Tag: CASE

  • Clients Of Reno Firm Carpentry Design Works Lodged 33 Complaints With CASE

    Clients Of Reno Firm Carpentry Design Works Lodged 33 Complaints With CASE

    Clients of Carpentry Design Works, a home renovation firm which was registered just over a year ago, have approached the Consumers Association of Singapore with more than $560,000 in claims.

    They claim the firm, registered in March last year, left work unfinished or did not deliver services after being paid.

    Case received 33 complaints, with 21 of those filed this month alone.

    One customer, who declined to be named, approached Case for help after no work was done for weeks on his four-room flat. The 33-year-old civil servant said he paid $7,000to a representative of the renovation company.

    The representative supposedly insisted work would soon begin, pending approval from the Housing Board, but after repeated delays, the client approached HDB directly.

    “They told me the company hadn’t even submitted an application,” he said. “I realised they had been lying to me all this while.”

    Another client said he engaged the same representative in early February and forked out $18,880 to fit his new four-room flat with cabinets, plumbing, wiring, tiles and air-conditioning.

    But the accounts executive, 29, who did not want to be named, said he waited weeks for work to begin, adding: “They had 1,001 reasons, like ‘The lorry broke down’ or ‘The workers have been hospitalised’.”

    A visit to the company’s registered premises in Telok Kurau, which bore no signboard, found the unit in disarray, with a Small Claims Tribunal summons dated April 20 under the door.

    Meanwhile, the Yishun office where customers said they met the representative bears a different name. Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (Acra) records also show no officers in common between the two firms.

    Acra profile lists its director as Mr Muhammad Nirzam Azmi, appointed on April 10 this year. When The Straits Times visited his home, Mr Nirzam, 32, said this was done without his consent and claimed he had made a police report.

    According to an earlier Acra listing, the original director of Carpentry Design Works is Ms Christina Wong Hoi Khay, 22, who told The Straits Times that a woman named Husniyati promised to pay her $3,000 a month in exchange for using her identity. She said she made a police report after being approached by debt collectors, and claimed her signature was forged in dealings with suppliers.

    Police confirmed reports were made and investigations are ongoing.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Beware: Renovation Company Cheating Customers Again After Several Years Passed

    Beware: Renovation Company Cheating Customers Again After Several Years Passed

    Dear Friends,
    If you see this couple running a company please don’t trust and make any payments. Now the company is under this name (Carpentry Interior Works Pte Ltd) but you will never know when they will change the company name again. They don’t bother how you suffer paying your loan back to the bank or etc. To them as long u pay them is enough but they won’t complete your job. Office is longer operating at Telok Kurua or Yishun. I wonder where would the next LOCATION & COMPANY BE???

     

    **** Make these scammers famous****

    This women Sharlyne real name Husniyati Binte Omar & her husband Andre Yu real name Aszrul Yusoff are scammers! They have cheated me a total of $15,100 for my renovation. Took a deposit from me of $500 in early Feb and waited for me to apply my renovation loan with DBS bank.. which was approved in March.. I received my chq and gave it to them on 5/4/2017 she promised to start work immediately but when I texted her she asked me to come down to the office to sign another agreement so I contacted her again to check when to go down..she didn’t reply.. tried to look for her company’s facebook but couldn’t seem to find it! After a few day’s I come to find out that she has been arrested for cheating..

    I made a police report and was advised to go to CASE TRUST went there today but was told nothing can be done if the company is no longer operating so they just took a report for formality sake. I can’t believe we got cheated. I have been suffering and just got my house after 6yrs and now when I finally when i get my house this happens to me.

    They’ve cheated many other people as well I’m not the only one.

    Both her office has been shut down

    1) 308 Telok Kurau Road, #01-18 Vibes @ East Coast Singapore 423858.
    2)A’posh Bizhub, Yishun Industrial St 1 #03-01.

    I really hope something could be done about this I feel devastated about what has happened.

    Please be aware of her & her husband! She’s has 7 kids I don’t understand how she could do this to another family?? How would she feel is this was one of own flash and blood?

    I remember clearly of her saying “I’m giving you my hand please don’t bite it” WELL DONE! who has bitten who’s hand!!! Bloody bitch!

    Now I have lost $14,600 + $500 (Deposit) where no work is done at all for my renovation plus I have to pay the bank back with interest of $16,600 total amount is $31,700! That’s alot of money to me I don’t even earn that in 1 year! I feel lost on what to do! She’s going to pay for this!

    My sister has also engage her service’s and got cheated too. Lucky my sister’s amount is not as much as mine but it’s still money and we’re not rich! We really hope all the truth about her will come to light. We have wasted so much time and money on this two people!

    Please share and make her famous!!!

    #carpentrydesignworksfeedback

     

    EDITOR’S NOTE

    Apparently, the couple and the company they own have scammed several victims since 2014 where we had a similar post about the scam. It is likely that they have been arrested based on photos taken from https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=332106030525901&id=332104343859403. Photos of the couple is also available here.

    Sadly, cheating companies can continue operating and they can even turn an occasional profit.

    Do a keyword search for the company and include the term “scam” and you’ll find all of the complaints about shoddy products and substandard service. And yes, those are the ones you want to avoid. Right about now, you should also look out for “Sharlyne / Andre / Sherie / Reshea Carpentry Design Works/ Carpentry Interior Works Pte Ltd” when looking for renovation company to engage their services.

    Have you been cheated by this particular scammers or any other renovation companies? Share your encounter with us at Rilek1Corner.

     

    Rilek1Corner

    Source: Renovation Scam Carpentry Design Pte Ltd

  • Artmani Italia Closed Down Without Warning, Customers Furious

    Artmani Italia Closed Down Without Warning, Customers Furious

    Ms Teo, an associate director of a recruitment agency, was hoping that a two-seater leather sofa she bought would be the centrepiece of her new home, after she moves in soon after Chinese New Year.

    But she is now missing a sofa, and is $3,000 poorer. She had paid furniture company Artmani Italia in two instalments – one last July and the other two weeks ago – and the firm promised to deliver the sofa to her flat in Boon Keng in early February.

    But Artmani Italia is believed to have shut down, leaving Ms Teo and about 50 others in the lurch. These customers, part of a WhatsApp group, are owed around $65,000 worth of furniture, and they have lodged police reports.

    When The Straits Times visited Artmani Italia’s premises in an industrial building off Hougang yesterday, the firm’s showroom doors were locked.

    At another two units listed under the firm’s name, letters from the landlord were pasted on the front doors, stating that no one was allowed access to the units with effect from Jan 18, unless authorised to do so.

    Others who work in the building saw movers loading furniture from the showroom onto a lorry.

     

    Attempts to reach the company were unsuccessful.

     

    One possible avenue for redress for the likes of Ms Teo is to file a claim with the Small Claims Tribunals. For now, she has bought another sofa from another company, with delivery expected in March.

    She still finds it hard to believe that she and her husband could have lost money like this.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • StreetDeal’s Hidden ‘Membership Fee’ Riles Online Shopper

    StreetDeal’s Hidden ‘Membership Fee’ Riles Online Shopper

    A few days after avid online shopper Smith Leong bought a set of drumsticks – priced at $16.40 – from e-commerce site StreetDeal, he was shocked to see a separate $88 charge on his credit card bill.

    “I thought I might have accidentally bought something else so I quickly logged on to my StreetDeal account, and checked all my invoices and e-mail. Nothing in the history showed that I had made any other purchase,” said the self-employed 31-year-old, who bought the drumsticks last month.

    When he contacted the homegrown firm, he was told the extra charge was a premium membership fee, and that it had been outlined clearly during the purchasing process and in the terms and conditions.

    “I felt cheated,” said Mr Leong, adding that he was refunded the $88 in credit for future purchases after numerous angry e-mail messages back and forth with the firm. “But I would rather just have my money back.”

    The Consumers Association of Singapore (Case) has received 49 complaints against StreetDeal since January last year, more than double the 24 in 2012 and 2013.

    Most of the cases are about hidden membership fees – either a one-time charge or in instalments.

    Case is investigating the matter. It said the firm could be flouting the Consumer Protection (Fair Trading) Act (CPFTA). Under this Act, it is an unfair practice to use small print to conceal a material fact from a consumer, said Case executive director Seah Seng Choon.

    “We feel that it is unfair for StreetDeal to charge consumers for premium membership fees if the consumers did not explicitly state that they want to sign up for this membership, and this could be a misleading claim under the CPFTA,” he said.

    When contacted, Mr Gregory Costamagna, StreetDeal’s chief executive, said the company has received some complaints from customers who claimed it was unclear that they were signing up for a membership. However, they made up only 1 to 2 per cent of its premium members here, he said.

    At the checkout page, shoppers need to agree to be charged the membership fee, said Mr Costamagna. When they make payment, they are shown only the amount for the items purchased. The membership fee is excluded because shoppers are given a two-day free premium membership trial before they are charged, he said.

    “If they want to cancel before the free trial, they can do so. And once we charge customers two days later, we send them another e-mail to tell them about the charge,” said Mr Costamagna, adding that customers will get a refund in credit if they want one.

    Launched in 2010, StreetDeal has as many as 10,000 premium members in Singapore. Premium members return to the site to shop three times more than regular members, said Mr Costamagna.

    StreetDeal also operates in countries such as Malaysia, Thailand, the Philippines and Australia.

    But Mr Leong thinks that there is a need for more clarity.

    “Yes, I did miss the part where I was told I was going to have to pay $88. But it should be reflected as part of charges and I should receive an invoice,” he said.

    Mr Een Yuan Long, 27, also missed the part where he was told to pay the membership fee. He bought a $7 dust cover for clothes and was charged the $88 fee too.

    “It’s very cheeky,” said the corporate trainer. “I was so angry about it because it wasn’t obvious that I was being signed up for any membership. It was only apparent to me when the bill came.”

    Ms Vera Ong, 29, was charged $9.90 a month for three months on her credit card for membership. She called StreetDeal and the charges were halted, but she did not receive any refund, she said.

    “Sure, it is my responsibility to read the terms and conditions but surely they should have proper forms for us to sign and fill out for subscriptions,” said Ms Ong, who is self-employed. “If not, any business can make us pay subscription fees without our knowing.”

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • CASE: Petrol Companies Profiteering From Petrol Tax Implementation

    CASE: Petrol Companies Profiteering From Petrol Tax Implementation

    The consumer watchdog here has accused some petrol companies of profiteering, after petrol prices across the island were raised yesterday by up to S$0.25 for a litre of 98-octane grade petrol and as much as S$0.18 for 95-octane grade petrol — a day after it was announced in the Budget statement that petrol duty rates would be increased with immediate effect.

    Noting that some of the petrol prices were raised beyond the levels of the duty hike, Mr Seah Seng Choon, executive director of the Consumers Association of Singapore (CASE), said it was understandable for the petrol companies to increase prices following the levy hike. But he pointed out: “They should not increase more than what the tax requires them to and if they do that, they are profiteering from the situation.”

    As of last night, a litre of 98-octane-grade petrol at Shell cost S$2.28 — S$0.25 more than on Monday. Other brands also adjusted their prices, with Caltex, Esso and Singapore Petroleum Company (SPC) charging S$2.25, S$2.23 and S$2.20, respectively. The increment ranged between S$0.17 and S$0.21 for the three brands.

    For 95-octane-grade petrol, which is most popular with drivers, Shell raised the price by S$0.18 to S$2.04 per litre. The other three brands raised their prices to S$2.01 or S$2.02 — with the increases ranging between S$0.12 and S$0.16.

    “(The) pump price adjustments reflect the increase in petrol duties as announced in the 2015 Budget,” said a spokesperson from Chevron, which owns the Caltex brand. The other brands could not be reached for comment by press time.

    Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam announced on Monday that petrol duty rates would increase by S$0.20 to S$0.64 per litre for the premium grade and by S$0.15 to S$0.56 per litre for the intermediate grade. To cushion the impact of the hike, motorists would be given a one-off road tax rebate for a year. Mr Tharman noted that with falling oil prices, pump prices after the duty hikes would remain lower than the levels in the past two-and-a-half years.

    Salesman Andrew Koh, 58, welcomed the road tax rebate, but felt it was not enough to mitigate the higher petrol prices. “I was happy when crude oil prices started falling … But now, all the drivers are going to suffer from the increase in levy and petrol prices,” he said.

    Yesterday, Mr Tharman said the taxes related to vehicle ownership and usage would have to be adjusted from time to time, to create a greener environment. Adding that the previous adjustment to petrol levies was done a dozen years ago, he said it was better to raise duties when oil prices are falling, compared with the opposite situation. It was also unlikely the duty hikes would filter down to overall consumer prices as commercial vehicles use diesel, he said. As for middle-income families who own cars, Mr Tharman said other measures in the Budget could alleviate the cost of living.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com