Blog

  • Today’s Young Singaporeans Will Be In Relatively Good Shape To Retire

    Today’s Young Singaporeans Will Be In Relatively Good Shape To Retire

    Singaporeans who work regularly and make prudent housing choices should have no worries in meeting their retirement needs through the mandatory Central Provident Fund (CPF) system, Manpower minister Tan Chuan-Jin has said, as he told the House that the retirement picture for younger Singaporeans was “relatively healthy”.

    He was addressing concerns that Singaporeans might not save up enough in their CPF accounts to meet the Basic Retirement Sum, now that they will be given more flexibility and options to use their CPF savings.

    Citing the example of a 25-year-old polytechnic graduate earning S$2,200 and assuming this CPF member works 32 out of 40 years, the minister estimated that this worker would have a nest egg of about S$55,000 by the age 65. With compounded interest earned in the Special Account, he would have about S$165,000 at age 65 – three times what was put in.

    “This is not magic – it is just basic mathematics and is a very conservative estimate because I did not account for any wage growth at all and whatever savings he has accumulated in his Ordinary Account after paying off his flat. And if you add those, clearly, he would have even more.”

    As he walked the House through a typical CPF member’s stages in life, Mr Tan said that at age 65, the member would have to decide whether to withdraw up to 20 per cent of his Retirement Account savings in a lump sum.

    The minister also announced that from January 2016, members will need to choose from among the three payout streams to subscribe to under CPF Life from age 65 – up from the current 55. They will also have to decide whether they want to start receiving CPF Life payouts at age 65, or between age 65 and 70.

    The Manpower Ministry (MOM) will also restore the contribution rates for workers aged 50 to 55 to the same level as younger workers, as employment rates for this age band have improved and are almost on par with that of younger workers, he said.

    During Monday’s Committee of Supply debate, MP David Ong suggested raising CPF contribution rates for workers above 55 to the same level as younger workers.

    But Mr Tan said the employment rate for those above 55 was still much lower than those who were younger, so it would not be prudent to raise contribution rates of this group too quickly. The higher rates would also put employers off hiring older workers, he said.

    To encourage the employment of older workers, Senior Minister of State Amy Khor said the government has launched an additional Special Employment Credit (SEC); employers who hire Singaporean workers aged 65 and up and who draw up to S$4,000 a month will receive up to 3 per cent of the monthly wage bill under this SEC.

    This is on top of the current 8.5 per cent SEC for hiring Singaporean workers above 50.

    The government is supporting employers in improving workplace practices so as to attract and retain mature workers, said Dr Khor, who added that the government is putting in place legislation to extend re-employment to 67 in two to three years.

    Employers should also tap existing measures available to put in place age-management practices, so that they can be better prepared to hire older workers, she added.

    Mr Tan urged CPF members to be prudent with their housing purchases, especially when buying or upgrading a property later in life.

    “I think it’s important to pay attention to this because older members may have to take on loans with shorter tenures, higher monthly instalments; they should also factor in any decline in CPF contributions as they age, which may mean that they may need to service their monthly housing instalments with cash on top of CPF.”

    In response to calls for more targeted help for non-working women with low CPF balances, MOM’s support for this group is two-fold, noted Mr Tan.

    Firstly, it has encouraged non-working women to rejoin the workforce, which has led to higher Labour Force Participation Rates (LFPR) among women; as a result, the difference in average CPF balances between men and women have started to narrow, he said.

    Secondly, with families remaining a pillar of support for women, the rules have been tweaked to make it easier for CPF members to transfer their CPF savings to their spouse’s CPF.

    He added that the government is providing attractive interest rates to encourage such transfers: from next year, those aged 55 and above can earn an extra 1 percentage point of interest for the first S$30,000 in their combined CPF balances.

    As for Ms Foo’s suggestion that such transfers be made automatic or require spouses’ joint consent before withdrawals from the Retirement Account, Mr Tan replied that those were ‘very personal decisions” and “best left to couples to decide”, as it would be intrusive for the government to intervene.

    MPs Zaqy Mohamed and Seng Han Thong asked how MOM was communicating the various changes to its members.

    The House was told that, under efforts in this direction, a guided one-to-one retirement-planning service to CPF members would be launched so they can get a better understanding of the various CPF options before making their choices.

    The ministry has completed a three-month trial project and will pilot a retirement-planning service in the second half of the year. The plan is to ramp up the service gradually from next year, with priority given to those turning 55, said Mr Tan.

    In his speech, he stressed that the fundamental principles of CPF will not change and that retirement adequacy remained the scheme’s primary objective.

    And while Singapore’s social safety nets for the vulnerable need to be strengthened, the government and the CPF system alone will not be able to solve all problems.

    “There is a role of collective responsibility – individuals, families, employers, social groups. We all need to step in to provide the assistance and support.”

     

    Source: www.businesstimes.com.sg

  • Teenage Thief Stole Chartered Bus For 155KM Joy Ride

    Teenage Thief Stole Chartered Bus For 155KM Joy Ride

    A thief stole a chartered bus from AZ Bus on Sunday morning on March 8.

    The theft is said to have taken place at 9am, but the vehicle was only discovered missing at 2pm by the bus driver, Mr Francis Toh.

    Mr Toh chased the bus down in his own car and eventually managed to stop the thief, with help from his supervisor, at Bukit Batok Central.

    The vehicle’s GPS tracking device revealed that the bus travelled a total of 155km. The thief is believed to be a 17-year-old boy, who was driving a Class 4 vehicle, which required a licence only awarded to drivers aged 21 years old and above.

     

    Source: www.tnp.sg

  • NEA Took Enforcement Action Against Tekka Market Stallholders For Improper Storage Of Fresh Meat

    NEA Took Enforcement Action Against Tekka Market Stallholders For Improper Storage Of Fresh Meat

    The National Environment Agency (NEA) said it has taken enforcement action 14 times against stall holders at Tekka Market for improper storage of fresh meat.

    NEA said under the Environment Public Health (Food Hygiene) Regulations, any person selling raw meat – such as pork, chicken and mutton – must store the raw meat in a chiller at all times. It said that stall holders who contravene this regulation face a fine of up to S$2,000.

    During a recent visit by Channel NewsAsia to Tekka Market, customers were found to be allowed to touch poultry meat, which had been left out of the chillers.

    “I thought authorities said that meat can’t be placed out in the open?” said one customer at the market. “I see some stalls that place the meat outside, while others put it inside the chillers. There is nothing customers like us can do anyway.”

    Health experts said raw meat should not be kept out in the open.

    Said Assistant Professor Yang Liang from Nanyang Technological University’s School of Biological Sciences: “Considering the high temperatures of Singapore, it is really essential to make sure all the meat and other food are always maintained at cold temperatures.

    “Bacteria can be found in the air, can be found from the body of the person who sells the chicken or meat. If we do not maintain the chicken at the right temperature and we do not cook it the right way, depending on the source of the micro-organisms, some of them can be very dangerous.”

    The contamination may not be deadly, but those who consume contaminated food could still suffer from diarrhoea for a couple of days. And contrary to popular belief, cooking does not always make it safe said Asst Prof Yang.

    “If we deep-fry, it can almost kill most of the bacteria, but I am not totally sure about some of the spores that the bacteria produce. Spores are a kind of fungi. Certain bacteria can produce spores, which can be extremely tolerant – even in several hundreds of degrees, they can survive.

    “Do not rely on just cooking; it is not a way to kill the bacteria,” he added.

    The stall keeper of Wee Chai Fresh and Frozen Chicken Supplier at Tekka, Mr Mohamed Rasun, said they only take their produce out of the chiller on weekends to attract customers and allow them to see the goods.

    “I know by the law it is not right. We are (going) against the law, but we have no choice,” he said.

    “So far our customers have never complained about our chicken being bad or dirty,” he said, adding that every hour, ice is put on the chickens put out of the chiller to keep them fresh.

    Some customers Channel NewsAsia spoke to had mixed opinions.

    “These are fresh chickens, so it probably won’t be a problem,” said one. “But if you keep it outside for a long period of time, then it is a problem.”

    Another disagreed. “I never buy (raw meat from) here. A lot of people touch it.”

    Stall owners said authorities have been conducting checks, and have warned errant stall holders. Some also said they have been fined in the past for similar practices.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Man Jailed Three Weeks For Taking Video Of Co-Tenant Showering

    Man Jailed Three Weeks For Taking Video Of Co-Tenant Showering

    A 48-year-old man was jailed three weeks on Monday for taking a video of his co-tenant when she was showering.

    The incident took place on Dec 23 last year, around 12am.

    The Malaysian and the victim were co-tenants in a HDB flat along New Upper Changi Road.

    The victim, who cannot be named as there is a gag order, was about to put on her clothes after showering when she noticed a hand holding a mobile phone over the toilet door.

    There was a gap between the toilet door and the ceiling, and the mobile phone was pointed towards the interior of the toilet.

    After the victim shouted, her co-tenant withdrew his hand.

    When she went out of the toilet, she noticed that he was seated five metres away from the toilet area and was fiddling with his phone, which was in camera mode.

    She then took his phone away, and called the police.

    Investigations showed that the man had heard the victim going into the toilet and knew she was showering as he heard the sound of running water. He went outside the toilet and took a video of her, but deleted the footage when she confronted him.

    For insulting the modesty of a woman, he could have been jailed up to one year and fined.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Former Warrant Officer Jailed For Providing False Information To Traffic Police

    Former Warrant Officer Jailed For Providing False Information To Traffic Police

    A former warrant officer who lied in his statement that his wife, and not him, had driven a vehicle was jailed for one week on Monday.

    Christopher Chua Chun Kiat, 44, provided false information to the Traffic Police to avoid further investigation into his alleged offence of drink driving.

    Chua admitted to lying that his wife, Ms Goh Seok Lin, 40, was behind the wheel of a car along Bukit Timah Road at about 2.30am on June 3, 2013, instead of him.

    He had made the false statement in writing to an officer at Traffic Police at Ubi Avenue 3 on June 4 that year.

    The court heard that Station Inspector Sharul Osman was stationed at a bus stop along Bukit Timah Road, about 100m from a road block where his colleagues were, when he saw Chua drive into the driveway of the Church of the Latter Day Saints before Balmoral Plaza at about 2.30am on June 3 that year.

    He followed Chua’s car and saw him change seats with the front-seat passenger Ms Goh. A friend was seated behind.

    During the interview, Chua admitted to having consumed three glasses of beer at a nearby hawker centre. He also admitted that he had driven the car into the church to switch seats with his wife.

    A breathalyser test was not done as Chua complained that he had breathing difficulties. He was conveyed to hospital for his blood sample to be taken.

    Investigation later confirmed that contrary to his statement, he was indeed the driver of the car at the material time.

    Chua’s lawyer had asked that a fine be imposed, saying his client, who runs his own security company, had an exemplary record in the Singapore Armed Forces, and the offence was out of character.

    But Judge Shaiffudin Saruwan agreed with the prosecution a custodial sentence was warranted. He said Chua aggravated the situation by instigating two others to make the false statement to help him.

    Chua could have been jailed for up to one year and/or fined up to $5,000.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

deneme bonusu