Blog

  • Two Malaysians Killed In Bangkok Blast

    Two Malaysians Killed In Bangkok Blast

    BANGKOK: Two Malaysians have been confirmed to be among at least 16 people killed in a bomb blast in central Bangkok which also injured dozens others.

    The Malaysian fatalities were confirmed by a Malaysian embassy official in the Thai capital.

    The explosion at about 7 pm (8 pm Malaysian time) occurred at the Ratchaprasong intersection, near the famous Erawan Shrine and Bangkok’s colourful and high-street shopping.

    It also damaged several cars and motorcycles. It was also reported that street vendors along the road were believed to be among the victims of the explosion.

    Thai police chief Gen Somyot Poompanmouag said 16 people died as a result of the bomb blast, including possibly China and Philippine nationals.

    Other police sources said the victims might also include visitors from Japan and Hong Kong.

    Somyot chaired a meeting at the police headquarters after visiting the site of the blast.

    He had earlier said that the explosion was caused by a TNT bomb.

    An unconfirmed report from a police source stated there might be two more unexploded bombs, indicating that those responsible wanted to cause major damage.

    As at 9.30 pm local time, 82 people were confirmed injured, according to the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration’s Erawan Emergency Medical Services Centre (EMS).

    It collected the figures from 15 hospitals in Bangkok.

    However, it was unable to confirm the number of fatalities.

    Ratchaprasong intersection in central Bangkok was a location of both protest site for the Red Shirt in 2010 and PDRC (The People Democratic Reform Committee) protest led by Suthep Thuaksuban in 2014, that eventually led to a military coup and removal of ex-premier Yingluck Shinawatra.

    Despite the bombing located not far from the Chitlom station of the rail service of Bangkok Train Service or popularly known skytrain, the service still continues.

    Major Gen Weerachon Sukhonthapatipak, the deputy government spokesman said Prime Minister Gen Prayuth Chan-ocha had already been informed of the bomb explosion and he had instructed the Explosive Ordnance Disposal team to go to the area.

    He said, so far, there was no plan to close schools and banks near the area.

     

    Source: www.thestar.com.my

  • Chinese-Muslim RSN Regular Allegedly Subjected To Mental Torture Through Racist Abuse, RSN And MINDEF Must Investigate

    Chinese-Muslim RSN Regular Allegedly Subjected To Mental Torture Through Racist Abuse, RSN And MINDEF Must Investigate

    Admin,

    Come across this ig post from a girl

    instagram.com/p/6Z7AlsNxqO/

    From what she say, her boyfriend is a chinese-muslim convert who is facing a lot of racist bullying on the ship he posted to as a navy regular.

    Afnieemardinee

    Afnie Mardinee And Dylan Khalid

    The regular like lost because of the bullying.  you read for yourself. guarantee darah up when u read.

    Afnie Mardinee Story 1

    Afnie Mardinee Story 2

    Afnie Mardinee Story 3

    I got to a point where enough is enough. How would you feel when your other half complains to you every single day, about the same thing over and over again? I kept on repeating “just endure for five years”. It’s easy for me to say as I’m not in his shoes.

    My boyfriend is a regular from the Republic Of Singapore Navy (RSN).

    The only Muslim onboard the ship. By being the only Muslim, he is often being discriminated for “betraying” his own race. Instead of calling him by his name, which is stated clearly on his name tag, several people onboard calls him “Muslim, Terrorist, ISIS, Malay, Mat or Kiao Tor (a derogatory term for Malays) etc”.

    This has been ongoing for almost half a year since he was posted onboard the ship.

    It started when a high ranking officer onboard the ship calls him by his religion instead of his own name.

    There is a saying, “If the upper beams is not straight, the lower ones will go aslant”. To out in simpler words, if a leader sets a bad example, it will be followed by his subordinates and true enough, many of the lower ranking crews has started calling my boyfriend by racial or religious remarks.

    To top that up, some have even made fun of his religion or made the effort to convince him to go against his religion. E.g – Just eat the pork la, Allah won’t see, Allah won’t know, Allah off day today. -.-? Drinking and eating in front of his face with the intention to disturb him while he’s fasting during ramadhan. Telling him that he is a real Muslim because he’s not circumcised yet. Thus, he’s able to drink,eat pork and all. – Muslims all terrorists, are you gonna bomb the ship? – Malay people are all poor. – Malay people like to steal.

    There are other things that he mentioned and complained to me about.But, however, I’m unable to recall every single one of them. These are the few points which I could remember.

    The Navy and Mindef must investigate this and punish all the people who bully this Muslim convert, how can they anyhow call him a terrorist and ask him to eat pork? so what he not yet circumcise?

    Muis and Minister Yaacob must also give stern warning to everyone, any racist in Singapore will not be free. Navy already not so many Malays or Muslims but after this you think people still want to sign on?

     

    Diver

    [Reader Contribution]

  • MFA: Singaporeans Among Injured In Bangkok Explosion

    MFA: Singaporeans Among Injured In Bangkok Explosion

    INGAPORE: Singaporeans are among those injured in an explosion in Bangkok, said the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Monday (Aug 17).

    Embassy staff are rendering consular assistance to the affected Singaporeans, and they are in contact with the Thai authorities to check if there are more Singaporeans affected in the incident, said MFA in a statement. The Ministry said it is also contacting registered Singaporeans based in Bangkok.

    MFA also urged Singaporeans in Bangkok to avoid the vicinity of the explosion and to monitor local news. It also said Singaporeans should contact the Singapore Embassy if they need urgent assistance.

    Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said Singapore’s Bangkok Mission staff have met the injured Singaporeans and that they are rendering consular assistance.

    My thoughts are with all those affected by the explosion outside the Erawan Shrine in Bangkok this evening. The Thai…

    Posted by Lee Hsien Loong on Monday, 17 August 2015

     

    “Singapore strongly condemns the bomb blast in Bangkok and is saddened by the loss of innocent lives,” said an MFA spokesperson. “We convey our condolences to the families of the victims and hope the injured will have a speedy recovery.”

    Singaporeans may contact the 24-hour MFA Duty Office at +65 6379 8800 / 8855 or [email protected]. Singaporeans who are in or visiting Bangkok are advised to register with the Singapore Embassy at http://eregister.mfa.gov.sg/.

    At least 16 were killed in the incident, said Thai police, while local media reported the death toll at 27.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Man Tried To Take My Child Away When Shopping At I12 Katong Mall

    Man Tried To Take My Child Away When Shopping At I12 Katong Mall

    Today at I12 Katong Mall, while my husband finished up his meal at BaliThai I was walking around the 2nd level trying to put SH to sleep in her pram. I went in and out of BaliThai and while M was paying the bill I browsed through some tshirts hanging at the racks of this shop called MegaFash.

    For a minute my hands were off the pram as I used both of my hands to check out a shirt, and from the corner of my eye I noticed a man walking near my pram but away from it first and then made a turn behind my back, walked towards my pram placed both his hands on the handle bar and casually walked away.

    Immediately I screamed HEY!!. He was very startled and his first reaction was to tell me off for my apparent over reaction.

    He began behaving very aggressively accusing me of unnecessarily shouting at him and quickly brought his wife from the other side and told me why would he take my child when he has his own. There are more details to this incident which I will not state here – too long.

    But dear friends who are parents, this dude is a buff Malay guy, wearing a white shirt and shorts. Very vulgar in language and aggressive in nature.

    His ‘wife’ looked foreign.

    I will make a police report on this incident because what happened was highly suspicious and the sequence of events and how it occured was just not very normal.

    Please be careful, Alhamdullilah nothing bad happened. If you would like to know more details, PM me and warn other parents.

    Still scarred and shocked that such a thing happened to us in Singapore. Not a safe place anymore it seems.

     

    Source: S

  • StreetDeal’s Hidden ‘Membership Fee’ Riles Online Shopper

    StreetDeal’s Hidden ‘Membership Fee’ Riles Online Shopper

    A few days after avid online shopper Smith Leong bought a set of drumsticks – priced at $16.40 – from e-commerce site StreetDeal, he was shocked to see a separate $88 charge on his credit card bill.

    “I thought I might have accidentally bought something else so I quickly logged on to my StreetDeal account, and checked all my invoices and e-mail. Nothing in the history showed that I had made any other purchase,” said the self-employed 31-year-old, who bought the drumsticks last month.

    When he contacted the homegrown firm, he was told the extra charge was a premium membership fee, and that it had been outlined clearly during the purchasing process and in the terms and conditions.

    “I felt cheated,” said Mr Leong, adding that he was refunded the $88 in credit for future purchases after numerous angry e-mail messages back and forth with the firm. “But I would rather just have my money back.”

    The Consumers Association of Singapore (Case) has received 49 complaints against StreetDeal since January last year, more than double the 24 in 2012 and 2013.

    Most of the cases are about hidden membership fees – either a one-time charge or in instalments.

    Case is investigating the matter. It said the firm could be flouting the Consumer Protection (Fair Trading) Act (CPFTA). Under this Act, it is an unfair practice to use small print to conceal a material fact from a consumer, said Case executive director Seah Seng Choon.

    “We feel that it is unfair for StreetDeal to charge consumers for premium membership fees if the consumers did not explicitly state that they want to sign up for this membership, and this could be a misleading claim under the CPFTA,” he said.

    When contacted, Mr Gregory Costamagna, StreetDeal’s chief executive, said the company has received some complaints from customers who claimed it was unclear that they were signing up for a membership. However, they made up only 1 to 2 per cent of its premium members here, he said.

    At the checkout page, shoppers need to agree to be charged the membership fee, said Mr Costamagna. When they make payment, they are shown only the amount for the items purchased. The membership fee is excluded because shoppers are given a two-day free premium membership trial before they are charged, he said.

    “If they want to cancel before the free trial, they can do so. And once we charge customers two days later, we send them another e-mail to tell them about the charge,” said Mr Costamagna, adding that customers will get a refund in credit if they want one.

    Launched in 2010, StreetDeal has as many as 10,000 premium members in Singapore. Premium members return to the site to shop three times more than regular members, said Mr Costamagna.

    StreetDeal also operates in countries such as Malaysia, Thailand, the Philippines and Australia.

    But Mr Leong thinks that there is a need for more clarity.

    “Yes, I did miss the part where I was told I was going to have to pay $88. But it should be reflected as part of charges and I should receive an invoice,” he said.

    Mr Een Yuan Long, 27, also missed the part where he was told to pay the membership fee. He bought a $7 dust cover for clothes and was charged the $88 fee too.

    “It’s very cheeky,” said the corporate trainer. “I was so angry about it because it wasn’t obvious that I was being signed up for any membership. It was only apparent to me when the bill came.”

    Ms Vera Ong, 29, was charged $9.90 a month for three months on her credit card for membership. She called StreetDeal and the charges were halted, but she did not receive any refund, she said.

    “Sure, it is my responsibility to read the terms and conditions but surely they should have proper forms for us to sign and fill out for subscriptions,” said Ms Ong, who is self-employed. “If not, any business can make us pay subscription fees without our knowing.”

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

deneme bonusu