Blog

  • SilkAir Flight From Singapore Makes Emergency Landing At Hainan Island

    SilkAir Flight From Singapore Makes Emergency Landing At Hainan Island

    A SilkAir flight on Tuesday (Jun 23) made an emergency landing in Haikou, on the Chinese island of Hainan due to adverse weather conditions.

    Flight MI8334 departed Singapore at 7.05am for Sanya, a popular tourist destination in the south of the island.  The Boeing 737-800 was unable to land and was diverted to Haikou, landing safely at 11.05am local time.

    A SilkAir spokesperson confirmed the landing was aborted due to strong tailwinds from a regional typhoon and arrangements are being made to transfer the affected passengers to Sanya via high-speed rail.

    “SilkAir regrets the inconvenience caused to customers as a result of this diversion, but assures them that this was necessary in the interests of safety,” the spokesperson said.

    Typhoon Kujira is currently causing strong winds and heavy rain in the region, with the China Meteorological Administration issuing a yellow alert for a rainstorm on Tuesday morning.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Zam Zam Water Customers Left High & Dry

    Zam Zam Water Customers Left High & Dry

    All she wanted was to collect the bottle of holy water from Mecca for her 61-year-old father.

    But Miss Norhidah Ahmad Dan felt cheated when she arrived at the designated office on Victoria Street last Wednesday only to find an empty shop.

    “When I found the shop at Golden Landmark, I saw a sign that said that the business was no longer operating from the premises,” the 24-year-old lab assistant told The New Paper.

    “I was very angry. It could have been my elderly father going to collect and he would have left empty-handed.”

    She said that someone selling charity tickets had approached her father, a 61-year-old retiree,”some months” ago at the Geylang Serai Market.

    Her father had bought one ticket costing $10.

    The ticket said he could exchange it for a 500ml bottle of Zam Zam water.

    Zam Zam water is drawn from a well in Mecca. It has special religious significance for Muslims.

    Some of the local distributors selling the water via Facebook list their price in the range of $85 to $95 per 10-litre bottle.

    Miss Norhidah made several calls to the company, which is called Riyaadhul Huffadz, RH Services and Management, but got an engaged tone.

    At least 500 other people are believed to have been affected.

    On Saturday, the company finally explained in Malay on its Facebook page that it was having trouble importing large quantities of Zam Zam water.

    The post said the company was still waiting for approval from the Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority of Singapore (AVA) and the Health Science Authority of Singapore (HSA).

    It also asked for those who had bought tickets to send a text message with their full name and address to a mobile number. It promised that the bottles would be delivered by Nov 1 or the money would be refunded.

    AWAY

    A man who identified himself Mr Muhammad Maliki replied to queries TNP posted through Facebook.

    Riyaadhul Huffadz

    He claimed that he was in Jakarta and had been there for the last eight months. He said he would return only in the middle of October.

    He acknowledged the issues over the water and added that over 500 people had given him their names and addresses via text messages.

    When asked why he had vacated his office in Golden Landmark, he replied that he was forced to move out by the owner of the shop space.

    He claimed that he found out only recently that he was kicked out.

    He added that the coupons had already been distributed when he was forced out of his shop.

    When we informed Mr Maliki that AVA had not received any requests to import Zam Zam water in the last six months, he replied that he had applied “last year”.

    He reiterated that he would fulfil the orders for the water or refund the monies.

    Miss Norhidah said: “I’m just disappointed that they had cut off all contact when it was time to collect. They should at least have stayed around to explain themselves.”

     

    Source: www.tnp.sg

  • Malaysian Muslim Man: Non-Muslims Should Not Have To Adjust To Accomodate Muslims’ Fast

    Malaysian Muslim Man: Non-Muslims Should Not Have To Adjust To Accomodate Muslims’ Fast

    This is exactly the spot where my daughter’s tutor sits when he comes to tutor her.

    He is a pious Christian. His free times are spent on missionary works. And when he is at my house, he has to sit under those frames.

    Did he complain that I was trying to convert him? Or that those Arabic names for Allah and Muhammad would lead him astray from his faith? Or that they would “rosakkan aQidah saya?”

    Did he ever request that his sitting be changed? Or that those frames be moved away or at least be covered by a batik sarong?

    Did he ask me to “respect” his faith? Or not to “insult” him or his faith?

    Well, he never did. Not even a word about those.

    That raises a question. Why is it that many Muslims in Mesia nowadays demand to be “respected” just because they are fasting? Why the need to close school canteens during Ramadhan? Why must non-Malay pupils be asked to drink behind closed doors and even in the toilet? Just because our kids are learning how to fast? Well, aren’t the non-Malay kids as well?

    I don’t care whether the minum-air-kencing statement was a joke. That misses the point.

    The point is why must non-Malay adjust their life to facilitate us, Muslims Melayoos, to fast?

    If that was necessary, why don’t we ask our non-Malay brothers and sisters not to study too hard so that we the Melayoos could at least get respectable marks during exams compared to them? Ask them to “respect” our inability to get good exams results? (I am not saying ALL of us are unable lah…so please don’t get emo with me here).

    Or ask them not to work too hard so that they don’t make too much more money than us.

    I call it self-pity.

    Which is, a pity, really.

     

    Source: Azhar Harun

  • Quran Doesn’t Specify Women’s Hair As Aurat, Muslim NGOs Insists As Concervative Islam Digs In

    Quran Doesn’t Specify Women’s Hair As Aurat, Muslim NGOs Insists As Concervative Islam Digs In

    KUALA LUMPUR, June 22 – The Quran does not specifically mention hair as part of a woman’s “aurat”, Sisters in Islam (SIS) has said amid rising religious conservatism in Malaysia.

    The Muslim women’s rights group said the perception that a woman’s “aurat” covers her entire body except for the face and hands came from a hadith narrated by Asma Abu Bakar. A hadith is a collection of sayings attributed to Prophet Muhammad.

    “However, this hadith has been greatly contested by Islamic scholars, such as Thariq Iwadullah and Sheikh Nasiruddin Al-Abani, on the grounds of its authenticity in the chain of message as the ‘rawi’ (transmitter of hadith) was renowned for being dishonest,” SIS told Malay Mail Online in a recent interview.

    “SIS is of the opinion that hair is not part of a woman’s ‘aurat’. In fact, the Quran has never mentioned hair as being specifically a woman’s ‘aurat’.

    “When reading Surah an-Nur (24:31) on covering one’s modesty, it is important to understand the context of when the verse was introduced,” the women’s rights group added.

    SIS said that the verse which states that women should “draw their khimar (head covering) over their bosoms” was made in reference to the culture of 7th century Arabia, in which women traditionally already wore the khimar.

    “The message of this verse is to advocate modesty by calling on women to cover their bosoms with the khimar, as bosoms traditionally did not constitute body parts which was (sic) already visible.

    “If hair was also considered a woman’s private part, the Quran would have clearly specified it in 24:31 when women were instructed to cover their bosoms,” said the group.

    The increasingly conservative stance of Islamic authorities and figures in Malaysia has been reflected in the way Muslim women are told to wear the tudung and are harshly criticised if they do not so, even though most Malay-Muslim women in the 1950s and 1960s, before the 1979 Iranian Revolution, did not cover their heads.

    Tudung brands in Malaysia have boomed since the Iranian Revolution started the popularisation of the tudung in the country, with one company estimating about 80 to 90 per cent of Muslim women aged between 25 and 50 years now wear headscarves.

    Women’s rights activist Norhayati Kaprawi, who had made a documentary titled Aku Siapa (Who Am I?) about why women wear the tudung, told Malay Mail Onlinerecently that she found that some Muslim women in both villages and cities in Malaysia were ostracised for not covering their heads.

    Following the uproar over several Muslims who had recently accused artistic gymnast Farah Ann Abdul Hadi, who did not wear a tudung, of exposing her “aurat” and the “shape of her vagina” in a leotard, some Twitter users have insisted that Muslim women should wear the tudung even when playing sports.

    Twitter user Ar.Zainur tweeted via the handle @ibnzainal95 last Sunday a picture of women athletes wearing headscarves, track bottoms and long-sleeved shirts.

    A tweet by HanyaTweet @TapiUntuk Semua on May 31 that lists body parts like hair, arms, legs, and the chest as “aurat” that must be covered, or “wajib tutup”, has been retweeted over 3,000 times.

    SIS told Malay Mail Online that the interpretation of the “aurat” in Malaysia has become increasingly influenced by Arab culture since the 1980s, noting that most Malay-Muslim women did not wear the tudung during the 1950s and 1960s, including the wife of the Kelantan mufti then and the spouse of Indonesian ulama, Prof Dr Haji Abdul Malik Karim Amrullah, better known as Hamka.

    “This very narrow and conservative interpretation of ‘aurat’ has also been directed mainly to women and as a result, the growing obsession with controlling women’s bodies by making wearing the hijab compulsory,” said SIS.

    Perak Mufti Tan Sri Harussani Zakaria told Malay Mail Online recently that Muslim women must cover their entire bodies except for their face and hands.

    Malaysians have come to Farah Ann’s defence, with a Facebook page even set up to support the 21-year-old athlete, who had won a gold medal in floor exercise during the recent SEA Games.

    Youth and Sports Minister Khairy Jamaluddin also said last week that the authorities should come out with guidelines for “perverts” instead of trying to regulate sportswear.

    Khairy’s remark follows his Cabinet colleague Datuk Seri Jamil Khir Baharom, minister in charge of Islamic affairs, who told Parliament last Monday that the federal government will carry out an in-depth study on Islamic compliance for clothing used for sports and other fields, amid the uproar over Farah Ann’s outfit at the SEA Games in Singapore.

     

    Source: www.themalaymailonline.com

  • Liverpool-Manchester United Rivalry Comes To Singapore’s National Stadium In November

    Liverpool-Manchester United Rivalry Comes To Singapore’s National Stadium In November

    The Liverpool Masters return to Singapore to take on their age-old rivals the Manchester United Masters in The Castlewood Group Battle of the Reds 2015 at the National Stadium on Nov 14.

    Among the confirmed names are Luis Garcia, who joins the Liverpool Masters line up this year, according to a press release from organisers. The lineup also includes Jerzy Dudek, Robbie Fowler, Steve McManaman and Dietmar Hamann.

    Garcia, who featured in the UEFA Champions League winning team in Istanbul in 2005, was also instrumental in the club clinching the UEFA Super Cup that year.

    Over on the Manchester United Masters side, three players from the United double winning team of 1995/96 will also be in attendance, namely Andy Cole, Paul Parker and Lee Sharpe. They will be joined by Ronny Johnsen and Karel Poborsky.

    United’s Lee Sharpe said: “We don’t like losing to Liverpool and they don’t like losing to us. They got the better of us the last few times we played them and I don’t know if revenge is the right word but we certainly owe them one, that’s for sure.”

    A full house crowd attended last year’s Liverpool Masters match up against a team of ex-Singapore internationals at the Jalan Besar Stadium, where the Reds won 3-1.

    Tickets are priced at S$19, S$30 and S$45 and are already on sale via SportsHubTix. Family packages for two adults and two children below the age of 12 are also available. 11,000 tickets have been released, organisers say.

    Doors open at 5pm and kick off is at 6pm.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

deneme bonusu