Blog

  • Damanhuri Bin Abas: Singaporeans Cannot Take Back CPF Likely Because Money Disappeared Through ‘Brilliant’ Investment Decisions (GIC)

    Damanhuri Bin Abas: Singaporeans Cannot Take Back CPF Likely Because Money Disappeared Through ‘Brilliant’ Investment Decisions (GIC)

    People should be very very very angry about this. Why not!!! We are told we cannot take back our CPF when we all know now most likely it is because they can’t honour our money since many have disappeared through brilliant investment decision by this million dollar led financial maestro.

    A pastor went to jail for $40 million financial mismanagement and we become all righteous criticising his dishonesty yet silent and tolerate worst abuse of power. We demand accountability from WP for APHTC over peanuts compared to far humongous public money thrown away as cheap lunches. Lets make it right Singapore. Demanding accountability from our government is our right and duty in a democracy. The only language that they will listen is through the ballot.

    We may have this opportunity come September in the upcoming Presidential election and we pray and hope our Courts will act justly to allow Dr Tan Cheng Bock to contest and if Mdm Halimah is the government’s candidate we may have a break via a GRC by-election for MYT to put 4 SDP candidates into parliament to make those Ministers sweat and work hard for their lunches instead of simply taking away ours.

     

    Source: Damanhuri Bin Abas

  • GIC Faces Possible US$4b Loss On UBS Bet: IFR

    GIC Faces Possible US$4b Loss On UBS Bet: IFR

    Singapore sovereign wealth fund GIC Private Ltd is facing a loss in excess of 4 billion francs (US$4 billion, S$5.6 billion) on its emergency investment in Swiss bank UBS Group nine years ago, according to IFR calculations.

    GIC cut its stake in UBS on Monday evening (May 15), selling 93 million shares at 16.10 Swiss francs each to bring in 1.5 billion francs. The sale was conducted by UBS as sole bookrunner and wrapped up in two and a half hours.

    The bank accidentally announced the sale ahead of the market close when it had been due to launch. UBS’s ECM bankers were already talking to investors through a wall-crossing exercise so the deal was not too disrupted.

    The share price did drop on the news so the discount was 3 per cent to Monday’s close and 4.6 per cent to the undisturbed share price, but pricing was still above the bottom of the 16-franc to market guidance at launch.

    The deal was covered in 20 minutes and allocations reflected strong support from some investors, with the top 10 orders receiving half the shares. There were around 140 lines in the book.

    The Singapore soveriegn wealth fund invested 11 billion francs in UBS through mandatory convertibles in December 2007, which converted into shares two years later to make it the bank’s biggest shareholder. GIC said Monday’s sale realised a loss, but did not say how big the loss was.

    IFR calculates it has lost over 4 billion francs on the investment, based on conservative estimates of income from share sales, interest payments on the original instruments, dividends and the value of its remaining 2.7-per cent stake.

    GIC did not immediately reply to requests for comment on the size of its loss.

    It said on Monday it was disappointed its investment resulted in a loss, but said an emergency investment in Citigroup at around the same time had earned a positive return, and the combined return “has been positive in mark-to-market terms”.

    It invested US$6.9 billion in Citigroup in January 2008.

    “GIC made the UBS sale despite the loss because conditions have changed fundamentally since GIC invested … as have UBS’s strategy and business,” GIC chief executive Lim Chow Kiat said. “It makes sense now for GIC to reduce its ownership of UBS and redeploy these resources elsewhere,” he added.

    GIC’s investment in UBS has always been complex and it gives limited details on its portfolio.

    GIC and an unnamed Middle East investor invested 13 billion francs in UBS in December 2007. At that time UBS shares were trading at about 50 francs, as the scale of capital and trading problems were only just emerging.

    The investment was in mandatory convertible notes (MCNs) that were converted into 273 million UBS shares in March 2010. They were converted at 47.68 francs per share, well above UBS’s share at the time to reflect the higher share price at the time of the original investment.

    The conversion left GIC with 245.5 million shares in the bank for a 6.4 per cent stake. It reduced its holding to 196 million prior to Monday’s sale, which would have raised 1.1 billion francs only if it was sold at the maximum share price during the intervening period.

    Its remaining 2.7 per cent UBS stake, or about 103 million shares, is worth 1.7 billion francs at the current share price.

    As a result, the sale of shares and remaining holding totals about 4.3 billion francs for GIC.

    GIC received an additional 2 billion francs in interest payments in the two years it held the MCNs. The notes paid 9 per cent annual interest, but had a maximum life of two years.

    It has also received 2.45 franc per share in dividend payments between 2011 and 2016, amounting to up to 602 million francs.

    As a result, its total return has been 5.2 billion francs to date, with it still holding 1.7 billion of shares. That equates to a current loss of 4.1 billion francs from its investment, according to IFR calculations.

    GIC manages more than US$100 billion globally and UBS was its second most valuable investment, according to Thomson Reuters data. It was set up in 1981 to secure the financial future of Singapore by managing its foreign reserves in a range of long-term assets. Temasek, another Singapore state investor, has also made big bets on some banks, including Standard Chartered.

    GIC’s loss shows the importance of timing of investments during the financial crisis. Sovereign funds from Singapore, Abu Dhabi, Qatar, Kuwait and China all invested in western banks.

    Many investors who went in early, such as GIC in UBS, have lost money. Others who were later have made money – often as they got better terms.

    Qatar’s sovereign wealth fund made more than US$2 billion on a controversial bet on Britain’s Barclays in 2008, for example. Most of its proceeds came from warrants the bank included as part of the deal, plus MCNs that paid out 14 per cent a year.

     

    Source: http://www.straitstimes.com/business/

  • Shops Re-Open, Flights Resume At Changi Airport Terminal 2 After Fire Yesterday

    Shops Re-Open, Flights Resume At Changi Airport Terminal 2 After Fire Yesterday

    Changi Airport resumed normal operations at 3am on Wednesday (May 17) after a fire at Terminal 2 disrupted flights and operations.

    Indigo Air flight 6E54 to Chennai left from T2 at 5.40am, the airport said in an update on Facebook.

    It apologised for the inconvenience caused and thanked its passengers for their patience.

    Mr Avneesh Mehta, 21, was among passengers who checked in for IndiGo flight 6E54 at about 4am. The flight, which departed Singapore for Chennai at 5.40am, was the first flight departing from T2 since operations resumed.

    The Indian national,  who had been in Singapore for a five-day holiday, said: “I’m glad that everything is now in order. I didn’t even know there was a fire that caused such a huge impact.”

    Some shops in T2 were affected by the fire. Indian fast food restaurant Chutney Mary and restaurant Nando’s on level 3 appeared to have been hit by a blackout caused by the fire.

    Chutney Mary’s manager Mohan Hase, 33, said the sprinklers on the fifth floor were activated and water leaked through the false ceiling into the 24-hour restaurant.

    There was also a power outage. So even though staff were allowed back into the restaurant at 10.30pm last night, the restaurant has not re-opened.

    The 24-hour Starbucks cafe at T2, which closed at 4pm on Tuesday, re-opened at 3am.

     

    The cafe staff were back into the shop around midnight.

    Starbucks barista Siti Umairah, 21, said her colleagues were unable to complete their duties due to the sudden closure, so their team cleaned the equipment and completed the sales report before re-opening the outlet.

    “It smelled quite smoky when I entered the shop around midnight, but it’s okay now” she said.

    Mr Wilfred Tan, 30, who works at the Times bookstore said nothing was amiss at the store, which closed early on Tuesday. The store opened at 6am, its usual opening time.

    “The airport conducts fire drills quite often so we know what to do in the event of an emergency,” said Mr Tan, who has worked for Times for four years.

    Passenger Carol Pantoja, 41, a sales manager at a pharmaceutical firm, could not even tell there had been a fire when she landed in the wee hours of the morning at about 5.40am.

    “When I arrived here I couldn’t tell that there was a fire. I walked around for 20 minutes and didn’t smell anything,” she said.

    The fire on Tuesday broke out in a room holding air-conditioning equipment at the terminal, which triggered a fire alarm at 5.40pm.

    Terminal 2 was evacuated and closed, while all flights were moved to Terminal 3.

    The Singapore Civil Defence Force gave the all-clear for T2 at 10pm on Tuesday. Flight operations then progressively resumed.

    A total of about 40 flights were affected, Changi Airport Group (CAG) said. Six people required medical assistance.

    Two people in the terminal were sent to hospital for observation after approaching Changi staff for medical assistance, and another four were brought to the Terminal 3 clinic, CAG said.

    Changi Airport said it will work with authorities to investigate the incident.

    Passengers departing or arriving on Wednesday are advised to check the Changi Airport website, app or social media channels for the latest information, it added.

     

    Source: http://www.straitstimes.com/

  • Goh Meng Seng: How About Naming MRT Stations After David Marshall And J B Jeyaretnam?

    Goh Meng Seng: How About Naming MRT Stations After David Marshall And J B Jeyaretnam?

    PAP has never asked Singaporeans what name to use for any MRT station but why now? Basically Wayang!

    They want people to suggest LKY station!

    But I say since two stations are near Anson, which David Marshall and JBJ had won their seats as MP, they should name David Marshall station and JBJ Station!

    Especially for David Marshall who was our FIRST Chief Minister

     

    Source: Goh Meng Seng

  • Bangladeshi Foreign Worker Denies Raping PRC National At MacRitchie Reservoir Park

    Bangladeshi Foreign Worker Denies Raping PRC National At MacRitchie Reservoir Park

    A Bangladeshi man is on trial for allegedly abducting a hiker at MacRitchie Reservoir Park in 2015, forcing her off the Lornie Trail at knifepoint and raping her twice in a forested area.

    Construction worker Pramanik Liton, 24, denied the charges on Tuesday (May 16) at the opening of his trial. He faces four counts, including two for aggravated rape, one for sexual assault and one for abduction for illicit intercourse.

    The victim, a 40-year-old Chinese national, had been hiking the Lornie Trail alone on Feb 8, 2015, when Liton accosted her and asked her to have sex with him. When she refused, Liton pressed a knife to her throat, covered her mouth and forced her off the trail.

    He took her deep into the forested area off the trail, where he raped her twice at knifepoint and forced her into other sexual acts. She feared for her life and pleaded with Liton to let her go, the High Court heard.

    The ordeal lasted nearly two hours, from 1.45pm when the woman was abducted, until about 3.37pm when Liton threw the knife in the bushes and left the victim in the forest.

    She called her then-boyfriend for help. They met at the Mushroom Cafe near the entrance of MacRitchie Reservoir Park, and he took her to make a police report immediately.

    Trackers from the Gurkha contingent were sent into the forest to locate the scene of the crime and to recover the weapon.

    The crime scene was located at about 9.30pm the same day. The Gurkha who discovered the scene said the ground was flattened in places and pieces of tissue were littered around the area. The pieces of tissue were seized by the police, and tested positive for Liton’s semen.

    The knife was recovered the next day by another Gurkha and handed over to the police. A crime scene specialist lifted a fingerprint off the blade of the knife, which matched Liton’s. He was arrested on Feb 10 at the construction site where he worked.

    Blood samples were taken from both Liton and the victim, which allowed investigators to tie Liton to the rape. His semen was found on the victim’s panties, as well as on swabs taken from the victim’s mouth and vagina. His DNA was also found on the victim’s blouse, and hers was found on the knife.

    Prosecutors Stella Tan and Sruthi Boppana said they would adduce evidence from 44 witnesses to make their case, including the victim and her then-boyfriend.

    Liton is not represented. Through a Bengali interpreter, he told the court: “I don’t want any lawyer.” At one point, he also insisted he “doesn’t know anything about the knife”.

    The trial continues.

    If convicted of aggravated rape, Liton faces at least eight years in jail and a minimum of 12 strokes of the cane, per charge.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com