Blog

  • Muslim Sensitivity In Malaysia:  Real Or Feigned?

    Muslim Sensitivity In Malaysia: Real Or Feigned?

    Many women who use dye to cover the grey in their hair know about the skin allergy test to be performed 48 hours before applying it. A person with an allergy to the chemicals in the dye, like the person with a food intolerance, can develop a nasty rash. In extreme cases, the face may swell and the air passages can get constricted to the point of causing suffocation.

    In Malaysia, we have a similar test, known as the “intolerance test”. Malays are sensitive creatures, or so they are told by the ulamas and religious authorities. All Malaysians live in fear of failing the Malay “intolerance test”.

    Religious authorities have told Malays that they are very sensitive creatures and that they will react badly to many everyday items. It is a relatively new phenomenon. In the past, Malays were not afflicted by this condition. Perhaps, when a lie is repeated often enough, people end up believing it.

    Today, we have Muslims, like the person with an allergy, who will react badly to many normal, everyday things, such as touching dogs, wearing items made of silk, not wearing the tudung, holding hands, being in the same house or room with a man who is not a family member, reading some types of books, listening to some types of music or watching certain films, playing stringed instruments, doing ballet, singing Christmas carols and playing choral music.

    In the past, Malay women were not forced to wear the tudung. Today, it is de rigeur, especially if you work in the civil service or aspire to be a politician. In Kelantan, steps are in place to fine women who refuse to wear the tudung. If you are Malay, was your grandmother, who was content with a shawl or selendang, less religious?

    How did we get to this stage, where mullahs and conservative Muslims fail to appreciate that a Muslim’s piety, compassion or spirituality cannot and should not be measured by how well she covers her head?

    There was a time when Malay girls who were active in sports did not mind wearing shorts, but today this mode of dressing is frowned upon. Now, we concentrate on the attire, rather than a healthy interest in sport.

    In years gone by, children were allowed to play amongst themselves. Today, girls and boys, even toddlers, are segregated. Little girls are made to wear the tudung and cover their bodies. Leggings for a child in a tropical climate encourage fungal diseases.

    Why are Malays depriving young children of both sexes the chance to bond? Why are we passing down our own adult fears of sexual impropriety to children who have not even reached the age of puberty?

    This segregation probably explains why young Malay adults are not able to relate to one another as normal human beings. Some Malay adolescents, when meeting a person of the other sex for the first time, do not know how to behave. They mistake a natural biological attraction for love.

    Older Malaysians will remember the days when Malaysians of different races or religions socialised freely. One of these occasions would have been the traditional Malaysian “open house” ritual for festivals.

    Today, Malays are reluctant to attend the open houses of their non-Muslim friends. They refuse to eat off plates which may have been contaminated by non-halal food.

    Non-Malay friends claim that their close Muslim friends would only attend a wedding reception at home if a separate section, with food cooked by halal caterers and served disposable plates, were provided. The preparations for the wedding are already stressful without this added burden. Only the very wealthy can accommodate this request.

    Older Malays used to do yoga in the privacy of their homes or in groups. A few years ago, a fatwa against Malays doing yoga was issued. Did the ulamas suggest alternative methods of stress or pain relief for these people? Is their prescription to read more of the Quran?

    At school, few non-Malay children dare share the contents of their tuck box with their Malay friends for fear of the teacher punishing them for “polluting the blood of the Muslim child” with non-halal food.

    Muslims who go overseas on holiday or work are happy to eat from plates in restaurants or dine at the house of foreigners. Back in Malaysia, some Malays behave with extreme fragility. Why the double standard? Why this Jekyll and Hyde character?

    Now we have water that is “seditious” and “insensitive” to Muslims because it comes in bottles bearing the image of Lord Murugan next to the halal logo. Will the normal, ordinary Muslim take control of his life and hound these gormless extremists from tarnishing Islam? Will Malays with common sense finally make a stand? Or do they agree that the Cactus Brand mineral water is only a side show to distract us from the other farce, the Sodomy II trial, and other issues like the KLIA2 flooding, the mudslides in Cameron Highlands, the GST, and the 1MDB debacle?

     

    Source: www.freemalaysiatoday.com

  • The CASE For And Against Online Vigilantism

    The CASE For And Against Online Vigilantism

    By now, many would be familiar with Mr Jover Chew and his shop at Sim Lim Square.

    The spotlight has recently been on him and Mobile Air after reports of foreign customers’ bad experience surfaced in mainstream media.

    But when Mr Chew showed no remorse in subsequent interviews, including with The New Paper, and Mobile Air continued its daily operations despite the bad press, infuriated netizens took matters into their own hands.

    On Tuesday night, Facebook page SMRT Ltd (Feedback) named and shamed Mr Chew, 32, and his wife.

    Photos of them, their contact numbers and Mr Chew’s properties were also listed on the Facebook page.

    And it seems that Mr Chew has succumbed to the pressure. When The New Paper visited Sim Lim Square yesterday, the shop was closed. Mr Chew has also diverted his calls to another number.

    Previously, Mobile Air did not cease operations despite regularly making it to the Consumers Association of Singapore’s (Case) blacklist of Sim Lim Square tenants.

    Some businesses on the list, like Cyber Maestro, simply switch their signboards and it’s business as usual.

    Cyber Maestro, which was slapped with a court injunction on Monday, gave way to a new tenant, Megacentrix Technologies, and subtenant VS One in August.

    But a check revealed that the person behind VS One is related to the boss of Cyber Maestro.

    The two businesses also share the same registered address. The shareholders of the two businesses are husband and wife. This is where the problem lies, said lawyer Steven Lam.

    “With the Consumer Protection (Fair Trading) Act (CPFTA), what comes out of it is a civil remedy,” he said.

    “You can sue the offending business, but many of them simply close down and wind up.

    “Then, they open another company under different shareholders who are shadow directors.”

    He suggested a dedicated enforcement body to clamp down on errant retailers for more “regulatory bite”.

    Mr Lam also cautioned against netizens’ online shaming.

    “Although it may seem to be effective, don’t forget there’s the Prevention of Harassment Act. They have to be a bit careful about where the line is drawn.”

    Singapore Management University’s law professor Eugene Tan feels that the netizens’ disgust with Mr Chew does not justify their actions.

    INTRUSIVE

    He said: “At another level, it’s over-zealous and self-righteous. Regardless of the legitimacy of the cause, the actions by netizens are disproportionate and intrusive. Two wrongs don’t make a right.”

    Case executive director Seah Seng Choon thinks that a civil law is sufficient for now.

    “I think that for the time being, given that we have a civil law in place, this is really sufficient,” he said.

    “We can try to speed up our action by serving voluntary compliance agreements faster or hopefully get injunctions speedier to stop errant retailers.”

    Mr Seah added that Case is already “doing a lot behind the scenes” to help consumers resolve their cases.

    As CPFTA is a civil act, it will take some time to go through the necessary process to stop the unfair practices, he pointed out.

    “It is a big thing for the person affected, but we can’t jump in at the first instant when there’s a complaint. Sometimes, it may be just a one-off (incident) because of some bad employees,” Mr Seah said.

    “Errant retailers can continue their businesses, but they must understand that the law will catch up with them.”

    Rather than a legal issue, lawyer Kang Kim Yang feels that the onus is on consumers to be more cautious.

    “To me, it doesn’t seem like an elaborate way of deception. You may say that the retailers are morally wrong, but sometimes, they are playing within the rules,” he said.

    “Consumers should be reading the fine print and inquire at a few other shops before making an informed decision.”

    [email protected]

    Blacklisted shops

    These shops at Sim Lim Square have been blacklisted by the Consumers Association of Singapore (Case) for the period of August to October.

    Shop name: Number of complaints

    Mobile Air 25

    Gadget Terminal 13

    Mobile22 10

    Mobile Apps 9

    Mackin 7

    Mobile Planet 7

    K-One Mobile 4

    Megacentrix Technologies 4

    SLR Pro 4

    Cyber Maestro 3

    Source: Consumers Association of Singapore

     

    Source: http://news.asiaone.com

  • Roy Ngerng Found Guilty of Defamation

    Roy Ngerng Found Guilty of Defamation

    SINGAPORE: Blogger Roy Ngerng has been found guilty of defamation, with damages to be assessed.

    Justice Lee Seiu Kin on Friday (Nov 7) has also ordered Ngerng to be restrained from publishing or disseminating the allegation that the plantiff, Prime Minster Lee Hsien Loong, is guilty of criminal misappropriation of the monies paid by Singaporeans to the Central Provident Fund, or any words and/or images to the same effect.

    “I therefore find that the Disputed Words and Images convey the natural and ordinary meaning that the plaintiff, the Prime Minister of Singapore and the Chairman of GIC, is guilty of criminal misappropriation of the monies paid by Singaporeans to the CPF,” said Justice Lee in his judgement. “There is no doubt that it is defamatory to suggest that the plaintiff is guilty of criminal misappropriation of the CPF monies.”

    The Prime Minister filed the defamation suit against Ngerng on May 29, and on July 10 applied for a summary judgment, where the plaintiff asks the court to rule without trial, on grounds that the defendant has no real defence to contest his claim.

    The suit against Mr Ngerng arose from a blog post in May entitled Where Your CPF Money Is Going: Learning From The City Harvest Trial, which alleged that CPF monies had been misappropriated.

    Mr Ngerng had been sent a letter from Mr Lee’s lawyers, demanding that he apologise, remove the post and offer damages. Though he complied with several of the demands, his offer of S$5,000 in damages was rejected as “derisory” by Mr Lee. Mr Ngerng had also emailed some local and international media on how to access other posts, which Mr Lee’s lawyers said was “further aggravation”.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • 20 Simple Childhood Snacks That Made Us So Happy We Didn’t Need Cupcakes Or Churros

    20 Simple Childhood Snacks That Made Us So Happy We Didn’t Need Cupcakes Or Churros

    Let’s put aside the crazy haze and think of happy thoughts like childhood snacks. Then compound that happiness by thinking of our adult spending power and that we can buy the snacks in bulk now.

     

    1. Ice Lolly Tubes


    Source 

    There are only two types of people in the world: The people who bite the top and twist the bottom, or those that break the tubes in half. Can you remember the ache in your teeth and the saltiness of your own saliva chewing through the plastic packaging? Whichever way you try to eat it, you’ll end up sucking away the fruit juice and leaving behind a flavourless ice stick.

     

    2. Hiro cake

    Source

    When recess time comes, we stock up on these small cheapo chocolate covered sponges. We’d eat them on the school bus even though they were squashed flat in our schoolbags.

     

    3. Kueh Balu

    Source

    Crusty on the outside, pillowy-soft on the inside. You can eat many of these at a go, dunking them into milo or a cold glass of milk.

     

    4. Kueh Tutu

    kueh tutuSource

    Watching your Kueh Tutu being made is as good a treat as the kueh itself. You always marvel at how smooth the flour looked as the excess was scrapped off before putting into the steamer. Too bad they can only do 6 at a go, if not you’d buy 30.

     

    5. Ding Dang
    6. Tora

    dingdang

    Source

    This was our budget friendly version of Kinder Bueno even before that luxury treat arrived in Singapore. Nobody cared that it was obviously a copyright infringement of Doraemon.

    And, apparently, Tora had more premium toys.

    toraSource

     

    7. Mr Softee

    Source

    Because 7-11 used to have something we really wanted. Like chendol softee. And that incredible chocolate fudge add-on for 30 cents. Slurp.

     

    8. Super Rings

    Source

    Before Cheetos and Cheezels made their (orange) mark on our fingers, there was the ever-ready Super Rings that were sweet, cheesy and gone too fast.

     

    9. Biscuit Piring


    Source

    We would wolf each dry and lightly-sweetened disc down, ending up with lots of wafer flakes on our laps. Who’s to say we didn’t use them as discuses?

     

    10. Buttercream cake

    Source

    The cake shops downstairs of our flats were always smelling so good. And the buttercream cake was one of our most popular picks. Our birthday cakes were usually piped with jelly colours of the traffic light or the hottest cartoon of the year.

     

    11. Kueh Lapis Sagu (九层糕, or literally 9-layer-cake)


    Source

    Just like its name, we tend to eat them layer by layer to prolong the snack’s lifespan. Some people are still convinced each layer has a different flavour.

     

    12. Fruit Jelly


    Source

    Remember how you would tear the plastic top open carefully and quickly sip the syrup on top of the jelly before it falls all over your fingers?

    Tip: these taste even better frozen.

     

    13. Ang Ku Kueh (Red Tortoise Cake)


    Source

    Today’s AKK come in many variations (agar agar, yam, durian even!), but when we were younger, there would only be green bean, or peanut ones. I don’t know why everyone loves the green bean ones.

     

    14. Haw flakes

    Source

    Do you like to it them one slice at a time or you’re one of those that would bite an entire stack? Whichever camp you belong to, the first bite probably stung your teeth and gums because they were so sour.

     

    15. Beebee

    Source

    Bee-Bee was pretty smart to have a mascot that looked like Mr. MaGoo, and we were never put off by this super-artificial orange coloured snack because it was *so* cheap!

     

    16. Push pop


    Source

    Taking it a level up from basic lollipops, we had Push Pops which could be consumed for a bit, and when classes started, we would “save” the lollipop for later consumption.

    Our fingers tended to be stained with saliva and melted sweet though.

    Was their advertising jingle “Don’t push me, push a Push Pop!”?

     

    17. Ring pop


    Source

    Diamonds were really affordable and tasty in those years. As they say today, if you like it then you should’ve put a ring on it.

     

    18. Whistle pop


    Source

    You’d rather skip those recorder lessons and make some music with this simple whistle pop. At least there’s some tasteful sounds.

     

    19. Cadbury Mini eggs

    Source

    These were more of a premium snack that you’d get lucky with if your parents were in a good mood. Speckled, sugary hard shell over smooth milk chocolate – what’s there not to love?

     

    20. Whistling sweets

    Source

    A faster way to set up a school choir with one tune, we present the Whistle Candy. Along with a lot of saliva.

     

    Source: http://mothership.sg

  • PAP Contributing to Congestion In Town To Celebrate Its 60th Birthday

    PAP Contributing to Congestion In Town To Celebrate Its 60th Birthday

    The People’s Action Party (PAP) is celebrating its 60th birthday today and it just couldn’t wait to let Singaporeans know that its birthday is here.

    And to do so, the PAP has deemed it fit to create traffic congestion in the centre of the city just so that Singaporeans will be aware of its birthday.

    Welcome to uniquely Singapore – where the ruling party believes that after 55 years of controlling government, it can, as a netizen called it, turn the roads in Singapore into its own “grandfather’s road”.

    Today, if you face any jams in the centre of town, don’t worry. You can thank the PAP for it, or blame them, whichever way you fancy.

    The roads that will be closed are near the Victoria Theatre and Concert Hall.

    • Old Parliament Lane and Empress Place will be closed from 11am to midnight.
    • The two right lanes of Parliament Place in the direction of Saint Andrew’s Road will be closed from 11am to 1.30pm.
    • The centre lane of Parliament Place in the direction of Saint Andrew’s Road (between Connaught Drive and Saint Andrew’s Road) will be closed from 1.30pm to 2pm.
    • The carriageway of Fullerton Road in the direction of Parliament Place (between Esplanade Drive and Parliament Place) will be closed from 2pm till midnight.
    • Parliament Place in the direction of Saint Andrew’s Road (between Fullerton Road and Saint Andrew’s Road) and the two left lanes of Fullerton Road in the direction of Esplanade Drive will also be closed from 2pm till midnight.

    Of course, no one is saying don’t barge onto the road. If a political party has a birthday, we should all give way and let it have the right of way, shouldn’t we?

    Well, not unless you are the Worker’s Party. Then, even when you decide to organise a cycling event at the perfectly legit East Coast Park, as it tried to in 2007 to celebrate their 50th anniversary, then the police are going to tell you that it “does not allow political parties to organise outdoor gatherings because such activities have the potential for public disorder and mischief, and may disrupt community life.”

    But of course, if you are the PAP, the police can tell Singaporeans that “Traffic delays may be expected” and that “Motorists are advised to plan their route early”.

    But because it is the PAP, and even as the road closures will “disrupt community life”, hey, it’s the PAP.

    Of course, cycling in East Coast Park would definitely cause more disruption to community life than closing roads and creating traffic jams, and causing delays to the hundreds of Singaporeans who will be rushing home for dinner, right?

    But hey, it’s the PAP’s 60th anniversary. Who are we to argue about the “grandfather’s road”, unless we think they have been in power for far too long?

     

    Source:  www.therealsingapore.com

deneme bonusu