Category: Singapuraku

  • GPFirst Programme Cuts Waiting Time At Changi General Hospital’s A&E By 7 Minutes

    GPFirst Programme Cuts Waiting Time At Changi General Hospital’s A&E By 7 Minutes

    The average waiting time for slightly more serious conditions at Changi General Hospital’s (CGH) Accident and Emergency (A&E) department has shortened by about seven minutes, thanks to the GPFirst Programme which launched last year.

    The waiting time was calculated at 29 minutes in January 2014 and 22 minutes in December of the same year.

    The GPFirst Programme encourages patients to first visit their General Practitioner (GP) clinic by offering a S$50 discount off the emergency department fee if they do so. Since the launch of the programme, about 3,800 patients have been referred to CGH’s A&E.

    60 per cent of clinics located in the east are on the programme. Of these, 90 per cent have used the mobile application “GPFirst Aide”. The application provides convenient access to information which has helped some GPs reduce consultation time by about 20 per cent.

    Said Associate Professor Mohan Tiru, Senior Consultant at CGH: “GPs sometimes have difficulty in risk stratification, that means informing the patient whether they have low, intermediate or high risk of complication for a specific disease.

    The application helps increase awareness of clinical decision rules such that GPs can make informed decisions and patients can also make informed choices on their treatment, he said.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Preservation Of Monuments Act Allows Government To Protect Oxley Road House

    Preservation Of Monuments Act Allows Government To Protect Oxley Road House

    The late Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s explicit wish was to have his Oxley Road house demolished after his death, but heritage and legal experts say the law allows the Government to protect it by preserving it as a national monument.

    Under the Preservation of Monuments Act, the National Heritage Board can ask the Minister for Culture, Community and Youth to gazette the more than 100-year-old bungalow.

    This is provided the property fulfils criteria such as having historic, cultural, traditional, archaeological, architectural, artistic or symbolic significance, and being of national importance.

    Senior consultant Gopalan Raman of law firm KhattarWong’s litigation department said yesterday that the property is clearly of “great historical value”.

    “It is the house of the first Prime Minister, who has done so much to develop Singapore to the state that it is in today with his early comrades,” he said.

    The Act also trumps Mr Lee’s wish in his will for the house to be demolished after his death – or immediately after his daughter, Dr Lee Wei Ling, who lives there, moves out

    Singapore Management University heritage law expert Jack Lee said the state has “power over personal wishes”.

    “A will of any person cannot override the ordinary law of the land. For instance, if someone were to will that his house becomes a casino, land zoning laws would take precedence,” he said.

    When a property has been identified for its heritage value, the authorities generally engage the owner over their plans.

    The owner’s consent is sought as the task and cost of the upkeep of the monument falls on the owner, said experts. So when a declaration to preserve it is made, it is presumably with the owner’s consent, they said.

    In the case of an unwilling owner, the law allows the Government to step in to acquire the property, said Dr Jack Lee. But this has rarely been done.

    There is also no annual budget for acquisitions, said Dr Kevin Tan, president of the International Council on Monuments and Sites Singapore.

    The experts yesterday acknowledged the late Mr Lee’s wishes and noted that his son, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, told Parliament on Monday that Dr Lee intends to continue living there.

    “Therefore, there is no immediate issue of demolition of the house, and no need for the Government to make any decision now,” PM Lee said of the property and Mr Lee’s wishes, in response to questions from MPs.

    Dr Tan said it was unlikely that the Act would be used to acquire the house any time soon, owing to the difficulty of doing so.

    Still, most experts said the formal process of assessing its historical significance should get under way. The Oxley house is where the People’s Action Party was formed in 1954 and key decisions made in the early years of independent Singapore.

    Dr Tan also believes that by the time the Lee family makes a decision on the house, a Founders’ Memorial would have been built. This would allow Singaporeans to commemorate Mr Lee and the first-generation leaders without the Oxley premises in focus.

    Since Mr Lee died on March 23 at age 91, calls to preserve his house have grown. An online petition gathered 1,700 signatures in about a week.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Law Society Produces Pamphlet To Inform Of Rights And Investigation Process Carried Out By Police

    Law Society Produces Pamphlet To Inform Of Rights And Investigation Process Carried Out By Police

    The Law Society has produced a Pamphlet of Rights to provide basic information on the relevant rights a person has when being questioned by the police and the process they should expect during investigations.

    In a news release on Tuesday (Apr 14), the Law Society said the pamphlet is “important and necessary” because information about legal rights during investigations may not be easy for members of the public to find or understand.

    “In 2013, the Law Society’s Criminal Practice Committee began work on a “Pamphlet of Rights” for members of the public,” said the release. “The idea was to provide basic information in a condensed and ‘simple to understand’ form to the public.”

    The pamphlet covers information about legal rights during investigation, search of possessions and property, prosecution and also legal aid.

    Pamphlet of Rights is currently being distributed to community clubs and police stations where it will soon be made available to members of the public and people who are arrested or brought in for questioning by the police.

    The pamphlet was produced through the engagement of various stakeholders in criminal justice system such as the Attorney-General’s Chambers and the Ministry of Home Affairs, with support from the Ministry of Law.The Law Society said it hopes to make it available in as many public locations as possible.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Couple Behind The Real Singapore Charged On 7 Counts Of Sedition Each

    Couple Behind The Real Singapore Charged On 7 Counts Of Sedition Each

    The couple behind socio-political website The Real Singapore – a 26-year-old Singaporean man and a 22-year-old Australian woman – were on Tuesday (Apr 14) each charged with seven counts of sedition.

    Yang Kaiheng and Ai Takagi allegedly published seditious articles on the website between October 2013 and February 2015. One of these articles falsely claimed that an incident between police and some members of the public during a Thaipusam procession earlier this year had been sparked by a Filipino family’s complaint that the drums played during the procession upset their child.

    Yang is Singaporean, while Ai Takagi is Australian.

    According to the charge sheets, the particular articles have the “tendency to promote feelings of ill-will and hostility between different groups of people in Singapore, name, between ethnic Indians in Singapore and Philippine nationals in Singapore”.

    The pair also face an eighth charge, this time under the Penal Code, for failing to produce documents to a police officer from the Criminal Investigation Department.

    Under the Sedition Act, the duo are liable, on conviction for a first offence, to a fine of up to S$5,000 or to imprisonment for a term of up to three years, or to both. As for the charge under the Penal code, they are punishable with imprisonment of a maximum of one month, or a maximum fine of S$1,500, or both.

    Court bail for each was set at S$20,000, and the case will be mentioned again on May 12.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Third-Party Taxi-Booking Apps Faces Impending Regulations

    Third-Party Taxi-Booking Apps Faces Impending Regulations

    Laws to regulate third-party cab-booking apps were proposed in Parliament today (April 13), which if passed will confer wide-ranging powers on the authorities to, for instance, amend, add to, or revoke codes of practice for specific providers, or across the industry.

    The Bill introduced by the Transport Ministry will also require third-party apps to register with the Land Transport Authority (LTA) before operating here, failing which they will be fined up to S$10,000 or jailed up to six months.

    The authorities can also impose sanctions of up to S$100,000 on providers that have failed to, among other things, comply with “any condition of registration (or) any direction given by the Authority”, and in severe cases, revoke the companies’ registrations.

    The proposed framework, first announced by the LTA last November, will also spell out the conditions registered providers must comply with, such as dispatching only licensed taxis and drivers and providing information on fare rates upfront to commuters.

    While app companies and transport experts whom TODAY spoke to welcomed the regulatory framework, they felt that it should not stifle innovation, which is critical to this industry.

    Hailo Singapore’s general manager Wong Yu Hsiang said web-based third-party booking firms thrive on constantly designing new practices that allow them to “better latch on demand and supply in the market”.

    One existing practice, which will be affected under the proposed framework, is to require prospective passengers to specify their destinations before they can make bookings.

    “While we understand concerns that taxi drivers may avoid taking bookings to certain destinations, having that requirement would allow better optimisation of the fleet and reduce downtime,” he said.

    He added that the current technology does enable third-party taxi providers to sieve out the cabbies who “constantly pick and choose”, and educate them.

    Mr Li Jianggan, co-founder and managing director of Easy Taxi Singapore, said the framework will give drivers and commuters more predictability.

    Echoing Mr Wong’s calls for room to innovate, Mr Li said: “Among the countries that Easy Taxi operates in, Singapore has been one of those more supportive of innovation, so we really hope that remains, even after regulations have been implemented.”

    Both men felt that the proposed laws give the authority more powers because theirs is a “fairly new industry”.

    “It makes sense (for the authority) to have flexibility to change the laws down the road…we don’t want them to over-regulate now and have to back-paddle later,” Mr Li said.

    National University of Singapore transport researcher Professor Lee Der Horng said the new framework may offer some reassurance for traditional taxi operators, but it may be difficult for the Government to accurately evaluate the performance of third-party apps.

    “You need a very sound basis to penalise people, but this becomes quite grey now because commuters’ booking behaviour is changing. At any one instance, commuters may use several apps to call for taxis but will eventually get on one, so it is hard to determine the matching rate and response time for each provider,” he said.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

deneme bonusu