Blog

  • Abuse Of Future Hawkers While Keeping Prices Low

    Abuse Of Future Hawkers While Keeping Prices Low

    By Foo CL

    This article by Straits Times, “First of 20 new hawker centres will open in Hougang in August 2015: NEA” wrote about how new hawker centres bring about more hawker and affordable food to Singaporean.

    For one of such hawker centres, NEA mentioned that Fei Siong Food Management will manage the new hawker centre on a not-for-profit basis, by channelling operating surplus “to improve vibrancy and create social benefits”.”

    I saw this as a step in the right direction but at the end, I cannot describe how disappointed after I was directed to “FEI SIONG FOOD MANAGEMENT PTE LTD”,  knowing more about the tendering of the hawker stall.

    In the article, it states that the rental is S$1500-S$1800 which is comparable to others hawker at the same area, but failed to mention all the hidden cost charge by Fei Siong food management.

    Cleaning and washing fee up to S$2000 per month excludes GST.

    In most hawker centers, their highest rate to clean tables ranges between S$450-600 and S$600-1000 to wash the bowl inclusive of GST. Even taking the highest rate of the of the busiest hawker center, most would never exceed S$1600 in total cleaning fee (GST INCLUDED).

    The rates offered is very much higher than the prevailing market rate.

    Compulsory rental of point of sale (POS)

    The POS system cost S$50 a month and the Fei Siong food management can also access your sales figure through this system.

    Fixed uniform and utensil

    Uniform and utensils will be provided by Fei Siong food management at an undisclosed amount.

    Unfair tendering system.

    There is a total of 40 stores but only 20 will be open tender, and the other 20 will be under the “entrepreneurship” program which will be operated by Fei Siong food management.

    Under this program, applicants will write in the food they can cook and Fei Siong food management will select them to operate the stall on their behalf. The operator and the helper will be paid 25% of the stall sales. If u cannot meet the sales target, you will be removed from the program.

    The rest of the 20 stall will be selected by Fei Siong food management instead of an open tender, which I will cover in the next point.

    Conflict of interest?

    Since Fei Siong food management will be managing 20 of the stalls and select the other tender. Wouldn’t Fei Siong food management give priority to food stores that are more popular, better profit margin and easier to operate to themselves and left over choices to those that decided to tender the stall remaining 20 stalls?

    This 20 stalls will also have an unfair advantage due to higher overheads and operation cost stated above.

    Strict Terms and conditions.

    Fei Siong food management will require the hawkers to operate their stalls for 12 hrs a day. Wear their uniform, and control their off days so there will be a minimum numbers of stall opened every day.

    This will not be easy for small family operated businesses that wish to keep their overhead low since they will definitely need to hire helpers to operate such long hours.

    Business entity or government entity.

    Is this hawker center that is built by taxpayer money been tender to Fei Siong food management for revenue or is it build for the benefit of residents to keep the food pricing low?

    Price control

    Despite having a higher operation cost, the hawker center management still wish to disguise it as a low-cost food center by restricting at least 2 product to be below $2.80

    Been in F&B business myself, all the condition seem awfully similar to those in commercially operated food courts. But this is a NEA hawker center that is built by taxpayer money and released by the government as a form to assist citizen keeping food cost low. Why is it being abused as such?

     

    Source: www.theonlinecitizen.com

  • Heartless Lorry Driver Swipes Motorcyclist, Then Says “He Die His Problem Lar”

    Heartless Lorry Driver Swipes Motorcyclist, Then Says “He Die His Problem Lar”

    Hi everyone,

    Spread awareness of this heartless lorry driver of vehicle no. YL3271E.

    This lorry driver was driving very recklessly on the roads when he turned and hit on a rider. The rider lost his balance, hit onto our car and flew.

    When we stop, we confront the lorry driver but he deny it is his fault. After arguing for a while he just say “If he die his problem la!”

    Now the rider still unconscious in hospital.

    Please do share the lorry driver photo and let everyone be careful of him!

    Jez
    A.S.S. Contributor

     

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

  • Naked On Cameron Highlands

    Naked On Cameron Highlands

    PETALING JAYA: First there was the Mount Kinabalu foreign nudists, now photographs of a man posing buck naked at Gunung Irau in Cameron Highlands has gone viral on social media sites and YouTube.

    All the shots, taken at the same spot, show him in various poses, standing in front of a signboard with the words Brinchang 2.35 km and the Malaysian flag in full view.

    It cannot be confirmed however if the bespectacled man, whose identity is still unknown, is a local or foreigner.

     

    Source: www.freemalaysiatoday.com

  • Pink Dot Supporters Should Look In The Mirror

    Pink Dot Supporters Should Look In The Mirror

    Pink Dot supporters cite the event as one emphasising tolerance, respect and love.

    Ironically, there was an intolerant, disrespectful call for governmental action against religious communities who disagree with it, in the letter “End the slurs on LGBT people and their allies” (June 22, online).

    Conservatives who disagree with Pink Dot are labelled as hatemongers. Religious leaders are accused of using the pulpit to attack persons attracted to the same sex. People with religious convictions are to be barred from discourse in “secular” public spaces.

    Of greatest concern, however, is the assumption that all persons attracted to the same sex support Pink Dot. There are many of them who disagree with its agenda, which is to “change society’s attitude”, whereby regulations “will naturally also change”.

    When an agenda seeks to alter a country’s laws and moral norms, it is only natural that society examines the merit of the movement. To suggest then that religious communities be silenced, when the movement imposes on everyone, is incredulous.

    Such uncivil attitudes and double standards have resulted in discrimination against conservative communities. For example, Focus on the Family was unfairly branded a sexist organisation (“Ministries studying feedback on relationship workshop”; Oct 9).

    Ms Agatha Tan’s accusations against it were taken wholesale and spread by news platforms and the public, with little critical thinking applied to her arguments.

    It did not take rocket science to reach the logical question one should have asked: Would the Education Ministry have approved a sexist programme promoting rape to be run for 17-year-olds?

    Even when her schoolmates who had sat in the same lecture wrote to address her allegations, little effort was made by the media, the school or the ministry to redress the issue publicly.

    The organisation and its staff have suffered real loss to their reputation and livelihood. Has integrity been compromised in a world that prizes tolerance over truth?

    Bullying of persons attracted to the same sex must be addressed. But remarks by Pink Dot supporters, such as those of the letter writer, divide the society and attack Singapore’s conservative religious communities.

     

    This article, written by Leo Hee Khian, was published on Voices, Today, on 1 Jul.

    Source: www.todayonline.com

     

     

  • Did Prophet Muhammad Warn About IS?

    Did Prophet Muhammad Warn About IS?

    In separate attacks last week, ISIS terrorists killed thirty-nine tourists at a beach resort in Tunisia, and close to thirty worshippers at a Shia Mosque in Kuwait. The onslaught came shortly after the group called on its militant Jihadi sympathizers to expand operations in the month of Ramadan.

    ISIS has demonstrated an unflinching determination to take out anyone that dares to disagree with it. Its members have slaughtered Yazidis and Christians, but the vast majority of their victims have been Muslims who resist them and refuse to acknowledge their authority. They have even executed Sunni clerics who refused to swear allegiance to them, and Muslim women who did not submit to their worldview.

    This feature is shared across all terrorist groups operating in the name of Islam. The vast majority of the victims of the Taliban, for instance, are also Muslims. Hundreds of Shia Muslims have been killed just in the last few years. And I have lost many close friends in similar attacks on the Ahmadi Muslims in Pakistan, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, and even in America.

    So when some anti-Islam critics keep doggedly associating the faith of us Muslims with the acts of our tormentors, we call them out for their insensitivity.

    I do not disagree that part of the motivation for religious extremism is rooted in perverted interpretation of scripture by radical extremists. However, it is dishonest to label the vast majority of Muslims who reject such interpretations as non-devout or ‘nominal.’

    An honest study of the Quran shows that groups like ISIS act in complete defiance of the injunctions of Islam. The Quran, for instance, equates one murder to elimination of the whole human race (5:32), and considers persecution and disorder on earth as an even worse offense (2:217). It lays emphasis on peace, justice and human rights. It champions freedom of conscience and forbids worldly punishment for apostasy andblasphemy.

    A study of the traditions of the Prophet Muhammad also demonstrates that he warned us of the rise of religious extremism in this age in astonishing detail.

    1400 years ago, he had prophesized that a time would come when nothing would remain of Islam but its name, nothing of the Quran but its word, and that many “Mosques would be splendidly furnished but destitute of guidance” (Mishkatul Masabih). In these latter days, the true spiritual essence of Islam would be lost, and religion, for the most part, would be reduced to a ritualistic compulsion. He foretold that the clergy would be corrupt and be a source of strife during these times.

    How true this is of the extremist clerics in parts of the Muslim world that abuse the pulpit to preach division and hate.

    He also went on to describe terrorist groups such as ISIS that would try to hijack the Islamic faith. At this time of dissension, he said there would appear “a group of young people who would be immature in thought and foolish.” They would speak beautiful words but commit the most heinous of deeds. They would engage in so much prayer and fasting that the worship of the Muslims would appear insignificant in comparison. They would call people to the Quran but would have nothing to do with it in reality. The Quran would not go beyond their throats, meaning they wouldn’t understand its essence at all, merely regurgitating it selectively. The Prophet then went on to describe these people as “the worst of the creation.”

    As if this outline wasn’t clear enough, another tradition in the book Kitaab Al Fitan reported by Caliph Ali, the fourth successor to Prophet Muhammad, describes these people as having long hair and bearing black flags. Their “hearts will be hard as iron,” and they would be the companions of a State (Ashab ul Dawla). Interestingly, ISIS refers to itself as the Islamic State or Dawla. The tradition further mentions that they will break their covenants, not speak the truth and have names that mention their cities. The ISIS caliph, Abu Bakr al Baghdadi comes to mind.

    Prophet Muhammad furiously and painfully described these evildoers, and admonished Muslims to beware of their evil and fight it. “Whoever fights them is better to Allah than them,” he proclaimed.

    Reflect on this critical point. Whenever ISIS kills in the name of Islam, claims to follow the Quran, or uses the Holy month of Ramadan to spread anarchy across the globe, know that Prophet Muhammad explicitly warned us of these imposters, and entrusted us to root them out.

    The only people who refuse to reflect on this point are ISIS, ISIS sympathizers, and anti-Islam extremists who want the world to believe that ISIS is legitimate. Intelligent people, meanwhile, see Prophet Muhammad’s prophetic wisdom and thus remain united against both ignorance and extremism.

     

    Source: www.huffingtonpost.com

deneme bonusu