Blog

  • Restaurant Secretary Fined $5,000 For Forging New Halal Certificate

    Restaurant Secretary Fined $5,000 For Forging New Halal Certificate

    A restaurant secretary who had failed to renew the company’s halal certificate forged a new one and showed it to potential customers.

    Pung Chee Lai then lied to her boss by telling him the halal application was still being processed and backed this up by showing him a faked email purporting to be from the Islamic Religious Council of Singapore (Muis).

    The 57-year-old was fined $5,000 on Tuesday after she admitted using the forged email.

    At the time she had been working for Pioneer Spring Restaurant and Tuas Point Seafood and Catering, which provided halal food for company functions.

    Tuas Point’s halal certificate expired on Nov 20, 2011, but when Rotary Engineering and Singtel made inquiries for halal food in the three months after that, she provided fakes that expired on Nov 30, 2012.

    A police report was lodged in March 2012.

    Deputy Public Prosecutor Ang Siok Chen said that Pung’s boss was alerted to the forged certificate by his staff, and when he confronted Pung about it she told him that the application renewal was still being processed.

    To back up her claims, she showed him an email from Muis – which had also been forged.

    Ms Ang highlighted the public interest in deterring conduct which undermines the Halal certification regime. She said Pung’s actions were dishonest and premeditated.

    Agreeing, District Judge Wong Choon Ning said the whole system would be affected if people could bypass it or create false certification, adding: “In this case, I do not find any basis of a deliberate commission of the act to provoke racial disharmony.”

    Pung’s lawyer Devadas Naidu said his client made the false statement to Mr Lee in order not to be pressed further and cause further stress to her boss.

    Pung, who has two other charges considered, could have been jailed for up to four years and/or fined for using a forged document.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • No Pay Increments For Politicians Over Past Three Years

    No Pay Increments For Politicians Over Past Three Years

    The sizes of politicians’ pay cheques have not changed in the past three years, although the salary benchmark for an entry-level minister last year was about 9 per cent higher than 2011 levels.

    Deputy Prime Minister and Minister-in-charge of the Civil Service Teo Chee Hean told the House yesterday the 2011 annual salary norm of S$1.1 million was kept because changes in the benchmark have been “moderate” — it moved up in two years and down in one, resulting in an overall annual increase of 3 per cent.

    While a ministerial salaries committee recommended the salary framework be reviewed every five years, Mr Teo said “we can continue to adjust salaries within this framework should there be a change in overall salary levels in the coming years”, given that things have been stable and the framework remains valid.

    He was responding to a question from Mr Edwin Tong (Moulmein-Kallang) at the Committee of Supply debate for the Prime Minister’s Office yesterday about how the framework proposed by the committee had been applied and how the benchmark had moved.

    The benchmark for politicians’ pay is based on the median income of the top 1,000 earners who are Singapore citizens, with a 40 per cent discount to reflect the ethos of political service, as recommended by a ministerial salaries committee appointed in May 2011 by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.

    This benchmark for an entry-level minister, also called the MR4 benchmark, includes all salary components including individual performance bonuses.

    The MR4 benchmark for last year was S$1.2 million, but the MR4 annual salary norm was kept at S$1.1 million, said Mr Teo.

    In January 2012, the ministerial salaries committee led by charity-sector veteran Gerard Ee had proposed linking the salary framework and National Bonus to the socio-economic progress of average and lower-income Singaporeans.

    Its recommendations, which were backdated to May 2011, included the removal of the pension scheme for politicians.

    Yesterday, Mr Teo said Singapore must continue to keep wages in the Public Service realistic and strike a balance between recognising the ethos of political service and providing a fair salary.

    This would ensure a flow of able and committed leaders into the Government, he added.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Khaw Boon Wan: HDB Flats Have Become More Affordable

    Khaw Boon Wan: HDB Flats Have Become More Affordable

    Public flats have become more affordable in recent years, with many Singaporeans able to buy a home within their budget, said Minister for National Development Khaw Boon Wan.

    To ensure that this remains the case for future generations, Mr Khaw said that the Government remains committed to quality housing that is within the reach of most Singaporeans.

    “Every generation will be able to afford their own HDB homes. This is our promise,” he said in the parliamentary debate on his ministry’s budget yesterday.

    Stressing the importance of home ownership, Mr Khaw said his ministry has achieved results in taming the red hot housing market. This was a hot topic in the 2011 General Election.

    Resale housing prices have risen by about 37 per cent since their low in 2009, while new flat prices rose by just 15 per cent without grants. With grants, new flat prices rose by just 6 per cent.

    — SOURCE: MND

    “Measured against the (median) household income increase of 38 per cent, we can see that public housing affordability has substantially improved since 2011,” he said.

    As for whether cooling measures will be lifted, Mr Khaw said that the property market is in transition and that the Government “should not overkill”.

    Mr Khaw also cited a recent Housing Board survey which showed that people were willing to pay up to $300,000 for a new three-room flat, and between $300,000 and $500,000 for a four- or five-roomer.

    In comparison, 90 per cent of new three-roomers last year were sold at below $250,000.

    For new four-roomers, 81 per cent were sold below $350,000, and 89 per cent of new five-roomers were sold below $450,000.

    “These are actual transactions. They paint a comforting picture of young Singaporeans being able to get their first BTO (Build- To-Order) flat, well within their expected budget,” said Mr Khaw.

    Home ownership has also been possible for the lower-income group, added Mr Khaw.

    From March 2012 to July last year, 1,491 families with household incomes below $1,000 had booked two-room or larger BTO flats.

    Yesterday, 24 MPs rose to ask about issues such as the affordability of housing. Ms Lee Bee Wah (Nee Soon GRC) was one of three MPs calling for the $10,000 income cap to be raised, while Mr Seah Kian Peng (Marine Parade GRC) and Mr Gan Thiam Poh (Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC) wanted flats with shorter leases for the needy.

    Mr Khaw outlined plans to help different segments, from singles to public rental tenants.

    Starting from May, half of all new two-room flats in non-mature estates will be set aside for singles, up from 30 per cent now.

    The Government will look for ways to help non-first-timers who want resale flats near their parents, as well as public rental tenants who aim to own a home.

    It is also prepared to raise the $10,000 income ceiling for public flats, as incomes rise, he said.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Rude FT At Pizza Hut Changi Airport Is Giving Singapore A Bad Name

    Rude FT At Pizza Hut Changi Airport Is Giving Singapore A Bad Name

    Dear TRS,

    On Sunday at around 1.45pm, I and a group of family member were at Singapore Changi Airport Terminal 1 to sent off our guest to her hometown.

    While waiting for the check in, we’ve decided to have our lunch at pizza hut as per request from my wheelchair bound aunt.

    The restaurant look calm and not so much patron at that time.. so my mum walk in and approach the service staff which is a pinoy whom was talking to her collegue.

    Mum wanted to asked her if the wheelchair can fit into their restaurant. But was taken aback when she replied “Excuse me ma’am, cant u see that Im talking to my collegue???” That was harsh enough to blow any customer away.

    What more we were damn ashame when our guest heard her saying that. So he stomp in and tell her off that her attitude sucks and that she should priortize the customer. We are giving business.

    Instead of apologising, the pinoy staff replied “Im just doing my job” thats where it sparks another anger.. my guest was so mad and scolded her “Shut up bitch” and the pinoy staff replied the same!!!!!!

    This incident was also witness by a group of eurasion family whom is seated right infront of the entrance.

    Wake up Pizza Hut!!!!!!!! How can u allow such a rude pinoy staff working at our famous changi airport!!!!!

    No apology No remorseful action!!!!

    I came back again to the restaurant after we have sent our guest to the departure gate and spoke to the other manager by the name of Liza… i told her about the bad experience that we have encounter earlier, and while talking to Liza… both the Pinoy manager n the Pinoy staff refuse to come out to apologise. Why???? Fishy right!!!! Wanna cover each other backside is it????

    Dear, Singaporean… how could we let this “bigheaded FT” work and stay here with this kind of uncivilise attitude.. My mum is in her 50’s and is asking her in a nicest way, but was given the shitty service by this FT Pinoy from Airport T1 pizza hut!!!! I seriously am very very upset with the whole incident and sadly, I would say even the management on duty cant handle this well..

    I demand an apology from the rude pinoy staff but was told that is gonna be difficult!!! My on My….. its so easy for her to raised her voice at my mum infront of other patrons but why is it so difficult for her to apologise for her doing!!! Ridiculous!!!

     

    MdKhairi Juwita

    TRS Contributor

     

    Source: www.therealsingapore.com

  • When Is A Good Time To Buy A Car?

    When Is A Good Time To Buy A Car?

    Is it a good time to buy a car?

    I get that question a lot but, in recent months, it has almost become a de facto greeting. Instead of “hello”, “how are you?” or “it’s a hot day, isn’t it?”, I get: “Is it a good time to buy a car?”

    I will try my best to answer the question which has obviously been keeping many Singaporeans awake at night.

    I will start by saying it is an irrelevant question – for the vast majority, anyway. Today, your decision to buy a car depends much less on where certificate of entitlement (COE) prices are at, than how old your current vehicle is.

    More than half of Singapore’s private car population is currently more than seven years old.

    That is quite a phenomenon, especially when you consider that we had one of the youngest car populations in the world merely a decade ago.

    The state of affairs has to do with how COE supplies are determined here, but more on that later.

    So, with so many old cars on the road, the pertinent question is: How many more months do you have before you need to scrap your current ride?

    Got it? Now, just before the end of that period would be a good time to buy.

    Going by anecdotal evidence, this is how motorists have been behaving. Because COE prices are so high, most people are keeping their cars until the last possible day of the vehicle’s 10-year statutory lifespan.

    I say most people because there are those with means who will buy regardless of price. These folks do not ask “is it a good time to buy a car?” Rather, their de facto greeting tends to be “what is a good car to buy?” If you belong to that group, you can stop reading now and go to Life! Motoring to check out this week’s suggestions.

    For the rest of you, and I count myself among you, I stand by my earlier recommendation: Use your car to the fullest – it not only makes good economic sense, but it is also environmentally sound.

    That is exactly what I am doing with my Toyota Wish, which is 91/4 years old now. I bought it in 2006, with a $9,000 COE.

    COE premiums are highly unlikely to ever go back to that level. Singapore’s human population has grown by 23 per cent – or one million people – since 2006.

    So, demand for cars has gone up significantly.

    The way COE supply is formulated has also changed. Today, supply – determined every three months – hinges on the number of vehicles scrapped in the preceding three months.

    Thus, supply tends to lag behind real demand. In the past, the allowable annual growth of 3 per cent might have masked this lag. But now, with the allowable growth rate at 0.25 per cent, any new injection of COEs is too minuscule.

    To illustrate, this rate translates to merely 134 fresh car COEs per month in the current quota period. Or 3.5 per cent of the total number of COEs available to car buyers.

    It is not a pretty picture. Nevertheless, the quota is poised for a dramatic growth between now and 2017, before it starts to taper again from mid-2018.

    With this supply explosion, prices will be on a downward trend. They could be as low as $30,000 for Category A (cars up to 1,600cc and 130bhp) and $40,000 for Category B (cars above 1,600cc or 130bhp). When? Sometime between 2016 and 2017.

    But that is irrelevant if your car is due to expire earlier.

    If your car has a couple more years before its time is up, you are in a good position because the ensuing COE bonanza is likely to translate to prices substantially lower than at present.

    This will happen provided the Government does not hold back some certificates for the next “dry spell”, which is due to start in late 2019.

    Even though Transport Minister Lui Tuck Yew first mooted this three years ago, there has been no word yet on whether he will do it.

    There has been much speculation. One recurring theory is that the Government will not do anything that is as unpopular as this before elections.

    And indeed it will be unpopular even though, over the long term, it will lead to more stability for car buyers and sellers. Unpopular because it will lead to tens of thousands of car-owning households not being able to own a car, at least in the medium term. And it will lead to COE prices heading for the moon in the near term.

    This implies that any decision to hold back COEs will be made after the polls.

    I know what you are thinking now. Better buy soon, before the election is called. But that would be foolish. One, very few people know when elections will be called. Two, a pre-election rush to the showroom will lead to only one thing: higher prices.

    Barring systemic changes, I stick to my original advice: Buy only when your car is near expiry. And if prices are still high then, consider revalidating your COE for another five or 10 years. It may still be a costly move but, in the long run, far less expensive than buying another car.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

deneme bonusu