&CC), but they said they hadn’t handed over to the town council yet and were not collecting. When we approached the town council, they said they were collecting on behalf of HDB, but the HDB said they didn’t know anything.”

    Human resource manager Sim Bee Lay, 39, said she has not paid the S&CC since she moved into her flat.

    “We only received one letter and there were no reminders following that,” she added.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • High Court Turns Down MND Request For Independent Accountants At WP-Run AHPETC

    High Court Turns Down MND Request For Independent Accountants At WP-Run AHPETC

    The High Court will not appoint independent accountants to oversee government grants to the Workers’ Party (WP)-run town council.

    Justice Quentin Loh said that the Ministry of National Development (MND) has not established legal bases for its court application to appoint the accountants.

    Despite the “grave and serious questions” raised over the state of accounts at Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC), the judge wrote that “when the Town Councils are set up, the whole idea is to rest the responsibility of the management of the funds as well as the estate with the Town Council.”

    The Court therefore will not appoint independent accountants to oversee payments made by AHPETC.

    MND had wanted independent accountants to sign off on AHPETC payments over $20,000 before it released several million in government grants to the town council.

    But in his grounds of decision, released on Wednesday, Justice Loh said that it is a “travesty for AHPETC to have ignored their duties and obligations imposed on them by the Town Councils Act and Town Council Financial Rules.”

    “They owe a duty and a heavy responsibility to their constituents to run AHPETC properly and it is incumbent on them to put their house and finances in order.”

    “If AHPETC was a managing corporation … I have no doubt that AHPETC or its officers will be exposed to to the possibility of civil liability or, in an extreme scenario, criminal liability,” he added.

    Justice Loh said that his decision should not stop the Housing Board or AHPETC residents from bringing legal action against AHPETC for the lapses.

    In a two-day court hearing earlier this month, the MND said that questions remain over the cash flow position and accounting practices of AHPETC, which recently missed two sinking fund payments.

    AHPETC said that it did not make those payments as it needed the funds to keep daily operations going.

    MND has withheld two years of grants to AHPETC – a total of about $15 million – as it said it has no guarantee that those funds would be used properly.

    On March 20, MND applied to the court to appoint independent accountants to AHPETC to safeguard government grants.

    Earlier this year, serious accounting and governance lapses were discovered at AHPETC by the Auditor-General’s Office.

    Commenting in the judgment on Wednesday night, AHPETC chairman Sylvia Lim, who is also WP chairman and an MP of Aljunied GRC, said: “We respect the court’s decision and will be studying the judgment in detail.

    “In the meantime, we remain focused on filing our audited accounts for FY 13/14 and FY 14/15, and on continuing to improve our financial processes.”

    Separately, the ministry noted in a statement that the Court agreed with its concerns about AHPETC.

    A spokesman, citing the judgment, said: “The Court said there were ‘grave and serious questions’ that have been raised regarding the state of AHPETC’s accounts and the validity and propriety of payments previously made by AHPETC to related parties (amounting to $25.9 million), and that ‘there have also been numerous breaches of the provisions’ of the Town Councils Act and Town Councils Financial Rules. The Court added that the TC’s conduct was the height of financial irresponsibility.”

    She added: “The judge also stated that if AHPETC was a managing corporation subject to the Building Maintenance and Strata Management Act, he would have no doubt that AHPETC or its officers will be exposed to the “possibility of civil liability… or, in an extreme scenario, criminal liability”.

    “The Court added that it was a travesty for AHPETC to have ignored their duties and obligations. And that the TC was to be blamed for not accepting MND’s offer to release the grant.

    “The Court said that HDB and residents could have brought the action, but not MND itself. The Court has also noted that MND can require the TC to appoint Independent Accountants (as a condition for release of grants), without having to get a court order.”

    The spokesman added that MND will carefully study the judgment, and consider what its next steps should be.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Amos Yee: Haters Will Hate, And Still Read My Comments!

    Amos Yee: Haters Will Hate, And Still Read My Comments!

    Something you guys should know about me is that I don’t read many comments or articles about myself, I just take a little glance at them.

    And the reason why I don’t is because I know that there’s a considerable amount of people who have an opinion, who watches and reads content every day, but just doesn’t comment. Like me.

    I have gushed at several Jontron and Cyriak videos, but I never ever comment on them, I don’t even press the ‘like’ button, I just enjoy it.

    So with the knowledge of that, to try to accurately gauge whether or not your public reception is leaning towards the good or the bad, based on your comments section, is just an exercise in futility.

    But I will acknowledge that I might be missing out some really great and insightful comments from not doing so.

    So I don’t read much of my comments, but my mother sure does, she also frequently corrects the Grammar in my posts. And she noticed that the same exact haters, without fail, would comment on almost every one of my post, vehemently spamming and expressing their displeasure towards me.

    I even have a list of their names, here you go:

    Siao Ginna, AisinGioro YongZhen, Wen Quan, Linda Goh, Vickers HS , Sheryl Tan, Peter Lim, Tan Eng Jen, Somkiat L Chong, Grace Trivian Chua, Tong Chong Hin, Lim Riana,Francis Leong, Amos Yee Yaymos Hee, Lin Lin Ling, Ruth Wong, Oei Marantz, Rebecca Tay, Lee Choon Heng, Fated To Win, Buaya Buaya, Ronald Phua, Sage Lee

    I’ve blocked most of them because the spam is tremendous, I don’t know why they simply insist on leaving multiple comments at once, and engage in these long conversations in the comments section, get a fucking private messenger jesus. .

    So these haters, really don’t like my posts, find them utterly reprehensible, and yet you read them all the time. So basically, you guys are willingly torturing yourself every day.

    Man…You guys gotta get some help dude..

     

    Source: Amos Yee

  • Zulfikar Shariff: Lee Kuan Yew Racist Islamophobe, Don’t Compare Him To Prophet Muhammad

    Zulfikar Shariff: Lee Kuan Yew Racist Islamophobe, Don’t Compare Him To Prophet Muhammad

    Ada segilintir orang Melayu yang cuma pertahankan claim bahawa Lee Kuan Yew mentadbir Singapura berlandaskan Islam.

    Tak perlulah cuba nak tegakkan benang yang basah. Benang ni bukan kena air sikit…dah kena celup dan berpintal-pintal.

    Rasulullah tidak zalim. Bahkan, Rasulullah rahmatul alamin.

    Baca sejarah LKY dan lihat betapa zalim orang ini. Dia robohkan masjid, menuntut agar orang Islam jangan amalkan Islam, kutuk Islam, kutuk Melayu..

    He imprisoned and made fitnah on anyone who posed a threat to his power.

    He promotes the demand for Muslims to relinquish Islam from our daily lives. Not only was it the views of a racist, Islamophobe, it became an institutional conduct.

    Ini pentadbiran Rasulullah ke?

    Sejak bila Rasulullah zalim?

    Jangan burukkan nama Rasulullah dengan mengaitkan makhluk yang termulia dengan seorang yang benci Islam dan yang zalim.

     

    Source: Zulfikar Shariff

deneme bonusu