Tag: Alfian Saat

  • The ‘Fundamentalists’ and the ‘Progressives’

    walid Jumblatt
    Of late, the Muslim ‘Progressives’ in Singapore have been more vocal and assertive; and I welcome this. Previously, they worked behind the scenes and used to detest being labeled as ‘liberal Muslims’ and the like. It is high time they ‘came out of the closet’ and clearly spell out their beliefs and agenda, so that the Muslim community can assess them properly.
    (note: we must exercise caution in using the ‘liberal’ or ‘progressive’ label against Muslims we disagree with. I am just appropriating the term that some of them have preferred to use to describe themselves).So the narrative being espoused now is that there are some ‘fundamentalists’ within the Muslim community, and, in my opinion quite humourously, they look to the state to ensure that these ‘fundamentalists’ do not threaten the ‘secular’ nature of the state. The #wearwhite campaign is the ‘poster boy’ for what they would term as rising Islamic religious assertiveness.

    Firstly let us not obfuscate the facts: the #wearwhite campaign was a call for the Muslim community, to return to fitrah, or the state of purity. It was a peaceful campaign, done in the spirit of compassion and love, and intended to include and not alienate any Muslim, however far from the faith they may be. The campaign was not motivated by events in neighbouring countries, it was not meant to interfere in the political or public policy realm, it was not meant to discriminate against anyone: it was a call to return to purity, i reiterate. This is quite a simple point that i think has either been genuinely misunderstood or adroitly manipulated by the ‘progressive Muslims’. Does not matter; i hope this clarifies it.

    Rather than get into a definitional debate about the problematic terms (‘fundamentalist’, ‘progressive’ etc) that have been thrown about recklessly in mainstream and social media, i have a few questions for these self-proclaimed Muslim progressives.

    1) What is your agenda or end-goal? Please spell it out properly.

    2) What is your position on issues such as homosexual acts and the hijab in Islamic jurisprudence? Please be straightforward and do not skirt the issue. Your positions seem to be ever-changing on these, so it would help to clarify.

    3) Do you believe that anyone can interpret the Quran, even those whose knowledge of the Arabic language can fit comfortably at the back of a stamp?

    4) What other laws/legal rulings do you seek to ‘reinterpret’?

    5) Do you accept the authority of the ulama’, local and foreign ones? If so to what extent? If not why and whose authority then do you accept? Who are the ulama’?

    6) What do you guys believe is the position of ‘rationality’ in Islam? Are there limits to rationality? If so where?

    7) I constantly hear you guys singing the tune ‘oh we do not reject the Quran, we just reject the interpretations of classical scholars that are not relevant.’

    What is the arbiter/criterion by which you judge what is relevant or not?

    8 ) What is your methodology in ‘re-interpreting’ the Quran?

    9) What is your methodology for accepting or rejecting the hadiths of the Prophet, if you accept them at all?

    10) Do you accept that as Muslims, we have to worship Allah the way He wants us to, and not the way we want to?

    These are just some of the questions that i believe should be answered, in order for the community to truly assess the ‘progressives’. Be open about your agenda and aspirations, and let the community decide whether they are worth the community’s time and efforts.

    And the answers to these questions are also needed if a genuine dialogue is to be started, and to avoid hollow calls for discussion.

    Authored by Walid J. Abdullah

    letters to R1C banner
  • Man Sexually Abused 12-year-old Boy at Children’s Home

    pedophile_sign
    The accused, who cannot be named due to a gag order, pleaded guilty last month to having oral sex with the victim outside a toilet cubicle at the children’s home in June last year. Both were then staying at the home.

    A district court heard that the victim was about to take off his clothes and put them in the laundry basket outside a toilet cubicle when the accused entered the toilet.

    The accused asked the victim if he was all right and the boy replied in the affirmative. The accused came nearer to the victim and asked him to perform oral sex on him.

    —–

    SEORANG lelaki berusia 20 tahun dijatuhi hukuman menjalani latihan pemulihan padi tadi kerana membuat seorang budak lelaki berusia 12 tahun melakukan seks oral ke atasnya.

    Kededua tertuduh dan mangsa merupakan penghuni sebuah rumah tumpangan kanak-kanak di sini, dan kesalahan itu berlaku di rumah tumpangan itu Jun tahun lalu.

    Tertuduh, yang mengaku bersalah bulan lalu, telah mengadakan seks oral dengan mangsa di luar sebuah kubikel tandas.

    Superintenden rumah tumpangan tersebut membuat laporan polis pada 19 Julai tahun lalu selepas mangsa mengadu kepadanya tentang kejadian itu.

    Timbalan Pendakwa Raya, Cik Siti Adrianni Marhain, berkata tertuduh telah mengambil kesempatan ke atas mangsa yang muda, yang tujuh tahun lebih muda daripadanya.

    Mangsa juga belum cukup matang untuk melakukan kegiatan seks, apatah lagi kejadian itu berlaku di sebuah rumah tumpangan kanak-kanak, di mana mangsa seharusnya berhak berasa selamat, kata Cik Adrianni.

    Menurutnya, laporan Institut Kesihatan Mental (IMH) menunjukkan mangsa telah melahirkan rasa bersalah dan malu akibat kejadian itu.

    Dalam rayuannya untuk meminta hukuman diringankan, tertuduh berkata dia tidak mendapat kasih sayang daripada ibu bapa.

    Dia ditinggalkan ibunya semasa kecil lagi sementara bapanya telah meninggal dunia.

  • Apply 377A on gay “Muslims”

    CH8 News
    CH8 News

    pinkdot2014_2

    Since the launch of the Wear White campaign, there has been many stubborn Muslims who still support Pink Dot and attack the Wear White movement.

    I wrote before in a previous article that these Muslims who support Pink Dot should be charged for spreading False Doctrine under AMLA S139.

    “Section 139 of AMLA states that “Whoever shall teach or publicly expound any doctrine or perform any ceremony or act relating to the Muslim religion in any manner contrary to the Muslim law shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $2,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to both.”

    Those people encouraging Muslims to attack the #wearwhite movement and to support Pink Dot are clearly teaching a false doctrine that is contrary to Muslim law. They should thus be punished with the maximum fine of $2000 and a prison term of 12 months to send a clear message to fellow Muslims that they must respect Islam and not attack our pro-natural family message.”

    What is worst though that there are some “Muslims” who claim to be Muslims but are actually gay. Islam forbids homosexuality so they are clearly not Muslims, and they are confusing the community by calling themselves Muslims. I think the time has come for Muslim gays to be charged under Section 377A.

    PM Lee once said 377A will not be “proactive enforced”, but I believe that for Muslim gays who claim that they are Muslims, we should punish them under 377A. As anyone who knows Islam will tell you, if you are Muslim, you cannot be gay. Hence, 377A should be actively enforced for Muslims. Those “Muslims” who are gay but want to call themselves Muslim do not have the right to do so, because Islam does not allow that. Applying 377A on gay “Muslims” will help to uphold the morality of the community. This proposal can be extended to the Christians as well, as they are also strongly against homosexuality.

    I hope the relevant authorities like the police and government considers this seriously, because it has a duty to protect the Muslim religion and community.

    Also, I support the call by our brave Bro Syed Muhd Bashir AlAzmatkhan to file police report and complaints to the subordinate Courts against the LGBT/Pink Dot movement. He has shared with us some tips and he said that the I.O. was very encouraging and helpful: “hi …police i.o did mention a few valid stuff..example ..the merit of my report,the potential danger..and the need for public to come forward if the felt the same……and their need to review pinkdot/lgbt permits applications…among some of the things the i.o mentioned.”

    https://www.facebook.com/groups/542917079078427/permalink/693944773975656/

    https://www.facebook.com/groups/542917079078427/permalink/694076077295859/

    Authored by Hazrul Hamzah

     

    READ PREVIOUS POSTING BY GAY PETER HU WHO CALLS COMMUNITY “F**KING MUSLIM TERRORIST”

    READ MORE ON WEAR WHITE & PINKDOT SG HERE

    letters to R1C banner

     

    YOUTUBE: youtube.com/user/rilek1corner

    FACEBOOK: facebook.com/rilek1corner

    TWITTER: twitter.com/Rilek1Corner

    WEBSITE: rilek1corner.com

    EMAIL: [email protected]

    FEEDBACK: rilek1corner.com/hubungir1c/

     

  • WP Malay-Muslim MP Supports Wear White

    https://www.facebook.com/wearwhitesg
    https://www.facebook.com/wearwhitesg

    The Wear White campaign got a ringing endorsement from Workers Party MP Faisal Abdul Manap!

    His photo was uploaded on the Wear White Facebook page with him standing beside another Wear White supporter.

    https://www.facebook.com/wearwhitesg/photos/pb.639032632854739.-2207520000.1403974152./650882588336410/?type=1&theater

    MP Faisal’s support for Wear White is a refreshing change, as WP previously remained silent on LGBT issues. It is commendable that he is speaking out against the LGBT threat and leading his party on this issue.

    Unlike the PAP MPs and Ministers who shied away from confronting the LGBT threat, it is good that WP MP Faisal is bravely taking a moral position against homosexuality.

    Authored by Hazrul Hamzah

    READ PREVIOUS POSTING BY GAY PETER HU WHO CALLS COMMUNITY “F**KING MUSLIM TERRORIST”

    READ MORE ON WEAR WHITE & PINKDOT SG HERE

    READ PREVIOUS LETTERS FROM CONTRIBUTOR HAZRUL HAMZAH HERE

    letters to R1C banner

    YOUTUBE: youtube.com/user/rilek1corner

    FACEBOOK: facebook.com/rilek1corner

    TWITTER: twitter.com/Rilek1Corner

    WEBSITE: rilek1corner.com

    EMAIL: [email protected]

    FEEDBACK: rilek1corner.com/hubungir1c/

     

     

  • SG Gay Chinese Who Say “F**king Muslim Terrorist” Now Claims FB Account Was “Hacked”

    https://www.facebook.com/thepeterhu
    https://www.facebook.com/thepeterhu

    And the mystery unfolds.

    Peter Hu emerged at Rilek1Corner’s Facebook Page to defend himself against allegations on him calling “f**king muslim terrorist“.

    For those who did not catch the drama earlier today, Rilek1Corner was informed that Peter Hu who is openly gay, an avid PinkDot SG supporter and an LGBT activist, had previously argued with several anti-PinkDot activists in a Facebook group called ‘We are against PinkDot’. FYI, Peter Hu is also a member of ‘We are against PinkDot’ Facebook group.

    Peter Hu had engaged in a sparring with several activists who had supported a pro-family movement led by Pastor Lawrence Khong, and the #wearwhite movement which is an informal grassroots group that encourages Muslims to ‘return to the natural state’.

    In his defense, Peter Hu claimed he was unaware of the offensive posting calling our community “f**king muslim terrorist“.

    Peter Hu claimed the posting was first sighted in a local HardwareZone Forum and ‘We are against PinkDot’ Facebook group.

    In both online platforms, Peter Hu claimed he was unaware of the offensive posting existence until his friends had informed him about it.

    Peter Hu blamed the incident on two Facebook personas ‘Panglima Hitam’ and ‘Alfian Lidia Lothbrok’, whom he suspects either one of them Facebook had “hacked” into his account.

    UPDATED INFO & CLARIFICATION

    Our Muslim brother Alfian Lidia Lothbrok has come clean and cleared the air that he did not “hacked” into Peter Hu’s Facebook account.

    In the police report lodged earlier this evening, Peter Hu had earlier mentioned to the police that he suspected ‘Alfian Lidia Lothbrok’ is one of the two suspects who “hacked”into his Facebook account.

    https://www.facebook.com/alfian.lidia
    https://www.facebook.com/alfian.lidia

    Like previous cases such as the recent one on SG Chinese woman @kimmeeoow who called Muslims “terrorists“, “Malays are liability to society” and “scumbags”, Peter Hu also informed the public that his Facebook account was hacked and pleaded to the Muslims that he “will never ever say” such offensive remarks to Muslims after such comments were exposed in public and drew criticisms from the Muslim community.

    However, a mismatch in his story unfolds when in his other posting, Peter Hu defended the Chinese for being racist:

    “The majority of Chinese Singaporeans are racist. And for that the Chinese community owes a deep apology to the Muslim community. But I too am a minority, & I have never been prejudiced against muslims, who are my friends & brothers. Someone had hacked into my Facebook account. Gays are human too. Live & let live. Peace out.”

    peterhu_racistchinese_1

    Peter Hu also defended the LGBT Muslims and took the opportunity to speak up against #wearwhite movement led by Ustaz Noor Deros:

    “I can understand where the #wearwhite campaign is coming from. But what about your Muslim brothers who attended Pink Dot? How do you think they would feel?”

    peterhu_racistchinese_2

     

    Peter Hu also claimed he had lodged a police complaint to say that he did not post the offensive comment. Peter Hu also claimed that the circulated image was doctored.

    https://www.facebook.com/thepeterhu

    Peter Hu is the Director at Amino Bar. Previously, he studied at Yale University and he is an alumni member of Anglo-Chinese Independent.

    He is a well-known PinkDot SG fanboy.

    https://www.facebook.com/theaminoamigos
    https://www.facebook.com/theaminoamigos, Peter Hu is the Director of Amino Bar
    malaysterrorists
    SG Chinese woman who said offensive remarks on Muslims and Malays. She claimed her Instagram account was hacked.
    kimgoog
    SG Chinese woman who said offensive remarks on Muslims and Malays. She claimed her Instagram account was hacked.

    READ PREVIOUS POSTING BY PETER HU WHO CALLS COMMUNITY “F**KING MUSLIM TERRORIST”

    READ MORE ON RACIST COMMENTS BY KIMMEEOOW, AMY CHEONG, JASON NEO HERE

    READ MORE ON WEAR WHITE & PINKDOT SG HERE

    letters to R1C banner

     

    EDITOR’S NOTE

    We are worried at the increasing number of non-Muslims who say offensive remarks openly and frivolously about both the Malay and Muslim community on social media.

    Several people conveniently used the word “hacked” as opposed to unauthorised access.

    We also aware that everything has a trace and we wonder what the police forensics team and IT experts are doing about these cases.

    Under Singapore law, comments made with the “deliberate intention of wounding the religious or racial feelings of any person” can result in a jail term of up to three years and a fine.

    Singapore is predominantly Chinese, but also has large Malay and Indian communities. For historical reasons, the government is generally quick to clamp down on public comments that might create tension between the country’s different ethnic groups.

    In 1964, tensions between the Chinese and Malay communities in Singapore twice erupted into riots that killed 36 and left hundreds wounded. Riots again broke out between the two communities in 1969, sparked by violence between Malays and Chinese in Malaysia.

    YOUTUBE: youtube.com/user/rilek1corner

    FACEBOOK: facebook.com/rilek1corner

    TWITTER: twitter.com/Rilek1Corner

    WEBSITE: rilek1corner.com

    EMAIL: [email protected]

    FEEDBACK: rilek1corner.com/hubungir1c/