Blog

  • Forced Into Hijab (Part 1)

    Forced Into Hijab (Part 1)

    Ramadhan has always been a special time for me because it’s the time when I sit down and reflect about my religion more seriously. I don’t mean for this to look like a biography, but I thought that it’d be easier to write things chronologically.

    And with that I shall properly begin.

    See, for as long as I can remember, the Hijab has always been an obligation enforced upon me and my sister.

    As a young Muslim, you don’t really question these things but you just do it because your parents tell you to. When I was younger I don’t remember if I had true conviction for wearing it, but I wore it anyway. I just assumed it was the norm since my mother wears it, and because it was compulsory to wear it when you went to religious classes. So I did.

    It was only in my pubescent teen years when this strong sense of dislike towards the Hijab sat at the back of my mind. The pubescent years was when how you looked started to matter, and for me, a person who has always struggled with low self-esteem, it aggravated the problem. I recall this incident that happened some time during my Secondary School years. My friends and I were out for a “Jalan Raya” outing. I was the only girl wearing the Hijab. I resented it the moment I put it on as it made me feel uglier than I already was. Seeing how pretty the other girls looked in something other than their Secondary School uniforms was enough to implant this small seed of jealousy within me. What worsened it however, was when the boys snickered, labelling me “alim” or pious because I wore the tudung. I remembered them laughing about it when I shortly excused myself to pray. It was something that damaged my self-esteem even more. At that moment I hated my parents for forcing such a thing upon me, and I hated the Malay community for endlessly criticising – it is a problem in their eyes to both wear it and not wear it. Most importantly, I hated that company; and that was when I swore to myself never to attend a “Jalan Raya” with anyone other than family.

    This dislike for the Hijab continued into my JC years, although in a smaller scale. The JC years introduced me to new perspectives on the Hijab, both good and bad. For one, my Chinese friends were more accepting and encouraging of the Hijab than my Malay friends. They told me things like “You look good with the Hijab, it frames your face nicely”, “You’re pretty”, “I like the way you dress” which really made me feel better about myself. Never once did they question me for my decision to wear it. The Malays in my JC, were nicer than the ones I met in Secondary School. Not only were they non-judgmental, they never once snickered at me for wearing the Hijab. Furthermore, the girls were undergoing a transition like myself. We were all at the age where we wanted to take our lives more seriously, and the Malay girls I knew were all making the decision to wear the Hijab because of varying reasons. I was really happy that they were making the decision to do so, and listening to their stories made me feel more optimistic about the Hijab. However, along with it came a deep sense of jealousy. You see, my friends were the sort who were never forced to wear the Hijab by their parents. When they wanted to wear it, it was a decision they made on their own accord, and I truly respected them for that. It was something that was never in my capacity to do. How I wished I were them, loving and embracing the Hijab for all that it is. I couldn’t however, as my deep sense of repulsion for it was still there. You see, the more you are forced to do something, the more you shy away from it.

    The present is when I’ve been starting to really rethink the whole idea of the Hijab. I am in uni now and it seems that in uni, at any given point of time, people see you in the Hijab and only the Hijab. I remember in year one I didn’t even bother to adopt a defensive attitude towards the Hijab. My friends asked me why I wore it, and I just answered “Because my parents forced me to”. I remember in JC I would tell my friends lies like “Because it allows me to be more modest” or something of the like, which, looking back, must have sounded really baseless and presumptuous. In uni I find myself being able to articulate my thoughts about the Hijab more clearly.

     

    Source: beyondhijabsg.wordpress.com

  • Singapore To Contribute Personnel and Equipment to Multinational Coalition Against IS

    Singapore To Contribute Personnel and Equipment to Multinational Coalition Against IS

    SINGAPORE – Singapore will play its part in the multinational coalition battling the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) by contributing personnel and equipment, said Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen in Parliament on Monday.

    This is part and parcel of Singapore’s ongoing efforts to combat terrorism, Dr Ng said, as he outlined how Singapore fought against the terrorist threat from Al-Qaeda and Jemaah Islamiyah.

    It did so by strengthening its social, psychological and physical defenses at home, and joining other countries to deal with the sources of radicalisation and terror in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    “As a result, both Al-Qaeda and Jemaah Islamiyah are weaker today. However, this terorrism threat is a long-term one, and new groups like ISIS will emerge even as existing ones falter. When they do, we must not lose focus or heart in dealing with the threat from ISIS. We must continue with the approach that has served Singapore well and protected us thus far,” he said.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • SPH Wins Most Transparent Company Award 2014.  Yes SPH.

    SPH Wins Most Transparent Company Award 2014. Yes SPH.

    SINGAPORE – Singapore Press Holdings (SPH) received the Most Transparent Company Award in the Services category at the 15th SIAS Investors’ Choice Awards 2014, held at the Marina Bay Sands Expo and Convention Centre on Friday evening (Oct 31).

    With this latest accolade, SPH has now won this award eleven times.

    This is also the third consecutive year it has bagged this award under the Services category (from 2012 to 2014). SPH won the award eight times when it was previously grouped under the Non-Electronics Manufacturing category.

    Mr Lawrence Wong, Minister for Culture, Community and Youth and Second Minister for Communications and Information, was the event’s Guest-of-Honour.

    Mr Alan Chan, Chief Executive Officer of SPH, said: “This latest achievement is a testament to the rigorous standards of corporate governance and transparency that we uphold throughout the years. This is made possible with the guidance of our board and the strong support from our management and staff.

    “I am also very proud of our award-winning journalists whose achievements continue to reflect their dedication and professionalism, as well as the high editorial standards set in our newsrooms.”

    The three SPH journalists who received awards for their editorial excellence were:

    1) Ms Michelle Quah (Senior Correspondent, The Business Times) – Financial Journalist of the Year

    2) Ms Lee Meixian (Journalist, The Business Times) – Most Promising Journalist of the Year

    3) Mr Goh Eng Yeow (Senior Correspondent, The Straits Times) – Best Commentary Award

    This was the third time Ms Quah was honoured at the SIAS Investors’ Choice Awards. She was a joint-winner for the Financial Journalist of the Year award in 2007 and won the Financial Story of the Year award in 2010.

    It was also the third accolade for Mr Goh Eng Yeow at the SIAS Investors’ Choice Awards. He was named Financial Journalist of the Year in 2006 and last year, he won the Outstanding Commentaries award.

    This is the first award for Ms Lee Meixian at the SIAS Investors’ Choice Awards.

    Mr Wong Wei Kong, Executive Editor and News Editor, The Business Times, said: “Michelle is without peer as an authority on corporate governance issues in Singapore. She combines her knowledge base with her years of experience covering corporate Singapore to put corporate governance, or the lack of it, under sharp scrutiny.

    “She pulls no punches, regardless of who are involved, and her commentaries and stories have touched on a wide range of issues that have investor protection at their heart.”

    Reflecting on Ms Lee’s achievements, he further added: “In just her first full year in reporting, Meixian has gone beyond the headlines to explore issues in depth. Her tenacity in chasing down the news, and refusal to give up until she is satisfied she has found the answers, make her a promising financial journalist.”

    On Mr Goh’s latest accolade, Ms Jeanette Lee Su Shyan, Money Editor, The Straits Times, said: “Eng Yeow consistently delivers insightful commentaries. His knowledge of the stock market is unparalleled in the newsroom.”

     

    Source: http://news.asiaone.com

  • Relax Visa Rules to Attract More Tourists While Singaporeans Vie for Space

    Relax Visa Rules to Attract More Tourists While Singaporeans Vie for Space

    SINGAPORE: The tourism industry has been hit in recent months following events such as the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines flight MH370, but Singapore could attract up to half a million more visitors in two years’ time if it improves its visa procedures, said a report by the World Travel and Tourism Council (WTTC) and World Tourism Organization.

    Key markets that require a visa for Singapore include China, India and Russia. Visa facilitation could result in about 358,000 to 504,000 more visitors in 2016 than under current policies and an additional S$768 million to S$1.08 billion in tourism receipts, estimated the report, The Impact of Visa Facilitation in ASEAN Member States, published earlier this year.

    The report’s projection of 2016 figures, however, was based on the World Tourism Organization’s international arrivals figure of 11.9 million for Singapore last year – significantly below the 15.6 million visitor arrivals published by the Singapore Tourism Board (STB).

    On the discrepancy, WTTC head of communications Emma Coulthurst said the World Tourism Organization’s arrivals figures are generally seen as the most authoritative and consistent source across countries.

    “VISAS INHIBITING TOURISM”

    Differing statistics aside, Singapore should consider e-visa programmes and regional agreements for visa facilitation and maximise infocomm technology to improve visa procedures, among other possibilities, the WTTC told TODAY.

    Visas are inhibiting the growth of tourism in general and governments need to automate processes, produce more visas-on-arrival and, eventually, get rid of visas altogether, said WTTC president and chief executive officer David Scowsill.

    “The ability that airlines now have in supplying data to the government authorities really removes the need in the future for visas at all,” said Mr Scowsill, who was in town last week for the Asia Travel Leaders Summit and ITB Asia conference.

    The tourism industry here is also feeling the manpower crunch and foreign labour restrictions and Mr Scowsill encouraged more flexibility in labour permits for foreign workers in the service industry. “If you want to maintain the service standards in Singapore in this industry – attractions, hotels, airlines – you have to make sure those jobs are filled and they are filled with customer-orientated individuals,” he said.

    The tourism industry is good at forecasting growth and this would help in working with the authorities on future manpower needs, he added.

    REINVENTION KEY TO REPEAT VISITORS

    The STB’s latest tourism sector performance quarterly report, which was released last month, showed that visitor arrivals numbered 3.6 million from April to June, a drop of 6 per cent from the previous year and the steepest year-on-year decrease in five years. Tourism receipts fell by 3 per cent to S$5.6 billion.

    Still, Mr Scowsill gave the thumbs-up to Singapore’s efforts in drawing visitors, praising its constant reinvention, the introduction of new products every two to three years and its infrastructure. “When I travel around the world and talk to other governments about what they need to do to develop their tourism industry, I use Singapore as a good example of what needs to happen,” he said.

    Reinvention is key to drawing repeat visitors, “because you’re not interested in the one-shot visitor who comes once, spends three or four days running around doing everything and does not come back for 20 years.”

    In addition to continued innovation and investment in infrastructure, Singapore has to focus on China, said Mr Scowsill. About 100 million Chinese travelled abroad last year and this number is expected to hit 200 million by 2020. Singapore would do well to stimulate demand from Chinese tourists, given their propensity to spend, he said.

    And in the face of competition with other markets, “the trick for Singapore is to make sure you’re always (part of travellers’ itineraries), in terms of not only groups, but individual leisure consumers”, he added

     

    Source: channelnewsasia.com

  • Ignorant Americans

    Ignorant Americans

    It’s quiz time, people. Let’s start with an easy one: What percentage of working-age Americans are unemployed and looking for work?

    If you guessed about 6 percent, give yourself a pat on the back. You have a pretty good understanding of the unemployment rate, one of the basic measures of economic well-being. If, on the other hand, you guessed 32 percent — which would rank America among the most desperate nations on Earth — then you guessed just like the average American!

    That’s one of the findings of a survey released this week by U.K. pollster Ipsos Mori, which interviewed 11,527 people. In the 14-country Index of Ignorance (Ipsos Mori’s name, but we approve), Americans are second only to Italians in how little we understand some of the stats that track the most basic contours of our society.

    Ready for more? Try these:

    What percentage of the U.S. population identifies as Muslim?
    Americans guessed: 15%
    Reality: 1%

    What percentage of the population do you think are immigrants to America?
    Americans guessed: 32%
    Reality: 13%

    Do you think this statement is true or false: The murder rate is rising in America
    70 percent of Americans guessed: True
    Reality: False

    Here’s a question that every country got wrong by a wide margin:

    What percentage of American girls aged between 15 and 19 years give birth each year?
    Americans guessed: 23.9%
    Reality: 3.1%

    This is a tricky one. I suspect most people ignore the “each year” part and instead guess what percentage of women get pregnant at any point during their teenage years. But that’s part of the point: the phrasing above is exactly what’s meant by “teen pregnancy rate,” which is often bandied about but rarely explained. If the annual pregnancy rate really were 23.9 percent, the average American woman would have more than one child by the age of 20, and the U.S. population would probably be closer to that of China.

    Here’s the ranking of countries on the Index of Ignorance, with the most fabulously ignorant at top:

    1. Italy
    2. U.S.
    3. South Korea
    4. Poland
    5. Hungary
    6. France
    7. Canada
    8. Belgium
    9. Australia
    10. Great Britain
    11. Spain
    12. Japan
    13. Germany
    14. Sweden

     

    Source: www.bloomberg.com/news

deneme bonusu