Blog

  • Ikea Prihatin Maklum Balas, Akan Tukar Iklan Raya

    Ikea Prihatin Maklum Balas, Akan Tukar Iklan Raya

    Gedung perabot Ikea akan menggantikan iklan Hari Rayanya mulai Khamis minggu depan menyusuli maklum balas negatif sesetengah pelanggan.

    Di media sosial, iklan yang antara lain disiarkan di akhbar selain di laman web Ikea itu, telah menerima kritikan kerana dianggap kurang peka kepada budaya masyarakat Melayu/Islam setempat, selain tidak menggambarkan semangat sambutan Ramadan dan Hari Raya yang sebenar.

    Iklan tersebut, bertemakan ‘This Raya, Bling Glamour Home’ (Raya ini, bawa pulang glamor ke rumah anda) dan mempunyai dua versi, memaparkan sebuah keluarga berbaju Melayu bertemakan budaya hip hop, lengkap dengan topi, kasut jenis high-cut dan kaca mata hitam. Dalam iklan itu, model lelakinya juga memakai rantai dan perhiasan emas.

    Menjawab pertanyaan Berita Harian (BH), pengurus pemasaran Ikea, Cik Caroline Ng, berkata iklan baru itu berlainan daripada yang asal.

    “Niat kami bukanlah untuk menyinggung perasaan sesiapa pun dan kami harap orang ramai dapat melihat keikhlasan kami menerusi usaha yang kami lakukan ini,” ujar beliau.

    Cik Ng menambah: “Di Ikea, kami amat prihatin dengan masyarakat dan menghormati dan terbuka menerima keprihatinan orang ramai.”

    Dalam pada itu, Ikea telah pun menarik balik iklan asalnya itu daripada beberapa penerbitan, termasuk akhbar ini.

    Bagaimanapun, ekoran masa yang amat suntuk, sebahagian iklan lama tidak sempat ditarik balik, tambah Cik Ng sambil memohon maaf.

    Diminta mengulas, seorang pembaca BH, yang hanya ingin dikenali sebagai Encik Rafi, 46 tahun, berkata beliau mengalu-alukan langkah syarikat Ikea menukar iklan tersebut.

    Beliau telah mengirimkan e-mel kepada syarikat itu untuk memberi maklum balas berkaitan iklan berkenaan.

    “Kalau perubahan untuk kebaikan dialu-alukan sangat kerana iklan Hari Raya perlu memberi gambaran yang tepat supaya anak-anak muda tidak terpengaruh dengan budaya popular,” ujar beliau, yang telah pun menerima e-mel balas daripada Ikea.

     

    Source: http://beritaharian.sg

  • Masagos Zulkifli: Muslim Community Must Beware Of ‘Absolutists’

    Masagos Zulkifli: Muslim Community Must Beware Of ‘Absolutists’

    The Muslim community has to be wary of the growing presence of “absolutists”, who have a rigid way of interpreting Islam, said Mr Masagos Zulkifli, Second Minister for Home Affairs, on Tuesday (Jun 23).

    Previously, religious teachers here came from Egypt, but now, they come from “all over” the world. The variations of Islam they embrace are “very cultural” and some of the conflicts experienced in other countries are brought to Singapore, said the minister in an interview.

    He noted that Singapore has succeeded as its people can live with one another despite their differences.

    However, “absolutists” believe there is only one way that Islam ought to be, and those who do not agree with them are considered “un-Islamic” for example, he added.

    When asked what was being done to reach out to or engage the absolutists, Mr Masagos said there is a need to ensure the Muslim community is aware of this phenomenon. “When we hear something that is really out of the norm, be alert to it. We have to accept them for their freedom to express their religious variations, too,” he said.

    However, he cautioned that Muslims should not easily “succumb” to the views of absolutists. “They may look attractive, they may look correct … but do not be gullible.”

    ONLINE BATTLE AGAINST ISLAMIC STATE

    On the issue of the online battle against the ideology of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, Mr Masagos said religious teaching in Singapore is moderate and tolerant.

    However, he noted that not every young person has gone through the structured way of learning Islam, such as doing so in a mosque or through accredited teachers.

    “Some of them take lessons from the Internet not because they’re looking for religious guidance, but because something may have happened in their lives,” said Mr Masagos.

    For instance, he cited M Arifil Azim Putra Norja’I, who has been detained under the Internal Security Act (ISA) for “terrorism-related activities”.

    Mr Masagos said the 19-year-old’s father had died and the teen was trying to find “meaning in life”. “Unfortunately, he found the meaning in life through his conversation and engagement with … (a) radical.”

    “He (Arifil) did not have references or background information about Islam to tell him these things are wrong,” Mr Masagos said.

    On the other 17-year-old unnamed youth, who has also been arrested under ISA for further investigations into his radicalisation, Mr Masagos said there are no updates yet.

    He said the teen’s views had “already (been) known” since he was 14. And now at 17, his parents “cannot somehow control” him and his views. “It’s important for him to know we are watching him. And that he has to behave and not do anything … to (affect) the safety and security of our country,” said the minister.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • The Untouchables In Malaysia

    The Untouchables In Malaysia

    OUTSPOKEN: The recent public spat between the Crown Prince of Johor, Tunku Ismail Ibni Sultan Ibrahim, popularly known as TMJ (Tengku Mahkota Johore) and Tourism and Culture Minister Nazri Aziz showed that under Umno Baru, two rules apply.

    One for the ordinary people and another for Umno Baru ministers. The irony is that it took a prince to force ministers to acknowledge that they lord it over the rakyat.

    Najib Razak should have ordered his minister to stop escalating tensions between royalty and ministers. Regardless of who is right or wrong, it is most unbecoming of ministers to act in an uncultured manner.

    Nazri behaved like a fish wife, trading insults over the garden fence, while others say he acted like a gangster. Najib’s silence reflects on his poor leadership skills, and heightens the enmity and fragile co-existence between the common man, ministers and the royal household.

    TMJ did not mince his words, when he rebuked Nazri, on social media and said, “You are a minister, not a God from the heavens who lords over everybody. Do not think that the people of this country exist to provide you with position and wealth. The position exists for you to serve the people.”

    The prince wanted to remind politicians of their roles and responsibilities and said, “… If you cannot deal with that, it just shows your arrogance to the people.”

    “I envision a future that every person has a right to voice their opinions. However, that is not the case in Malaysia today, where ministers think they are untouchable,” he added.

    TMJ is right. Ministers are Malaysia’s “untouchables”. Ministers can do no wrong. They are not subject to the laws which govern the rakyat. Ministers and their cronies, escape all punishment. Any court judgement appears to work in their favour, with only minimal fines.

    The following are possibly Malaysia’s most notorious untouchables:

    Dr Mahathir Mohamad may crow about Najib’s corruption and his link with Altantuya, but Mahathir’s laundry list of crimes against the nation, is as long, if not longer, than Najib’s. The monopoly of Malaysia’s major industries from padi to power supply, transport to telecommunication are self-evident. When things go wrong, as in the PKFZ scandal, no one is found guilty.

    Mahathir denied ordering the detention of people in Operation Lalang and distanced himself from Project IC. He shifted the blame for the emasculation of the judiciary to TMJ’s grandfather. Malaysians who consider Mahathir a hero, for taking up the rakyat’s cause, fail to realise that Mahathir has a hidden agenda.

    Across the South China Sea, Sarawak Governor Taib Mahmud is East Malaysia’s most prominent untouchable. Despite various disclosures by Bruno Manser Fonds and Sarawak Report, the MACC can find nothing concrete against Taib. The syariah courts find it difficult to prosecute his son, Bekir, for his infidelity and refusal to pay alimony to his wife. Being untouchable is perhaps, hereditary.

    Najib’s role in the Perak coup d’état of 2009, was an act of treason but Najib is an untouchable and no court can, or will, find him guilty. It helps when the PM and his deputy, close one eye to wrongdoings in government. All that matters is that Umno Baru triumphs.

    Despite the contradictory statements issued over 1MDB, Najib is still in charge of Putrajaya. The various departments, which conduct the investigations, the Attorney General and the IGP all report to him. That figures!

    Untouchables are not limited to men. Former Minister for Family, Women and Community Development, Shahrizat Abdul Jalil and her family were involved in the National Feedlot Corporation (NFC) scandal, but the investigation into this fraud, has more or less fizzled out.

    Despite Shahrizat’s family’s alleged abuse of the funds, allocated for the NFC, and the evidence collected by opposition politicians, there has been no prosecution of the key players in the NFC corruption. Scapegoats are plentiful.

    The ulamas create divisions in society. They work hand-in-glove with Umno Baru and use religion to control the behaviour of Malaysians. They support one another’s hidden agenda. The ulamas are another strong group of untouchables in Malaysia.

    Extremist NGOs like Isma and Perkasa are also untouchable. They are outsourced by Umno Baru to cause tension and create distractions, when bad news hits the country. They make false claims about Malays being proselytised and make false accusations of Malays being “influenced” to convert, by the crosses on top of churches.

    Other untouchables are institutions like the Election Commission. Despite allegations of cheating in elections, the EC is not subject to scrutiny and has long-term plans to make Umno Baru win in future elections.

    Ordinary ministers, like Nazri, are untouchable. Nazri was not charged with sedition for rebuking TMJ and only had his knuckles rapped for “making mischief”. Opposition MP Nizar Jamaluddin, was charged with sedition, for tweeting that the money spent on the Sultan of Johore’s WWW1 car registration plate, could have been put to better use, to help the poor.

    Engineer Chan Hong Keong was jailed for one year and fined RM50,000 for sedition, for insulting the late Sultan Azlan Shah in appointing Zambry Abdul Kadir as Perak mentri besar, in the Perak coup d’état.

    Despite the 4R rule using ‘race, religion, rural people and royalty’ to control the rakyat, Malaysia appears to be unravelling at the seams, and lurches from one toe-curling embarrassment to another. This is perhaps, the curse of the Dalits.

    Mariam Mokhtar is “a Malaysian who dares to speak the truth”.

     

    Source: www.theantdaily.com

  • 5 Misconceptions Of Being A Police Officer In Singapore

    5 Misconceptions Of Being A Police Officer In Singapore

    1. Arrest him, Officer!
    No, cannot. The policeman cannot just come to the scene of crime and arrest the suspect. We have certain SOPs to follow and have to do some investigating before deciding to arrest someone. Even then, we cannot use the handcuff on everyone. Besides, the paperwork for a single arrest is unbelievable.

    2. Why so slow?
    We don’t have to arrive at the scene of crime in a matter of a few minutes. We don’t have a helicopter nor do we drive a Ferrari. Our patrol cars are mostly just Subaru-s. Plus there are traffic lights. We have a certain timing to arrive for emergency and non emergency cases, and we always try to reach even before that.

    3. Taser him, Officer!
    Not every policeman carries a taser. One needs to be certified and be of a certain rank. And NS guys are not required to carry them. Oww…

    4. So stuck up for what?
    Unless we have a resting bitch face, most of us are friendly. Our aim is to build a bond with the community. We are not the bad guys: we just want to keep the bad guys away. It is also our professional obligation to keep a neutral face so that we look both approachable to the public and intimidating to the “bad guys”.

    5. So heavy!
    We may look like we are not carrying much and can effortlessly run after people and give chase. Yes, we are fit enough to do that but did you know that our utility belt that houses the gun, baton and taser is rather heavy? It is like being pregnant with a 3 month old child and I am not even exaggerating.

     

    Source: www.lowkayhwa.com

  • Woman Told To Cover-Up Before Allowed To Enter Hospital Premises

    Woman Told To Cover-Up Before Allowed To Enter Hospital Premises

    PETALING JAYA: A third “sarong” incident has been making waves on the internet.

    This time, a woman had to don a towel around her waist in order to enter a public hospital.

    The woman was reportedly stopped by security at Sungai Buloh hospital visitor’s gate on June 16 for wearing shorts.

    The woman’s father then borrowed a patient’s towel from one of the hospital wards and brought it back outside for the woman to wrap around herself.

    The woman was allowed into the compound only after covering her knees with the borrowed towel. It is believed that when questioned, the guards answered that the ruling was an instruction from the Health Ministry.

    Hospital Dress Code

    Among the images circulated was one of the woman wearing a yellow towel standing in front of a sign which listed the hospital dress code. Among the prohibited items of clothing are sleeveless tank tops, short shorts or short skirts. Long pants are allowed. The dress codes for both men and women are also available on the hospital’s website.

    On Monday, two women, a journalist and Selangor resident, were forced to wear sarongs to enter the Selangor State Secretariat building.

    In another incident on June 8, a woman was denied entry into the Gombak Road Transport Department (JPJ) office for wearing a skirt above her knee and was asked to wear a sarong for service.

     

    Source: www.thestar.com.my

deneme bonusu