Blog

  • Nostalgia For Bazaar Ramadan Geylang Serai

    Nostalgia For Bazaar Ramadan Geylang Serai

    Share this if you want 🙂 and hashtag ‪#‎imisstheoldgeylangbazaar‬ or‪#‎rindubazargeylangdulu‬

    Geylang Serai Bazaar in the 80s and 90s. From Paya Lebar Mrt all the way to Eunos. Huge crowds and cheap goods to get for Hari Raya. The kuih-kuih and goodies for Hari Raya, food for breaking of fast, new clothes, carpet etc. Lelong here, lelong there, lelong everywhere. Macam-macam. All here.

    Geylang Serai 1 Geylang Serai 2
    Geylang Serai 4 Geylang Serai 5 Geylang Serai 6 Geylang Serai 7 Geylang Serai 8

    Dedicated to all the 80s and 90s kids, shoppers and the sellers of Geylang Serai Hari Raya Bazaar. Post Fb ini adalah untuk semua anak-anak zaman 80an/90an, pembeli dan pegerai di Bazar Raya Geylang Serai.

     

    Source: Rudy Djoe

  • Singaporean Becomes NZ Citizen, Cannot Get Senior Citizen Benefit There Because of Unclaimed CPF In Singapore

    Singaporean Becomes NZ Citizen, Cannot Get Senior Citizen Benefit There Because of Unclaimed CPF In Singapore

    A 66-year-old Singaporean failed in his bid to get senior citizen pension benefits in New Zealand after a tribunal found he had not first used his Central Provident Fund (CPF) money, as advised.

    The Social Security Appeal Authority was not convinced by his concerns of being traced by the Singapore authorities if he applied to withdraw his CPF money, as there could be “significant repercussions” for his two grown-up sons, who were liable for national service (NS).

    “(He) was completely unable to explain what action the Singapore authorities might be able to take against him or his sons if they became aware of his residence in New Zealand,” said the Social Security Appeal Authority of New Zealand in decision grounds released last month.

    Superannuation benefits of about NZ$600 (S$570) are payable fortnightly to New Zealand citizens or permanent residents over 65 who have lived in the country for at least 10 years since they turned 20, five of which must be since they turned 50 years old, according to its website.

    But the payout is modified according to conditions such as deductions from income earned elsewhere or abroad.

    According to the decision grounds, the Singapore citizen, who is also a New Zealand citizen, was granted the benefit when he turned 65 in November 2014 but he disclosed in his application that he had lived in Singapore for 50 years.

    He had worked in various jobs in Singapore before emigrating to New Zealand in 2000 with his wife and two sons, then aged eight and 10.

    The Auckland-based man, who was granted citizenship in 2004, was told by New Zealand’s Ministry of Social Development to apply to Singapore’s CPF Board to withdraw funds from there.

    He objected and failed to comply with the July 2015 deadline issued by the New Zealand ministry. A month later, his New Zealand Superannuation was suspended.

    He initially claimed it was discriminatory to require people from countries that paid pensions, such as Singapore, to be required to apply for those pensions, which were then deducted from their entitlement to New Zealand Superannuation.

    He pursued the case before the two-member appeal authority, arguing among other things that his two sons, now aged 25 and 23 years and having promising careers, could be affected if his whereabouts were known to the Singapore authorities through his CPF application.

    The man, who was not named, suggested his sons might be forced to return to Singapore to do national service and be prosecuted as enlistment defaulters. Under Singapore laws, eligible persons who fail to register for national service may be fined up to $10,000 or jailed up to three years or both.

    But the tribunal pointed out that the alleged offences under the Singapore Enlistment Act were not recognised as extraditable offences under New Zealand law and prosecution was, therefore, “remote”.

    “We are not satisfied that there is any real danger or disadvantage to either the appellant or his two sons if the appellant’s whereabouts were to become known to the Singapore Government,” wrote the Wellington-based appeal authority.

    It added that the man, having worked variously in Singapore as an aircraft mechanic, hotel cashier and elsewhere had maintained CPF deposits from which he could apply to withdraw funds, since he was already past 62 years old, the minimum age for CPF withdrawal.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • MHA: Political, Controversial Social Issues Should Be Decided by Singaporeans Alone

    MHA: Political, Controversial Social Issues Should Be Decided by Singaporeans Alone

    The Government has always taken the position that foreigners and foreign entities should not interfere in our domestic matters (“Clarity needed on ‘interference by foreign entities’” by Ms Corinna Lim; yesterday).

    Political and controversial social questions should be decided by Singaporeans alone.

    The Speakers’ Corner was established to provide a space for Singaporeans to express themselves, without requiring a permit, on the condition that there is no participation of foreigners.

    In line with this condition, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) is reviewing Speakers’ Corner rules to make clear that foreign entities should not fund, support or influence such events held at the Speakers’ Corner.

    We will adopt a practical approach.

    When this review is complete, the ministry will set out the parameters.

    The Government is committed to diversity and inclusiveness, and expects the same of businesses operating here with respect to their employees.

    However, advocating positions on Singapore laws and policies on socially divisive issues is an entirely different matter.

    That is a right that must be reserved for Singaporeans.

    The MHA statement of June 7 made it clear that this applies equally to those who advocate lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) causes, as well as those who oppose LGBT causes.

    Lee May Lin (Ms)

    Director

    Information Planning and Strategy

    Community Partnership and Communications Group

    Ministry of Home Affairs

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Walid J. Abdullah: Do We Live For Social Media?

    Walid J. Abdullah: Do We Live For Social Media?

    How strange is the modern human.

    When we have spouses, we keep talking about them or go out of our way to post stuff that demonstrate how happy we are, to people we barely know.

    When we have children, we keep bombarding our social media pages with their pictures. Without caring about how those without children, in spite of trying, would feel.

    When we are pregnant, we tell the entire world. Without knowing what the outcome of the pregnancy would be. Without bothering whether those who are not pregnant would feel a tinge of sadness.

    When it is mother’s day, we write long and beautiful poems about our mothers on social media, but do not even say ‘I love you’ directly to them.

    When we attend funerals, we busy ourselves with taking ‘solemn’ pictures, and with thinking about what caption the photos should be accompanied with. Without even bothering to respect the deceased, or say a prayer or two for him/her.

    When we do a good deed, we rush to advertise it to the world. While somehow convincing ourselves that we are not showing off, but rather, portraying an example for others to follow. And then we find no irony at all in perennially checking how many ‘likes’ our post garnered.

    When we praise ourselves in public, we paradoxically always precede it with ‘All praises to God’, when in fact, we proceed to praise ourselves.

    How strange is the modern human, indeed.

    Has social media changed us? Or has it merely given us an opportunity to express our true selves?

    Do we live for social media?

     

    Source: Walid J. Abdullah

  • Rising Trend Of Halal Labelling Generates Concern

    Rising Trend Of Halal Labelling Generates Concern

    The paint tin has a silhouette of a mosque on the label, while the paint company’s brochure has the face of a pig crossed out.

    Indonesian company Bernahal uses these images to show its wall paint is halal, or permissible for Muslims, part of a growing range of goods aimed at winning over pious Islamic consumers in a global market estimated to be worth US$2 trillion (S$2.7 trillion) a year.

    To emphasise its appeal, Bernahal says the chemicals in its paints are free from lard, which is considered unclean in Islam.

    In Indonesia, the world’s most populous Muslim nation, there are many other items touted as halal, such as a computer mouse, headscarves and even shirt buttons.

    In Malaysia, it is the government’s Islamic Development Department, or Jakim.

    In Singapore, it is the Islamic Religious Council (Muis), while in Indonesia, it is the Indonesian Ulema Council’s Food and Drugs Supervisory Agency.

    Makers of products such as canned food or those selling meat such as chicken must first apply to the local Islamic authority to carry the halal logo.

    Applicants need to ensure their supply chain uses ingredients and processes permitted under Islamic law.

    Beyond the requirements of having no pork, no lard, no alcohol and a clean processing environment, a supplier of chicken or sheep, for example, must have the animals slaughtered by Muslim workers reciting the name of Allah in abbatoirs certified by Jakim.

    Biscuits and mineral water are examples of food that do not generally have to carry the halal logo. But manufacturers seek certification to attract more Muslim customers.

    A company or seller will be allowed to carry the official halal stamp once the Islamic body is satisfied the conditions are met, and occasional spot checks are carried out to ensure compliance.

    Muis says it conducts “unannounced post-certification audits”. Once approved, the validity of halal certification lasts for one to two years, depending on the firm’s past track record, among other things.

    In Malaysia, there are discussions whether to introduce halal supermarket trolleys that cannot be used by buyers of pork. There is also a recently launched halal Internet browser and halal household detergents.

    Some think the frenzy over “halal” products has gone too far and accuse businesses of exploiting pious Muslims who fear touching or eating items deemed unclean, or haram, meaning forbidden.

    But others say it is the Muslims who insist on the halal label.

    A director at Malaysia’s Islamic Development Department (Jakim), Mr Sirajuddin Suhaimee, told The Straits Times that “the push power of consumers has nudged the industry to get halal certification”.

    “People ask for a halal toilet bowl because it comes into contact with humans. Same for plastic bags and packaging that have contact with food,” said Mr Sirajuddin.

    Datuk Hooi Lai Lin, chief executive of Ken Rich Corporation, which produces halal personal care products and household detergents, said: “We just want to cater across the board and give comfort to all Muslims.

    “Even though our cleaning products are not consumed, a lot are touched by people.”

    Lumin Spring International Group produces mineral water that has the Jakim halal logo. “If we tell buyers that our water is Malaysian halal-certified, it sells better,” said company director Philip Ting.

    The drive to make more products and services halal has grown in the past three decades as Muslims have become more observant of Islam, as shown by the growing number of Muslim women who wear the tudung or headscarf around the world.

    “It’s not a choice. We must use halal goods,” Perak state’s mufti, Tan Sri Harussani Zakaria, told The Straits Times.

    But a worry is that Muslims are buying these products simply because of the halal stamp, without asking whether a can of paint, a computer mouse, a bottle of water or that colourful headscarf needs the label in the first place.

    “Muslims are required to eat halal, but the problem is when people practise religion beyond the nature of Islam itself,” Mr Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin, Perlis state’s mufti, told The Straits Times.

    “Traders are commercialising religion and halal by promoting what Muslims should use and consume,” he added.

    Such commercial uses of the label have spurred a group of auditors, including Muslim Singaporeans, to form a new association to help governments certify manufacturers using halal guidelines and standard practices.

    The International Association of Halal Auditors, which will be registered in Indonesia by the end of this year, will possibly be the first halal body in the world to be led by professionals, said Mr Imran Musa, 51, one of the main initiators.

    The Singaporean is the chief executive of Ark Incorporation, a Singapore company that has audited 40 companies worldwide for halal compliance since 2011.

    Among the group’s aims is to quash “halal extremism” and set the record straight on what is “genuinely halal and good”, Mr Imran told The Straits Times.

    “Having unnecessarily stricter rules towards halal will lead to halal extremism. Who would have thought of halal paint, halal tudung and halal condoms?” he said.

    “Halal extremism is slowly creeping in as some clerics impart their own judgment, hence making halal more stringent.”

    Mr Imran has so far gathered 50 auditors from Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, Australia, South Korea, Japan, Thailand, New Zealand, Germany, Italy and Britain to join the association.

    He said the proposed group has received the backing of Indonesia’s top Islamic authority, the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI), which is also the halal certification body in the country.

    Halal certification currently has no universally accepted standard, with different countries imposing varying interpretations of the Islamic rules for what is permissible.

    Some go beyond what the religion requires, in what is described by Mr Asri as being “halal crazy”.

    To add to the headache, halal approvals issued previously for products can be reversed depending on circumstances, MUI’s deputy secretary-general, Tengku Zulkarnain Rafiuddin, told The Straits Times.

    For instance, kopi luwak, made from coffee beans which are ingested and excreted by civets, is halal in Indonesia as the waste matter can be washed away. But if the coffee beans break up in the animals’ bodies before they are expelled, the beans become haram, he said.

    Kopi luwak is halal in Singapore. But it is haram – not permissible for Muslim consumption – in Malaysia.

    Manufacturers say stricter requirements translate into more time, money and paperwork which, in turn, drive up costs of goods.

    Typically, a company can take anything from two to five months and spend US$4,000 to US$67,000 to get their products halal-certified in Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia, officials say.

    Mr Martin Wissler, sales international manager for Germany-based Martin Braun group, which exports pastry and baking ingredients, said he hopes to deal with a single body with clear guidelines.

    He told The Straits Times: “This is actually what we are looking for as a manufacturer… We wouldn’t mind paying for such good services provided we can save a lot of time.”

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

deneme bonusu