Category: Sosial

  • Workers’ Party Lee Li Lian Mooted Idea Of More Aid For Single Mothers In 2013 By-Election Rally

    Workers’ Party Lee Li Lian Mooted Idea Of More Aid For Single Mothers In 2013 By-Election Rally

    Social and Family Development Minister Tan Chuan-Jin’s new agenda for his ministry is to put vulnerable children high on the priority list of those to receive help.

    Currently, a review is being conducted by MSF so that unwed working mothers may soon get the same benefits as married ones.

    This was revealed in an interview with Channel News Asia on July 29, 2015:

    REVIEWING BENEFITS FOR UNWED MOTHERS

    Besides vulnerable groups in society, Mr Tan also revealed that unwed working mothers may soon get the same benefits as married ones under a review being conducted by MSF.

    It is the lament of unwed mothers that they do not get the same benefits as married mums. And that just because they are single, why should their children be penalised, is their argument.

    Among the differences is how unwed mothers get eight weeks of maternity leave paid for by their employers, while married mothers get 16 weeks. Unwed mothers do not benefit from the Handicapped Child Relief, nor the Baby Bonus cash gift.

    The minister asked for a review of current policies: “My sense is that the public understands and sympathises with single unwed mothers; I see it on the ground. When I came in, I asked my colleagues to see whether we can review some of these things. Some of the differentiation that exists, could we harmonise it?”

    SINGLE PARENTS STILL NOT THE NORM

    It has been a long-standing principle of the Singapore Government that policies should support and encourage parenthood within the context of marriage. But as traditional family structures change, policies too need to be re-looked, he said.

    But Mr Tan said he is mindful about the kind of signalling any change in policy sends: “Is it an indication or signal that we condone single-parenthood? That is something that you bear in mind. I do believe that society is sympathetic to single mums but we also need to be careful not to appear to encourage it as something that you could do.

    “We do see in other countries, individuals choosing as a matter of lifestyle: ‘It’s ok, I’m not married, but I don’t mind having a child.’ I don’t think we are there yet as a society. I’m sure there will be individuals and some who may disagree, but I don’t see that as a norm and I don’t personally feel that some of these changes would open the floodgates if you will, for that particular lifestyle to develop.

    “But be that as it may, it remains one consideration. But recognising that single mothers do have vulnerabilities, how best do we support?”

    Mr Tan said the review involves a whole-of-Government approach, bringing together agencies that take care of housing and manpower policies.

    He said the help rendered needs to be holistic: “The support provided for single parents, single mothers, unwed mothers really isn’t just about that Baby Bonus – I know there are differences, but actually the help extended needs to be much more extensive.

    “It’s about healthcare availability, it’s about education opportunities and the support that comes with it. So, on the one hand, while there are some differences that exist today the help isn’t just in those areas. Actually the more fundamental issue is that broader extent of help.”

    For example, all mothers, including unwed ones are currently eligible for infant care and childcare subsidies. Government-funded education programmes are also extended to all children.

    “I’ve not met a single child who is not going to school because they couldn’t pay school fees,” said Mr Tan. “Schools fees are provided for. Uniforms are provided for. School books are provided for. Pocket money. Consistently. And that has been really encouraging for me.”

    Mr Tan did not say when the review will be completed, just that an announcement will be made soon and it will likely be before Budget 2016.

     

    However, the idea that single parents should receive same benefits as married ones was mooted by Workers’ Party Lee Li Lian in 2013 during a rally speech for the Punggol East SMC by-election:

    Our inclusive society has also forgotten the 2nd group, single parents, who are Singapore citizens and whose daughter and son will bear and nurture future generations as well as serve National Service.

    Did you know that single parents can only purchase HDB BTO Flats only when they are 35 and above? Regardless of marital status, all parents love and want to provide their children with the best they possibly can. Some single parents need caregivers too, but they are excluded from working mothers’ child relief, grandparent caregiver relief and foreign maid-levy relief.

    Babies from single parents are also not eligible for Baby Bonus.

    While having children outside of marriage should continue to be discouraged in our society, children born to single parents should not be denied the benefits that children of married parents receive. The children are innocent parties and should not start life being disadvantaged. Single parents should receive the same parenthood benefits packages as married parents.

    Allow me to quote our pledge, ‘happiness, prosperity and progress for our nation.’ How can there be actual progress when stay at home parents and single parents are being left behind! We, the citizens of Singapore should move together as one people under one Flag!

    Currently, the Parliament is made up of 80 PAP MPs vs 6 elected Opposition MPs. There is a great imbalance in Parliament right now. That is why there is an urgent need to vote more Workers’ Party candidates into Parliament.

     

    Source: http://mothership.sg

  • Man Commemorates SG50 By Having Sex With 50 Singapore Girls

    Man Commemorates SG50 By Having Sex With 50 Singapore Girls

    I saw this funny picture circulating online and it definitely needs to be shared! Now is fashion to be #SG50, everything also #SG50 but nobody can win this crazy guy lah!

    He intends to celebrate and commemorate SG50 by f**king 50 girls this year. With a face like his, I wonder how he get all his lobang or is he very rich to spend money on FL?

    Funny things people do just to suck up to the government’s SG50 celebrations.. end up overdo it and make it feel fake and gross. Wish him all the best no STD.

    Jia Wens

    A.S.S. Contributor

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

  • 3-Month Old Baby Left Blind In One Eye, Damaged From Camera Flash

    3-Month Old Baby Left Blind In One Eye, Damaged From Camera Flash

    A baby is left blind in one eye after a family friend forgot to turn off the flash while taking a close-up photograph.

    Doctors said the three-month-old, who has not been named, has suffered irreparable damage from the flash of the camera, which was held about 10 inches away from the baby boy.

    The parents noticed that there was something wrong with their baby’s vision soon after the photograph was taken, reported the People’s Daily Online.

    Following the incident, the baby suffered from reduced vision in his left eye and blindness in his right eye. The damage is said to be permanent and cannot be fixed with surgery.

    The strong flash has damaged cells on the macula, which is the part of the eye where incoming light rays are focused.

    Damage to the macula can lead to the loss of central vision, which allows people to see straight ahead.

    The macula is not fully developed until children are four, meaning youngsters are very sensitive to strong light.

    Experts have said that while babies will shut their eyes when exposed to light on reflex, just milliseconds of strong light can cause permanent damage.

    They added that parents should be careful of strong bathroom lights when their babies are taking a bath.

    It is not clear whether the family friend will face any legal action following the incident.

    The strong flash has damaged cells on the macula, the part of the eye where incoming light rays are focused 

     

    Source:www.dailymail.co.uk

  • Kopitiam Foodcourt Employee Sacked After Filmed Scraping Dead Skin With Fruit Knife

    Kopitiam Foodcourt Employee Sacked After Filmed Scraping Dead Skin With Fruit Knife

    A food court employee caught on camera using a fruit knife to scrape dead skin off her hand has been sacked.

    Personal assistant Renny, who is in her 30s, had filmed the incident while having lunch with her family at the Kopitiam food court in Sembawang’s Sun Plaza on Monday (July 27).

    “I saw this disturbing scene of a woman working at the mixed vegetable rice stall – she was removing the dead skin cells from her hand with what looked like a knife used for food,” Renny, who is in her 30s, told The Straits Times after first alerting netizen website Stomp.

    “This is so terrible and unhygienic.”

    She claimed that the woman wiped the knife with a receipt instead of washing it, before putting it below the cash register.

    A spokesman from Kopitiam, which operates more than 50 food courts in Singapore, said it had issued a warning letter to the stall’s tenant.

    The tenant then dismissed the employee on Monday night.

    After conducting its investigations, Kopitiam clarified that the knife in question was for the staff’s personal use. It was not used to prepare any food at the stall.

    “Nevertheless, her behaviour was unacceptable and not in line with the high standards of hygiene Kopitiam sets at all its food outlets,” said the spokesman.

    Monday’s incident was the second in a little over a month involving the food court operator. A video of one of its employees washing her shoes in a sink at its National University Hospital outlet went viral late last month.

    The female employee was later sacked by Kopitiam, which runs the desserts and drink stalls at all its food courts. All other food stalls are leased to tenants.

    The National Environment Agency (NEA) also said then that it would be taking action against Kopitiam for the “flagrant breach of hygiene that could have resulted in contamination of food and untensils”.

    Kopitiam has assured customers that it conducts weekly inspections of all its outlets to ensure that staff and tenants abide by a stringent set of hygiene standards.

    “While we are definitely concerned, both cases were isolated ones that happened due to personal lapses, rather than a lapse in our system,” added the spokesman.

    The Straits Times has contacted NEA for comment.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Rich People Problems – Just Because They Stay In Private Properties Doesn’t Mean They Are Rich

    Rich People Problems – Just Because They Stay In Private Properties Doesn’t Mean They Are Rich

    Call it the power of mrbrown: The popular blogger’s tweet about a private property owner’s gripe is circulating online, provoking indignation and endless mockery.

    In a profile of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s Ang Mo Kio GRC by The Straits Times, father of three Chew B.W. was one of the constituents interviewed. His complaint: Not enough is being done for those living in private estates.

    Mr Chew noted the rising cost of living, such as the cost of a year’s tuition at The Learning Lab ($4,000) and a fencing costume for one of his children ($600). He added: “It doesn’t mean we are rich just because we live here. The Government should also help people like us – we pay the most taxes.”

    According to the Manpower Ministry’s website, the median gross monthly income in June 2014 was $3,770. The cost of a semi-detached house typically runs into seven figures.

    Mr Chew’s sentiments got short shrift from netizens on social media. The tweet has been retweeted almost 570 times. Here are some of the choicer comments on Twitter:

     
    Over on Facebook, user Callan Tham said: “Here, let me play the world’s smallest violin for them.” Kwan Tuck Soon also remarked: “The gahmen should help them upgrade to a mansion with a fencing room.”

    But it was Reddit user xavierkoh who had perhaps the most reasoned response: “Perhaps what we really need to cultivate as a community is a sense of empathy for the less privileged instead of always focusing on our own problems which might be more trivial in nature as compared to others. Without that, our society will further fragment into distinct social classes who only care about themselves.”

     

    Source: https://sg.news.yahoo.com

deneme bonusu