Blog

  • Damanhuri Abas Dan Bryan Lim Akan Bertanding Untuk SDP Di Philihanraya Nanti

    Damanhuri Abas Dan Bryan Lim Akan Bertanding Untuk SDP Di Philihanraya Nanti

    Parti Demokratik Singapura (SDP) memperkenalkan dua lagi calon yang akan bertanding pada Pilihan Raya Umum yang akan datang.

    Mereka ialah Encik Damanhuri Abas, mantan pengarah Kolej Islam Muhammadiyah dan Encik Bryan Lim, seorang pengurus hospital.

    Encik Damanhuri, 45 tahun, bapa kepada lima orang anak, sudah bergiat aktif dalam pertubuhan-pertubuhan Melayu/Islam selama 20 tahun, dan melakukan kerja-kerja sukarela di masjid selama 10 tahun.

    Menurut Encik Damanhuri, beliau berupaya untuk menyampaikan apa yang menjadi keprihatinan masyarakat Melayu/Islam khususnya dan rakyat Singapura secara amnya.

    “Saya berharap dengan penglibatan saya dalam pilihan raya kali ini, saya dapat menyumbang kepada pembangunan orang Melayu di Singapura, dengan pengalaman yang saya bawa sepanjang 20 tahun, melibatkan diri secara langsung di masjid, persatuan-persatuan Islam, dan juga di sekolah-sekolah dalam pelbagai bidang yang saya terlibat, latihan bengkel dan sebagainya.

    “Jadi saya benar-benar berharap bahawa saya dapat beri sumbangan kepada pembangunan masyarakat Melayu di singapura,” ujar Encik Damanhuri.

    Encik Lim pula menerajui unit operasi SDP yang menjalankan kegiatan seperti bertemu para penduduk. Beliau pernah bertanding di GRC Hong Kah pada tahun 2001.

    SDP telah memperkenalkan enam calon sejak beberapa hari lalu. Antaranya termasuk pegawai pentadbiran jagaan kesihatan Chong Wai Fung, pengurus akaun Khung Wai Yeen, pengarah penjualan Jaslyn Go, profesor perubatan Paul Tambyah, juruaudit Sidek Mallek dan pensyarah psikologi John Tan.

    Source: http://berita.mediacorp.sg

  • Damanhuri Abas – A Champion Of Malay Rights

    Damanhuri Abas – A Champion Of Malay Rights

    Until recently, Mr Damanhuri Bin Abas has been the Director of Muhammadiyah Islamic College. He has extensive experience in managing educational organizations, and spent over a decade teaching and training.

    Married with five children, Daman holds a Bachelor degree in Architectural Study from the National University of Singapore. Thereafter, he holds a Diploma in Teaching and Training from Cambridge, UK, and a Diploma in Counseling from Kaplan, Singapore.

    As a Malay Muslim, Daman is perturbed about the institutionalization of discrimination in Singapore. For example, many Malays feel that they are not being trusted to be in the arm forces. It is also easy to notice the lack of Malay students in Special Assisted School. Daman wishes to ensure that such inequality is being addressed.

    He joins the Singapore Democratic Party because it is the only party that concretely spelt out a stand on the Malay issues that he can identify with. An example of the effectiveness of the SDP’s Malay policy paper can be seen in the introduction of Edusave and the recent announcement by the Government to help improve secular education in Madrasah. He hopes Singaporeans will let him be their Voice in Parliament.

     

    Source: http://yoursdp.org

  • Walid J.Abdullah: Damanhuri Abas Deserves Plaudits For Joining SDP Based On Political Convictions

    Walid J.Abdullah: Damanhuri Abas Deserves Plaudits For Joining SDP Based On Political Convictions

    On joining the wrong party:

    Some have suggested that Mr Damanhuri Abas has joined the wrong party: had he joined WP, he would have had a higher chance of getting elected.

    (For my friends of different or no faiths who may not understand the significance of this matter, this guy is the real deal. He is someone who has truly been ‘on the ground’ and has been active in many grassroots activities over so many years (real grassroots activities; not merely helping out at the MPS a couple of years before being unveiled as a candidate, and then claiming that ‘i have always wanted to help others’. This man is quite respected in the community.)

    The suggestion is perhaps right: WP definitely poses more of a threat to PAP than SDP does. However, one has to ask this question: could Mr Damanhuri have mentioned all those things he did in his first press conference had he been in WP? Could he have been as forthcoming and blunt as he was about discrimination if the careful WP was the conducting the press conference? Probably not.

    So the challenge then goes to WP: is it willing to openly champion minority issues as much as SDP does? And perhaps the larger questions are: will WP continue to tread down this conservative, non-committal path on such issues, and if so, what really is the difference between PAP and WP?

    On another note, it is highly refreshing to see someone joining a party based on his convictions, rather than on probability of electoral success. We will never have a shortage of people who want to join the ruling party to cause ‘change from within’, and to be honest, the more successful WP becomes, the more it will attract people who wants to try to ‘change from within’. But it is extremely rare, to have capable people – not disgruntled nobodies – who make a huge sacrifice and join a party, just so as to be true to his/her beliefs.

    For that, this man deserves a ton of respect.

     

    Source: Walid J. Abdullah

  • K Shanmugam To Lodge Police Report Against Sangeetha Thanapal For “Inaccurate And Seditious” Facebook Post

    K Shanmugam To Lodge Police Report Against Sangeetha Thanapal For “Inaccurate And Seditious” Facebook Post

    Law and Foreign Affairs Minister K Shanmugam says he intends to lodge a police report against independent scholar Sangeetha Thanapal on Friday for a Facebook post he called “inaccurate and seditious”.

    He said her post – which has since been taken down – had misrepresented remarks he made at a Singapore Press Club talk on Thursday on how regional trends can affect Singapore.

    “What Ms Thanapal wrote is inaccurate and seditious, and attributes to me sentiments that I do not hold and have never held,” he said in a Facebook post last night.

    “I intend to file a police report about this tomorrow.”

    He added: “She unfortunately twisted what I had said and suggested that I was an ‘Islamophobic bigot who thinks Malay-Muslims are a threat’. I had not said anything like that.”

    Ms Thanapal, 33, took her post down less than an hour after Mr Shanmugam’s post was put up at around 8pm. She also said she was seeking legal advice.

    Mr Shanmugam, responding on her Facebook at about 11.15pm, said he held “no personal animosity” towards her, and said he would be happy to speak to her.

    Shortly afterwards, she responded saying: “I am very sorry for all that has happened. The post took on a life of its own, and came out differently from how I intended. Thank you so much for agreeing to speak with me. I will make myself available anytime you wish to do so.”

    Mr Shanmugam then asked for a telephone number and said he would contact her today. As at midnight, there was no indication in the exhanges about whether he would still file a police report.

    When Mr Shanmugam first posted about Ms Thanapal’s remarks, he said the point he actually made at the event was that the Malaysian education system was not good for integration.

    “The Chinese leadership in various local areas in Malaysia want to maintain control over the Chinese population. It suits them to have Chinese students go to Chinese schools instead of mainstream Malaysian schools. And the schools are more Chinese (because they are effectively single race),” he wrote.

    “At the same time, many mainstream schools in Malaysia are becoming more Malay (because the students are largely Malay) and Islamic (e.g. through the way some principals and teachers handle matters) which discourages the Chinese from going into those schools. So you end up with having more Malays going to mainstream schools, and more Chinese going to Chinese schools. As a result, the different races are kept apart from a young age.”

    Ms Thanapal’s Facebook post appeared to take issue with Mr Shanmugam saying that mainstream schools in Malaysia were “becoming more Malay and Islamic”.

    She wrote: “The only reason you would consider this important enough to make statements about, is if you are an Islamaphobic bigot who thinks Malay-Muslims are a threat.”

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Another Racist Grabcar “Driver” – Calls Passenger “Malay Pig” And Threatened Passenger After Complaint Lodged

    Another Racist Grabcar “Driver” – Calls Passenger “Malay Pig” And Threatened Passenger After Complaint Lodged

    Lets make this guy famous…spread the love people…cause he named us “MALAY PIG!” I booked a grabcar using a promo code. This driver accepted my booking. If you were to see my booking timing, it was at 12.49pm today 28/08/15. However driver did not turn up. He then ended my trip at 1250pm, from my location and reaching to destination within 1min is ridiculous (by doing this grabcar will be paying him $3 cause I used the promo code)

    I called him and he answered my call. Asking him for his location, the driver then shouted at me and hung up the phone. I called again twice but he rejected both my calls. Since he did not turn up, ive made another booking but this time ive booked grab taxi instead. And yes a Malay driver turn up.

    Later i received an email from grabcar its my E-receipt from this vehicle number SGD6936G which i did not even took his car.

    My husband then called this driver to asked him what actually happened and why he did not turn up after accepting my booking yet ended the trip instead of cancelling it which he is not supposed to, he answered rudely to my husband, hung up again and sending rude and racist messages.

    You can see for yourself what he said on his messages. He even threatened that he will find us.

     

    Source: www.thelocalsociety.com

deneme bonusu